The world’s “faith-based” monetary system is breaking down before our eyes. Don’t be caught off guard.
Last week’s euphoria over the Euro bailout turned around sharply this week on news that the political situation in Greece is worsening. That’s been the pattern for months.
The grim reality is that “rescue plans” can’t fix what’s broken. The Western nations are suffocating under mountains of debt…and there are only two known “cures”: default or inflation.
The default option is quick, direct and painful…but very effective. The inflation option is slow, indirect and somewhat less painful…but very ineffective. Inflation is more an anesthetic than a genuine cure, which is the reason why politicians prefer it to an outright default.
So it should be little surprise that the politicians of the euro zone have been signaling very clearly that they intend to “inflate away” the Greek-cum-Italy crisis. They will embark on a European version of Ben Bernanke’s quantitative easing tactic — i.e. print money to buy the bonds of troubled PIIGS governments.
Since the default option in not on the table, the PIIGS crisis won’t be close to resolved until we see the ECB overtly or covertly monetize a lot more PIIGS debt. The math doesn’t work without heavily diluting the wealth of eurozone savers via inflation.
We will see much more debt monetization; this week’s interest rate cut from the ECB was just the start of monetary easing in Europe. On this subject, I dug from my files a piece I wrote for Strategic Investment in March 2007.
Here is an excerpt from this essay, which has become even more relevant today than when it first appeared three and a half years ago:
I think more clearly on a train. The rumbling helps focus my mind… Passengers are very much a part of their landscape, yet detached — a perfect occasion to sit back and think about the world that flies past the window.
Here in America, the world that flies past the window is one in which capitalism has become a wealth-transfer process instead of a wealth-creation process. Without genuine wealth-creation, however, the US dollar’s value will become increasingly suspect.
A few weeks ago, as I was rolling up the tracks from Baltimore to New York, my gaze landed on an oil refinery. A little while later, I spotted a casino. Then I started to think about these two very different forms of capitalism — one that relies on an intensive investment of physical capital and one that relies almost entirely on paper money.
Is one of these forms of capitalism inherently better than the other? Does one of them produce a more enduring prosperity?
Yes, to both questions.
Passing by Sunoco’s Marcus Hook Refinery, you can’t help but admire this feat of engineering. Situated on the Delaware/Pennsylvania border, this 800-acre campus covered in miles of steel pipe has the capacity to crack 175,000 barrels of crude oil into refined products in a single day.
Harrah’s Chester Casino & Racetrack does not produce gasoline. It does not produce anything…except a transfer of wealth. It stands in stark contrast to the refinery. The only similarity between the two is that you wouldn’t want either in your backyard.
Yet in the all-important calculation of gross domestic product (GDP), a dollar pumped into Harrah’s one-armed bandit is treated the same as a dollar Sunoco invests in maintaining its refinery. For those who only look at surface numbers, GDP can be a very misleading gauge of economic health. In itself, it tells you nothing about capital formation.
Will America’s capital formation process continue in a sustainable manner when investment dollars are constantly diverted away from refineries because they are too “capital-intensive?”
The ability to cheaply unleash crude oil’s chemical energy is made possible by intellectual capital that has compounded over the years, thanks to consistent investment in research. This intellectual capital translates into material wealth when it’s combined with physical investment in steel, concrete, and the like. Productivity improves as this process of intellectual and physical investment is repeated and refined over time.
Compare this with intellectual capital stored in the minds of mathematicians writing algorithms for Harrah’s computerized slot machines. Casinos are good businesses because the house always wins. But aside from the entertainment value they provide, they do not add to the capital base of the US economy.
Instead, casinos are a vehicle to transfer wealth from gamblers to Harrah’s shareholders. While this casino’s perpetual profits add to overall corporate earnings numbers, does it really create wealth?
Who contributes more to the wealth creation process in the United States — the maintenance worker at Sunoco’s refinery or the Ph.D. mathematician writing algorithms for Harrah’s?
As I consider this question, our train approaches the Philadelphia stop. The urban decay surrounding the University of Pennsylvania’s ivy-draped buildings comes into focus. Ghosts of factories long dormant stand hollow.
This landscape must represent the picture of progress to proponents of the “information economy.” Most Penn students are trained for roles in finance, medicine, and law, while most residents of surrounding communities face a bleak future in this very same information economy.
Someone in China is able to undercut entry-level manufacturing wages by 90% in order to earn a standard of living that approaches the US poverty level. This leaves non-information workers the option of working in un-exportable service industries.
