It’s been around longer than any official, state sanctioned economy. Call it, if you like, the “original” economy. It is resilient. It is adaptive. And it will continue to exist and thrive regardless of whatever financial crisis slams the rest of the world in the future.
The French even have a word for the kinds of people who operate within it: débrouillards.
The word describes particularly effective and motivated people. To call someone such is to tell them how resourceful and ingenious he or she is. They are part of the “l’économie de la débrouillardise.” Or in the slang phrase used on the street, pirated from the French- speaking Africa and Caribbean… these people are a part of “Systeme D”.
“System D” is the economy of improvisation.
In fact, a number of chefs have appropriated the term to describe the skill and sheer joy necessary to improvise a gourmet meal using only the mismatched ingredients that happen to be at hand in a kitchen.
It’s embodied by a meticulously organized chaos.
You probably know it by another name…
The “informal economy” or… “the black market”.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz points out that this sector of the economy was inhabited by nearly all mom-and-pop businesses in the United States until the spread of credit cards ensured that the majority of purchases were no longer cash transactions and thus had to be reported on the books.
Similarly, Robert Neuwirth had never heard of System D until he started visiting street markets and unlicensed bazaars around the globe. He was eventually enchanted.
In his book, Stealth of Nations, he articulates a startling fact:
“In 2009, the organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a think tank sponsored by governments of thirty of the most powerful capitalist countries and dedicated to promoting free-market institutions, concluded that half the workers of the world — close to 1.8 billion people — were working in System D: off the books, in jobs that were neither registered nor regulated, getting paid in cash, and most often, avoiding income taxes.”
Not only is it largest sector of the economy, it’s also the fastest growing. He continues…
“In many developing countries — particularly in the developing world — System D is growing faster than any other part of the economy, and it is an increasing force in world trade. What’s more, after the financial crisis of 2008/2009, System D was revealed to be an important financial coping mechanism. A 2009 study by Deutsche Bank, the huge German commercial lender, suggested that people in the European countries with the largest portions of their economies that were unlicensed and unregulated — in other words, citizens of countries with the most robust System D — fared better in the economic meltdown of 2008 than folks living in centrally planned and tightly regulated nations. Studies of countries throughout Latin America have shown that desperate people turned to System D to survive the most recent financial crisis.”
Throughout the book, it will amaze you how desperate yet successful his aspiring real-life characters are.
Now I know what you have probably been thinking…
As you can imagine, System D maintains legitimate “employees” of merit and integrity, but these people often cross paths with legitimate criminals.
In the words of Neuwirth, “Finding a dividing line is not easy… it’s very difficult to separate the nice African ladies selling oranges on the street and juggling their babies on their backs from the Indian gangsters who control the fruit trade and who they have to pay rent to”.
The important question is: has it always been this way?
In most ways… yes. But there are differences, and the most important one is globalization.
In particular, the rise of globalization marks the rise in counterfeiting of goods.
China is in fact the counterfeit capital of the world, accounting for 8% of China’s GDP. And I don’t have to tell you who they’re selling their goods to…
In a detailed breakdown of the counterfeit goods industry, the total loss faced by countries around the world is $600 billion, with the United States facing the most economic impact.
While counterfeit money is the most popular product counterfeited, and is most aggressively attacked by governments, the federal crackdown on counterfeit imports has been harsh enough to actually drive an increase in domestic output of fake merchandise from the United States.
But the most nefarious of all these counterfeiting schemes is the fake pharmaceutical industry. The US is an especially attractive market in this area, because 40 percent of worldwide annual prescription drug sales were made in the United States in 2007… and between 2002 to 2010, drug imports to the US more than doubled, with 80 percent of drugs’ active ingredients imported, now accounting for 40 percent of finished medicines.
The new technologies that have enabled globalization act as a double-edged sword. Fortunately, there are countless ways to make money off of solving the world’s problems. And while counterfeiting has become a more sophisticated problem, there are brilliant minds advancing more sophisticated solutions.
The question remains: can we adopt the ingenuity and improvisation of a System D “professional”, and create solutions as quickly as we created problems?
Josh Grasmickfor The Daily Reckoning
Josh Grasmick is managing editor of Tomorrow in Review and associate editor of Technology Profits Confidential and Breakthrough Technology Alert. After graduating from Washington College with a degree in English, the self-described autodidact was interviewed by Time magazine for his novel entrepreneurship and worldwide eco-adventures. His experience with those in the fields of science, medicine and technology puts readers ahead of the curve and on top of the market.
Seriously Josh! “the Indian gangsters who control the fruit trade” Which fruit trade ? Which country ? And how did you end up with this brilliant insight ?
Anmol, he was quoting Neuwirth.
“Legitimate criminals”, like” legitimate rape”? Please explain or get a grip!
Are you suggesting that a black/grey ecnomy actually works? The Italians and many others have had one forever. Governments become unable to meet their obligations when fhey don’t receive enough tax revenue.
I’m from Norway and live in Colombia. Prices here are ca 1/3 of those in Norway, but salaries are less than 1/10. 2/3 of Colombians are poor, and most don’t pay taxes. If salaries were higher the government could get more tax revenue and upgrade the infrastrucfture, which is badly needed. People could then also afford products from the developed world made here or in another low cost countries. That would also help the “poor” developed countries.
With Janet Yellen more or less committed to keeping the money spigot open, you'd think Wall Street would be rejoicing. Yet, stocks are mostly a mixed bag right now. Oh well... No matter what stocks do, it appears the Fed and other central banks' folly will keep the Wall Street casino awash in free money for the foreseeable future. Read on...
Today, Wayne Mulligan counts down the top 5 most profitable investments in history and discusses the one thing they all have in common... and the one "golden rule" that increases your odds of doubling or even tripling your money in the markets. Read on...
When the government pumps trillions of dollars into the economy, it's not actually printing the money. It enters as digital entries in banks across the country. It's made the system fast, responsive, and unfortunately, vulnerable. And ff this network goes down, the entire world could fall apart. Bill Bonner explains...
Debtor's prison is supposed to be illegal in the U.S., but these days it's making a comeback. Today, Alexander Tabarrok explains how a simple failure to pay court fees can start to snowball, eventually ending in jail time. And he begins by focusing a keen eye on the problems going on in Ferguson, Missouri. Read on...
People assume that markets and financial instruments have some kind of long-term average they tend to flock toward. But in reality, a handful of wild swings in various directions often skew these averages to a point where the "long-term" is not at all reliable, let along predictable. Chris Mayer has more...