The Philly Fed manufacturers survey for February plunged from negative 5.8 to negative 12.5, the worst reading in eight months. A big miss from the +1 reading that was expected. Ouch!
Our friends at ZeroHedge point out that hope springs eternal:
“Oddly enough survey participants have been hoping for a brighter future for 4 years now. Expect the sellside penguins to say that this number too should be ignored, just like the initial claims earlier, and the new housing starts yesterday. After all one should ignore all data that does not fit the goalseeked script of a centrally-mandated ‘recovery.’”
Evidently consumers haven’t received the recovery memo from Washington either. “Well, we just had one of those weeks here at Wal-Mart U.S. Where are all the customers? And where’s their money?” February was the retail giant’s worst month in 7 years. Wal-Mart may not be the entire economy, but what goes on (or doesn’t go on) in those big blue boxes, tells us a lot about the economy.
America’s economy just can’t get going despite trillions in stimulus from the Federal Reserve and Washington D.C. President Obama said in his State of the Union address, “After years of grueling recession, our businesses have created over 6 million new jobs.” Of course fact checkers have torn this assertion to shreds. The number is really, maybe 1.2 million.
But let’s take the President at his word. Four years of zero interest and a $2.1 trillion increase in the Fed’s balance sheet hasn’t provided much bang for the buck. That $2.1 trillion divided by 6 million jobs is $350,000 per job. The federal government has run deficits of $1.4 trillion, $1.3 trillion, $1.3 trillion, and $1.1 trillion the last four years. The total of the deficits — $5.1 trillion — divided by the 6 million jobs is $850,000 per job. All this stimulus hasn’t been so stimulating.
Surely Ben Bernanke is scratching his head. However, a couple of “smaller fries” in the Fed food chain put their fingers on part of the problem a decade ago, in a paper published in, of all places, the Cato Journal. It’s important to remember that along with all that liquidity came government bailouts, guarantees, and finance support.
John R. Walter and John A. Weinberg, who toil for the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, wrote an article in 2002 entitled “How Large Is The Federal Financial Safety Net?”
Walter and Weinberg state right away why size matters when it comes to safety nets. “It matters because actual or perceived guarantees can impair the efficiency of the financial system,” declare the two economists. “Guarantees alter economic behavior by increasing people’s willingness to take risks. Further, risk taking can become concentrated in those sectors of the economy enjoying the greatest protection. More broadly, resources tend to flow away from parts of the economy with few or no guarantees toward those with substantial coverage.”
Well no kidding. That’s why we have cash piling up in bank accounts while banks play the derivatives market to scratch out earnings in the Fed’s zero interest environment. Or they take the free deposits and buy long term debt for the yield, gambling that rates will never go up. But that’s not all. Weinberg and Winkler also point out, “The ultimate effect can be to limit the growth of income and wealth, and the larger the safety net the greater the effect. Our estimate of the safety net’s magnitude suggests that such an effect is a real possibility.”
The authors make the case that competitive markets allocate goods and services more efficiently. Markets do the same for risk and moral hazard. Government interference upsets this efficiency, distorting resource allocation and reducing economic efficiency.
Even if government guarantees are priced fairly, distortions occur if the guarantee is greater than what could be obtained without government interference. But most government guarantees are underpriced. The authors write that government guarantees are similar to direct subsidies, but different in the way it affects risk. “By assigning to the government part of the risk in the activities being financed, the safety net reduces market participants’ willingness to control risk.”
Much of what is guaranteed people know about: deposits at banks, S&Ls, and credit unions, and the liabilities of Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
However, the pension liabilities of most U.S. businesses are guaranteed by a government agency. There are loans backed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Farm Service Agency (FSA). Plenty of mortgage debt is guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Affairs (VA). Many student loans are also backed by Uncle Sam.
Using numbers from 1999, the authors calculated that in that year federal government guarantees totaled $9.2 trillion, “or more than one-fourth of all private liabilities.” Walter and Weinberg write that the distortions to the economy were apparent. “Approximately 61 percent of commercial bank and savings institution liabilities and 90 percent of credit union liabilities are protected by government guarantees.” These guarantees led to the excessive risk taking that manifested as the S&L crisis and the less-developed-country loan crisis.
Since then, as you would expect in “bailout nation” (see Vancouver favorite Barry Ritholz’s book) the size of the federal safety net has only become larger. In fact, it has more than quadrupled. The folks at the Richmond Fed have updated their data and have come to a new number as of yearend 2011. Their most inclusive estimate of the federal safety net is $44.5 trillion, or over 57 percent of total liabilities.
No wonder that while the Fed keeps forecasting GDP growth of 3.5 to 4 percent, the actual results come in at less than half that. If the Richmond Fed economists were worried about the magnitude of the financial safety net in 2002, they can’t be enjoying a wink of sleep these days.
Capitalism only works its magic with honest risk taking, with the results being profits, or, just as important, losses. As government protects more and more of those who invest capital, that capital is being misallocated to the detriment of the overall economy. Risk taking is increasingly being subsidized and funneled into politically correct avenues. The result is that instead of poor entrepreneurs being weeded out, they are being propped up by government to waste capital again and again.
The results trickle all the way down to those shopping at Wal-Mart.
