Jeffrey Tucker

Maybe a dark column is appropriate for tax day, but, I must tell you, it is not my usual way. Nonetheless, there are certain terrible realities in the world, preventable ones, that we must speak about if we expect to end them.

The sad and tragic story of Andrew Wordes — the chicken farmer who was driven to despair by government harassment and killed himself last month — continues to haunt me. And it turns out to be just one of millions of cases of similar psychological torment caused by government, directly and indirectly. These are wholly unnecessary events, inflicting terrible loss on the world.

For every one person these days who dies fighting in US wars around the world, 25 other soldiers kill themselves. Veterans are killing themselves at a rate of one every 80 minutes. There are more than 6,500 veteran suicides every year. That’s more than all the American soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq in the last 10 years, according to a New York Times analysis. Being a veteran apparently doubles your risk of suicide.

Economic conditions wrought by government policies around the world have contributed to the death toll. Europe is undergoing an epidemic of suicide in countries seriously hurt by the downturn. In Greece, the suicide rate among men increased more than 24% since the disaster hit. In Ireland, male suicides have shot up more than 16%. In Italy, economic-motivated suicides have increased 52%.

The big aggregates reported here do not convey the level of tragedy experienced in the lives of every single individual here. They leave behind shattered families and wrecked communities. There is an unbearably sad story behind every single statistic.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that the same is happening in the US and that the broad trend follows economic prospects. The difference between the rising prosperity of a free market and economic desperation caused by government is really a matter of life and death. The desperation and sadness wrought by war — an extension of domestic policy and carried out with much higher stakes — is a symptom of the same problem.

These represent both direct and indirect ways that government is spreading misery around the world. The direct way involves war and its psychological effects. Being harassed by regulators is another direct way: The person sees no way out and is thereby driven to desperate measures. The indirect way results from the economic stagnation caused by government policies.

Life is hard enough on its own. Government makes it harder. Its recession-causing policies; its policy responses that do not work; its regulations that makes people crazy; its poverty-inducing taxes and inflation; and, most of all, its wars have driven millions to despair.

Why the state in particular? It all comes down to the sense of having control over your life. The essence of statecraft is the absence of choice and the inability to escape. Many operations of the state try to disguise these features.

Once you develop a nose for this, you see it everywhere. The faces of people in line at the DMV, the sauntering mass in line to be screened by the TSA and even the blank stares you see in the post office lines. There is something about state policy that demoralizes us all. That takes a toll on our health and our outlook on life and even leads to tragedy.

I think back to the old Soviet days, which to me typify what it means for a society to be entirely under state control. The government put out a magazine called Soviet Life, and it was filled with pictures of happy, healthy people who were living fulfilling and active lives. The contrast with reality couldn’t have been more extreme. Emigrants told stories of a demoralized population turning to alcohol, drugs and suicide — anything to escape the toxic combination of sinking living standards and the absence of choice due to despotism.

Today we know that the propaganda was a lie. What we fail to realize is that this human tragedy is not unique to a fully socialized society. We can get there in small steps by growing the state and expanding its reach year by year until it envelops us in all our life activities. We have to turn to the state ever more. We are blocked by barriers. Everywhere we go, we encounter bureaucrats who demand our papers, riffle through our belongings, forbid what we want to do and mandate what we do not want to.

Of course, soldiers in war face this reality every day. They are not their own persons. They must obey orders whether they make sense or not. They see things that no one should have to see and they are ordered to do things that no one should have to be forced to do. It is hardly surprising that people who go through such an ordeal have confused perspectives on the value of human life.

To a lesser extent, citizens in every country with an interventionist state face an analogous situation. They may have a dream of starting or growing a business, but they are blocked — not because of their own lack of vision, but because of the thicket erected by public policy. The state acts as a dream killer. It becomes all the more maddening when there is nothing that the citizen can do about it. There is no real choice.

Oh they tell us that in a democratic system, we can vote and that this is our choice. We have nothing to complain about. If we don’t like the system, we can change it. But this is wholly illusory. The government completely owns the democratic system and administers it to generate the types of results that government wants. More and more people are catching on to this, which is why voter participation falls further in every election season.

The great thinkers of the libertarian tradition have always told us that freedom and the good life are absolutely inseparable. I think of Thomas Jefferson, Frederic Bastiat, Herbert Spencer, Albert Jay Nock, Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, F.A. Hayek and so many others. Even contemporary authors have addressed the theme. They had long warned that every step away from freedom would mean a diminution of the quality of life. We are seeing these prophecies come true.

