Decent folk don’t need Dick Cheney to describe something as “a good policy” to know it’s probably a bad idea. But just in case they missed the point the first time around, the former VP was on television last week to hammer it home for them.
In an interview with CBS This Morning, Cheney brushed aside calls for “checks and balances” against the Obama administration’s controversial drone program.
“I think it’s a good program,” Cheney told the host. “I don’t disagree with the basic policy that the Obama administration has pursued in that regard.”
Readers will recognize drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), as the weapon of choice used by Nobel Peace Prize recipients who wish to carry out extrajudicial assassinations of United States citizens abroad… and to lay bloody and horrific waste to hundreds of innocent children by raining missiles down on their heads from the high heavens.
Never mind all that, grumbled Cheney. The president “is getting paid to make difficult, difficult decisions.”
In sum, the man who told the world that invading US troops would be greeted in Iraq as “liberators” has assured us that it’s ok for another man, one who personally oversees a “kill list” before unleashing remote control murder machines abroad, to make tough military decisions on your behalf… because he is getting paid a lot of your dollars to do so. They just don’t want anyone to keep track of what they’re doing, is all. On that last point, members of both parties are paid to be in conspicuous agreement.
Are you feeling safer yet?
Of course, as anyone with a spine well knows, it’s not making the “difficult, difficult decisions” that counts; it’s getting them right… or at least not murderously wrong, that’s important. Any scoundrel of the hoi oligoi can choose to, say, invade a foreign country on a false premise… or to bend at the waist every time a special interest group whispers the words “Blackwater” or “Monsanto” or “Unmanned Systems Caucus” softly in his ear. Indeed, moral malleability is practically a job requirement. And for the truly sociopathic, these decisions might even come easily, automatically… as if not a thought was given to their outcome or human consequence.
As it turns out, Obama himself seems capable of understanding that, at least in certain cases, scorching poor, forsaken villages on the other side of the globe with AGM-114 Hellfire missiles is probably less than neighborly conduct. In fact, the “leader of the free world” said as much at press conference in Asia just last year.
“…[T]here’s no country on Earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders,” the president solemnly declared.
“So we are fully supportive,” he then added, “of Israel’s right to defend itself from missiles landing on people’s homes and workplaces and potentially killing civilians.”
Mr. Obama might want to get out a map (here’s a helpful link, sir). His Weapons of Aerial Destruction are currently, as we type, cutting lines across the skies over (as least) Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia. As far as we are aware, these are countries roughly located “on this earth.”
If, as the president asserted, “Israel has every right to expect that it does not have missiles fired into its territory,” then what are we to make of the rights of those innocent people formerly living in the above mentioned areas, whose bloodied remains now stain the dirt whence they came? Is pre-meditated murder somehow less painful for the victims’ families if it is delivered by a RQ-1 Predator drone? Is it somehow less “murderous” if the act is carried out by a gutless bot wearing a US military uniform or in possession of a CIA clearance card? Do the bodies still count if the assassin answers to a chain of command that ends with the winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize?
The issue clearly appears to be a confusing one for Obama. “To drone, or not to drone?” Hmm… this must be what Cheney meant by “difficult, difficult decisions.”
Unperturbed, the president marches to the age old Mantra of the Militarist: When in doubt, proceed!
Since taking office, Obama has upped the ante on Bush’s UAV program, increasing total missions flown to date six fold. According to analysis conducted by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ), current through January of this year, the Obama administration has executed at least 312 drone strikes, including a couple of operations carried out over Yemen on Christmas Eve which killed at least seven people.
Observed blogger Kevin Gosztola at the time:
There was no ceasefire from the Obama administration during the holiday. In fact, it appears they waited until Christmas Eve on purpose to conduct a couple strikes as there had not been action in the covert drone war in Yemen for well over a month.
In earlier wars, there may have been some kind of a truce because most of the soldiers and their families would be celebrating Christmas, however, characteristic of drone warfare, the drone pilots who carried out the order to fire upon suspected militants were nowhere near the area of the strike. They were completely detached and, depending on where they were when they directed the flying killer robot to attack, they were likely able to go home and see their family on Christmas Eve.
On the body count question, Obama’s “targeted killing” operations have so far resulted in the deaths of between 473 and 893 civilians in Pakistan. Of these victims, 176 were children. They had names like Syed Wali Shah, a seven year-old boy, and Maezol Khan, an eight year old girl. Between 1,270 and 1,433 innocent people were reported injured in the attacks.
