The Economist magazine, in a column wryly titled “Pangloss Revisited”, notes that “The average deficit over the next decade in now expect to be 5.1% of GDP, compared with an average of 4% in the original budget”, and that even in the last year of the forecast, 2019, the budget deficit is supposed to be 5% of GDP! Wow!
As weird as that is, it gets weirder later in the article when Peter Orzag of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), whom the article called “Mr. Obama’s top budget man”, has “tried to put a positive spin on the situation. By 2019, he argued on his blog, America’s primary deficit (the difference between revenue and spending excluding interest payments) would be only 0.6% of GDP.”
Excluding interest payments? Hahaha! Why in the hell would you exclude interest payments? Hahaha! You shake your head in amazement that this is the kind of Silly, Stupid Crap (SSC) that is everywhere these days! “Excluding interest payments”! Hahahaha!
Immediately I realized that, again, I was too hasty, and this brilliant little stratagem could solve my problems at work! My main problem is that money comes hard these days, customers don’t buy as much these days, and they don’t want to spend what little money they have with (and I quote) “a disagreeable moron” like me these days, which makes me fear for my job and the bankruptcy of the company these days.
However, with this new ploy in hand, now we’ll see who the moron is when I cleverly arrange for the company to borrow money with an interest-only/ balloon-payment-at-the-end loan, that comes due after I retire, so that it looks in the meantime like money is coming in but no money is going out because I “exclude interest payments”! It’s like free money! Hahaha!
I know there is an obvious flaw in the plan, and it gets even weirder when you learn that this same Mr. Orzag and this same OMB, for some bizarre reason that I assume only makes sense if you are mentally ill or taking drugs, or both, presupposes that “the average interest rate on government debt in 2019 is the same as the rate of economic growth.” What? Hahaha!
Of course, The Economist gets it wrong when the say, “Federal debt will read 77% of GDP in 2019, up from 41% in 2008”, in that they are only counting the federal debt held by the public, and conveniently ignoring that whole freaking giant glob of debt held by the Social Security Trust Fund and dozens and dozens of other places where public money has been “invested” by buying government bonds and thus giving the cash to Congress to spend, a fact that is so obvious that it makes me laugh in Utter, Utter Contempt (UUC) at such a rookie mistake, which makes you wonder what kind of boneheads they are hiring at The Economist magazine since the actual debt is almost $12 trillion and the GDP is $14 trillion, making the debt-to-GDP ratio 86% already!
But before I get too hard on The Economist magazine, I will note that they are exactly right when they say that the reappointment of Ben Bernanke as chairman of the Federal Reserve “ignores the fact that Mr. Bernanke was complicit in creating the loose monetary conditions which fuelled the financial frenzy in the first place. As a governor of the Fed earlier this decade, he was even more convinced than Alan Greenspan that central banks had no business raising interest rates to head off asset bubbles.”
The good news in the article is that polls show that Americans are waking up the fact that the Federal Reserve is a disastrous failure and it has ruined the dollar and America, which I interpret from the news that “Americans think less of the Fed than of the Internal Revenue Service.”
And since the smart play is to buy gold, silver and oil when the government is behaving so badly, the best news was not in the article at all, but for us greedy money-grubbers who want to make a lot of money without working and think that gold, silver and oil is the way to do that because that is what seems to be the lesson of the last 4,500 years, it is wonderful news that the majority of investors are not yet buying gold, silver and oil, which makes sense because it is mathematically impossible for the majority of investors in anything to make a profit, and only a minority betting against the crowd can, by mathematical imperative, make a profit!
You cannot see the Utter Mogambo Sincerity (UMS) in my eyes, and so you will just have to take my word for it that this is only one – one! – of the many, many reasons why I say, when buying gold, silver and oil, “Whee! This investing stuff is easy!”
Richard Daughty (Mogambo Guru) is general partner and COO for Smith Consultant Group, serving the financial and medical communities, and the writer/publisher of the Mogambo Guru economic newsletter, an avocational exercise to better heap disrespect on those who desperately deserve it. The Mogambo Guru is quoted frequently in Barron's, The Daily Reckoning , and other fine publications. For podcasts featuring the Mogambo, click here.
