07/06/10 Baltimore, Maryland – On Sunday, we celebrated America’s independence from Britain.
Having just come from London, it’s hard to see what the fuss was all about. The English seem like decent people. The queen still has her dignity. The British government seems no worse than its American counterpart. And David Cameron appears to have a much better idea of what he is doing than the Obama team.
Cameron is calling for ‘austerity.’ He wants the British public to make sacrifices so that British public finances can be brought back under control. We have some doubt that he will succeed. As far as we know, no democratically elected government has ever been able to reduce its debt burden DURING A CREDIT CONTRACTION. A number of governments – including the US and Britain – managed to reduce their debt in the ’80s and ’90s. But that was when their economies were booming. As long as the economy is growing faster than the debt, the burden of debt will decline as a percentage of GDP. The ’80s and ’90s were boom years. Credit was expanding. People were buying more and more things they didn’t need with more and more money they didn’t have.
Obviously, that kind of boom can’t go on forever. And when it came to an end in 2007 it changed the financial picture for governments as well as households and businesses. Tax revenues went down. Expenses went up. And so did the bailouts and boondoggles that they call ‘stimulus’ spending.
As deficits rise, so does debt. And so do the voices who tell us that debt is nothing to worry about. Those voices – led by Paul Krugman at The New York Times – mention the debt decline of the ’80s and ’90s. They say we can “grow our way” out of debt this time, just like we did the last time.
Here at The Daily Reckoning we don’t rule out anything. The day is long past when we said anything with absolute, unshakeable conviction. Today, even when someone asks us our name, we check the initials on our undershirt just to be sure.
Might the US and Britain ‘grow’ their way out? Well, anything is possible. But two things make it unlikely. As we said above, we’re in a credit contraction. It’s part of what we call the Great Correction. Growth rates are going to be low…and occasionally negative. US government deficits, on the other hand, are scheduled to be over 5% of GDP from here to kingdom come. And if David Stockman is right, they could stay over 10% of GDP for the foreseeable future. Stockman is the former head of OMB during the Reagan Administration. He predicts deficits as high as $2 trillion per year, thanks to a weak economy and strong spending by the feds.
The second thing that makes it unlikely that we will be able to grow our way out of debt is the composition of the economy. More and more of it is under the control of government. ‘Growth’ in this economy is largely phony. It reflects activity. But not prosperity. The activity, therefore, is not the sort that you can tap to pay down your debt. Instead, it adds to the debt.
You can see how this works just by imagining what would happen if the feds hired a million census takers. The economy would appear to ‘grow’ – maybe even faster than the debt. But the economy itself would be hollow and less able to sustain the debt burden.
The other example used by Krugman et al is WWII. At the end of the war, US debt was equivalent to what it is today, as a percentage of GDP. “Hey, what’s the big deal? It didn’t do us any harm then,” they say.
But the federal government was actually in a much stronger financial position back then. While it had about the same official national debt, it faced almost no off-the-books unfunded liabilities, financial guarantees, and open-ended commitments. The last time we looked, these off-balance sheet debt items – such as for health care programs – totaled more than $50 trillion.
And then, there’s the private sector debt too. That’s about $50 trillion too.
How much net private debt was there in 1950? Almost none.
In the post-war period we were in a different stage of the credit cycle. People were just beginning to spend. They didn’t have a mountain of debt. They had a mountain of savings!
Yes, dear reader, people made sacrifices during the war years. They had put off consuming. Then, soldiers came back from Europe and the South Pacific with pent-up demand, and real savings that they could put to work. So, the economy was ready for a credit expansion, not a contraction. People had lived through the lean years. Now they were ready for some fat ones. The economy too was ready to rock and roll. It had been converted to a war footing. Now it was ready to meet consumer demand.
This is the opposite of the picture today. Few sacrifices were made over the last 50 years. Instead, the last 5 decades were a time of increasing extravagance. That’s why sacrifices are necessary today.
Households are only now beginning to cut back. Governments in Europe are cutting back too – or so they say. And under the sway of Krugman and other neo-Keynesians, the US government continues to run huge deficits…hoping that the debt will be refinanced and repaid, as it was after WWII.
But probably the nicest thing about after WWII was that there was an AFTER WWII. The war had a beginning and an end. When it was over people were finally able to get on with their lives. The economy was ready to switch to a new phase too – from making tanks to making hot water heaters. And, finally, governments could stop borrowing and begin repaying their debt.
The major trouble with today’s struggle is that there is no end in sight.
Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning
Bill Bonner
Since founding Agora Inc. in 1979, Bill Bonner has found success and garnered camaraderie in numerous communities and industries. A man of many talents, his entrepreneurial savvy, unique writings, philanthropic undertakings, and preservationist activities have all been recognized and awarded by some of America's most respected authorities. Along with Addison Wiggin, his friend and colleague, Bill has written two New York Times best-selling books, Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt. Both works have been critically acclaimed internationally. With political journalist Lila Rajiva, he wrote his third New York Times best-selling book, Mobs, Messiahs and Markets, which offers concrete advice on how to avoid the public spectacle of modern finance. Since 1999, Bill has been a daily contributor and the driving force behind The Daily Reckoning. Dice Have No Memory: Big Bets & Bad Economics from Paris to the Pampas, the newest book from Bill Bonner, is the definitive compendium of Bill’s daily reckonings from more than a decade: 1999-2010.
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address
What if the world is not actually living beyond its means?
What if the world as a whole is not actually consuming more than it produces? (how could it?)
What if the world as a whole owes no net debt (no debt to the Martians)?
What if the ability to consume tends to rise with technology?
What if technology is still advancing?
What if all the investments in new houses and buildings and infrastructure and in research and development are treated as savings?
What if the world continues to be a net saver. That is, investing in long term assets more so than living off of past long term assets?
What if the future is bright? (Even if most of us are not so bright?)
“As far as we know, no democratically elected government has ever been able to reduce its debt burden DURING A CREDIT CONTRACTION.”
Canada went through just such a effort successfully during the first half of the 1990′s. Which forms the basis of its considerable success today.
My recollection is that governments in Canada at that time spoke of expanding the social safety net and pretended to do so and of course continued the photo op spending announcements.The reality was they downloaded debt (by reducing transfer payments) upon lower levels of government.The feds balance sheet improved but health care suffered and the roads were a mess.Lower levels of government are still complaining about those days.
I don’t have the data but I believe credit was only restricted inconsistantly because there was competition for retail loans.So overall it wasn’t much of a credit contraction .