10/20/10 Baltimore, Maryland – “It makes logical sense: Whenever you have a shortage of raw materials in the world, it historically has led to war.” So said investment biker and Vancouver veteran Jim Rogers during a recent address to the Mises Institute in Alabama.
A couple of generations ago, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor within months of a US oil embargo. Monday, China embargoed exports of rare earth elements to the United States.
Rare earths, in case you need a refresher, are a class of 17 elements used in everything from mobile phones, to hybrid car batteries, to flat-screen TVs, to guided missile systems, to wind turbines.
If it involves cutting-edge modern technology, chances are it requires rare earths.
So what’s the rub? Right now, China controls 93-97% of the world supply, depending on the source you choose to cite at your next cocktail party.
Still, the Chinese decision to stop exports to the US marks one of the strangest export bans in recent history.
When Russia banned grain exports in August, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin made the announcement himself and outed his fear that Russians would starve. But when China banned the export of rare earths to the United States, a New York Times reporter had to suss it out through “three rare earth industry officials, all of whom insisted on anonymity for fear of business retaliation by Chinese authorities.”
There’s no indication how long the embargo may last, and a fourth industry official says it appears a stray shipment or two is still being allowed to go through.
It puts officials in Washington in an odd position: “We’ve seen the news report,” says a spokeswoman for the Office of the US Trade Representative, “and are seeking more information.”
On this front, they’re bereft of their usual posturing and indignant outrage. As if they just didn’t see this one coming… Hmmmn…
When China cut off rare earth exports to Japan last month, the motive was pretty obvious: Japan captured a Chinese fishing boat in waters claimed by both countries. But what gives with the stealth embargo to the US?
Of course, there’s headline-grabbing tension between policy wonks in Washington and party apparatchiks in Beijing over the value of the renminbi (CNY)… which has, in turn, played host to a series minor trade disputes: The US government has imposed duties on Chinese tires. Chinese officials have imposed duties on US chicken. Yada, yada… Bureaucrats squabbling: what else do they fill their time with?
As we were looking under the hood, we found a motive with a little more oomph behind it.
Last Friday, the Office of the US Trade Representative announced it was launching an investigation into Chinese subsidies of green energy. The United Steelworkers have been raising a ruckus about this so, of course, given the election cycle, there’s more than one beltway resident willing to go to bat for them.
The union claims the Chinese have adopted “policies that protect and unfairly support its domestic producers of wind and solar energy products, advanced batteries and energy-efficient vehicles…as China seeks to become the dominant global supplier of these products.”
What goes into wind turbines? Rare earths. What goes into advanced batteries and energy-efficient vehicles? Rare earths.
Suddenly, it all starts to make sense. Then again, the US investigation may have simply handed Beijing a pretext for doing something it planned all along.
“China does have 97% of rare earths,” Jim Rogers explains, “and China’s booming. So China’s cutting back on the exports of rare earths, which I guess anybody would do if they were booming and they could see there was limited supply.”
“Since 2006,” explains The Economist, “China has behaved in a way that resembles OPEC, the oil-producers’ cartel, cutting exports by 5-10% a year. In July the export quota was cut by 40%. Prices have soared.” And they’ve soared at the very time demand is soaring, too: “Demand is forecast to increase by around two-thirds over the next five years.”
“If you could figure out a viable way to invest in rare earths,” Jim Rogers concludes, “you will probably make a fortune.”
So who are the winners and losers from all this? Reuters is out this morning with a handy list. The losers include the manufacturers who rely on rare earths. In the US, those are primarily makers of catalytic converters, along with the metal-alloying and ceramic-making sectors.
The winners are the miners of rare earths…and they do exist outside China’s closed system. In fact, 65% of world reserves lie outside China. They just haven’t been developed yet. The United States, Canada and Australia all have deposits that tiny mining firms are scrambling to bring into production.
Addison Wiggin
for The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





With the elevated interest in REE and the big push by letter writers, the small, relativly unknown REE miners are experiencing lots of attention. Investers are having difficulty acquiring sound information, but are ready to plunge in. I foresee an ETF offering a conglomerate of miners to spread the risk. Works for me.
“But what gives with the stealth embargo to the US?”
Taiwan?
I got into LYC at 1.48 a week or two ago.
Upto 1.70 now…3 or 4% up-a-day at the moment…
Works for me!
With the uncertainty as to where the USD is headed (or rather, how quickly it will drop), it isn’t really surprising that the Chinese wouldn’t be in any hurry to trade valuable minerals or metals for a pile of increasingly worthless paper. Of what use are all those dollars when US politicians block the sale of, for example, Unocal? The true power of this ‘toilet paper’ has been revealed.
I’ll take your word for the need for these elements in wind turbine generators : some static steel/concrete, moving steel/Al? parts, steel and copper alternator – they must be in some piddling microprocessor controls? As for Cat.s – it struck me as totally extravagant to use platinum, etc in car exhausts (> pollution when not at optimum temp.) when lean burn (UK lead) was most of the way there and more fuel efficient but we had to have the EU option.
ps: I was forgetting the alternator iron rotor core. The steel works i worked at for several years could produce iron pure enough for magnets (from my recollection of the ‘grades file’) but apparently, for example, a rare earth element called Neodymium is added to improve performance. Maybe a realisation of dependence in the West will spur a new era of innovation and productive activity.