Gold in the 1970s
We start in 1970 when the gold price was massively undervalued. The golden shackles had come off in the US domestically 37 years earlier when relentless paper money printing had commenced, albeit at first at a somewhat moderate pace.
However, in blatant disregard for economic reality, the official gold price was kept at $35 an ounce, which by 1970 had become a joke. Remember that the US state banned its own citizens from investing in physical gold (the currency that the country’s own constitution had decreed!), and that restrictions on private ownership of gold or on exporting and importing gold remained in place in many countries.
Still, many foreigners could exchange dollars for gold, not least the central banks, and they did, which began to put further upward pressure on the gold price. In the 1960s, Western governments formed the gold pool – first secretly, then openly – to manipulate the gold market and to keep a lid on gold.
(Yes, dear reader, the governments of the ‘free’ and ‘capitalist’ West banned their citizens from holding the world’s oldest monetary asset and were for years engaged in outright large-scale market manipulation to make their fiat monies look good. Be under no illusions what these ‘democratic’ governments will be prepared to do when the present system is on its last leg!)
By 1970 the US was hemorrhaging gold and by 1971 Nixon had to close the gold window (well, he could have stopped printing paper dollars but that no longer seemed an option).
Richard Nixon Photo White HouseStarted drug war, closed gold window
Between 1974 and 1978, gold traded consistently within a 20 percent band on either side of PPP [Purchasing Power Protection as explained in yesterday's issue. --ed.]. In 1974 and 1975, gold traded for the first time above its PPP price and probably for the following reasons: From January 1975 onwards, US citizens were again allowed to hold gold privately. 1974 was also the first year since the late 1940s that the US registered official annual inflation rates of double-digit figures. Gold was in demand because ever-higher inflation seemed inevitable. Gold began to trade at a premium.
This was the time of the ‘oil shock’, which is often described as the nasty colluding of oil-producing countries to artificially boost the price of their produce but which can also be described as a pooling of interests of the oil exporters to make sure they were not selling their precious oil for constantly depreciating paper dollars. James Turk of the Gold Money Foundation has an interesting chart that shows that when measured in gold the oil price has hardly moved since the 1950s.
1980: First paper dollar crisis
Be that as it may, gold moved up relentlessly and in the late 70s did so at an even faster pace than the dollar’s purchasing power was plummeting, which was already pretty fast to begin with. In 1980, US inflation reached a peak of 13% p.a. The gold price reached a then all-time high of over $800 and an average price for the year of $613, which was 2.7 times its PPP-price ($222).
Gold was trading at a substantial spread over its inflation-protection price because the public feared that inflation could spin out of control any minute. Having a pure paper dollar with no anchor in any commodity suddenly appeared to be a bad idea. The fiat money concept seemed to be failing. The market began to contemplate imminent paper money meltdown and monetary regime change.
As John Butler has pointed out, at 1980 gold prices the 260-million-ounce gold hoard of the US government (at least that is the number that I have in my head) would have covered the entire US monetary base (between $133 and $144 billion in 1980 – those were the days!) The gold price thus reflected the prospect of an imminent return to a gold standard.
Indeed, Ronald Reagan campaigned on a promise to investigate a return to gold and upon being elected president he set up a gold commission to do so. The 17-member commission decided almost unanimously against a return to hard money and voted to keep the paper dollar. I say ‘almost unanimously’ as two members objected to this verdict. They were Lewis E. Lehrman and ….Rep. Ron Paul from Texas!
But it was Jimmy-Carter-nominated Fed Chairman Paul Volcker who gave the paper dollar another lease on life. Volcker stopped the printing press. He allowed short rates to shoot up and liquidate the misallocations of capital from the inflationary boom. The US went through a biting recession – then the worst since the 1930s – but inflation was crushed. So were inflation expectations. And thus the gold price. Paper money collapse had for once been averted.
The premium over PPP declined from 2.7 times PPP to around 1.5 times PPP by 1983. Throughout the 1980s, gold continued to trade substantially above its inflation-protection price although by 1990 the premium had disappeared completely. From 1990 to 1996 gold still traded exceptionally close to PPP but then the gold price went down in the late 1990s and for the first time since the early 1970s gold traded at a considerable discount to its PPP. How can we explain this?
