Patrick Cox

One of the most naive idioms of all time is that the world will beat a path to your door if you build a better mousetrap. In fact, you’re more likely to be charged with endangering some previously unknown subspecies of rodentia.

Readers of my investment letter, Breakthrough Technology Alert, know that historically, the media, the public and the financial community have resisted big changes. Great ideas have a way of succeeding, but they do it without the help of “the world.” Inventors and scientists routinely spend more time and effort defending their ideas than they spent making their discoveries.

A good example comes from this year’s Nobel Prize for chemistry. The recipient, a scientist at Israel’s Technion Institute in Haifa, used electron microscope technology to discover an entirely new molecular structure now known as quasicrystals. In 1982, while on sabbatical at Johns Hopkins, Dan Shechtman discovered metallic quasicrystals. For nearly three decades, however, he was mocked for saying so. The very notion of metallic, five-sided, nonrepeating crystal structures was ridiculed.

Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling mounted what has been described as a personal “crusade” against Shechtman. “There is no such thing as quasicrystals,” Pauling claimed, “only quasi-scientists.” The scientific team Shechtman was working with gave him the boot for “bringing shame” to his colleagues.

Today, however, scientists all over the world are exploring the potential of nonstick, rust-free, heat-resistant quasicrystals.

Other breakthroughs are even more difficult to recognize. They may involve an unproven superior marketing, distribution or presentation technology. Sometimes, breakthroughs happen when something new is applied to an older and seemingly dated technology. We’ve written here, for example, about new materials that have radically improved flywheels. These energy conservation devices are currently used in high-end race cars and have the potential to save energy and add automobile performance in a more cost-effective manner than batteries.

This is just one example of a new technology revolutionizing an old design and industry. Consider a somewhat less obvious example, Amazon.com.

Healthy retail mail-order businesses existed long before the founding of the Seattle-based company in 1994. Over a hundred years ago, Sears, Roebuck and Co. built a successful business based upon rapidly improving mail delivery service and printing technology. Sears, Roebuck catalogs were common in urban as well as remote rural homes. Customers all over America bought mail-order tools, piano rolls, coca wine and even tape worms for weight loss.

In the ’90s, I was consulting at Netscape, where the truly interactive and open Internet came into existence, along with the encryption technologies that enable secure e-commerce today. In retrospect, Amazon.com’s success seems almost inevitable given the emergence of those tools, but that’s not how people saw it at the time. Enormous skepticism about the practicality of the new technology existed. Mockery was far more evident than belief that the world would change radically due to network technologies.

If the potential and benefits of the Internet and e-commerce had been obvious at the time, we could assume that Sears and other existing mail-order businesses would have taken advantage of the opportunities. With plenty of capital and established supply and distribution networks, it would have been far easier for Sears to build a Web version of their catalog.

The “smart money,” however, considered the Internet a fad with limited practical application. “Trust us,” the experts said, “the real action will always be in the catalog business model.”

Amazon astutely exploited both the shortsightedness of established businesses as well as the emerging electronic communications technology, eclipsing catalog marketers by pushing retail where it had never gone before. Creativity and vision proved more important than the advantages held by pre-existing mail-order businesses. Today, Amazon is the world’s largest online retailer and the premier online shopping destination. Recently, they have even begun to compete with television networks and movie rental businesses via online streaming.

Amazon.com, however, ranks well behind the world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart. The success of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is worth discussing here for a number of reasons. One is that Wal-Mart’s stock has increased in value more than 160,000% since its public offering in 1970. It is widely reported that $1,000 of that IPO equity would be worth more than $1.5 million now. Another reason is that it is not obvious that Wal-Mart is even a breakthrough transformational company.

From the outside, Wal-Mart appears just like any other big-box brick-and-mortar retailer. It is not. Inside the wrapper is the founding vision of the Eagle Scout and entrepreneur from Kingfisher, Okla., Samuel Moore Walton. Very early, he realized the power of emerging information technologies. Rather than wasting time telling others about this potential, he implemented it himself.

Walton leveraged emerging IT to boost the efficiency of his logistical supply chain. Other retail companies wasted resources by warehousing goods and then delivering them to stores as need was perceived. Walton did something entirely new. He bought goods only when they were needed imminently and had them shipped exactly where they were needed. He could do this because he had computerized his entire enterprise.

Goods on shelves are not simply idle. They cost money. They tie up capital and shelf space, consuming and wasting resources. Walton realized that he could sell goods for less not just by negotiating better wholesale prices. With new inventory and data mining tools, Walton was able to determine precise location-based needs. He could determine even where within the store a product sells best.

He lowered his real price of the acquisition of goods by reducing storage, financing and transportation costs via IT. Because of those better prices, he sold more. The sales volume he generated then allowed him to negotiate better wholesale costs. Because of superior in-store computerized communications, he could spread information throughout his corporation and deal with problems in record time.

In each of the examples cited above, pioneers of industry were ridiculed and mocked for their ideas…ideas that would become revolutionary breakthroughs in their respective fields. As investors, we can learn a lot from their successes.

Change, after all, is nurtured at the fringe. Embrace it.

Regards,

Patrick Cox,
for The Daily Reckoning

Patrick Cox

Patrick Cox has lived deep inside the world of transformative technologies for over 25 years. This expertise lead him to Mauldin Economics, where he now heads Transformational Technology Alert.

Recent Articles

Maestro
6 Major Flaws in the Fed’s Economic Model

James Rickards

Use what analogy you will: a car, a clock, a chemistry experiment... the point remains that the Fed believes it can control the economy. Indeed the Fed will stop at nothing to realize the goals of its dual mandate" to maximize job growth and maintain price stability. But, as Jim Rickards expalins, that conceit always ends in disaster. Read on...


The Best Way to Play the Surge in Equity Crowdfunding

Matthew Milner

When it comes to life-changing tech investments, venture capital has been at the forefront of the investment landscape. But now, there’s a new kid on the block that’s threatening the “old way” of doing things: Equity Crowdfunding. What happens when these two fields meet? Matthew Milner explains...


How You’re Attracting Unwanted Government Attention

Mike Leahy

The NSA will tell you their surveillance programs protect you and the country from terrorists who seek to do you harm. But when you get past their talking points and prepackaged press statements, you'll find their search for enemies covers more people than you'd imagine. Mike Leahy explains...


The Surging Market Sector You’re Probably Ignoring

Greg Guenthner

If the back-and-forth action in the markets has you banging your head against the wall these days, maybe you're concentrating on the wrong stocks. While the market churns near its highs and investors continue to fret over the makings of a possible correction, Asian stocks listed on U.S. exchanges are catching fire. Greg Guenthner explains...


Bill Bonner
Why the Government Views You As Collateral Damage

Bill Bonner

The economist Milton Friedman didn't go far enough when he said, "Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it." In fact, as Bill Bonner explains, those same good intentions are often used as pavement on a road that leads to a rather ominous and fiery destination. Read on...