12/14/09 London, England – Itâs open season on bankers. But the hunters are shooting blanks!
First, Britain said it would impose a 50% super-tax on their bonuses. Then, Sarkozy said he would do the same thing. Angela Merkel merely said that she found the idea âcharming.â
As for the US, the argument goes on. Goldman has tried to head it off with various gestures. Its top man said the firm wasnât just trying to make money; it was doing âGodâs work.â No kidding. We couldnât make this stuff up.
How Mr. Blankfein knows what God wants him to do, we canât tell you. But it was certainly a bold public relations move to suggest it.
More recently, top executives agreed not to take cash bonuses.
The Financial Times calls it a âwar on greed.â But itâs a bogus war. What is really going on is that both sides are conspiring to share money that doesnât belong to them. The Wall Street Journal, for example, revealed more of the real dealings between AIG and Goldman. AIG had guaranteed billions worth of Goldmanâs dodgy mortgage deals. If AIG went down, Goldman would lose a lot of money. So, when the feds stepped in to âsave western civilization as we know it,â they were really saving Goldman. Western civilization would have been better off if they had all taken their losses and gone to wherever willing investors and lenders sent them. Instead, the feds put up the taxpayersâ money…and the bankers got their bonuses.
The show must go on. And now, the government pretends to punish the bankers, the bankers pretend to suffer.
In the first place, a 50% tax is not that extraordinary. The top marginal rate is nearly 50% in many places already â including the US. Add the local tax to the federal levy and you barely have half left.
In the second place, if the bankers donât take big cash bonuses theyâll take their compensation in some other manner.
According to The Financial Times, rough handling by English tax collectors is causing many bankers to leave the country. But thereâs more to it than just the taxes. Bankers are leaving the UK because the opportunities for them are better elsewhere.
Here we come to one of the worldâs big trends â one that will have profound consequences for the entire world. There may be a depression in the US and Britain…but it hasnât slowed the movement of money and power from the mature, developed economies â notably the aforementioned Britain and America â in the direction of the emerging markets. The emerging markets are growing faster; everybody knows that. According to a Goldman study, nearly half the worldâs economic growth is now occurring in just four countries. And neither the US nor Britain is on the list. Nor is any other developed country. The four are the BRICs…Brazil, Russia, India and China. They were given a big boost by the Fed…which has kept the price of credit in the US artificially low for almost an entire generation. This increased consumer demand in the US for foreign products, indirectly transferring a substantial part of the US GDP to the emerging market exporters.
This year, nearly twice as many IPOs were completed in Hong Kong as in either New York or London. Why? Because there is more new economic activity in Asia than in the mature Anglo-Saxon markets. And because there is more money available in those emerging markets than there is in the West.
This trend could come to an end at any time. But it is unlikely. The industrial revolution favored the West. The next phase of global development seems to favor the new, emerging markets. They donât have the legacy costs and corruptions of mature industrial societies. No giant military establishments. Minimal social security and public health care systems. Smaller welfare, education and health bureaucracies. Fewer lobbyists and entrenched special interests. Fewer retirees. In short, fewer parasites.
Emerging markets are now playing catch up. Sometime in the future, some of them may take the lead â surpassing the US and Europe in military power, national income, growth, even quality of life and income per capita. Then, they too can begin ruining themselves. But that is still far, far in the future. Weâll have many a laugh between now and then…
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and youâll get a free research report, âHow to Survive the Fall of Social Security.â Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Mr. Bonner,
Today’s article was exceptionally well written. Thank you for your wit and insight.
I was forced to pay SS for the last 45 years(maximum amount until they changed the law) . Am I really a parasite when I start drawing benefits? Kinda harsh wouldn’t you say?
If you paid a monthly insurance policy for years and years are you a parasite when you collect?
It is not our fault those in charge threw the money away. It isn’t like were getting this free!
Explain how this is our fault, please
Ken- he’s talking Macro, not Micro.
But you illustrate his point all the same. Nobody, and I mean NOBODY… doesn’t think they deserve what they are getting from the government.
And the trough grows, and grows, and grows…