Of course, precise numbers are notoriously hard to come, due both to the nature of the strikes themselves and the bureaucratic opacity shrouding operations. This is especially true in Yemen and Somalia. In the former state, the BIJ estimates anywhere between 42 and 135 strikes carried out since 2002. Total death estimates range from 374 to 1,112 people.
In their 2012 report, Living Under Drones, researchers at Stanford University found that, lo and behold, the tale served up to the American public with regards to the administration’s expanded drone program was, well… flawed.
“In the United States, the dominant narrative about the use of drones in Pakistan is of a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the US safer by enabling ‘targeted killings’ of terrorists, with minimal downsides or collateral impacts. This narrative is false…
“Publicly available evidence that the strikes have made the US safer overall is ambiguous at best,” says the report, adding that targeted killings and drone attacks undermine respect for international law.
Is it any wonder then that the Cheneys and Obamas of the world would rather their heinous operation be kept under wraps, far from the prying eyes of the public and the dreaded “checks and balances” they might seek to impose?
Needless to say, the families of slaughtered civilians in Pakistan and elsewhere know far more about the horrors of living under America’s predator drone program than do Americans themselves. Don’t feel left out though. If these criminals have their way, (and there is good reason to believe they will) their robots of death will be patrolling the skies over your backyard soon enough… if they aren’t already.
[Ed. Note: When the last administration started the drone war almost 10 years ago, hardly anyone said anything. And then when the current administration continued and expanded it to target U.S. citizens abroad, the outcry a reasonable person might expect, didn’t happen.
Now we have drones patrolling our skies in North Dakota, keeping an eye on potential cow thieves. And the Dallas Police Department’s SWAT team has a 50 lb. drone with the capability of carrying a 12 gauge shotgun or a 40 mm grenade launcher (though neither’s been installed…yet).
And just yesterday, there are reports of House Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, saying that the President doesn’t have to disclose to the public when he targets and executes an American citizen with a drone. As she eloquently told the Huffington Post, “It just depends.”
As you probably know, the FAA has cleared the way for 30,000 drones to patrol American airspace, watching, recording and transmitting the images of your daily life back to some data storage facility. Leaving a record of your activities in your backyard, trips to soccer games with your kids and even walking your dog.
This is not what we want from our government. I can only assume that you feel the same way. If you do then sign our petition and tell the White House, Congress and John Brennan we have seen enough of their drones.)
Original article posted on Laissez-Faire Today
Joel Bowman is a contributor to The Daily Reckoning. After completing his degree in media communications and journalism in his home country of Australia, Joel moved to Baltimore to join the Agora Financial team. His keen interest in travel and macroeconomics first took him to New York where he regularly reported from Wall Street, and he now writes from and lives all over the world.
Here’s the most thorough and serious article I’ve seen about the illegal drone assassinations that Obama is launching in many countries:
Here’s why thy are illegal from my own perspective:
What differs in American perceptions today is that none of the laws or treaties, from the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 up to the current UN Charter and our own Constitution to never violate the national sovereignty of another country, need to apply to America — since it is acting like an EMPIRE.
All such historical realities and restraints on all ‘nation-states’, even those nation-state-centric Empires like; Britain, Germany, France, and more recently Japan, don’t have to apply to a truly Global Empire — aren’t applicable to multiple nation-states or nation-state Empires, because a unitary GLOBAL EMPIRE has no peers, and holds absolute sovereignty over the entire world.
And here’s what should be done to solve Obama acting like an Emperor:
Congress needs to vote on declaring war on all countries that Obama wants to attack with drones.
Congress can vote down such a declaration of war — which they would (unless they are suicidal in terms of their political careers) — and then Obama can’t act as Commander in Chief (and Emperor) and can’t launch unaccounted, illegal, and immoral drone strikes in an expanding array of nations, which otherwise would likely lead to droning some country (like Russia) that would shoot back —- “BIG TIME”, as previous VP Cheney liked to say.
Best luck and love to the fast expanding ‘Occupy Empire’ educational and revolutionary movement against this deceitful, guileful, disguised EMPIRE, which can’t so
easily be identified as wearing RedCoats, Red Stars, nor funny looking Nazi helmets —- quite yet!
