02/01/10 Baltimore, Maryland – Well, itâs a new world, after all…
Maybe we were wrong. Maybe the mainstream economists are right.
You know, up to now all theyâve been good at was explaining why the forecasts they made in the past didnât work out. But maybe theyâre right, after all. Maybe up IS down. Maybe better IS worse. Maybe you can squander trillions of dollars and yet have more!
It is all too much for us. Our head aches thinking about it. But there it is, right there on the front page of the weekend news:
âUS growth accelerates…â announces The International Herald Tribune.
Right there in black and white. And it must be true. The newspapers wouldnât lie, would they? And, the economists who fiddle the numbers for the US government wouldnât hit a false note on purpose, would they?
Nah, that never happens. But how is it possible for the economy to go right back to Bubble Era growth rates after taking only a couple percentage points off of US GDP? We all know it was a credit bubble, right? We all know it couldnât last, right? We all know, too, that the fuel for that growth â bubbly gases coming out of the banks and the real estate sectors â has disappeared. So where is this growth coming from?
On Friday morning, the stock market got excited about the stronger-than-forecast growth numbers, along with news that Ben Bernanke was around for another four years. The Dow rose more than 100 points. But by the afternoon, investors were asking questions again.
If the economy really is recovering, maybe the feds will reduce their stimulus…
If the economy really is heating up, mightnât it melt all that money and credit frozen by the depression? Doesnât that increase the odds of inflation â and higher rates from the Fed…?
If the feds tighten, wonât the US economy fall back into the second part of the W-shaped recession…just like Paul Krugman says?
By the close of business the Dow had lost 53 points, which makes us think the final push to the bottom has begun. Even good news canât stop it. When 5.7% growth â after the worst slump since the â30s â doesnât get investors excited, thereâs something wrong.
Wait a minute…
âThe biggest lift to economic activity,â continues The New York Times, âcame because businesses ran down their stocks of unsold goods at a much slower rate than earlier in the year…â
In other words, the âgrowthâ came because businesses restocked their shelves at a faster rate. So, thereâs more on the shelves to buy. Hmmm. Wonder if it will sell…?
The only way you could have real, sustained growth is with a recovery in employment â and earnings. Looking at it broadly, Americans were earning a certain amount of money in 2007. Then, they discovered that much of what they were doing was not worth doing. They were building houses for people who couldnât afford them, for example. And they were spending money that was âtaken outâ of their houses. At the peak, a substantial part of US GDP â and virtually ALL the growth â came from these sources.
That money has disappeared. People arenât getting paid to build houses that no one will buy anymore. And shops arenât selling to people who pay with money from mortgage equity extraction. Theyâve already extracted so much that thereâs nothing left. Or less than nothing. Many homeowners have net negative equity.
What does this mean? It means that people are earning less, borrowing less, and spending less. What else could it mean? A substantial part of the economy, 2003-2007, was fraudulent â in which excessive consumer credit masqueraded as real purchasing power. That part of the economy has gone away. So should that portion of the GDP. In theory, GDP should go down and stay down until new industries, businesses, and jobs are found.
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and youâll get a free research report, âHow to Survive the Fall of Social Security.â Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





You don’t have to look far to see the true impact of the mal-investments. I lived in Sarasota, Fl from 1995 to 2005. I moved there when is was affordable. I am in the building industry. I witnessed the growth and then the boom. It was unreal, money was getting used like monopoly money. Prices went up weekly during the height of the market bubble. I got out when the gettin’ was good.
I go back now and visit. You can see the horrible impact that was left; jobs lost, foreclosures, business failures, bank failures, scam artists revealed, lives ruined. Most of my friends in the business are struggling, fired, moved or are moving out. Who know where to? Recovery, hah!