This week, “Fabulous Fab” Tourre was forced to appear before the US Senate. The senators may not have been able to tell a derivative from a hole in the ground, but they knew what the mob wanted – blood. The poor French lamb was bled on Tuesday.
Meanwhile, an Englishman wrote to the TIMES, suggesting that media was being distracted from the big story:
“Based on recent Budget reports, since 2001 the proportion of GDP spent by [the UK] government has increased from 47 per cent to 55 per cent of GDP. Over the same period total revenues decreased from 48 per cent to 42 per cent of GDP; while total expenditures increased by 70 per cent, total revenues increased by only 25 per cent…
“The rates of growth in expenditures in the three largest items are: social protection and services, 92 per cent; health; 102 per cent; and education, 76 per cent. The main sources of tax revenue increased by much less: the increases in the three largest sources of tax revenues are income tax, 36 per cent; national insurance, 56 per cent; and VAT, 1.6 per cent.”
He’s right. Fabulous Fab is a sideshow. The real story is fab finance. And at some point in the future, the effect of modern financial theory will become clear: it turns little problems into big ones.
Chesterton wrote that a landlady should consider a new boarder’s philosophy, not his bank account. But the financial whizzes cared nothing about philosophy. In every instance, they brushed aside qualitative judgments in favor of quantitative ones, turning trifling, idiosyncratic risks into systemic catastrophes. Naturally, Tourre comes from the math-mad French school system. All they care about is numbers. Because you can crunch them, massage them, and twist them into whatever shape you want.
If you look at the financial industry over the past two or three decades, you see more or less the same trends – economists turned into mathematicians, investors turned into gamblers, and finance professionals turned into conmen.
But behind these trends is a bigger one: little, current risks have turned into much bigger future ones. Mutual funds took away the risk of selecting a single bad company but they increased the risk that the whole stock market might become dangerously overvalued. Likewise, other new investment vehicles removed from the investor the burden of making his own decisions. He didn’t have to study balance sheets or meet company executives. He needn’t worry that his office building would be struck by lightning or that his favorite new technology would be upstaged by even newer technology. The investment industry made it easy for him. He could now act with the insouciance of a mortgage lender; he could buy an ETF or a REIT.
The man on the street found himself in a similar territory. No longer were his financial risks entirely his own. If he fell sick, he could count on the National Health Service in England…and now Obama’s new nationalized health care program in America. And in the largest financial takeover of all time, the government took on the burden of retirement finance too. Now the consumer could spend all his money, rather than save it. Grasshoppers and aunts – both got about the same government pension check. And now, society no longer faces the risk that some retirees will go broke; now it faces the risk that they all will.
The rise of the state corresponds to a decline in individual judgment. The idea was to eliminate the risks of personal failure by socializing them, much in the way an insurance company spreads the risk of fire hazard among hundreds of different homeowners.
Thus did the risk that one or two individual mortgages might go bad get replaced by the risk that the whole housing market would go bad. And instead of a relatively few bad decisions by a few bad bankers, we got a whole rotten mortgage industry. As for the risk that the homeowners might turn into pyromaniacs…the quants chose to ignore it. Then, in 2007, the whole town burned down.
The banks took horrible losses. The state rushed to the scene. It put out the fire at AIG, for example, and thereby kept the sparks off Goldman’s roof. Iceland…Greece…Britain…the US – all poured liquidity onto the small forest brushfires…while debt tinder piled up in their public accounts. The big banks were saved. But now, government’s own credit is at risk. From the householder to the mortgage lender to the big banks to the small governments to the big governments – fab finance pushes the costs of error into the future and onto a bigger and bigger pool of chumps.
Bill Bonnerfor The Daily Reckoning
Since founding Agora Inc. in 1979, Bill Bonner has found success in numerous industries. His unique writing style, philanthropic undertakings and preservationist activities have been recognized by some of America's most respected authorities. With his friend and colleague Addison Wiggin, he co-founded The Daily Reckoning in 1999, and together they co-wrote the New York Times best-selling books Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt. His other works include Mobs, Messiahs and Markets (with Lila Rajiva), Dice Have No Memory, and most recently, Hormegeddon: How Too Much of a Good Thing Leads to Disaster. His most recent project is The Bill Bonner Letter.
bravo, great article
Great article Bill. Thanks
Days like this are why we read Bill Bonner everyday.
And buy gold stocks.
A wonderful blog. A master piece. I echo Pierre’s bravo.
