We also have a way to vastly increase US household income — the feds have only to spend more money! Just add zeros. How about that? The poor family has not a dime more in real, spendable income…but we’ve managed — by clever use of mathematics and economics — to double its income.
But that illustrates the nature of modern economics. It is all numbers…and none of them mean anything. And none means less than the zero.
I’ve always been especially suspicious of the zero. It is a number. But a number is ‘something.’ The zero, on the other hand, is supposed to represent nothing. Well, which is it? Something or nothing? Nothing, right? But how can something be nothing? You say you have zero tomatoes. And you tell me zero is a number, used for counting. But how can you count tomatoes that aren’t there? You’ve either got tomatoes or you don’t. Zero tomatoes is a contradiction. It’s oxymoronic.
And if the zero is actually nothing, how come you can put it after a number…and suddenly you have 10 times as much? Or, put it in front of a number…and you have 1/10 as much. How can nothing do all that?
Now if I have 3 tomatoes and I add zero tomatoes, I have done nothing. I still have three tomatoes. But if I multiply my 3 tomatoes by zero, suddenly, I don’t have any tomatoes. If zero is nothing, I want to know what happened to my tomatoes.
We didn’t have the zero for thousands of years. As far as I know, we got along fine without it.
Numbers are a trap for economists. They make it look like science, but it is not science. Far from it. Initial conditions can never been controlled or fully understood. Instead, they are infinitely complex. Nor can results be reproduced. Nor can hypotheses ever be disproven. That’s why economists can cling to dopey ideas for centuries — they can never be disproven.
Using numbers, economists pretend to tell you something they don’t really tell you, often something they can’t possibly tell you. The unemployment rate, for example.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics uses numbers like make-up. Put on enough of them, and you can make things look good…as long as you don’t look too closely. Behind every number is a wrinkle… Small numbers hide small ones. Big numbers hide big ones. A big number, such as the unemployment rate, has a Grand Canyon of wrinkles hidden behind it. There are the statistical adjustments…seasonal adjustments…and enough arbitrary definitions to make a corpse look good.
BLS says that 7.8% of the workforce is unemployed. Simple enough. But what does it mean? What’s the ‘workforce’? And what does it mean to be ‘unemployed’? Think of all those people who work for cash…like the Latinos you pick up at gas stations for day work. Are they unemployed? How about the guy who couldn’t find a job, so he went back to school? Is he unemployed? What about the housewife who would like to find a job…sort of…but isn’t actively looking for one? Are these people part of the workforce?
It’s obvious that you can change the assumptions a bit and change the reported unemployment rate a lot. When statistician John Williams looks at the US data, for example, he comes up with a real unemployment rate of 23% — almost as high as the jobless rate in Spain.
And yet, the BLS tells us that US unemployment is 7.8%. Not ‘around 8%.’ Not ‘less than one in ten.’ But 7.8% exactly. And yet, there are so many greasy assumptions lurking in the cracks of this number that it is not only completely unreliable and practically meaningless, it is the downside of mathematics. It pretends to tell you something…but once you have taken it in you know less than you did before, because what you think you know is largely a fraud.
The exact number of people who want a job and can’t get one is unknowable. It is unknowable because the people concerned don’t know it themselves. I saw a bum on the street in Baltimore the other day. He stopped me and asked if I could spare a dollar.
I said I couldn’t give him a dollar. “Free money could adversely affect your moral character development,” I explained.
Instead, I offered him a job. I had some work to do around the office; I thought I was doing him a favor. What do you think he said?
It begins with an “F”.
Now, should that man be counted as unemployed? He certainly didn’t have a job. But if you offer a job to most people…what will they say? They’ll reply — maybe. Because it depends on a lot of things that even they don’t have the answers to. How much will they be paid? How many holidays will they have? How far will they have to commute? Will they get health benefits?
And those are just the obvious questions. If you’re considering taking a job you also have to think… ‘What are my other options?’ ‘Could I make more without working?’
‘Maybe I should start my own business instead.’ Or, ‘Let me see if I can get on disability, first…’
That’s why the old economists thought it was absurd to try to calculate an unemployment rate. It was just an empty number. And it was even more absurd to try to ‘increase’ employment. As long as buyers and sellers of labor were both free to make a deal, there would never be any ‘unemployment.’ There would merely be people who, given the current bid, decided to withhold their labor from the market.
The old economists knew their limits…all they could do was describe the conditions under which people had jobs…and come up with some general rules and principles that explained why some people had jobs and others didn’t. But you could not say with any precision how many people were unemployed.