The gold underperformance from 1996 to 2000
Gold market analysts such as Ferdinand Lips point toward various technical factors, such as massive gold sales by certain central banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of England in the late 1990s, and the growth of the gold-lease market, which gave mining companies cheap tools to sell gold production forward using again the substantial gold hoards of the central banks.
I find it difficult to independently evaluate the impact of these factors but am willing to believe they played a role. I also believe that the overall macro-environment between 1996 and 2000 was very unusual. With hindsight we may say that, structurally, politically and cyclically, not everything was as squeaky-clean as it might have appeared at the time. But still, if there was ever a period over the past 43 years during which all major problems of the paper money economy seemed to be under control or even solved for good, this was it…
These were the ‘good Greenspan years’. Real short-term interest rates were positive, bank reserves grew slowly, the yield curve was flat and the dollar fairly strong. There was a new belief in entrepreneurship and innovation, particularly in information technology. NASDAQ boomed. Productivity gains seemed high and there seemed to be no limit to growth.
The business cycle was declared dead; the New Economy had arrived. In any case, growth was not manufactured by the government through deficit spending and money printing. The US was top dog, politically, economically and ideologically.
President Clinton had been elected on the promise to introduce state health care but once in office had to bow to the zeitgeist and advocate free trade instead (NAFTA), and even cut taxes. In 1994, the Gingrich Republicans shut down the government for some time, loudly contemplated closing various government departments for good, and started blocking much of Clinton’s spending proposals.
In 2000, the US had a budget surplus for the first time since it had severed its last link to gold in 1971. In 2001, the gold price reached a low of $272 an ounce and thus traded 43% below its PPP price, its largest ‘undervaluation’ since 1972.
Then the wheels came off the US economy and economic policy-making became outright bizarre.
2001 to today: crisis, deficits and cheap money
The NASDAQ boom turned out to be a bubble and it ended like all bubbles eventually do. The record bankruptcies of Enron and WorldCom in 2002 exposed recklessness and even fraud at the top of America’s New Economy. The 9/11 attacks in 2001 put America on a war footing.
The Gingrich-Republicans were replaced with the neoconservatives, and instead of closing government departments many new departments and agencies were created, most infamously the Department for Homeland Security. As the ‘War on Terror’ had from the start no clearly defined enemy and no clearly defined objective it promised to be an instance of ‘never-ending peace through never-ending war’. The budget deficit exploded.
Short-term economic growth was now engineered through easy monetary policy. Greenspan kept rates at 1 percent for 3 years and blew a massive housing bubble, and when that popped in 2007, a much worse financial correction than in 2001/2002 commenced. Lehman and AIG collapsed and a run on the entire system seemed imminent. The new policy tools included TARP, nationalization, massive stimulus packages, zero interest rates and repeated rounds of debt monetization (“quantitative easing”).
Through Greenspan’s 1-percent policy phase the gold price had already begun to recover and by 2006 gold was again trading at a premium to its inflation-protection price, for the first time since 1990. Since the financial crisis commenced in 2007, gold moved up relentlessly, the market-price-to-PPP ratio moving from 1.25 to 2.64 last year. At its present price of (around) $1,600 per ounce gold is trading at 2.6 times its PPP price, a ratio that is close to where it was in 1980.
So is gold in a bubble?
I do not think so.
That it is trading at an inflation premium similar to 1980 should not surprise us. Just as in 1980 there is again a clear and present danger that the authorities are losing control over their fiat money. There is a risk of monetary regime change, just as there was in 1980. Just because the authorities managed to pull this thing back from the brink thirty years ago does not mean they will succeed this time.
In 1980, the key point of concern was high headline inflation. This is not the reason for concern at present. Back then the official inflation rate was almost 14 percent. By contrast, last year’s CPI-inflation in the US was slightly more than 3 percent. The concern stems from two other areas in my view: the massively inflated monetary base and the out-of-control budget deficit. The former is a clear indication of how sick the financial system is.
Since 2007 the Fed injected $1,800 billion in new reserve money into the financial system, or more than twice the amount of reserves that existed in 2007 when subprime fell out of bed, and more than ten times the amount of reserves that existed in 1980. This money is not circulating through the economy, hence inflation is still fairly low.
