[Ed. Note: This article originally appeared at “The Big Picture”]
For many years, I’ve been a fan of Warren Buffett’s long term approach to value investing. Understanding the value of a company, regardless of its momentary stock price, is a great long term investing strategy.
But it pains me whenever I read commentary from Buffett that glosses over reality or is somehow self-serving. His OpEd in the NYT – Pretty Good for Government Work – paints an artificially rosy picture of the Bailout, ignores the negatives, and omits his own financial interest in government actions.
What might he have written if Sir Warren was dosed with some sodium pentothal before he sat down to pen that “Thank you” letter? It might have gone something like this:
DEAR Uncle Sam Sucker,
I was about to send you a thank you note for bailing out the economy…but then some nice men dressed in Ninja outfits came in and shot me full of truth serum. That led me to make one more set of edits to my letter thanking you for saving the economy.
It also helped me recall some things I seemed to have forgotten in my other public pronunciations about the bailouts.
I suddenly recalled who it was who allowed the banks to run wild in the first place: You. Your behavior before, during and after the crisis was the epitome of a corrupt and irresponsible government. You rewarded incompetency, created moral hazard, punished the prudent, and engaged in the single biggest transfer of wealth from the citizenry of the United States to the Wall Street insiders who created the mess in the first place.
Before I get to the bailouts, I have to remind you that in:
These actions and rule changes were requested by the banking industry. Rather than behave as adult supervision, you indulged the reckless kiddies, looking the other way as they acted out. You were the grand enabler of the finance sector’s misbehavior. Hence, you helped create the mess by allowing the banking sector to run roughshod over decades of successful constraints. (Kudos again on that).
There were voices warning about the upcoming crisis, but you managed to turn a deaf ear to them: Warnings about subprime lending, problems with securitization, against the false claim that residential real estate never went down in value, or that the models forecasting VAR were wildly understating risk. An economy driven by growth dependent upon credit-fueled consumption was unsustainable, and yet you encouraged that reckless credit consumption. The compensation schemes for Wall Street were hilariously short term (ignored by you); the crony capitalism of Boards of Directors that undercut market discipline was similarly ignored. You encouraged the hollowing out of the US economy, allowing it to become increasingly “Financialized” at the expense of industry and manufacturing. What was once a small but important part of the economy became dominant, yet unproductive, with your blessing.
Bottom line: You were at a loss for understanding the many factors that led to the crisis in the first place.
When the crisis struck, you did not seem to understand the role you should play. Instead of stepping up to halt the financialization, to unwind it, you gave away the shop. You failed to extract concessions from firms on the verge of bankruptcy. Your negotiating skills were embarrassing. In the face of meltdown, you panicked.
You could have undone the decades of radical deregulation at that moment. You could have fired the incompetent management, wiped out the shareholders who invested in insolvent companies, given the creditors and bond holders a major haircut for their foolish lending. Instead, you rewarded them for their gross incompetence.
The solutions you ran with were ad hoc, poorly thought out, improvised. You crossed legal boundaries, putting the Fed in the position of violating its charter and exceeding its mandates. You created a Moral Hazard, the impact of which may not be felt until decades in the future.
Very few of your senior elected and appointed officials understood what was going on.
Rather than offer an intelligent response to the crisis, you delivered brute force: Trillions of dollars were thrown at the problem, papering over its symptoms but not its underlying causes.
Well, Uncle Sam, you delivered a motherload of cash. Considering the dollar sums involved, your actions were remarkably ineffective. What was left over afterwards was a wildly over-leveraged consumer whose credit limits had been reached; State and municipal budgets were heavily dependent upon that excess consumer spending, creating huge budget holes because of it. Net net: The resultant economy was in the worst recession since the Great Depression.
As a student of the Great Depression, Ben Bernanke should have had the best grasp – but his bailout of Bear Stearns revealed him to be just another banker, intent on saving the banks – banking system be damned. To give you a clue of exactly how lost Hank Paulson was, he spent his time praying, and creating documents that exempted himself personally for liability. He’s from Goldman, so we know that “team first” ain’t exactly his style. Tim Geithner, who did such a stupendous job overseeing the banks in the first place, was in way over his head. And while I never voted for George W. Bush, I give him great credit for hiding under the bed and pretty much staying out of everyone else’s way. I would call him clueless, but that wouldn’t be fair to the legions of clueless around the world.
Sheila Bair grasped the gravity of the situation earliest, and put numerous failed banks through the insolvency process. If we were smart, we would have allowed her to work her way through the entire finance sector, effecting a GM-like prepackaged bankruptcy for Citigroup, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AIG, etc. It would have been painful as hell, but we would be much better off had we allowed her to tear the Band-Aid off quickly. Instead, we are suffering through a death of a 1000 cuts, Japanese style.
I would be remiss if I failed to mention my personal positions in this: I made a killing in Goldman Sachs and GE. My investments in Wells Fargo would have been a disaster if not for you. Don’t even get me started with me being the largest shareholder in Moody’s – that was some joyride. And considering all of the counter-parties that Berkshire Hathaway has, we risked being just another insolvent investment firm along with everyone else had nothing been done.