But today, economists tell us not only how many people are looking for work…but what to do so that more of them find jobs. How? The easy slight-of-hand would be to redefine what the workforce means…reduce the workforce and you automatically increase the employment rate. That’s what economists and their numbers can do for you. During the Obama administration a record number of people left the workforce, substantially lowering the unemployment rate.
But now if you want to get your face on the cover of TIME magazine as a hero of some sort, you’ve got to come up with some other, craftier subterfuge. How about this… Raise the taxes on overtime pay! This is exactly what Francois Hollande has done in France. He says it will increase employment. And he’s probably right. Because now it is more expensive to pay someone to work overtime than it is to hire someone new. So, with a little luck, the unemployment numbers may look better in France.
Is that good? Are people better off? Who knows? The numbers certainly don’t tell you.
In America, they’ve kept the jobless numbers down by lending people money to go to school. So, instead of people officially counted as unemployed….people are counted as students. They load them up with debt — student debt is now over $1 trillion. Now, when the young person finally gets out of school, his job prospects may still be uncertain, but his debt is undeniable. Is he better off? Is anyone better off? Has any improvement been wrought?
The numbers are not silent on the matter. They lie at the top of their voices.
Probably no numerical grease is thicker and less transparent than the GDP. There, the numbers dissemble and mislead, just like economists’ other numbers.
Here’s a story from The New York Post:
They take a limousine to McDonald’s, own his-and-her Segway scooters and have designed their new house with 23 bathrooms, each equipped with Jacuzzi tubs.
Time-share magnate David, 77, and his beauty-queen trophy wife, Jackie, 46, were already Orlando’s gaudiest couple when they decided to open their doors to filmmaker Lauren Greenfield as they broke ground on a 90,000-square-foot monster home with a 120-foot Grand Hall modeled after France’s Palace of Versailles.
It’s bigger than a 747-jet hanger. Designs include three swimming pools, 10 kitchens, a bowling alley, a skating rink and a garage that fits 20 cars. The home’s mahogany doors and windows alone cost $4 million.
“We never sought to build the biggest house in America,” Jackie says in the film, titled The Queen of Versailles. “It just happens.”
It has been described as tacky, trashy and tasteless, with the top three floors inspired by Las Vegas’ Paris Hotel.
Trashy? Tasteless? In 2012, the biggest house in America sat unfinished. It may never be finished.
But hey, it added to the GDP!
GDP numbers are a complete scam. They don’t tell you if you’re coming or going. They don’t tell you if you’re getting richer or poorer. This is another way that numbers fail. They can only measure quantity. Or speed. Here’s an example. An article ran in the Wall Street Journal last month. It explained how Italy’s economic growth was retarded by strong family attachments. Half the young children in Italy are raised by their grandparents — their ‘nonni’ — while their parents work. Instead of going to day care centers, the kids go to their grandparents.
How does this affect an economy? There is no exchange of money when the grandparents do the day care. So, it doesn’t register in the GDP. No exchange of money, no ‘growth.’ The article also went on to say that people were reluctant to leave their hometowns to seek work elsewhere because they relied on the family for childcare. Theoretically, a mobile population increases GDP too…GDP increases when people take new jobs, move, buy houses and furniture, sign up for health clubs, day care and so forth. All these things add to GDP growth, even though they do nothing to really increase quality of life. They are a kind of phony growth. GDP looks only at the quantity and velocity of money transactions, not the quality of them…nor the quality of life they produce…nor the real wealth of the people in an economy.
I cut your lawn. You mow my lawn. We pay each other. The GDP goes up. The more transactions per person per year — the greater the GDP of a country.
Is anybody better off? What really have the numbers told us? Has one single extra lawn been mowed? One single extra blade of grass cut down?
No, right? So, if a number…the GDP growth number…tells you that you’re growing…and you’re not really growing…what good is the number? It’s a flimflam. An empty number. There’s no good information in it. It’s like the unemployment number. Empty. Hollow. A zero. And so are almost all the compound, formula-driven numbers used by economists. They are dishonest. Their only role is to tart up economists’ confections and make it appear that they can do things they can’t really do. They are designed to make economics look like engineers, working on the economy as though they were real technicians preparing a moon launch.
But if these guys were building a bridge, none of us would want to drive over it. If they were building cars, we wouldn’t buy them. And if they were running the phone company, and we needed a telephone number, we could call “Directory Information;” they’d estimate it for us.
