“You’re kidding, right?” a Daily Reckoning reader wrote after our briefing from last week: “The End of Social Security As We Know It.” “Are you the only ones who believe in the accounting farces that are the Social Security and Medicare ‘Trust Funds’? Every dollar in both of those funds has been spent by the US Treasury…”
We weren’t kidding, dear reader… There’s only so much reckonin’ we can do in one day. Last week we chronicled a turning point for retirement in America: On September 30, the Social Security Trust Fund will officially begin paying out more than it’s taking in. Now, you – and many others who wrote in – provide an inadvertent introduction to our final question in this Social Security Series: What, exactly, is in that fund?
The quick answer is this, as we noted Saturday. “With $2.6 trillion left in the Social Security war chest, there is no immediate threat to the status quo.”
The Social Security Trust Fund is, in fact, worth roughly $2.6 trillion. The status quo is safe at the moment. But as you hinted, there isn’t a single US dollar in that fund…and anyone who thinks the money they’ve been sending the government to pay for retirement is neatly stacked in a giant vault – some super-sized swimming pool of money – has the wrong idea.
Indeed, your government-sponsored retirement fund has all been spent already. Didn’t you get your receipt?
The World’s Biggest Bond Investor – You
You, loyal taxpayer – not the Chinese – are the biggest US Treasury Bond investor in the world. The entire balance of the Social Security Fund, all $2.6 trillion of it, has been borrowed by the US government. Upon receipt of your payroll taxes (those are the ones that fund Social Security) the Treasury instantly converts them to special issue Treasury bonds. In simpler terms, money is taken out of the Social Security “vault” and replaced with an IOU.
That’s not necessarily bad. Many sovereign states purchase debt from other nations, government owned companies or private institutions, and for good reason. If that money is not needed right away, the interest on the bond will help guard the fund against inflation. Those bonds might even make some extra money.
But such an investment doesn’t work when a debt-burdened government borrows money from itself. While the American Social Security scheme is not quite as simple as taking money out of one pocket and putting it in another, it’s darn close.
“Since 1983, the money from all payroll taxpayers has been building up the Social Security surplus, swelling the trust fund,” the LA Times’ Michael Hiltzik neatly explained in August. “What’s happened to the money? It’s been borrowed by the federal government and spent on federal programs – housing, stimulus, war and a big income tax cut for the richest Americans, enacted under President George W. Bush in 2001.”
The government is not using your payroll taxes to build retirement nest eggs or to insure the elderly and disabled. Rather, the SSTF is used to sustain government itself. Not a dollar is set aside for you…just debt. Given the current state of US affairs – $13 trillion in public debt, weak economic growth and a $1.3 trillion budget deficit for 2010 – this is not the kind of sovereign debt most investors want to own.
We should note, this is no conspiracy theory. On the SSTF website, the Trustees offer to-the-month spreadsheets of fund holdings, each and every one revealing nothing inside but US Treasury bonds. President Bush himself laid it out quite simply back in 2005:
Some in our country think that Social Security is a trust fund – in other words, there’s a pile of money being accumulated. That’s just simply not true. The money – payroll taxes going into the Social Security are spent. They’re spent on benefits and they’re spent on government programs. There is no trust.
There is No Trust… So Why Trust Social Security?
This bookkeeping scheme known as the Social Security Trust Fund is not the biggest issue in America for one reason: US Treasuries are currently as good as cash. In fact, since they pay a paltry yield and are accepted everywhere, they might even be better than dollars.
But in a real, utilitarian sense, T-Bonds in the SSTF are way, way worse than cash. They are a liability, not an asset. The SSTF can exchange them for dollars, but those dollars must come from the very government that’s on the other side of the exchange. As President Clinton’s Office of Management and Budget once explained:
Balances are available to finance future benefit payments and other Trust Fund expenditures – but only in a bookkeeping sense…. They do not consist of real economic assets that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits. Instead, they are claims on the Treasury that, when redeemed, will have to be financed by raising taxes, borrowing from the public, or reducing benefits or other expenditures.
