07/21/09 Vancouver, British Columbia
You can rest easy today… the financial crisis is over.
CIT Group, the new epicenter of systemic financial risk, got thrown a lifeline this week from its bondholders. As we reported Friday (link), the company needed $3 billion — fast — in order to stay afloat. It was rightfully denied a government bailout, but was able to strike a last-minute deal with holders of its debt. Of course, the market rejoiced… the S&P 500 rose 1.1% yesterday largely on the news.
But again, we’re calling the market’s bluff. Anybody read the fine print of this deal? The loan was secured by “substantially all unencumbered assets.” That lawyer talk means CIT will have no collateral left over for a similar deal in the future. What’s more, the company will have to pay 13% annually on the $3 billion loan… no small order.
But most importantly, the whole deal is an ugly microcosm of 2008-2009. No problem has actually been fixed at CIT. The business still finances loans to tens of thousands of small businesses by borrowing from the credit market. CIT’s business model is still broken. They are still massively in debt. All they’ve done is create another liability.
(Just as we were about to publish today, CIT filed a warning with the SEC, saying that their bondholder rescue might not keep them out of bankruptcy. Wouldn’t you know it – they’ve got more bills coming due! On August 17th they’ll have to cough up another $1 billion. And so the madness continues.…)
Nevertheless, coupled with the recent earnings surprises from JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and Citi, “investors were encouraged to see that the financial sector can take care of itself, without government bailout funds,” as CNN put it. Heh… right.
“Anyone who takes this as evidence of a recovering economy should work for the government,” sneers Bill Bonner. “Only a government economist or a mental defective (excuse us for being redundant) could believe that genuine prosperity can be built on a foundation of speculating by large financial institutions. You can see why by asking a simple question: Whom were they trading against?
“The banks’ core business is actually getting worse! The core business of banking is lending to people who are capable of paying it back — out of earnings. If the borrower is counting on higher house prices… or higher stock prices… to allow him to refinance on better terms, the lender is asking for trouble. Prices may go up… or they may go down. And if they go down, down goes the lender’s collateral too… and his hope of getting repaid.
“The banks made big mistakes in the bubble years. And now they’re paying the price. But so far, they’ve only made the first installment payment. Subprime loans started going bad two years ago. Then, people began losing their jobs… and loans of all sorts were in trouble.
“There is no sign that this process is over. Instead, it is merely proceeding in good order… just as you’d expect.”
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





I haven’t seen any improvement and I spend a fair amount of time at looking at bank capitalization data. I’m eager to see the call reports for Q2.
It is an ominous sign that things are so obscenely perverse that Wall street rewards Goldman stockholders and employees for the profits it gained at the expense of those being evicted from their homes, and then cheers again for the “smart bets” they placed on commodities.
Was it just financial cronyism or something far more sinister when Hank Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman, got appointed as treasurer, and then bailed out AIG, while making sure that Goldman got paid off for the bets they placed on the imminent collapse of the sub prime loans they had pioneered, packaged and then sold off to unsuspecting investors..?.
Are Larry Summers & Tim Geithner still possibly only looking out for Goldman and other hedge funds , as they continue to try and convince us to stay the course, instead of demanding a moratorium of foreclosures and requiring that banks modify the loans?
How else do you explain that 9 months after the bailout, this trickle down plan that Paulson came up with is actually hurting those who need it the most, particularly as monthly mortgage payments keep re-setting ever higher?
We have reached the point, where we must wonder if it I by design, that the average borrower on Main street, cannot get through to his lender to discuss modifying his loan, and in the interim 1/2 a million more households per month, are losing their jobs and their homes?
Have Obama and much of the Democratic congress betrayed their core voter support, by pandering to the interests of Goldman and the rest of the financial community?
Where this any other country, the press would be reporting on this economical political chicanery, instead of applauding Goldman’s profits, and a well informed citizenry would be demanding that its government stop the payouts to Goldman and other hedge funds, while declaring a moratorium on all foreclosures, until the banks modify the loans..