But this money is needed by somebody. It is evidently required to keep the banks in business or at least to prevent them from shrinking and from selling assets that nobody wants to buy at present prices. In short, all this money is needed to sustain a mirage of solvency of the financial system and an illusion of ‘recovery’.
At the same time, there is no self-sustaining recovery that would allow the Fed to reduce its balance sheet. Quite to the contrary, the recent weak employment report will ignite new calls for another round of debt monetization (‘quantitative easing’). The Fed is boxed in. Without their massive support the chimera of recovery and of solvency would quickly disappear.
At the same time, the hyperinflated monetary base is a gigantic powder keg. When this money starts dripping into economy, inflation will go up and then what? Will the Fed be able to hike rates and stop the printing press to restore faith in paper money, just as they managed to do in 1980?
The key difference between 1980 and 2012 is this: In 1980 inflation was high but the Fed had room to maneuver. All that was needed was the political will to stop the printing press, to allow rates to go up and to allow a painful but cleansing recession. I am not saying that it was easy but it only took will. Paul Volcker had that will and resolve, and Reagan managed to sell it to the public.
Today, inflation is still fairly contained and without the Fed’s ultra-generous reserve policy there would even be deflation. But the Fed has no room to maneuver. The Fed has to stay super-easy to support an incredibly overstretched and bloated financial system, a system that is addicted to cheap credit much more than anything in 1980. If this easy policy leads to rising inflation or even rising inflation expectations, the Fed will be in a heap of trouble. If they hike rates they pull the rug from under a system that is on constant life support.
Also, the disappointing ‘recovery’ is bound to increase the pressure on the Fed to become even more accommodative and that increases the risk that things will ultimately slip out of their hands.
Then there is the gigantic budget deficit. In 1980 the US budget deficit was $73.8 billion in 1980 dollars, or $206 billion in 2012 dollars. In 2012 the deficit is likely to be $1,330 billion. In 1980 public debt was 33% of GDP, in 2012 it is 100% of GDP. Already the Fed is the largest buyer and the single largest owner of the government’s debt. Last year, 61% of new Treasurys were placed with the central bank.
Strangely, US Treasurys still seem to enjoy safe haven status in the private capital markets. Should this change and should investors begin to demand a higher running yield on these bonds, then the Fed would have to step in and buy even more in order to avoid a rise in the state’s funding cost and to mitigate the hugely deflationary impact on the inflated financial infrastructure that higher yields would have.
Everywhere we look things seem unsustainable and fragile, and everything seems to point in the direction of more accommodation rather than ‘exit strategy’. The printing press has become the last line of defense for a hopelessly over-leveraged financial system and an out-of-control government. And the gold market knows it.
But our analysis can also explain why gold has traded sideways for the past 12 months. The monetary base is roughly unchanged from where it was last spring as the Fed has refrained from additional net asset purchases and has ‘only’ manipulated the yield curve via “Operation Twist”. The unchanged base seems to have caused the gold market to pause. The fiscal situation is still very bad. But nobody expects any change here until after the election anyway.
In summary, gold is not cheap,but its high price does not seem unreasonable given the current policy predicament.
If the Fed refrains from further easing measures and if there are no shocks to the system, the gold price could drift lower as the market decreases the premium over the PPP price. However, I would be very surprised if the ratio would fall below 1.5. That would mean a gold price of about $950. This would also constitute a retracement of 50% from last-year’s all-time high, a fairly brutal correction but one that also occurred in previous bull markets.
On the other hand, any additional measures from the Fed to ‘stimulate’ the economy, or any ‘accidents’ in the financial system, and the premium could even expand further. Additionally, any rise in inflation from still fairly low levels should also feed through into a higher gold price, even if the premium over PPP was unchanged.
Personally, I can still not envision an endgame here that does not involve either high inflation or a substantial correction (meaning collapse) of large parts of the financial infrastructure. In either case I want to hold gold, the superior monetary asset that is no-one’s liability, that is outside the banking system and outside of political control. Gold remains my favourite asset because it is a self-defense asset rather than a quick way to make a (paper money) buck.
Pingback: Is Gold In A Bubble, Part II « Financial Survival Network
I have read from reasonably credible sources that the cost of gold production on a worldwide average is some $600 per ounce, and that the capital investment repayment cost is another $600 per ounce. If these numbers are correct, it would seem that gold would have a floor of some $1,200 per ounce.