This is a similar situation to what China has called its “nuclear option.” As the largest foreign holder of US Treasuries, China could cripple the US by cashing out its bond holdings. The Treasury would be forced to either redeem the bonds or default, both of which would send American interest rates through the roof…maybe even destroy our economy altogether.
The SSTF isn’t that different, except China holds “just” $846 billion in US bonds, about a third of what’s owed to the Social Security Trust Fund.
So add up the American fiscal condition as we know it, dear reader, and tell us what you get:
76 million Baby Boomers about to retire
+ Life expectancies increasing
+ A Social Security Administration that’s now paying out more than it’s taking in
+ The Social Security Trust Fund holding nothing but $2.6 trillion in US debt
+ A national debt over $13 trillion
+ The worst US economy since the Great Depression
+ Unemployment near generational highs
+ Stagnant wages for over a decade
+ Average personal savings rate of 6% of disposable income
+ Minimal interest rates on those savings
+ Home prices (most people’s largest investment) down 20% from their peak
+ Stock indexes (and most private retirement funds) down 25% from their peak
+ Rising energy and healthcare costs
The sum of these parts, among other things, equals a lousy retirement landscape in America. Like so many other economic matters these days, it’s hard to picture a worse scenario for retirees since the Great Depression.
It Could Be Worse
One cliché has been working overtime lately: The night is always darkest before dawn. No one really knows how long this “night” will last in America. It’s running about 20 years strong in Japan, an economy eerily similar to our own. But just the same, most people felt like nothing could possibly go wrong in early 1999… and by September 11, 2001, just about everything had. Maybe now, as most of us are choking in the dark smog of this economy, a breath of fresh air might blow our way. Who knows?
But to bank on that is a bad move. If America doesn’t return to booming prosperity, the Treasury and Social Security Trustees will have to do something to keep the program alive. In the past, that’s meant raising payroll taxes and reducing benefits. Not only will the government have to accommodate Social Security operating at a deficit, but they’ll have to deal with all these bonds… the trillions owed to the American public and trillions more to foreign investors. Either income or sales taxes will have to rise dramatically, or the Fed will have to print money. Both “solutions” would seriously impact American purchasing power, particularly retired Americans living on a fixed income.
Even the rich ought to devise a retirement Plan B. The richest 1% of US population now accounts for 24% of the country’s income, the highest ratio since just before the 1929 market crash. Most of the other 99% is understandably bitter about that, and especially given the tendencies of the current administration, we expect the rich to get soaked good and hard over the next few decades. As we’ve forecast before, expect a Social Security means test in the near future and a hike in the SS taxable wage base even sooner.
Thus, all economic classes in America could feel the sting of imminent Social Security reform. Those that need it will likely receive fewer benefits, and those wealthy enough to retire on their own will likely be forced to pitch in for those that can’t. Meanwhile, all government welfare programs will likely be reduced, as one day – who knows when – Uncle Sam will have to start paying back money borrowed from the Social Security Trust Fund.
Your choice is to wait for that day and see what happens…or start preparing for it now.
for The Daily Reckoning
Ian Mathias is the managing editor of Agora Financial's Income Franchise, where he writes and researches about retirement, dividend and fixed income investing. Much of his work is featured in The Daily Reckoning and Lifetime Income Report, Agora Financial's flagship income investing advisory.
Previously, Ian managed The 5 Min. Forecast, a fun, fast-paced daily look into the future of global markets and macroeconomics. He's also worked in public relations, where media outlets like Forbes, AP, Yahoo! and MSN Money have syndicated his writing. If he's not at work, you'll probably find Ian on a bicycle, racing up and down the "mountains" of Baltimore County. Ian has a BA from Loyola University in Maryland.
The problem with trying to “soak the rich” is that the rich just up and move when the soaking starts to annoy them.
If I don’t get my Social Security I am going hunting.
Me too. Squirrel stew is mighty tasty when properly prepared.
I reiterate what I posted previously. SS is not broke. It has collected more each year than it paid out since inception. The government stole the excess and accumulated interest. The government has to repay this. If Washington can give the New York banks $trillions so that they can pay $50 billion in bonuses this year, Washington can certainly repay what it stole from SS.
