The Fed’s latest inflationary scheme sounds like a technocratic innovation. It lowered the costs of currency swaps between central banks of the world with the idea that the Fed would do for the globe what Europe, England, and China are too shy to do, which is run the printing presses 24/7 to bail out failing institutions and economies. In effect, the Fed has promised to be the lender of last resort for the entire global economy.
It sounds new, but it is not. Following the Second World War, John Maynard Keynes pushed hard for a global paper currency administered by a global central bank. This was his proposed solution to the problem of national currency disputes. Let’s just take the inflation power away from the national state and give it to a world authority. Then we’ll never have to deal with a lack of coordination again.
The idea didn’t fly but the institutions that were supposed to administer such a system were nonetheless created: the International Monetary Fund and the so-called World Bank. It didn’t work out that way. Instead, nation states retained their monetary authority and the new institutions became glorified welfare providers, conduits for transfer payments and loads to developing nations.
The dream lived on, however. The creation of the Euro and its central bank was a step in that direction. So was Nixon’s closing of the gold window. Each new currency crisis has created the excuse for further steps toward what Murray Rothbard calls the Keynesian dream.
Why hasn’t it happened yet? Many reasons. Nation states do not want to give up power. The World Bank and the IMF are institutionally unsuited to the task. Many people in the banking world are also downright squeamish about the idea, with full knowledge of the ravages that unchecked inflationary credit can bring to the world economy. Mostly, there hasn’t been a crisis big enough to warrant such extreme measures.
However, that crisis might have finally arrived. Since 2008, the Fed has demonstrated that among all the world’s central banks, it alone is brave enough to embrace gigantic inflationary measures without wincing. The European Central Bank is under some strictures to not act as a monetary central planner. China is unconverted to the inflationary faith. The same holds true for England.
Ben Bernanke, however, is different: he is revealing himself to be an unreconstructed Keynesian with an unlimited faith in the power of paper money to solve all the world’s problems.
What this means is that it is left to the Fed alone to bail out the world. There is a perverse logic to this. After all, if you are going to be a world empire, operating under the assumption that nothing on the planet is outside your political purview, you bear certain responsibilities as well. Foreign aid and troops in every country are just the beginning. You must eventually embrace your financial responsibilities too. A globalized economy addicted to debt needs an institution willing to step up and guarantee that debt and provide the liquidity necessary to get us through the hard times.
As soon as the announcement of the new Fed measures came, the smart set of the worldwide web lit up with the obvious observations that these measures come with massive risk of setting off a global inflationary crisis. It could lead to the final crack-up boom.
The Fed assures us otherwise. It “bears no exchange risk” in undertaking such actions. But as economist Robert Murphy explains “strictly speaking this isn’t true. If the Fed gives $50 billion in dollars to the ECB, which (at those market prices) gives $50 billion worth of euros to the Fed, then the ECB lends out the dollars to private banks and, before they repay the loans, the euro crashes against the dollar…then the ECB has no means of acquiring dollars to repay the Fed. Even though the ECB has a printing press, it is configured for euros, not dollars.”
He further states what everyone knows but no one is willing to say: “The current round of interventions will not solve the problem. Down the road — probably much sooner rather than later — the central banks of the world will engage in some further extraordinary measures, again lest the whole world fall apart. Even so, printing money doesn’t fix the underlying problems. No matter what they do, eventually the whole financial world will fall apart.”
The speed at which all of this is happening is startling to behold. It was only 36 hours ago that we heard the first public worries about the drying up of credit in Europe. Large corporations were seeing their credit lines tightened. Banks were starting to become more scrupulous in their operations, which is hardly a surprise given that zero interest rates have made it nearly impossible to make a profit in conventional lending operations.
Where in the fall of 2008, the Fed let the worries about tight credit grow to the point of international mania before it acted, this time it jumped in to anticipate the inevitable warnings about the imminent death of civilization. Only trillions in paper money can save us now! The Fed saw what was coming and decided to do the deed even before the demand came.
But rather than settle markets down, the real effect is the opposite. If you go to the doctor with a head cold, and he rushes you to the hospital for surgery, you don’t merely congratulate him for being thorough. You figure that he knows something that you don’t, namely that your condition is way more serious than you thought. Your family is likely to fly into a panic.
