Today, let’s take a look at the “logic” of the American Empire and what you can expect in the year(s) ahead… regardless of whether a donkey or an elephant squats in the Oval Office come Jan. 20, 2013.
“Great empires, such as the Roman and British, were extractive,” the economist Paul Craig Roberts observed recently. “The empires succeeded, because the value of the resources and wealth extracted from conquered lands exceeded the value of conquest and governance.”
But unlike empires of the past, the American Empire has a perverse logic all its own.
“America’s wars are very expensive,” says Roberts, stating the obvious. “Bush and Obama have doubled the national debt, and the American people have no benefits from it. No riches, no bread and circuses flow to Americans from Washington’s wars.”
In the big Iraqi oil auction of 2009, for example, even as US military helicopters droned overhead, the Iraqi oil minister gave out zero contracts to American firms. Not one. And we spent at least $3 trillion on war — $2.9 trillion more than Team Bush’s original budget. So much for paying for war with “oil profits.”
Russia was actually the big winner here. So what gives? The American Empire has perverted the Roman mantra “Veni, vidi, vici” (I came, I saw, I conquered) into the odd imperial slogan: “We came, we saw… we borrowed!”
The results from this turn of phrase are less than desirable. Again Roberts: “Washington’s empire extracts resources from the American people for the benefit of the few powerful interest groups that rule America. The military-security complex, Wall Street, agribusiness and the Israel lobby use the government to extract resources from Americans to serve their profits and power. The US Constitution has been extracted in the interests of the Security State, and Americans’ incomes have been redirected to the pockets of the 1%.
“That is how the American Empire functions,” concludes Roberts. Instead of plundering foreign resources to finance itself, the American Empire is always looking to inflate the next financial bubble. Each of these serial bubbles has the effect of “extracting” wealth from the citizens — by drawing both savings and credit into overly inflated asset classes that then implode.
As the bubbles inflate, robust tax revenues flow to the federal government. As the bubbles implode, tax-payer dollars flow to the connected Wall Street elite. Thus, over time, savings pass from the wallets of citizens to the pockets of scoundrels in Washington and on Wall Street.
For confirmation of this assertion we need look no further than the top o’ the 1%, the Oracle of Omaha. Peter Schweizer of Reason reckoned in his March exposé on Warren Buffett that this folksy fellow “needed the TARP bailout more than most.”
Let’s run through the numbers. Berkshire Hathaway firms in total received $95 billion in TARP money. Berkshire, you’ll recall, held stock in Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and American Express. Not only did these companies receive TARP funds… they also dipped into the FDIC’s treasury to back their debt. Total bailout: $130 billion. TARP-enabled companies accounted for 30% of the Oracle’s publicly disclosed stock portfolio.
He’s definitely one of the top beneficiaries of the big bank bailout. And to sharpen the sting, he even got a better deal to help ailing Goldman Sachs than our own government. Buffett got a 10% preferred dividend while the Feds got all of 5%. He cleaned up with $500 million a year in dividends. Without the bailout, you can bet many of his stock holdings would have gone near-zero instead.
Contrast that with a blog post from Rosemarie Jackowski, a community activist at Dissident Voice. She’s describes her experiences working with the underclass in a small town in Vermont.
“In Bennington, there are three very distinct classes,” writes Jackowski. “First, there are the ‘fancy people.’ They are the ones who rule and control everything. They are on the boards — the hospital board, the library board, the select board, the school boards. They have the power — even the power over life and death. They, occasionally during a medical crisis in the hospital, make the decision to pull the plug or allow life to go on.”
Then there is the large group of ordinary citizens. Some are blue-collar workers. Most work hard. Love their families. And have had family in Vermont for generations. They acknowledge the class system in conversation often. They call it the ol’ boys network — cronyism.
The third group consists of those who are in need. Those on the bottom of the economic pile. A poor mother of two disabled children, for example, talked about the oppressive avalanche of redundant paperwork required to get any tiny benefit. The social services system is designed by nameless, faceless, unelected bureaucrats. It is set up to assure maximum job security to the workers in the system. To a struggling family, it often feels like an attack of the “paper churners.” Being poor is a full-time job.
In her post, Ms. Jackowski provides a list of 35 ways poverty robs you of your dignity. Here are just a few:
Poverty means living with shame.
Poverty means working three jobs, and still not “making it.”
Poverty means that you go to work when you are sick. Worse than that, you send your children to school when they are sick.
Sometimes poverty means that you skip meals so that your children can eat.
Poverty means that your housing is never secure…
Poverty means following all of the rules, then graduating with oppressive student debt so that the president of UVM can be paid $447,000 per year.
Tragically, more and more “ordinary citizens” are faced with the challenge of joining this third group of government dependents. Case in point: “In the most recent Census,” writes our managing editor Samantha Buker in The Little Book of the Shrinking Dollar (a book we co-authored for the Wiley Little Book Series), “48% of America qualifies as ‘low income.’ There are more Americans living under extreme poverty than have ever been recorded.
“Since 2009, we’ve added another 4 million souls to the category of low income to below the poverty line. That’s 146 million people in America who aren’t consuming much aside from ever-increasing applications for food stamps.”
In November 2008, food stamp applicants topped 30 million for the first time in history. Today, we’re still posting “record highs,” having added over 16 million more names to the food stamp list.
Does this sound like a nation of financially healthy citizens, able to contribute to the national coffers? Au contraire. Sounds like another case in which our Empire will hand out more than it’s taking in.