The people will have to get their money back from the Oligarchs without any help from the government.
Squirrels are not what I will be hunting.
I’ll be hunting what I learned to hunt in the Far East. Thats a hint.
It has long been a ptactice to borrow the interest from the social security trust fund to mask the size of the U.S. annual operating deficits. The Social Security Trust Fund is invested in special treasury notes for the same reason that private investors do so, it is the safest financial product.
Are you implying that real taxpayer dollars, from domestic creditors, if you will, should not seek shelter in this type of security, like astute foreign creditors?
There’s real money in the Social Security Trust Fund, until it’s cannibalized, as some suggest.
Actually the “Social Security” “Trust Fund” is of no value to the American people. The assets held in the “fund” aren’t liabilities of the government they are liabilities of the people who will in fact have to pay them off…the American people. Hence the trust fund assets are perfectly offset by the liabilites; net value to Americans equals zero. This is why you can’t enrich yourself by writing and IOme.
…madam sophie! what’s in the social security trust fund?….eh i see pencil clips…an oeraser…paper sharpner…and…a sparkle dust?….just ONE sparkle dust madam?!!!….relax fernandes, it’s a bullion!….HOW many pencil clips!….sorry signor, times up…
John, the point of this and other articles is that the government would pay those trillions back in deeply discounted dollars. Just one more reason to maintain exposure to hard commodities (JMR talking here). Instead of saying SSTF is “broke”, perhaps “broken” is a better moniker. I see only a couple possible end games, and rainbows, unicorns and lollipops do not occur in any of them.
The SSTF is a designated fund entirely separate from the General Fund from which the Treasury pays the nation’s bills. It’s exactly the same as my 401k account which never had cash in it. Money deposited with the 401k was immediately invested in stocks or mutual funds depending on how I had the thing set up. Excess Social Security funds are invested in Special Treasury Notes redeemable only by SSA. The T-Notes only pay like 5% interest so they’re not the greatest investment. If SSA begins running a deficit, the idea is that it will be able to redeem the Special T-Notes so as to draw down the SSTF balance. We must not allow the Congress to renege on those T-notes. That trust fund money belongs to every American – not the Congress.
I did not know this site and I must be conquered ! I was looking for details on here since last Monday !
Pingback: jazda konna()
Pingback: bike rentals minneapolis()
Pingback: giochi di slot machine da bar gratis online()
Pingback: European golf course()
Pingback: non-prescription supplements()
Pingback: original site()
Pingback: work from home()
Pingback: Excessive sweating()
Pingback: this post()
Pingback: buy ageless male()
Pingback: click here to watch()
Pingback: epromos promotional item()
Pingback: for flights to()
Pingback: souche de kombucha()
Pingback: view more()
Pingback: casino bonus ohne einzahlung()
To allow exports of oil or to not allow exports of oil? That has become a very important question. Today Jody Chudley takes a look at that and three ways to invest around political thumb sucking…
As the business publication Quartz reports, "Cisco projects video to represent 71% of all mobile data traffic by 2019, up from about 55% last year, and representing the bulk of mobile traffic growth."
Bill Bonner writes with his mouth wide open… staggered by the shabby immensity of it… a tear forming in the corner of his eye. Yes, he's looking at how the US economy, money and government have changed since President Nixon ended the gold-backed monetary system in 1971.
There may be a long trip to India in your future if you have hepatitis C. That’s because the Indian Patent Office recently rejected Gilead Sciences’ application for a patent on Sovaldi. You may remember Sovaldi, the nearly miraculous “cure” for hep C that was approved by the FDA a little more than a year ago.
Use what analogy you will: a car, a clock, a chemistry experiment... the point remains that the Fed believes it can control the economy. Indeed the Fed will stop at nothing to realize the goals of its dual mandate" to maximize job growth and maintain price stability. But, as Jim Rickards expalins, that conceit always ends in disaster. Read on...
The median forecast of the 76 economists Bloomberg surveyed undershot the actual total by 75,000. And the highest estimate was still 49,000 short. Not even close guys. Try again next month.