Bill Bonner,for The Daily Reckoning
Since founding Agora Inc. in 1979, Bill Bonner has found success and garnered camaraderie in numerous communities and industries. A man of many talents, his entrepreneurial savvy, unique writings, philanthropic undertakings, and preservationist activities have all been recognized and awarded by some of America's most respected authorities. Along with Addison Wiggin, his friend and colleague, Bill has written two New York Times best-selling books, Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt. Both works have been critically acclaimed internationally. With political journalist Lila Rajiva, he wrote his third New York Times best-selling book, Mobs, Messiahs and Markets, which offers concrete advice on how to avoid the public spectacle of modern finance. Since 1999, Bill has been a daily contributor and the driving force behind The Daily Reckoning. Dice Have No Memory: Big Bets & Bad Economics from Paris to the Pampas, the newest book from Bill Bonner, is the definitive compendium of Bill's daily reckonings from more than a decade: 1999-2010.
I think their liar’s number is 3. Trivial good news is puffed up times 3 and bad news gets
2/3′s chopped off. I just reverse the process: make believe unemployment of
7.8% X 3= 23.4. Works like a charm; except when it doesn’t. Hey Bill it’s great
to see you back here wtiting.
“If zero is nothing I want know what happened to my tomatoes.”
Goldman Sachs has them.
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Mark Twain
Pingback: Linkfest:Oct 12, 2012 | Alpha Ideas
“Free money could adversely affect your moral character development.”
I always believed 0 was an actual number, but I suck at math. Also thought black and white were colors, but they are just the absence and presence of light.
Bravo! Keep this in mind whenever they talk about govt. spending “as percentage of gdp”. That’s the second derivative of flim flam!
three week wait to read this article…..not impressed.
Imagine a carpenter trying to build a house with an elastic ruler – I shudder at the thought of what might result; using this analogy, you now have an idea why today’s economists can’t agree on anything: their unit of measurement, the dollar, changes many times every single day and over time goes up and down in very large increments. Every economist should be asked to explain exactly how a variable, like the dollar, represents data in nearly every computation they perform.
Real Fractals have no zeros, nor negative numbers… The asset-debt macroeconomic system’s relationship between asset valuations, asset overproduction and accumulation, and system saturation by accumulative bad debt undergoing inevitable default appears to have time based extremely patterned behavior .. macroeconomics appears to a very elegant science …
great article bill. I’ve been saying some of this stuff in bits and pieces the last 30 years, but you put it all together and said it much better. Thanks. Do you think the decline in the labor participation rate is illustrated here too?
A MESS OF POTTAGE
Bill, you seem to be a man with a head for the big picture; what do you think of this?
A couple of hundred years ago we of the first world managed to get the lean, hard American Indians to sell their souls for a mess of pottage. The pottage in that case was beads, booze and guns.
And then about a hundred and fifty years ago Satan managed to pull the same trick on us. He managed to get the lean, hard empire builders to sell their souls for a mess of pottage, which in this case was a massive increase in physical comforts. We sold ourselves into debt slavery to purchase the boundless cornucopia of luxuries produced by the free-market system, which in turn was fired up by the expansion of credit.
Now the calling in of the debts is causing such discomfort that a really big war is looking ever more likely. And just who’s agenda will that suit?
Socrates spoke of the ‘feverish city’ in the Republic. That’s how I think of the GDP now, a measurement of the feverish city’s temperature.
see it again.
10 is a symbol for quantum of TEN ( Symbol too ) entities.
Quality and Quantity.
Quantity convert to Quality. ( Marx… )
Pingback: home business ideas
Pingback: divinity degree online
Pingback: small business ideas for women
Pingback: Read more
Pingback: free online credit report
Pingback: wives swapping
Pingback: local swingers
Pingback: christian relationship seminars dfw
Pingback: windows and doors
Pingback: tranny cams
Pingback: dich vu marketing online
Pingback: heart attack lawsuit
Pingback: pu er tea
Pingback: make your own beats
Pingback: msn messenger
Pingback: music promotion
Pingback: pu erh tea shop
Pingback: kitchen tile installation atlanta
Pingback: paxil lawsuit information
Pingback: how to lose weight fast
Pingback: How to treat herpes on lips
Pingback: Cheap Backlinks
Pingback: buy contextual links
Pingback: reliable computers
Pingback: book of ra
Pingback: do you agree
Pingback: social media
Pingback: movie trailer
Pingback: Dien dan seo
Pingback: are aliens real
Pingback: nha hang tiec cuoi
Pingback: medimops gutschein 10 euro
Pingback: s. oliver gutschein mai
Pingback: vertbaudet gutschein juni 2013
Pingback: gutscheincodes asos
Pingback: teeth whitening
Pingback: gutscheincode sanicare versandkostenfrei
Pingback: Rao nhanh
Pingback: Garmin nüvi 2797LMT 7-Inch
Pingback: gutscheincode teufel neukunde
Pingback: gutscheincodes von congstar
Pingback: zalando lounge gutschein 10 euro
Pingback: gutscheincodes meinpaket
Pingback: versandkostenfrei gutschein conrad
Pingback: gutscheincode cewe neukunde
Pingback: gutscheincodes von zooplus
Pingback: plus gutschein juni 2013
Pingback: gutschein neukunden spartoo
Pingback: koffer direkt gutschein mai
Pingback: vintage clothing auctions pennsylvania
Pingback: frontlineshop gutschein aktuell
Pingback: mirapodo gutscheine
Pingback: Coleen Frucheyï¿½
Pingback: promod gutschein 2013
Pingback: versandkostenfrei gutschein douglas
Pingback: Eusebio Jarrellsï¿½
Pingback: home24 gutscheinnummer
Pingback: remote pc software
Pingback: Piedad Piombino
Pingback: mister spex gutscheine
Pingback: gutscheine baur
Pingback: ernstings family gutschein juni 2013
Pingback: gutscheine weltbild
Pingback: rebuy gutschein aktuell
Pingback: gutscheincode lands end versandkosten
Pingback: best computer desktop
Pingback: aktuelle yoox neukunden gutscheine
Pingback: ??.?'?? ????????