Liberty, democracy, justice, and equality
Violent/’Vichy’ Rel 2.0
U.S. law ends at our borders (in most cases). Perhaps the military should have wide discretion on whom to kill — oveseas. Let’s face it, there are plenty of evildoers that the world would be well rid of! However, I would be more concerned about the continuing erosion of our supposed rights at home: where are the courts, even secret ones, that are supposed to be the check and balance against the police state? Well, we can’t tell you, you see…it’s classified!
Good on you Joel.
Shoot first. Ask questions later.
Sooner or later our so called ” enemy ” ,[ we must have many since we have bombed and invaded over 30 poor 3 rd world countries since 1950 ] will acquire Drones and then retaliate and send Drones back to the U.S.S.A. , hopefully not against civilians but directly into the laps of the Terrorists in the heart of Washington , D.C. . An eye for an eye , a tooth for a tooth . Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Revenge is SWEET .
Hey boys and girls. Wake up . There is only one reason this administration wants drones flying all over america. We are being led down the path to a one world govt. and both parties are working hard. Drones are for the bad guys. And pray tell who are the bad guys? Those people who disagree with the world leaders. Drones can follow you, hear you, shoot you, spy on you. Why? Control over the population. It is for control. Thats why they want to take away assault rifles. Control. Now, some of you think I am nuts. Fine. Let me ask one question. How can you get a one world govt. with the United States, the greatest country ever blessed by God, as strong as we are militarily, educationally, politically, socially, financially, christian fearing?. You can’t. We have to fail in all these areas first. Lets see, we won World War II, fought to a draw in Korea and got kicked out of Viet Nam. The rest is garbage. Sleep well tonight boys and girls. President Obama will be up all night thinking what he can do to wreck (control) tomorrow. Good night.
Pingback: jazda konna()
Pingback: visit website()
Pingback: builds apps with no coding()
Pingback: how to win the lottery book full survey()
Pingback: work from home jobs()
Pingback: click here()
Pingback: Samsung Galaxy S3()
Pingback: mickey rourke cirugia()
Pingback: lyric music video()
Pingback: home inspection in the bronx()
Pingback: milton keynes driving instructors()
Pingback: my site()
Pingback: this website()
Pingback: ashley benson hot()
Pingback: gioachino rossini moses in egypt()
Pingback: Seguros Estados Unidos()
Pingback: paintless dent repair training()
Pingback: one direction pictures()
Pingback: Miami dui defense lawyer()
Pingback: umek at tomorrowland()
Pingback: more bonuses()
Pingback: giochi di slot machine gratis da scaricare()
Pingback: dieta bajar peso()
Pingback: Joshua A Jacobi()
Pingback: electric cigarettes free trial()
Pingback: book of ra free download()
Pingback: Joshua A. Jacobi()
Pingback: rachat credit immobilier()
Pingback: STD Testing()
Pingback: book of ra runterladen kostenlos()
Pingback: reconquistar a mi ex novia()
Pingback: nuestra web()
Pingback: Best Way To Get Pregnant()
Pingback: casino bonus ohne einzahlung()
Pingback: teaching in Italy()
Pingback: kate middleton without makeup()
Pingback: аренда квартир на сутки в Минске()
Pingback: rybne jedzienie()
Pingback: joshua a jacobi()
Pingback: linkedin developer()
Pingback: get rid scars()
Pingback: proxy server()
Pingback: mouse click the up coming post()
Pingback: click through the following website page()
Pingback: relevant website()
Pingback: mouse click the next page()
Pingback: simply click the next web page()
Pingback: mouse click the up coming website page()
Pingback: Suggested Site()
Pingback: Recommended Internet page()
Pingback: similar web-site()
Pingback: visit the following webpage()
Pingback: Suggested Reading()
Pingback: visit the next web site()
Pingback: click the next internet site()
Pingback: mouse click the next internet page()
Pingback: similar site()
Pingback: simply click the up coming web site()
Pingback: simply click the up coming article()
Pingback: click the next webpage()
Pingback: click through the up coming webpage()
Pingback: Full Survey()
Pingback: simply click the up coming internet site()
Pingback: Suggested Resource site()
Pingback: Click That Link()
Pingback: Read the Full Guide()
Pingback: simply click the following page()
Pingback: mouse click the next article()
Pingback: Check This Out()
Pingback: please click the next post()
Pingback: Read the Full Post()
Pingback: Recommended Studying()
Pingback: Read More At this website()
Pingback: visit the next site()
Pingback: visit the next web page()
Pingback: click through the next page()
Pingback: click through the following web site()
Pingback: just click the next document()
