Decent folk don’t need Dick Cheney to describe something as “a good policy” to know it’s probably a bad idea. But just in case they missed the point the first time around, the former VP was on television last week to hammer it home for them.
In an interview with CBS This Morning, Cheney brushed aside calls for “checks and balances” against the Obama administration’s controversial drone program.
“I think it’s a good program,” Cheney told the host. “I don’t disagree with the basic policy that the Obama administration has pursued in that regard.”
Readers will recognize drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), as the weapon of choice used by Nobel Peace Prize recipients who wish to carry out extrajudicial assassinations of United States citizens abroad… and to lay bloody and horrific waste to hundreds of innocent children by raining missiles down on their heads from the high heavens.
Never mind all that, grumbled Cheney. The president “is getting paid to make difficult, difficult decisions.”
In sum, the man who told the world that invading US troops would be greeted in Iraq as “liberators” has assured us that it’s ok for another man, one who personally oversees a “kill list” before unleashing remote control murder machines abroad, to make tough military decisions on your behalf… because he is getting paid a lot of your dollars to do so. They just don’t want anyone to keep track of what they’re doing, is all. On that last point, members of both parties are paid to be in conspicuous agreement.
Are you feeling safer yet?
Of course, as anyone with a spine well knows, it’s not making the “difficult, difficult decisions” that counts; it’s getting them right… or at least not murderously wrong, that’s important. Any scoundrel of the hoi oligoi can choose to, say, invade a foreign country on a false premise… or to bend at the waist every time a special interest group whispers the words “Blackwater” or “Monsanto” or “Unmanned Systems Caucus” softly in his ear. Indeed, moral malleability is practically a job requirement. And for the truly sociopathic, these decisions might even come easily, automatically… as if not a thought was given to their outcome or human consequence.
As it turns out, Obama himself seems capable of understanding that, at least in certain cases, scorching poor, forsaken villages on the other side of the globe with AGM-114 Hellfire missiles is probably less than neighborly conduct. In fact, the “leader of the free world” said as much at press conference in Asia just last year.
“…[T]here’s no country on Earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders,” the president solemnly declared.
“So we are fully supportive,” he then added, “of Israel’s right to defend itself from missiles landing on people’s homes and workplaces and potentially killing civilians.”
Mr. Obama might want to get out a map (here’s a helpful link, sir). His Weapons of Aerial Destruction are currently, as we type, cutting lines across the skies over (as least) Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia. As far as we are aware, these are countries roughly located “on this earth.”
If, as the president asserted, “Israel has every right to expect that it does not have missiles fired into its territory,” then what are we to make of the rights of those innocent people formerly living in the above mentioned areas, whose bloodied remains now stain the dirt whence they came? Is pre-meditated murder somehow less painful for the victims’ families if it is delivered by a RQ-1 Predator drone? Is it somehow less “murderous” if the act is carried out by a gutless bot wearing a US military uniform or in possession of a CIA clearance card? Do the bodies still count if the assassin answers to a chain of command that ends with the winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize?
The issue clearly appears to be a confusing one for Obama. “To drone, or not to drone?” Hmm… this must be what Cheney meant by “difficult, difficult decisions.”
Unperturbed, the president marches to the age old Mantra of the Militarist: When in doubt, proceed!
Since taking office, Obama has upped the ante on Bush’s UAV program, increasing total missions flown to date six fold. According to analysis conducted by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ), current through January of this year, the Obama administration has executed at least 312 drone strikes, including a couple of operations carried out over Yemen on Christmas Eve which killed at least seven people.
Observed blogger Kevin Gosztola at the time:
There was no ceasefire from the Obama administration during the holiday. In fact, it appears they waited until Christmas Eve on purpose to conduct a couple strikes as there had not been action in the covert drone war in Yemen for well over a month.
In earlier wars, there may have been some kind of a truce because most of the soldiers and their families would be celebrating Christmas, however, characteristic of drone warfare, the drone pilots who carried out the order to fire upon suspected militants were nowhere near the area of the strike. They were completely detached and, depending on where they were when they directed the flying killer robot to attack, they were likely able to go home and see their family on Christmas Eve.
On the body count question, Obama’s “targeted killing” operations have so far resulted in the deaths of between 473 and 893 civilians in Pakistan. Of these victims, 176 were children. They had names like Syed Wali Shah, a seven year-old boy, and Maezol Khan, an eight year old girl. Between 1,270 and 1,433 innocent people were reported injured in the attacks.