Pingback: makia julpo
Pingback: Click for Info
Pingback: jalia parsnip
Pingback: buy followers
Pingback: I was reading this
Pingback: mark mania
Pingback: handy orten
Pingback: universal remote
Pingback: click to watch
Pingback: Lorraine Cristiano
Pingback: My Blog Title
Pingback: Josef Wicinsky
Pingback: Another Blog Title
Pingback: Fredrick Miyagi
Pingback: Aubrey Raatz
Pingback: Las Vegas Escorts
Pingback: Koygemandsoft.xpg.com.br Р§С‚Рѕ РѕР·РЅР°С‡Р°РµС‚ С„Р°РјРёР»РёСЏ РЇР±СЂРёРє . Р‘РµРѕРіСЂР°С„РёС‡РµСЃРєРѕРµ Р·РЅР°С‡РµРЅРёРµ С„Р°РјРёР»РёРё Рё
Pingback: Elinore Bohling
Pingback: Patria Knatt
Pingback: Ginny Vanvoorhees
Pingback: Gabriel Bow
Pingback: Stewart Garlington
Pingback: Shellie Mceldowney
Pingback: best online data backup
Pingback: Mitch Tarduno
Pingback: Lynda Auldridge
Pingback: San Antonio wedding videographer
Pingback: charlottesville va homes
Pingback: deezer gratuit
Pingback: youtube partnership
Pingback: garcinia cambogia side effects
Pingback: garcinia cambogia extract
Pingback: pillow that holds ipad
Pingback: youtube partner
Pingback: garcinia cambogia
Pingback: Payday Loans
Pingback: karen millen dresses
Pingback: cowgirl supplies
Pingback: Los Angeles SEO services
Pingback: social bookmarking
Pingback: human hair extensions
Pingback: best colleges for musical theater
Pingback: Arcadia local seo packages
Pingback: belstaff jackets long way down
Pingback: El Segundo organic seo services
Pingback: accessories ipad 2
Pingback: Dating Tester
Pingback: moncler jacket
Pingback: school of performing arts in new york
Pingback: pirater compte facebook
Pingback: this contact form
Pingback: best tactical edc flashlight
Pingback: Unlock iPhone
Pingback: david sills red lion stats
Pingback: binary trading
Pingback: recette pate a crepe
Pingback: Revitol Buttock Cream
Pingback: Ð¾Ð½Ð»Ð°Ð¹Ð½ ÐºÐ°Ð·Ð¸Ð½Ð¾
Pingback: ÐºÐ°Ð·Ð¸Ð½Ð¾ Ð¾Ð½Ð»Ð°Ð¹Ð½
Government life support…liquidity injection… or a giant Band-Aid…whatever you want to call it, quantitative easing is the keeping the global economic ship afloat – but for how much longer? Richard Duncan explores…
Ben Bernanke introduced the world to the concept of "quantitative easing" back in 2002. It was an "unorthodox plan" to save the economy from the horrors of deflation. But the monstrous economy it has actually created is in some ways far worse. And as Richard Duncan explains, it's not going to end any time soon. Read on..
While the technical details of Bitcoin may intimidate the novice, they shouldn’t keep him from getting in on a digital currency revolution that -- while taking different forms -- isn’t going away. How do you get the simplest, easiest-to-act-on tips about how to invest, safeguard and grow your digital wealth? Dominic Frisby has more…
The duality is stark. In one hand, we have an energy renaissance underway, in the other, a virus is threatening to wreak havoc on the markets and, potentially, your life. Nothing we’re currently doing to fight the Ebola virus will work in 2014, say the researchers. Nothing we’re currently doing will beat it in 2015, either. We need a new game-plan. Read on…
Lose your shirt in 3D printing stocks this year? Don’t kick yourself. You’re not alone. (Okay, kick yourself a little if it’ll make you feel better.) You need to make sure you don’t lose your 3D-printed shirt in the next tech craze. Because there will be a next time. Look, it’s really not your fault if you got taken for a ride on 3D stocks. Greg Guenthner has more...