Pingback: just click()
Pingback: click through the following article()
Pingback: More hints()
Pingback: click through the next website page()
Pingback: Learn Alot more()
Pingback: linked website()
Pingback: simply click the up coming website()
Pingback: Suggested Browsing()
Pingback: please click the following article()
Pingback: please click the following web site()
Pingback: please click the up coming document()
Pingback: read on()
Pingback: please click the next webpage()
Pingback: please click the next website page()
Pingback: Recommended Looking at()
Pingback: relevant web page()
Pingback: visit the next post()
Pingback: visit the next page()
Pingback: Suggested Online site()
Pingback: Full Posting()
Pingback: Highly recommended Reading()
Pingback: just click the following document()
Pingback: simply click the next internet site()
Pingback: This Resource site()
Pingback: please click the following post()
Pingback: please click the following internet page()
Pingback: please click the up coming post()
Pingback: similar resource site()
Pingback: visit the following web site()
Pingback: additional reading()
Pingback: click through the next web page()
Pingback: Highly recommended Internet page()
Pingback: Going On this page()
Pingback: Highly recommended Resource site()
Pingback: More Tips()
Pingback: similar internet page()
Pingback: simply click the next website page()
Pingback: visit the following web page()
Pingback: visit the next website page()
Pingback: Our site()
Pingback: visit the following internet site()
Pingback: Discover More()
Pingback: click through the up coming website page()
Pingback: just click the up coming internet page()
Pingback: just click the next website()
Pingback: linked internet site()
Pingback: simply click for source()
Pingback: simply click the following webpage()
Pingback: Recommended Internet site()
Pingback: simply click the following internet site()
Pingback: please click the next website()
Pingback: related resource site()
Pingback: similar web page()
Pingback: simply click the next document()
Pingback: visit the following internet page()
Pingback: visit the up coming article()
Pingback: More Help()
Pingback: helpful hints()
Pingback: Read the Full Content()
Pingback: Read the Full Write-up()
Pingback: relevant site()
Pingback: Read the Full Posting()
Pingback: simply click the up coming website page()
Pingback: Suggested Web page()
Pingback: visit the following site()
Pingback: related web-site()
Pingback: Learn More()
Pingback: Click on()
Pingback: click for source()
Pingback: click through the next article()
Pingback: click through the up coming website()
Pingback: Going at()
Pingback: Highly recommended Web-site()
Pingback: resource for this article()
Pingback: Read More In this article()
Pingback: visit the next internet site()
Pingback: source for this article()
Pingback: just click the following website()
Pingback: just click the following post()
Pingback: main page()
Pingback: simply click the up coming document()
Pingback: This Internet site()
Pingback: please click the following internet site()
Pingback: Read Significantly more()
Pingback: Recommended Web site()
Pingback: simply click the following internet page()
Pingback: similar internet site()
Pingback: Click at()
Pingback: visit the following website()
Pingback: please click the following webpage()
Pingback: Full File()
Pingback: relevant web site()
Pingback: simply click the next website()
Pingback: linked site()
Pingback: Learn More Here()
Pingback: simply click the next internet page()
Pingback: To Drone, or Not to Drone? - Free Market Café()
Stephen Petranek explains how the blood pressure medication, Verapamil, could be used to do big things for sufferers of Type 1 diabetes. Click here to see why some are calling this a sign of hope...
I consider this trade a mean-reversion play. We're not hanging around if it doesn't work out--and I certainly don't think these stocks will regain the momentum they had during last year's monster run. This is a short-term trade, OK? But a little disbelief rally can hand us some quick double-digit gains.
Bubbles in land, mortgages, art, gold… tablets. Who knew? An astute lifelong student of financial and economic history, for one. What’s next? Marc Faber takes a stab at an answer below…
Fact: More Americans than ever before are choosing to give up their citizenship. If you’ve been finding America’s tax laws inconvenient or even oppressive, however, read on. Peter Schiff outlines options for avoiding government intrusion in your life… without giving up your citizenship...
Like everything in life, there are winners and losers -- money production is no exception. In fact, thanks to the opening the money spigot, Guido Hülsmann of the Mises Institute explains we're ultimately looking at worsening income inequality. Read on...