Of course, precise numbers are notoriously hard to come, due both to the nature of the strikes themselves and the bureaucratic opacity shrouding operations. This is especially true in Yemen and Somalia. In the former state, the BIJ estimates anywhere between 42 and 135 strikes carried out since 2002. Total death estimates range from 374 to 1,112 people.
In their 2012 report, Living Under Drones, researchers at Stanford University found that, lo and behold, the tale served up to the American public with regards to the administration’s expanded drone program was, well… flawed.
“In the United States, the dominant narrative about the use of drones in Pakistan is of a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the US safer by enabling ‘targeted killings’ of terrorists, with minimal downsides or collateral impacts. This narrative is false…
“Publicly available evidence that the strikes have made the US safer overall is ambiguous at best,” says the report, adding that targeted killings and drone attacks undermine respect for international law.
Is it any wonder then that the Cheneys and Obamas of the world would rather their heinous operation be kept under wraps, far from the prying eyes of the public and the dreaded “checks and balances” they might seek to impose?
Needless to say, the families of slaughtered civilians in Pakistan and elsewhere know far more about the horrors of living under America’s predator drone program than do Americans themselves. Don’t feel left out though. If these criminals have their way, (and there is good reason to believe they will) their robots of death will be patrolling the skies over your backyard soon enough… if they aren’t already.
[Ed. Note: When the last administration started the drone war almost 10 years ago, hardly anyone said anything. And then when the current administration continued and expanded it to target U.S. citizens abroad, the outcry a reasonable person might expect, didn’t happen.
Now we have drones patrolling our skies in North Dakota, keeping an eye on potential cow thieves. And the Dallas Police Department’s SWAT team has a 50 lb. drone with the capability of carrying a 12 gauge shotgun or a 40 mm grenade launcher (though neither’s been installed…yet).
And just yesterday, there are reports of House Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, saying that the President doesn’t have to disclose to the public when he targets and executes an American citizen with a drone. As she eloquently told the Huffington Post, “It just depends.”
As you probably know, the FAA has cleared the way for 30,000 drones to patrol American airspace, watching, recording and transmitting the images of your daily life back to some data storage facility. Leaving a record of your activities in your backyard, trips to soccer games with your kids and even walking your dog.
This is not what we want from our government. I can only assume that you feel the same way. If you do then sign our petition and tell the White House, Congress and John Brennan we have seen enough of their drones.)
Original article posted on Laissez-Faire Today
Joel Bowman is a contributor to The Daily Reckoning. After completing his degree in media communications and journalism in his home country of Australia, Joel moved to Baltimore to join the Agora Financial team. His keen interest in travel and macroeconomics first took him to New York where he regularly reported from Wall Street, and he now writes from and lives all over the world.
Here’s the most thorough and serious article I’ve seen about the illegal drone assassinations that Obama is launching in many countries:
Here’s why thy are illegal from my own perspective:
What differs in American perceptions today is that none of the laws or treaties, from the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 up to the current UN Charter and our own Constitution to never violate the national sovereignty of another country, need to apply to America — since it is acting like an EMPIRE.
All such historical realities and restraints on all ‘nation-states’, even those nation-state-centric Empires like; Britain, Germany, France, and more recently Japan, don’t have to apply to a truly Global Empire — aren’t applicable to multiple nation-states or nation-state Empires, because a unitary GLOBAL EMPIRE has no peers, and holds absolute sovereignty over the entire world.
And here’s what should be done to solve Obama acting like an Emperor:
Congress needs to vote on declaring war on all countries that Obama wants to attack with drones.
Congress can vote down such a declaration of war — which they would (unless they are suicidal in terms of their political careers) — and then Obama can’t act as Commander in Chief (and Emperor) and can’t launch unaccounted, illegal, and immoral drone strikes in an expanding array of nations, which otherwise would likely lead to droning some country (like Russia) that would shoot back —- “BIG TIME”, as previous VP Cheney liked to say.
Best luck and love to the fast expanding ‘Occupy Empire’ educational and revolutionary movement against this deceitful, guileful, disguised EMPIRE, which can’t so
easily be identified as wearing RedCoats, Red Stars, nor funny looking Nazi helmets —- quite yet!
