American civilization has become much more civilized during the last hundred years. In the process, ironically, it has become much more savage toward capitalism and free enterprise.
One hundred years ago, most folks accepted adversity as an unavoidable facet of life. Childbirth was a high-risk endeavor. “Old folks” died at 50. Dysentery claimed more lives than heart attacks. Businesses failed. Governments defaulted. Currencies crumbled.
But not anymore. We are more civilized. Childbirth has become a low-risk endeavor and old folks live long enough to have a heart attack in their 80s.
American civilization has achieved a stunning number of medical breakthroughs during the last century — adding about 28 years to the average lifespan in the process. Unfortunately, American civilization has also devised a stunning number of mechanisms to extend the lifespans of ailing financial institutions and brain-dead corporate entities.
As our civilization has aged, it has become obsessed with erecting economic guardrails, stringing safety nets, straightening curves and legislating Bubble Wrap around almost every conceivable mishap. As a result, the financial system is so thoroughly insulated with regulations and “protections” that it is suffocating.
As a nation, we have become intolerant of any economic adversity…even when that adversity serves an essential economic purpose. We want our summers without any winters. We want our victors without any vanquished. We want our successes without any failures.
That’s not good news for free enterprise. Defaults and bankruptcies are staples of economies that flourish over the long term. “Capitalism is not just about success — that’s the easy part,” observes James Grant, editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer. “It’s also about failure — recognizing it, dealing with it, liquidating it, properly pricing it.”
Schöpferische Zerstörung means “creative destruction” in German. In America, we have forgotten what it means. Thanks to the Federal Reserve and other destructive creations of government, the process of creative destruction rarely takes root in American soil anymore.
“At its most basic,” Wikipedia explains, “‘creative destruction’ describes the way in which capitalist economic development arises out of the destruction of some prior economic order…From the 1950s onward, the term ‘creative destruction,’ sometimes known as ‘Schumpeter’s gale,’ has become more readily identified with the Austrian-American economist Joseph Schumpeter, who adapted and popularized it as a theory of economic innovation in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942).”
The destructive portion of “creative destruction” plays a vital, therapeutic role. But the financial leaders of the US and the eurozone have zero appetite for creative destruction. Instead, creative denial is the order of the day. They pump trillions of dollars of fresh credit into insolvent banks like embalming fluid into a corpse. But the fresh credit rarely revives these financial corpses. It simply enables them to keep hanging around and stinking up the place.
The Federal Reserve should ditch its embalming fluid and buy cement instead. If the Federal Reserve were genuinely serious about reviving long-term economic growth, it would be fitting America’s big insolvent banks with “cement galoshes” and tossing them into the Hudson.
That’s because creative destruction is not just about destruction; it is primarily about creating the investment opportunities that result. When ventures fail, a new generation of capitalists can enter the fray to make the next generation of fortunes.
That’s how the world works…or at least how it should work. The recent history of sovereign defaults and currency devaluations illustrates this phenomenon very clearly.
Within a few years of a default or devaluation, most countries embark on a robust new growth phase. The process is not easy or painless, but it is extremely effective in clearing away the rot so that new ventures can flourish.
The Russian government defaulted in 1998. An investor who allowed the dust to settle a bit but then purchased stocks exactly one year after the default would have doubled his money in just one year. After three years, the gain would have been more than 200%. After five years, more than 400%.
This hypothetical example is not an exception: It’s the rule. An investor who purchased stocks one year after the 1997 Thai baht devaluation, 1997 Indonesian rupiah devaluation or 2002 Argentine peso devaluation would have more than doubled his money during the ensuing 12 months in each instance.
The Brazilian default of 1990 was an exception. An investor would have lost money initially. But within a couple of years, that investment would have paid off handsomely as well.
As the charts show, these five “crisis buys,” on average, would have doubled an investor’s money after two years and tripled it after five years — dramatically outperforming the benchmark international and emerging market indexes over those time frames.
The message is clear: Destruction can be very creative.
Addison Wiggin,for The Daily Reckoning
Addison Wiggin is the executive publisher of Agora Financial, LLC, a fiercely independent economic forecasting and financial research firm. He's the creator and editorial director of Agora Financial's daily 5 Min. Forecast and editorial director of The Daily Reckoning. Wiggin is the founder of Agora Entertainment, executive producer and co-writer of I.O.U.S.A., which was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, the 2009 Critics Choice Award for Best Documentary Feature, and was also shortlisted for a 2009 Academy Award. He is the author of the companion book of the film I.O.U.S.A.and his second edition of The Demise of the Dollar, and Why it's Even Better for Your Investments was just fully revised and updated. Wiggin is a three-time New York Times best-selling author whose work has been recognized by The New York Times Magazine, The Economist, Worth, The New York Times, The Washington Post as well as major network news programs. He also co-authored international bestsellers Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt with Bill Bonner.
So I guess clearing away the rot in the USA would be to let everyone over fifty who is not wealthy die from lack of medical care.
Excellent article. The rule should be “Survival of the Fittest.” as far as the private sector is concerned. However, bailouts make the entire system more uncompetitive, punishes better players (in some ways) and also uses up taxpayers money.
Policymakers would argue that it was necessary in order to prevent the financial system from collapse. However, I have serious doubts on a financial system, which would collapse due to 2-3 banks going bust.
Everything needs a revamp. Including policymakers.
The one percent are the fittest. They will be preserved at all costs…..especially where the tax payers pick up the cost.
Not only that, buteven with these high returns most of those markets are still better to invest in – by valuation basis – than US stocks are today
One of the most heated political battles raging across the western world is debt versus austerity. In the U.S. this debate reached it's apex in 2011 when the U.S. credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poor's. In today's essay, however, Chris Mayer throws the debate out the window, explaining why he thinks a U.S. debt crisis will never happen...
Believe it or not, more capital for a company doesn't necessarily mean better returns for investors. In fact, in a recent study that dug through data from more than 200 acquisitions going back to 2006, they found a "sweet spot" for the most likely acquisition targets. And it's lower than you think. Matthew Milner explains...
The Affordable Care Act dumped 2,000 pages of regulations into the health care sector, stifling any innovation that could have brought about real cost savings. But even with these obstacles, there are still people looking for ways to do things better and at a lower cost. These new technologies could be the key to fixing health care in America...
While many of the newer social media stocks struggle for gains this year, old-school tech stocks have become some of the best trades on the market. With the rare exception (Facebook is doing well—shares are up 26% year-to-date) the social stocks are in the gutter. They got off to a fast start in January and Februray, but ran out of steam in the spring. Aside from a few feeble attempts, few have posted anything close to a noteworthy comeback. Twitter, LinkedIn, and Groupon are all down double-digits year-to-date. Groupon—the worst performer on this short list—is down 47%. On the other had, the biggest of the big tech stocks on the market are helping traders pile up even larger gains right now. Greg Guenthner explains…
In the 1960s, total credit in the U.S. broke the one trillion dollar mark...and since then, it has expanded over 50 times. But now, as Richard Duncan explains, the explosion of credit that's made America prosperous, threatens to take the entire economy down. And that could mean the return of another depression...