For this psychological reason alone, this action is likely to roil markets in crazy ways. The Fed is now paper-money printer for the entire world. It’s a new world, and a brave one. If you think that a new era of prosperity, peace, and stability awaits, you have been living under a rock for at least a century. There’s not a soul alive who will sleep soundly knowing that Ben Bernanke has elected himself the loan officer of the entire globe.
Jeffrey Tuckerfor The Daily Reckoning
I'm executive editor of Laissez Faire Books and the proprietor of the Laissez Faire Club. I'm the author of two books in the field of economics and one on early music. My main professional work between 1985 and 2011 was with the MIses Institute but I've also worked with the Acton Institute and Mackinac Institute, as well as written thousands of published articles. My personal twitter account @jeffreyatucker FB is @jeffrey.albert.tucker Plain old email is email@example.com
Thanks America for generously exporting your debt insanity to the rest of the world. No wonder the likes of Hugo Chaves and Castro must be smiling- the capitalist system is being crushed by government manipulation. RIP soon,
All those dollars sent overseas will come home to roost one day. The velocity will be unbelievable. The Fed would have to spike interest rates to incredible levels to soak up this liquidity. But if it ever tried that the country itself would become insolvent. It’s a catch 22. We pay today or we pay tomorrow, the FRB is saying tomorrow.
Looks like some fools wet dream. The fools keep pretending to understand, the idiot zombies keep believing.
Jane, no sane person would smile at what’s ahead.
If Americans refuse to buy treasuries, municipal bonds, bank CDs etc and move their savings out of banks into credit unions, gold and siver they could stop the madness. When the American crackup boom occurs we will need Morgan dollars and gold coins to conduct commerce. The nanny state and empire will collapse. Volcker was able to prevent the crackup with 20% interest rates. The debt was a much smaller fraction of the economy then so that trick might not work this time.
Sad, they’re not sane.
We’ve been pouring billions up billions into the trade defecit for decades with little of it heading back to the United States except in the form of Treausry debt purchases. Why worry about it now? I don’t think it will cause the least blip in inflation, except in oil, gold, and food. And who needs any of those to get by anyhow?
I have said it before but look what the result was in Iceland. They said no to the bailouts and now their economy is chugging along better than any Euro state.
If we had let the rotten bits of the economy deleverage back in 2008 we would be far better off than this dragged out strangulation we are witnessing.
WW III should arrive sometime soon. I wonder who US will attack. Iran? Pakistan? Both? Forget gold and silver ammo may be the new currency of the realm.
Right on, DM. PS,will pick on a country weaker then us. Cuz thats watt “Bullies Do!”
We are D00MED!!!
My understanding of Keynes is that he would have been shocked to see the kind of debt we currently have. I think he personally hated debt and particularly trade debt or trade deficit. It’s possible that if he came back today he might push just as hard for a plan to bring this under control as he would for a full employment stimulus. Perhaps look to what the Germans do with their trade surplus.
Use what analogy you will: a car, a clock, a chemistry experiment... the point remains that the Fed believes it can control the economy. Indeed the Fed will stop at nothing to realize the goals of its dual mandate" to maximize job growth and maintain price stability. But, as Jim Rickards expalins, that conceit always ends in disaster. Read on...
When it comes to life-changing tech investments, venture capital has been at the forefront of the investment landscape. But now, there’s a new kid on the block that’s threatening the “old way” of doing things: Equity Crowdfunding. What happens when these two fields meet? Matthew Milner explains...
The NSA will tell you their surveillance programs protect you and the country from terrorists who seek to do you harm. But when you get past their talking points and prepackaged press statements, you'll find their search for enemies covers more people than you'd imagine. Mike Leahy explains...
If the back-and-forth action in the markets has you banging your head against the wall these days, maybe you're concentrating on the wrong stocks. While the market churns near its highs and investors continue to fret over the makings of a possible correction, Asian stocks listed on U.S. exchanges are catching fire. Greg Guenthner explains...
The economist Milton Friedman didn't go far enough when he said, "Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it." In fact, as Bill Bonner explains, those same good intentions are often used as pavement on a road that leads to a rather ominous and fiery destination. Read on...