Liberty, democracy, justice, and equality
Violent/’Vichy’ Rel 2.0
U.S. law ends at our borders (in most cases). Perhaps the military should have wide discretion on whom to kill — oveseas. Let’s face it, there are plenty of evildoers that the world would be well rid of! However, I would be more concerned about the continuing erosion of our supposed rights at home: where are the courts, even secret ones, that are supposed to be the check and balance against the police state? Well, we can’t tell you, you see…it’s classified!
Good on you Joel.
Shoot first. Ask questions later.
Sooner or later our so called ” enemy ” ,[ we must have many since we have bombed and invaded over 30 poor 3 rd world countries since 1950 ] will acquire Drones and then retaliate and send Drones back to the U.S.S.A. , hopefully not against civilians but directly into the laps of the Terrorists in the heart of Washington , D.C. . An eye for an eye , a tooth for a tooth . Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Revenge is SWEET .
Hey boys and girls. Wake up . There is only one reason this administration wants drones flying all over america. We are being led down the path to a one world govt. and both parties are working hard. Drones are for the bad guys. And pray tell who are the bad guys? Those people who disagree with the world leaders. Drones can follow you, hear you, shoot you, spy on you. Why? Control over the population. It is for control. Thats why they want to take away assault rifles. Control. Now, some of you think I am nuts. Fine. Let me ask one question. How can you get a one world govt. with the United States, the greatest country ever blessed by God, as strong as we are militarily, educationally, politically, socially, financially, christian fearing?. You can’t. We have to fail in all these areas first. Lets see, we won World War II, fought to a draw in Korea and got kicked out of Viet Nam. The rest is garbage. Sleep well tonight boys and girls. President Obama will be up all night thinking what he can do to wreck (control) tomorrow. Good night.
Pingback: jazda konna
Pingback: visit website
Pingback: builds apps with no coding
Pingback: how to win the lottery book full survey
Pingback: work from home jobs
Pingback: click here
Pingback: Samsung Galaxy S3
Pingback: mickey rourke cirugia
Pingback: lyric music video
Pingback: home inspection in the bronx
Pingback: milton keynes driving instructors
Pingback: my site
Pingback: this website
Pingback: ashley benson hot
Pingback: gioachino rossini moses in egypt
Pingback: Seguros Estados Unidos
Pingback: paintless dent repair training
Pingback: one direction pictures
Pingback: Miami dui defense lawyer
Pingback: umek at tomorrowland
Pingback: more bonuses
Pingback: giochi di slot machine gratis da scaricare
Pingback: dieta bajar peso
Pingback: Joshua A Jacobi
Pingback: electric cigarettes free trial
Pingback: book of ra free download
Pingback: Joshua A. Jacobi
Pingback: rachat credit immobilier
Pingback: STD Testing
Pingback: book of ra runterladen kostenlos
Pingback: reconquistar a mi ex novia
Pingback: nuestra web
Pingback: Best Way To Get Pregnant
Pingback: casino bonus ohne einzahlung
Pingback: teaching in Italy
Pingback: kate middleton without makeup
Pingback: аренда квартир на сутки в Минске
Pingback: rybne jedzienie
Pingback: joshua a jacobi
Pingback: linkedin developer
Pingback: get rid scars
Pingback: proxy server
Pingback: mouse click the up coming post
Pingback: click through the following website page
Pingback: relevant website
Pingback: mouse click the next page
Pingback: simply click the next web page
Pingback: mouse click the up coming website page
Pingback: Suggested Site
Pingback: Recommended Internet page
Pingback: similar web-site
Pingback: visit the following webpage
Pingback: Suggested Reading
Pingback: visit the next web site
Pingback: click the next internet site
Pingback: mouse click the next internet page
Pingback: similar site
Pingback: simply click the up coming web site
Pingback: simply click the up coming article
Pingback: click the next webpage
Pingback: click through the up coming webpage
Pingback: Full Survey
Pingback: simply click the up coming internet site
Pingback: Suggested Resource site
Pingback: Click That Link
Pingback: Read the Full Guide
Pingback: simply click the following page
Pingback: mouse click the next article
Pingback: Check This Out
Pingback: please click the next post
Pingback: Read the Full Post
Pingback: Recommended Studying
Pingback: Read More At this website
Pingback: visit the next site
Pingback: visit the next web page
Pingback: click through the next page
Pingback: click through the following web site
Pingback: just click the next document
Pingback: just click
Pingback: click through the following article
Pingback: More hints
Pingback: click through the next website page
Pingback: Learn Alot more
