01/05/11 Buenos Aires, Argentina – The supply of paper currencies is infinite; the supply of gold is finite. This striking contrast provides an excellent reason to exchange the former for the latter.
The gold supply is limited…very limited. According to one estimate, all the above-ground gold in the world totals between 120,000 and 140,000 metric tons. Let’s split the difference and call it 130,000 metric tons (about 4.2 billion troy ounces). If you brought it all together and made it into a gigantic cube, it would measure about 19 meters along each side – about three meters short of the length of a tennis court.
Furthermore, about 20% to 25% of all the gold is stored in the world’s central banks as country reserves. So the total amount of gold in private hands is enough for just 14 grams for each living person – that’s less than half the quantity of a standard one-ounce coin like a US Gold Eagle or a South African Krugerrand.
At present, only about 2.25% of the world’s total wealth – or 4.5% of world’s financial wealth – is allocated to gold, including jewelry. But resurgent inflation could raise that percentage dramatically, while raising the gold price dramatically in the process.
To gain perspective, let’s examine a brief history of the gold price relative to US inflation. The gold price peaked in January 1980 at $850/oz. But this peak was very brief. Gold jumped 29% alone in the run towards $660. Probably a better reference point for the market top is the average price during 1980 as a whole. This was $615/oz. Since then, the gold price has increased only 125%.
Over the same timespan, however, the government’s most widely quoted inflation gauge, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), has increased 185%. Therefore, if the gold price had increased as much as the CPI, it would be selling for $1,753/oz today, not $1,390/oz. But the official inflation figures might not be the real story. Using alternative inflation figures calculated by ShadowStats.com, consumer prices have soared an astounding 789% since 1980, which means that the inflation-adjusted gold price would be $5,467/oz.

Interestingly, if we look at the market bottoms for gold – 1970 and 2001 – instead of the market tops, the ShadowStats data seem to provide a much more accurate inflation gauge than the CPI. For example, in January 1970 – before gold’s 10-year bull run – the price of gold was just $35/oz. Thirty-one years later – after soaring to more than $800 an ounce in 1980 – the big bear market in gold bottomed out at $256/oz. And the average price for 2001 was $271/oz.
Therefore, during this 31-year period – through gold’s full bull and bear market cycle – the gold price advanced 674%. Over the same timeframe, the ShadowStats inflation measure advanced a nearly identical 688%. By contrast, the CPI increased only 370% during this period. In other words, the cumulative CPI readings from 1970 to 2001 failed to account for all the inflation indicated by the rising gold price. The ShadowStats figures, on the other hand, were pretty much bang on target.
I’m staying conservative, and there’s nothing to suggest that just because using the ShadowStats inflation worked for the bear market lows it will work for the bull market highs. But if the ShadowStats figures above are a guide, then maybe they point to a price north of $5,000/oz for gold – or even $7,000 for a short time.
I’ve just thrown a lot of numbers at you. But the point is this: gold looks like it has plenty of upside. But let’s be really clear about one thing. I’m not making a hard prediction or setting a price target here. These figures just provide reference points. We also need to watch out for gold “going mainstream” – when references make their way into TV programs, when taxi drivers start talking to you about gold and when your mother calls to ask how to buy an ounce of the stuff.
I can easily see gold getting into the $2,000/oz to $3,000/oz range in the next few years – maybe higher. And there’s a very real possibility that we’ll have a short-term spike – a genuine investment bubble – that takes us into the $5,000/oz to $8,000/oz.
None of this is certain. And it most likely won’t happen smoothly. There could even be big corrections along the way – like between December 1974 and August 1976 when gold fell 47% before powering ahead again. But I hope I’ve shown you that there are good reasons to think that gold still has plenty of room on the upside.
Conclusion: If you own plenty of gold already, then hang on for the ride. If not, buy more on the dips.
Regards,
Rob Marstrand
for The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Let’s do a little maths. Barely, 4.2 billion oz times $1400/oz = 5880 billions.
Productive QE2 alone will blow out an encouraging 600 billions, which will efffectively partially overshadow 5880. We are rather confident that more and even more productive QE3..QE4..QE5 in the brewery; till QE series completely overshadow hard gold asset, i.e a total eclipse of the asset. Now, gold may only be circling in the earth orbit, by then, it could well in the track of moon trajectory.
Let’s do a simple projection. QE3 production be 800b, QE4 be 1000b, QE5 be 1200b on a rock-bottom step-up staircase
with an incremental bonus of 200b on each occassion. A very conservative extrapolation for gold movement would be QE3=$2000, QE4=$2500, QE5=$3000.
Taking into consideration of gigantic fundamental changes brought about by the wide-open door policy of the eastern economies, where all natural or unnatural
resources are gorged up in dead silent broad daylight, it is in stark contrast to the days of the 1970s or 1980 – the spectacular rise and fall of commodities.
I don’t see even a false reason why MG keeps mumbling “whee..whee..whee…this investment stuff is so..so..so easy.
MG’s “whee!!whee!! sound” carries significant signal of importance.