About health care, Mr Bonner seems to think – or is he faking for ideological reasons; he seems to think that everybody,if left on his own, could afford the costs of any disease, even the severest one. So, either Mr Bonner has never seen poor people who are just able to pay the food and some bills, sometimes not all, or his vision is, as I think, pure social darwinism: they are poor? So they are inadapted; so let them dye. I would not be surprised if Mr Bonner was living in a castle in France, fancying himself an old regime aristocrat and trying to escape the agents of the “bolchevist regime” he’s living in. You know: France with its universal health care, it’s math mad school of economics; France, the source of all evil even if, while saying so, many anglo-saxon ultimately find it a better place to live in than UK or USA.
–”they brushed aside qualitative judgments in favor of quantitative ones, turning trifling, idiosyncratic risks into systemic catastrophes.” The belief that numbers are the only or even always the best foundation for making decisions is madness.
–”the government took on the burden of retirement finance too.” You’ve got to be kidding. At best Soc Sec covers only a portion of what’s needed to retire in the way you’ve lived during your working years. Perhaps you are too young to remember when old people went hungry or ate cheap cat food because that was all they could afford.
–”If he fell sick, he could count on the National Health Service.” Oh, yeah. Instead we should let people die in the streets. But wait — then who would be responsible for getting rid of the body? Surely *I* shouldn’t be responsible. Who’s gonna pay for that?
I was wondering in what kind of environment you have to be working when bragging about yourself the way Fabulous Fab did at Goldman Sachs isn’t considered inacceptable (or unprofessional to say the least).
I guess the whole banking and investment sector consists of cretins. Draw your own conclusions from this.
NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – In what is looming as another public relations predicament for Goldman Sachs, the banking giant admitted today that it made “a substantial financial bet against the Gulf of Mexico” one day before the sinking of an oil rig in that body of water.
The new revelations came to light after government investigators turned up new emails from Goldman employee Fabrice “Fabulous Fab” Tourre in which he bragged to a girlfriend that the firm was taking a “big short” position on the Gulf.
“One oil rig goes down and we’re going to be rolling in dough,” Mr. Tourre wrote in one email. “Suck it, fishies and birdies!”
Pingback: human barbie
Pingback: raspberry ketone plus
Pingback: seguros en mexico
Pingback: pure garcinia cambogia extract
Pingback: buy raspberry ketones
Pingback: Wartrol Reviews
Pingback: remove warts
Pingback: the fat loss factor
Pingback: raspberry ketones dr oz
Pingback: amanda bynes fotos recientes
Pingback: reviews green coffee bean extract
Pingback: Conceiving A Girl
Pingback: work at home moms
Pingback: kurs zlota
Pingback: Landscaping Service
Pingback: kasyno bonusy bez depozytu
Pingback: poker bonus bez depozytu
Pingback: citizen cd s500
Pingback: how to make android apps
Pingback: aumentar el miembro masculino
Pingback: green coffee bean extract weight loss
Pingback: Joshua A. Jacobi
Pingback: pret immobilier au meilleur taux
Pingback: Joshua A Jacobi
Pingback: selena gomez breast implants
Pingback: foreks brokery
Pingback: ways to earn extra money
Pingback: teaching in Italy
Pingback: skin tag removal at home
Pingback: book of ra online casino paypal
Pingback: Hay Day Hacks
Pingback: Love Letters For Him
Pingback: mujeres solteras
After the 2008 financial crisis, little could be heard over the deafening cries of "mission accomplished." And while the Fed's massive QE program seemed to work, the question remains: for how long? Addison Wiggin explains why the next round of QE will fail miserably, paving the way for the IMF to step in with something called "special drawing rights." Read on...
Despite what you hear in the mainstream news, the commercial market for small drones could eventually dwarf the military one. In fact, it’s already happening. This is a big market, and it's getting bigger by the day. Today, Wayne Mulligan explains how to get in on the ground floor. Read on...
While a traditional "buy and hold" investment strategy can be a good way to make money in the long run, it's by no means the only way. For those investors who dismiss technical trading as a "witchcraft" and impossible to figure out, Greg Guenthner has just two charts to show you that could completely alter how you feel about trading stock market trends. Read on...
American citizens aren’t the only ones fleeing the country because they don’t like the direction it’s headed. Corporations expatriate for similar reasons. So why are companies desperate enough about corporate tax to leave the U.S., the champion of freedom and enterprise? Clem Chambers explains here...
Milton Friedman is roundly regarded as one of the great economists of the 20th century. But his view of the Bretton Woods system was all wrong. And the current mess of floating exchange rates proves that. Today, Lewis Lehrman explains how the current monetary system pits every country against each other in a financial "race to the bottom"...