Doug Frenchfor The Daily Reckoning
Douglas French is a Senior Editor for Agora Financial. He received his master's degree under the direction of Murray N. Rothbard at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, after many years in the business of banking. He is the author of two books, Early Speculative Bubbles & Increases in the Money Supply, the first major empirical study of the relationship between early bubbles and the money supply, and Walk Away, a monograph assessing the philosophy and morality of strategic default. He is founder and editor of LibertyWatch magazine.
Pingback: Trickle Down Stagnation |
Doug, Excellent article!
“Capitalism only works its magic with honest risk taking, with the results being profits, or, just as important, losses. As government protects more and more …”
Surely, only honest enterprising deserves honor. As mentioned, simple division of a fund pool by numbers of employed to derive salary earned per worker is a peculiar newly established economics. Software controlled casino and lottery spinning methods generating huge figures to enhance balance sheet was ostensibly left out in the discussion.
Calm and peaceful effect of the entire world is pivoted entirely on the initiative of the
purported sole superpower. Apparently, nothing could stroll around on earth without a nod from uncle Sum. Whatever goes on, that would equate to tacit approval from DC
in the absence of any apparent support. As of latest weather observation, the american
stylish 007 charater has faded beyond recognition as compared to its first inception, and,
persistently on the irreversible course.
Let’s deviate a little from here to the disputed seas. Apparently, a defense triangle,
comprising, US, Japan and Taiwan has been formed in an effort to deter the growing
might of communist China. Generally, motivation does not suffice to warrant any
large scale conflict in the scenario. Conversely and transparently, Japs conceded
2 goals to US in WW2. Slowly but surely Japs will seek equaliser in the 2nd half
as does Arsenal went down to M U. So, the worrisome issue falls on none other
than uncle Sam. The assumption seems odd but need not be repudiated. And,
the iron triangle hence could not be proven congruent from any angle till now.
Could you rewrite that in English?
Which area you need elaboration? Simple isn’t?
Pingback: web hosting
Pingback: trung tam seo
Pingback: how to get on reality tv
Pingback: windows and doors
Pingback: Adrienne Hernandez
Pingback: tranny webcams
Pingback: music promotion
Pingback: granuflo attorney
Pingback: Will there ever be a cure for herpes
Pingback: Cheap SEO Services
Pingback: garcinia cambogia bean
Pingback: what is pu erh tea
Pingback: how to lose weight fast
Pingback: beat maker
Pingback: link builder
Pingback: naprawa sterowników pomp wtryskowych
Pingback: Buy Computer Accessories
Pingback: book of ra online
Pingback: mexx gutschein 10 euro
Pingback: gutscheincode sanicare versandkosten
Pingback: gutscheincodes zalando lounge
Pingback: gutscheine meinpaket
Pingback: gutscheincode medimops neukunde
Pingback: gutscheincode s. oliver mai
Pingback: ???? ??? ?????
Pingback: getgoods gutschein aktuell
Pingback: gutscheincode otto office versandkosten
Pingback: redcoon gutscheincode 10
Pingback: best computer brand
Pingback: ernstings family gutschein versandkosten
Pingback: cewe gutschein aktuell
Pingback: gutscheincode zooplus 10 euro
Pingback: thalia gutschein 2013
Pingback: spartoo gutscheine
Pingback: Faye Harfordï¿½
Pingback: gutscheincodes von weltbild
Pingback: blume2000 gutschein 10 euro
Pingback: prosolution pills
Pingback: love it
Pingback: online-pr hannover
Pingback: obat kuat
Pingback: Google Analytics help
Pingback: Minnesota Mediation
Pingback: website seo analysis
Pingback: Orthodontist Chandler
Pingback: tenerife forum
Pingback: Orthodontist Gilbert AZ
Pingback: tradeking promo code
Pingback: how to get your boobs bigger naturally
Pingback: Green Coffee Bean Max
Pingback: Military Dog Tags
Pingback: tactical defense system
Pingback: Jana Covone
Pingback: Affordable Graphics
Pingback: Florida Home Insurance
Pingback: hair products
Pingback: auto insurance
Pingback: more discounts webhosting promo
Pingback: ger?ek lida
Pingback: online betting
Pingback: electronic cigarette starter kit
Pingback: Santiago Labarbara
Pingback: jadwal pelatihan hipnoterapi
Pingback: window cleaners Gold Coast
Pingback: Yahoo SEO
Pingback: la consultation de voyance gratuite
Pingback: Buy Facebook Likes Fast
Pingback: model railroad people
Pingback: acoustic guitar
Pingback: how to make your hair grow faster
Pingback: cheap jordan shoes
Pingback: free video games
Pingback: check here
Pingback: ?????????? ?????
Pingback: hcg injections
Pingback: Buy youtube views
Pingback: click this
Pingback: customized fat loss review
Pingback: stock trading advisory
Pingback: Keva Grocottï¿½
Pingback: lots of yourtube views
BDCs are soaring while banks are suffering. Banks are still working through nonperforming portfolios while regulators continue to restrict them.
There’s an easy recipe you can use to root out the strongest stocks on the market right now.
America’s Strategic Energy Weapon, Part II
The quack policy that was good for stock owners in North America turned out even better for those in Japan.
From under which fetid igneous formation did these IRS slugs slither?
Why following market skeptics can protect you in the long run.
From “Bits” to “Atoms”… Digital Innovation Finally Comes to the World of Real Stuff