Pingback: linked website
Pingback: simply click the up coming website
Pingback: Suggested Browsing
Pingback: please click the following article
Pingback: please click the following web site
Pingback: please click the up coming document
Pingback: read on
Pingback: please click the next webpage
Pingback: please click the next website page
Pingback: Recommended Looking at
Pingback: relevant web page
Pingback: visit the next post
Pingback: visit the next page
Pingback: Suggested Online site
Pingback: Full Posting
Pingback: Highly recommended Reading
Pingback: just click the following document
Pingback: simply click the next internet site
Pingback: This Resource site
Pingback: please click the following post
Pingback: please click the following internet page
Pingback: please click the up coming post
Pingback: similar resource site
Pingback: visit the following web site
Pingback: additional reading
Pingback: click through the next web page
Pingback: Highly recommended Internet page
Pingback: Going On this page
Pingback: Highly recommended Resource site
Pingback: More Tips
Pingback: similar internet page
Pingback: simply click the next website page
Pingback: visit the following web page
Pingback: visit the next website page
Pingback: Our site
Pingback: visit the following internet site
Pingback: Discover More
Pingback: click through the up coming website page
Pingback: just click the up coming internet page
Pingback: just click the next website
Pingback: linked internet site
Pingback: simply click for source
Pingback: simply click the following webpage
Pingback: Recommended Internet site
Pingback: simply click the following internet site
Pingback: please click the next website
Pingback: related resource site
Pingback: similar web page
Pingback: simply click the next document
Pingback: visit the following internet page
Pingback: visit the up coming article
Pingback: More Help
Pingback: helpful hints
Pingback: Read the Full Content
Pingback: Read the Full Write-up
Pingback: relevant site
Pingback: Read the Full Posting
Pingback: simply click the up coming website page
Pingback: Suggested Web page
Pingback: visit the following site
Pingback: related web-site
Pingback: Learn More
Pingback: Click on
Pingback: click for source
Pingback: click through the next article
Pingback: click through the up coming website
Pingback: Going at
Pingback: Highly recommended Web-site
Pingback: resource for this article
Pingback: Read More In this article
Pingback: visit the next internet site
Pingback: source for this article
Pingback: just click the following website
Pingback: just click the following post
Pingback: main page
Pingback: simply click the up coming document
Pingback: This Internet site
Pingback: please click the following internet site
Pingback: Read Significantly more
Pingback: Recommended Web site
Pingback: simply click the following internet page
Pingback: similar internet site
Pingback: Click at
Pingback: visit the following website
Pingback: please click the following webpage
Pingback: Full File
Pingback: relevant web site
Pingback: simply click the next website
Pingback: linked site
Pingback: Learn More Here
Pingback: simply click the next internet page
The dollar in your pocket is worth a whole lot less today than 100 years ago. And you have the Federal Reserve to thank for you. So, as the Fed approaches its 100th birthday, Gregory Bresiger reflects on the controversial institution, relaying the criticisms of several of the Fed's most vocal opponents. Read on...
There's been a lot of press lately about the 3-D printing revolution - much of it right here on The Daily Reckoning. But there is one technology that's already threatening to make 3-D printing yesterday's news. Josh Grasmick examines a new kind of printing... that takes place in the 4th dimension. Read on...
Rejoice! What was perhaps the freest market in the entire world is now ended. Crushed. Wiped out by the swift hand of the state. Wait... That's NOT a good thing? (Sigh)... Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. Dominic Frisby explains why the shutdown of the Silk Road is such a travesty. Read on...
There is one chart, just one chart, that market analysts and gold bugs alike could learn a lot from. It displays clearly the ebb and flow of one critically important trend, where it's headed through the end of the year, and how you can use it to your advantage. Greg Guenthner explains...
China's push towards a more market-based economy could kick into high-gear, as recently proposed economic reforms are some of the country's most radical policy changes in over three decades. But what will that mean for foreign investors and how could it shape the global economy? Frank Holmes takes a closer look...
John Mauldin spoke with Steve Forbes on the future of gold and the Federal Reserve in an interview released yesterday. What he said may surprise you.