Not all of us can enjoy the privilege of thinking for a living. But all Americans do have the right to vote, and we have every reason to expect a louder populist voice at the ballot boxes as we head down the bumpy transition to an information economy. As most populist politicians have done in the past, they will make promises that can be paid only through newly printed paper money.
Paper money is popular under democracies. Under the control of a central bank, paper money provides modern economies with the illusion of great flexibility and resilience. Without the rigidity of the gold standard, bad bank loans are easily swept under the rug.
But what are the long-term costs of paper monetary systems? How can an economy develop in a healthy, sustainable manner when wealth’s scale constantly changes?
Contrary to popular opinion, paper money is not wealth. Paper money is a claim on wealth. It only has value to the extent that it can be exchanged for things — a bushel of corn, a gallon of gasoline, a dental cleaning, or an Intel microprocessor.
When the government prints more money, it gives a public fixated on asset prices the illusion that they are growing wealthier, when, in fact, they are growing poorer. As paper money becomes more and more plentiful, the producers of valuable products will eventually demand more units of money in exchange for their product or service.
Investors should expect the current momentum behind populist political movements in the US to grow stronger. This will be bad for the dollar, bad for longer-maturity bonds and bad for the stock market, but good for gold prices.
The global economy now floats on a sea of paper money.
This grand monetary experiment has been in place for only a few decades — a mere tick in the clock of civilization. We know how this show ends, having seen previews in Weimar Germany and several banana republics.
Will the price of gold ultimately increase from its current $620 to $3,000 per ounce? I expect that it will.
Investors who hold gold will be very reluctant to sell it when dollar-holders around the world anticipate the endgame of paper monetary systems. For its holders, gold will serve as a solid bridge on the journey from this monetary system to the next.
Gold is no longer $620 an ounce, like it was when I wrote this essay. But neither is gold $3,000 an ounce, which is where it will likely be if I revisit this essay again in 2014. But however high the gold price may climb from here, one thing is clear: The faith-based monetary system is breaking down. Gold will not break down with it.
Dan Amoss,for The Daily Reckoning
Dan Amoss, CFA, is a student of the Austrian school of economics, a discipline that he uses to identify imbalances in specific sectors of the market. He tracks aggressive accounting and other red flags that the market typically misses. Amoss is a Maryland native, a graduate of Loyola University Maryland, and earned his CFA charter in 2005. In spring 2008, he recommended Lehman Brothers puts, advising readers to hold the position as the stock fell from $45 to $12. Amoss is managing editor of the Strategic Short Report.
A most interesting article. The banks will sweep away the notion of trust and faith in paper money, because they will cease to trust each other. International capitalism will collapse.
In my opinion, its the use of economies (money, ownership, price tags) that causes all the problems. Not one other living creature on the entire planet… uses economies. Why do capitalists? Are economies really needed? Are systems that promote competing… wanted/needed?
Think about competitive systems as racing, for a moment, if you will. There’s the old stale adage… “It takes money to make money”. Now apply it to racing/competing systems such as capitalism/car racing. It takes a big motor… to win races. It takes winning races… to afford big motors. In other words, in capitalism and car racing, the folks who are good at racing… will always win at racing. The folks who are not good at racing, will rarely win. Now what if… the race was to see who could be the most cooperative (opposite of competitive). First off, cooperators HATE racing… and its against everything they stand for. I should know… I’m a proud cooperator… and I abhor racing. A big-dog cooperator is altruist. They/we always look out for the other’s needs/wants FIRST, and always place themselves last. Cooperators want to make sure that everyone crosses the finish line at the same time… and often, before THEY do. That’s fairness/love. Although cooperators never compete, IF they did, it would be a competition to see which could put forth more effort to help others cross the finish line ahead of them. In other words, cooperators might compete to see who could be the most cooperative. Love competing. Altruism (and Christianity/other love-based religions).
So, when the USA and many other parts of the world… have decided that a competing/racing system is the proper way, then guess what. The folks who are best at racing/competing, will consistently be way out front. And since the folks with all these monetary and property winnings… are stern competers… they are unlikey to give away “their” (ownership) earnings to late finishers and to folks who hate/refuse racing… because that’s not the way of a stern competer.