Pingback: Is Gold In A Bubble, Part II « Silver For The People – The Blog
Thanks for this excellent article. The methodology of tracking the gold/PPP ratio seems to be a good one, more fundamentally sound than attempting to track gold supply/demand data, central bank purchases, etc. One interpretation of the current high ratio is that we will see high inflation, but the gold price may not move as much, causing the ratio to eventually revert to the historical average (e.g., a lot of inflation is already “baked in the cake” of the gold price). I also like your philosophy of using gold for self-defense as opposed to making a quick paper buck.
What applies to gold, that it is a pure indicator of supply and demand, i.e., one of the last bastions of pure practical capitalism, and one of the few markets that cannot really be successfully manipulated, APPLIES VASTLY MORE to platinum! Less than 1/10 as much platinum is produced per year as compared to gold, the cost of production of platinum is over $1500 per ounce, the RETAIL price is at that level and about 10% lower than that of gold, which only happens about every 30 years, AND PLATINUM has vastly more industrial uses than gold and is in extremely short above ground supply, given its great rarity plus the severe production problems in South Africa and Russia. PLUS being used extensively in jewelry, so it therefore competes with gold on that front. Therefore, platinum is now a LOWER risk, BETTER-priced, MORE useful alternative to gold, much less subject than gold is currently to even temporary price manipulation, given its huge need in industry and very, very short above ground supply.
Nice response in return of this difficulty with real arguments and explaining the
whole thing regarding that.
451325 496708As soon as I found this internet site I went on reddit to share some of the love with them. 751001
643376 583801I undoubtedly didn
262788 462014You are the top, It is posts like this that maintain me coming back and checking this internet site regularly, thanks for the information! 122532
Pingback: mark mania
Pingback: cat videos
Pingback: My Blog Title
Pingback: Arron Kroener
Pingback: п»їAnyrtew Hisvong
Pingback: handyortung kostenlos
Pingback: Desmond Hatch
Pingback: otc ed pills walmart
Pingback: universal remote
Pingback: Drew Sandora
Pingback: Lester Menck
Pingback: Margert Triblett
Pingback: Malik Castillejo
Pingback: online backup companies
Pingback: cras crashes compilation
Pingback: quarterback camp for youth
Pingback: Houston wedding videographer
Pingback: deezer gratuit
Pingback: youtube network
Pingback: how to get abs fast
Pingback: kindle cases
Pingback: garcinia cambogia extract
Pingback: barbour outlet
Pingback: cannabis seed bank
Pingback: Payday Loans
Pingback: GranuFlo lawyer
Pingback: protein powder
Pingback: fireplace vent gas
Pingback: must have ipad accessories
Pingback: micro loop hair extensions
Pingback: free website promoter
Pingback: ham radio3k
Pingback: Burbank affordable seo specialist
Pingback: best free sites to submit url
Pingback: which web host
Pingback: karen millen
Pingback: high pagerank backlinks
Pingback: negri electronics
Pingback: Dating Tester
Pingback: lon rosen magic johnson
Pingback: roosevelt university chicago college of performing arts
Pingback: social bookmarking sites
Pingback: kliknij tutaj
Pingback: car title loans open on sunday
Pingback: FF14 RMT
Pingback: kosze upominkowe
Pingback: damska torebka
Pingback: FIFA 14 RMT
Pingback: PSO2 RMT
Pingback: FF14 ã‚®ãƒ«
Pingback: WOT Power Leveling
Pingback: Neverwinter Astraldiamant(Neverwinter Astral Diamonds)
Pingback: tlumacz przysiegly wloskiego grudziadz
Pingback: ä¿¡é•·ã®é‡Žæœ› è²«
Pingback: mieszalniki do kontenerow