Too often public policy debates take place on the wrong level. The core point is not to make the “system” work better or otherwise fine-tune the rules within a bureaucracy. We need to start talking about larger issues about the dignity of the human person, the moral status of freedom and the rights and liberties of the individual in society. The expansion of the state is not just wrong as a matter of “public policy”; it is wrong because it is dangerous to the good life and the quality of life.

To kill freedom is to kill the essence of what makes us human.


Jeffrey Tucker
for The Daily Reckoning

Jeffrey Tucker

I'm executive editor of Laissez Faire Books and the proprietor of the Laissez Faire Club. I'm the author of two books in the field of economics and one on early music. My main professional work between 1985 and 2011 was with the MIses Institute but I've also worked with the Acton Institute and Mackinac Institute, as well as written thousands of published articles. My personal twitter account @jeffreyatucker FB is @jeffrey.albert.tucker Plain old email is

  • Ben the layabout

    Speaking on suicide: It is not entirely a bad thing (I am being the Devil’s Advocate.) As long as somebody wants to “check out,” as long as he isn’t taking innocents with him, why should we stop him? There may be valid reasons to kill onself (use your imagination.) In any case, once gone, if nothing else, there is one less mouth to feed, etc. I say good riddance. Leaves more resources for the living. Life is for healthy well adjusted people. On a more positive (?) note, counter to many peoples’ intuitive answer, in a “normal” year, far more people worldwide commit suicide than are murdered or die by other violent means.

  • gman

    “Life is hard enough on its own. Government makes it harder … It all comes down to the sense of having control over your life.”

    you got that right! stop the madness! end all road-building! end all food inspections! close all schools! disband the army navy and air force! ignore all zoning laws! no national parks! close the jails! tear down the court houses! send the police home! no traffic laws (YAY!)! shut down the faa, we can fly whereever we want! can you just IMAGINE how much more efficient our lives would be then!

    life is hard enough on its own? you have no idea.

  • mike

    This sounds very much like sedition to me.

  • fritz

    thank you gman.
    this article is crap but you had the good taste to explain why.
    next week-government causes cancer.

  • Tee

    To be specific, prostate cancer, no?

  • Pfc. Parts

    Good to see a well considered opinion piece like this one followed by a few inarticulate rants. You know you’ve really hit a nerve when the slobbering morons start screaming at you!

    Nice work.

  • mike

    …judicial pronouncements need only be unanimous, while prejudicial opinions may be subject to variance…self-interest before, and ignorance of the laws leads to inaccurate interpretations causing variance of ruling among an appointed judiciary of dubious quality…as so many supreme court decisions are “won” or “lost” by one judge, then paying for 9 is redundant by 88.88% and so, an 88% pay cut is warranted as an incentive towards excellence…

  • gman

    “Good to see a well considered opinion piece like this one followed by a few inarticulate rants.”

    your incomprehension is not my inarticulation. like I said, you have no idea. but soon you will, along with many others.

    “hello, 911.”


    “I’m sorry but your local firehouse was eliminated in budget cutbacks last month. we have another station in a nearby town, it will take two hours for a unit to arrive.”


  • Larry Bernard


    I get what your saying but there was a day and age where IF people saw their neighbors house was on fire they would get their gardenhoses out and spray the stuff down.

    As the state got bigger people got smaller. IF your local firehouse got cut in budget cuts know what you can do? Form a volunteer fire department. You can be vigilant and keep an eye out for your neighbor

  • gman

    “I get what your saying but there was a day and age where IF people saw their neighbors house was on fire they would get their gardenhoses out and spray the stuff down.”

    dude. you’re missing the forest for the trees.

    get a scanner and listen to your county fire department. hear what goes on.

    and to get down into the weeds, regarding the garden hose thing, they still do. it don’t work. I’ve seen seven houses burn down where I live, owners’ and neighbors’ garden hoses running all the while. once ran a garden hose from one house out to another myself trying to help. almost pointless. so I have no clue what day or age you’re talking about.

Recent Articles

The Euro Isn’t Dead

Peter Schiff

Peter Schiff reports on the broken spell of confidence surrounding the dollar, and how it may also reverse the fortunes of other beaten down currencies...

Gold Miners, RIP…

Bill Bonner

Bill Bonner explains why you can count on central banks to exaggerate the commodities cycle with more cheap credit...

Five Stories You Should Read This Week

Amanda Stiltner

“Supersoldiers” of future warfare…A switch that turns off ageing? Plus, a little robotic bug that defies physics, testing your viral history with a single drop of blood, and can plants react to stress?