In pyramid systems such as capitalism and even in playground pyramids (both always collapse and hurt those on the bottom)… the strife is to get a leg UP, not a leg down. Competer folks tend not to seek the nobility and pride of being a strong bottom-layer foundation member of a pyramid. They instead tend to seek the “heads in the clouds” monetary powers and luxuries of climbing high. And when many are racing to climb high, the tops of pyramids get top heavy, and put enormous excess strain on the bottom layer foundation people. The weight of the world’s knees is on/in their backs, and they get crushed, and the racing pyramid collapses, just like capitalism’s pyramid is doing. Wise mothers everywhere know that the kids should NEVER be allowed to build pyramids of people… its exploitive upon the strong foundation layers. Yet childhood pyramids are seen all the time, including in cheerleading… and rarely does a parent stand up and say STOP IT RIGHT NOW like we all know should be done.
I’ve been anti-capitalism, and moreover, anti-economy-usage for over 20 years, and I have been saying STOP PYRAMIDING the whole time. The Columbian Freemason pyramid scheme symbol is right there on the back of the USA dollar, and the USA gov is located in a district of COLUMBIA and not even part of the USA proper. Its the USE of economies, that causes racing systems, and its the use of racing systems, that causes sure-to-collapse pyramiding. Its racing systems that are to blame, and economies (and luxuries/empowerments gotten there-from) are the devices which cause racing. The occupiers are grumbling about unfairness… but they don’t know the reasons unfairness happens. I do. I have a better idea, and I know how to implement it. When the USA and world are ready, we can begin the short or long trip to make it happen.
Larry “Wingnut” Wendlandt
MaStars – Mothers Against Stuff That Ain’t Right
(anti-capitalism-ists) (anti-economy usage)
Bessemer MI USA
I’m grateful I am not a cooperator. But I think there is some place that cooperators can get help, isn’t there?
Bill, by chance, did your parents have a “share share share” policy until you were 18, and then reversed the policy? I wonder why the sharing policy was 180′d at age 18? Sharing is for kids only?
When you and a sibling were tug-o-warring over something, your parents took it away from BOTH… until you learned to cooperate. Wise policy, and I propose the taking away of ownership and money… for the same reasons.
No wonder our young adults are confused and rebellious, eh? Thanks for the comment. Feel free to elaborate on your stance. Any Christianity in your world? Is it a cooperator’s thing, or a competer’s thing? Does the church condone 25000 preventable deaths per day from lack of basic survival supplies, while other sit on yachts and eat lobster all day? Show me one that condones that.
It seems to me that cooperation is one of the very ingredients missing in the USA today (other than the 1%ers co-operating to bail each other out with the wealth of the 99%ers.)
There are other countries lacking the “cooperation gene” as I call it. Think the Middle East, think Africa’s myriad of miserable States.
Now think of the cooperative countries. Think Scandinavia, think Australasia.
I know where I would rather be right now. To dismiss cooperation as a critical component of a successful society is to deny that society any hope of success.
I think Bill is a cooperator, he just doesn’t like to admit it.
I have a suspicion that multi-culturalism has something to do with our current problems, but best to leave that alone.
Yes, it’s cooperation until the pinch.
No other living creatures on the planet… use iPhones, either.
Capitalists do not control the monitory system. Government controls the monitory system. It is the irresponsible decisions in government that results in monetary problems.
In any governing system, it is not practical for many people to contribute to every decision resulting in one or a few people in the position of making decisions. Eventually a time will come when the decision maker(s) are corrupt, lazy or ignorant and bad decisions are then made. If decisions are made by majority vote, one must note that Einsteins are in the minority and there is a reason for the terms mob-rule or angry-mob. Because government tends to be a monopoly on the use of force, bad decisions are not easily challenged. It is simply a matter of accumulating ignorant petty decisions on the part of government officials. The only part of the system that does work well is capitalism because it is driven by the need of individuals to create, desire and consume wealth. Wealth can be many things and different things to different people. Wealth can be limited or in infinite supply depending on perspective and reality.
When you've got a room full of 200 oil insiders scratching their heads at current high prices, something's gotta give.
For most investors, it’s weird to think of stocks as their go-to investing option.
The petropoly has bills to pay and setting the price of oil was a simple way to balance their budgets.
Investors don’t seem to care that what's propping up their investments is what will ultimately destroy them: government monetary policy.
For the next decade the energy revolution will be likely confined to the US, displaying the robustness of American entrepreneurship.
Why the Sage of Baltimore’s commentary persists through America’s changing times.
After attending Platt’s oil conference in London I want to relay two important themes you need to know.