Pingback: gutscheincode tommy hilfiger versandkosten
Pingback: dentist Cuyahoga Falls oh
Pingback: orthodontist in gilbert az
Pingback: USEFUL SITE
Pingback: garcinia cambogia extract
Pingback: gutters clearwater fl
Pingback: online-pr hannover
Pingback: MN Estate Planning
Pingback: Estate Planning
Pingback: especialista en columna
Pingback: garcinia cambogia
Pingback: Marketing Plastic Surger
Pingback: obat kuat
Pingback: Orthodontist Chandler AZ
Pingback: medical marketing
Pingback: Learn more
Pingback: weight loss supplements
Pingback: wczasy wladyslawowo
Pingback: read this
Pingback: Garcinia Cambogia Extracts
Pingback: guitar courses for beginning players
Pingback: grosir baju murah
Pingback: Home Based Business Ideas
Pingback: free intro maker
Pingback: Google Sniper
Pingback: Saffron Extract Select
Pingback: Pro Image for Business - Graphics
Pingback: best dermatologist NYC
Pingback: Guadalupe Sisonï¿½
Pingback: asus f3sa 7
Pingback: Dog Tags
Pingback: buy zynga poker chips
Pingback: Antonio Softich
Pingback: Gene Kinsler
Pingback: Clarence Carolan
Pingback: web hosting india
Pingback: rape prevention
Pingback: Military Dog Tags
Pingback: dell inspiron 1320 7 64bit
Pingback: Barb Bruchman
Pingback: Business Investment
Pingback: Buy Google Circles
Pingback: IT Paper
Pingback: locksmiths london
Pingback: Home Page
Pingback: kids shoes
Pingback: Homeowners Insurance Florida
Pingback: e cigarette
Pingback: czy aspartam jest szkodliwy
Pingback: acne scars treatment
Pingback: three credit reports
Pingback: click here
Pingback: best lida
Pingback: pro lida
Pingback: lidal? lida
Pingback: electronic cigarette starter kit
Pingback: cheapest car insurance
Pingback: sorunsuz lida
Pingback: Buy Google Plus Followers
Pingback: Facebook Fans
Pingback: VMware Promo Code
Pingback: Video Creation
Pingback: la consultation de voyance gratuite
Pingback: Buy Google Plus Circles
Pingback: more info about Rotterdam
Pingback: ganar dinero en internet
Pingback: belajar hipnotis
Pingback: computer repair
Pingback: Best Yellow Diamond Rings
Pingback: buy led light bulbs
Pingback: Google SEO
Pingback: model railway figures
Pingback: how to make your hair grow faster
Pingback: model train people
Pingback: The Top Guitar Company
Pingback: custom guitar
Pingback: hosting coupon codes
When you've got a room full of 200 oil insiders scratching their heads at current high prices, something's gotta give.
For most investors, it’s weird to think of stocks as their go-to investing option.
The petropoly has bills to pay and setting the price of oil was a simple way to balance their budgets.
Investors don’t seem to care that what's propping up their investments is what will ultimately destroy them: government monetary policy.
For the next decade the energy revolution will be likely confined to the US, displaying the robustness of American entrepreneurship.
Why the Sage of Baltimore’s commentary persists through America’s changing times.
After attending Platt’s oil conference in London I want to relay two important themes you need to know.