Pingback: altech krakow
Pingback: How to make wine
Pingback: android answers
Pingback: how to get viral traffic
Pingback: active dutygear
Pingback: ä¿¡é•·ã®é‡Žæœ› RMT
Pingback: TESO Power Leveling
Pingback: æˆ¦å›½ixa RMT
Pingback: breaking bad pc
Pingback: sell your car
Pingback: extreme trucking
Pingback: diablo 3 power leveling
Pingback: ã‚¢ãƒˆãƒ©ãƒ³ãƒ†ã‚£ã‚« RMT
Pingback: Wo finde ich Doppelkopfkopfregeln
Pingback: Neverwinter Astral Diamonds
Pingback: Dragon Nest Power Leveling
Pingback: ã‚¨ãƒãƒ¼ãƒ—ãƒ©ãƒãƒƒãƒˆ RMT
Pingback: PSO2 ãƒ¡ã‚»ã‚¿
Pingback: EverQuest Next Platinum
Pingback: çœŸãƒ»ä¸‰åœ‹ç„¡åŒ RMT
Pingback: buffalo web design
Pingback: lakeville jurong
Pingback: wall stickers
Pingback: ArcheAge RMT
Pingback: AION ã‚®ãƒ¼ãƒŠ
Pingback: ãƒ‰ãƒ©ã‚´ãƒ³ã‚¯ã‚¨ã‚¹ãƒˆX ã‚´ãƒ¼ãƒ«ãƒ‰
Pingback: NEW Free Xbox Live Codes
Pingback: FFXIV è‚²æˆä»£è¡Œ
Pingback: Unlock iPhone
Pingback: Diablo 3 è‚²æˆä»£è¡Œ
Pingback: comment pirater un compte facebook
Pingback: FIFA 14 coins XBOX 360
Pingback: FF11 ã‚®ãƒ«
Pingback: ãƒ¬ã‚¸ã‚§ãƒ³ãƒ‰ ã‚ªãƒ– ã‚½ã‚¦ãƒ«ã‚º RMT
Pingback: woodworking projects
Pingback: AION RMT
Pingback: vb6 tutorials free forum
Pingback: ESO Power Leveling
Pingback: path of exile Items
Pingback: Neverwinter Power Leveling
Pingback: runescape 3 gold
Pingback: rs3 gold
Pingback: free sesso
Pingback: david sills qb scouting report
Pingback: World Map
Pingback: ãƒ©ã‚¹ãƒ†ã‚£ãƒãƒ¼ãƒ„ RMT
Pingback: FF14 è‚²æˆä»£è¡Œ
Pingback: Jessica Alba images
Pingback: Solicitation of a Minor Virginia Loudoun
Pingback: cheap desktop utilities
Pingback: nanny cameras w
Pingback: FF11 RMT
Pingback: Baby Products
Pingback: Wholesale Jerseys
Pingback: Кекс с какао
Pingback: building backlinks for free
Pingback: sudski tumaci
Pingback: free icons
Pingback: download movies
Pingback: ãƒ¬ãƒƒãƒ‰ã‚¹ãƒˆãƒ¼ãƒ³ RMT
Pingback: top criminal lawyers wv
Pingback: FIFA RMT
Pingback: recette crepe
Pingback: how to make beats
Pingback: makeup for acne
Pingback: Dish Vs Directv
Pingback: queuing software
Pingback: everquest next platinum
Pingback: get more followers on twitter
Pingback: Love Letters For Her
Pingback: Ballistic Labs
Pingback: bathroom ideas
When investing in a private company, there are two kinds of investors: early-stage and later-stage. And while early-stage investors have more upside potential, they're also exposed to far more risk. Today, Matthew Milner explains how you can be a successful later-stage investor, and still make great gains, with much less risk. Read on...
In his recently released book, A Viennese Waltz Down Wall Street, Mark Skousen gives the Austrian School's take on what triggered the 2008 financial crisis - and why you should be wary of the artificial boom that's driving the recovery.
The Heartbleed bug is a massive security flaw that could put you and your personal information at risk. And while there are things you can do to limit the damage, you haven't yet seen the ramifications of this security disaster. The Internet in the post-Heartbleed world won't look like anything you've seen before. Mike Leahy explains...
As the U.S. "shale gale" nears its 10th birthday, it appears the America energy renaissance has outlived its critics. Still, it's natural to wonder whether all the big gains are behind us. Today, Matt Insley reveals the newest shale hotspot, and explains why there's still plenty of opportunity left in the U.S. energy boom. Read on...
The U.S., Russia, the EU and Ukraine all met in Geneva, where all sides agreed to halt all violence and provocations in Ukraine. But the news media are still taking an antagonistic stance toward Vladimir Putin and Russia. What gives? Today, Marc Faber explains the hypocrisy behind U.S. foreign policy... and the BS the news media are pushing about it...