So I must say thanks to you, Uncle Sam, and your aides. In this extraordinary emergency, you came through for me – and my world looks far different than if you had not.
Your grateful but wide-eyed nephew,
Barry Ritholtzfor The Daily Reckoning
Barry Ritholtz is author of Bailout Nation (Wiley), publisher and editor of The Big Picture , and CEO and director of equity research at FusionIQ , a quantitative research firm that provides web-based software services to individual investors and traders. Ritholtz makes frequent TV & Radio appearances, including Bloomberg, CNBC, CNN, Fox and PBS. He is regularly quoted in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Barron's, Forbes, TheStreet.com, and other media. At the moment, he has his eye on a 28-foot Doral Venezio and a 1968 230 SL.
Correction: Uncle Sam should be changed to either Uncle Scam or Uncle Sham.
Crony capitalist = Warren Buffet
Seem’s you’ve been fooled too. When did Buffet ever not put his own personal interests (and of Berkshire’s) first?
Brilliant summation of the same impression I had after reading Buffet’s comments. For whatever reason, Buffet has been allowed to become some sort of American folk hero here in the United States. At one time that adulation was based on Buffet’s demonstrated degree of humility, the fact that such a rich man remained living in such a humble house etc. But alas his ego became involved in the game. Like some junkie baseball player on steriods, he lost the ability to accept life on life’s terms, instead insisting the rest of us should pony up trillions to keep his winning streak alive. Buffet deserves to have Berkshire nationalized. And given the certain turbulence the nation is headed for, it may happen sooner than even Warren realizes, so soon it happens within his lifetime so he gets to see it happen.
The govt bank bailout saved Buffetts ass. He has a 20% weighting in WFC , plus other banks and insurance.
He should be thanking US for saving his reputation.
Uncle Sam put our heads under the water with their regulations then realized they had to rescue us from their own stupidity.
Pingback: Joshua A. Jacobi
Pingback: jazda konna
Pingback: walking dead game walkthrough
Pingback: kfz versicherungsvergleich
Pingback: online jobs
Pingback: Facebook Like Button
Pingback: Samsung Galaxy S3
Pingback: empower network blog
Pingback: ageless male reviews
Pingback: hot alexis dziena
Pingback: try ageless male
Pingback: lyric music video
Pingback: read more
Pingback: internal medicine jobs in Los Angeles
Pingback: tag away skin tag remover reviews
Pingback: pure raspberry ketone
Pingback: liposuccion costo
Pingback: seguros merida
Pingback: green coffee beans
Pingback: garcinia cambogia extract reviews
Pingback: planters wart removal
Pingback: treatment for warts
Pingback: raspberry ketones reviews
Pingback: miranda kerr 2013
Pingback: real work from home jobs
Pingback: casino mit anmeldebonus ohne einzahlung
Pingback: kliknij teraz
Pingback: real hcg drops
Pingback: book of ra forum
Pingback: hcg diet dangers
Pingback: selena gomez plastic surgery
Pingback: libro el metodo gabriel
Pingback: paintless dent repair
Pingback: Conceive A Girl
Pingback: book of ra ag spiele
Pingback: casino gratis geld ohne einzahlung
Pingback: binary brokers
Pingback: ketogenic diet gout
Pingback: How To Conceive A Baby
Pingback: Singapore Pools Secret Tips
Pingback: meg ryan cosmetic surgery
Pingback: electric cigarettes sample
Pingback: Dewayne Corvin
Pingback: the glades keppel land
Pingback: get rid scars
Pingback: click here
The dollar in your pocket is worth a whole lot less today than 100 years ago. And you have the Federal Reserve to thank for you. So, as the Fed approaches its 100th birthday, Gregory Bresiger reflects on the controversial institution, relaying the criticisms of several of the Fed's most vocal opponents. Read on...
There's been a lot of press lately about the 3-D printing revolution - much of it right here on The Daily Reckoning. But there is one technology that's already threatening to make 3-D printing yesterday's news. Josh Grasmick examines a new kind of printing... that takes place in the 4th dimension. Read on...
Rejoice! What was perhaps the freest market in the entire world is now ended. Crushed. Wiped out by the swift hand of the state. Wait... That's NOT a good thing? (Sigh)... Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. Dominic Frisby explains why the shutdown of the Silk Road is such a travesty. Read on...
There is one chart, just one chart, that market analysts and gold bugs alike could learn a lot from. It displays clearly the ebb and flow of one critically important trend, where it's headed through the end of the year, and how you can use it to your advantage. Greg Guenthner explains...
China's push towards a more market-based economy could kick into high-gear, as recently proposed economic reforms are some of the country's most radical policy changes in over three decades. But what will that mean for foreign investors and how could it shape the global economy? Frank Holmes takes a closer look...
John Mauldin spoke with Steve Forbes on the future of gold and the Federal Reserve in an interview released yesterday. What he said may surprise you.