Is it time to buy a house? Maybe…
This morning we received a bouquet of flowers. It was from the woman who just sold us a house in Baltimore. She sent the flowers to say ‘thanks.’
“We must have paid too much,” we said to Elizabeth. ”She likes us. She probably figures she was lucky to find such retarded buyers.”
We needed a house. We found one we liked. It was one of a kind. We bought it, even though the price seemed high. We weren’t even bidding against anyone. She hadn’t had an offer in months…maybe years. But she held out…and got the price she wanted.
Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reports that the housing market may have bottomed out. Of course, that’s what the press has been saying for the last 4 years. But now, the WSJ says buyers are bidding against one another:
A new development is catching home buyers off guard as the spring sales season gets under way: Bidding wars are back.
From California to Florida, many buyers are increasingly competing for the same house. Unlike the bidding wars that typified the go-go years and largely reflected surging sales, today’s are a result of supply shortages.
“It’s a little surprising because we thought bidding wars were done with,” said Andy Aley, who is looking to buy his first home in Seattle’s Beacon Hill neighborhood. The 31-year-old attorney was outbid this year when he offered up to $23,000 above the $357,000 listing price and agreed to waive inspections and other closing conditions.
Competitive bidding in the current environment isn’t producing huge price increases or leaving sellers with hefty profits, as occurred during the housing boom. Still, the bidding wars caused by tight inventory provide the latest evidence that housing demand is starting to pick up after a six-year-long slump.
An index that measures the number of contracts signed to purchase previously owned homes rose in March to its highest level in nearly two years, up 12.8% from a year ago and 4.1% from February, the National Association of Realtors reported on Thursday.
“We very much believe we’ve hit bottom,” said Ivy Zelman, chief executive of a research firm, who was among the first to warn of a downturn seven years ago. Earlier this week, she raised her home-price forecast for the year, calling for a 1% annual gain, up from a 1% decline.
We don’t know. But our guess is that there’s more pain to come from this housing bear market…lower prices. And more collateral damage too.
In the 1960s, Americans had housing equity equal to 70% of their homes’ values. Now, it is barely 40%. Forget about trading up…homeowners don’t have anything to trade with.
And with 4 million homeowners still underwater, that’s a lot of inventory to work down. It could take a while…and lower prices…before the bottom is finally reached. Recent buyers are still losing money. And CoreLogic says prices are still falling. Here’s a Reuters report:
(Reuters) — More than 1 million Americans who have taken out mortgages in the past two years now owe more on their loans than their homes are worth, and Federal Housing Administration loans that require only a tiny down payment are partly to blame.
That figure, provided to Reuters by tracking firm CoreLogic, represents about one out of 10 home loans made during that period.
It is a sobering indication the US housing market remains deeply troubled, with home values still falling in many parts of the country, and raises the question of whether low-down payment loans backed by the FHA are putting another generation of buyers at risk.
As of December 2011, the latest figures available, 31 percent of the US home loans that were in negative equity — in which the outstanding loan balance exceeds the value of the home — were FHA-insured mortgages, according to CoreLogic.
Many borrowers, particularly since late 2010, thought they were buying at the bottom of a housing market that had already suffered steep declines, but have been caught out by a continued fall in prices in wide swaths of America.
Even for loans taken out in December — less than four months ago and the last month for which data is available — nearly 44,000 borrowers, or about 7.5 percent of the total, now find themselves under water.
“The overwhelming majority of the US is still seeing home prices decline,” said CoreLogic senior economist Sam Khater. “Many borrowers continue to be quickly wiped out.”
According to the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city composite index, which tracks home values in 20 major US metropolitan areas, US home prices were down 3.5 percent in February from a year earlier and are now at their lowest level since late 2002. Over the past 12 months, 15 of the 20 major metropolitan areas monitored saw declines.
But that doesn’t mean that houses are a bad deal. Or that you will lose money buying now.
To the contrary, this could be the best time to buy in many, many years.
Things are a’changin’. And they affect the outlook for housing for many years into the future.
For one thing, young people don’t seem to be getting together and pitchin’ woo the way they used to. They’re waiting longer. They used to get married and have children in their 20s. Now they wait until their 30s.
So, they don’t need to buy a house until years later. In the meantime, they rent. Rentals are up…which could be good news — if you’re a landlord.
Home ownership is at its lowest level in 13 years; it seems to be going down, even though houses are much more affordable than they’ve been in many years.
Unemployment among young people is much higher than usual; fewer young people have the wherewithal to buy a house.
Young people also have much more debt than they used to. Student debt, for example, recently topped the $1 trillion level. No jobs…no spouses or children…shackled to student debt — young people are unlikely prospects for house-builders.
But “US housing is the best value play in America,” says colleague Chris Mayer. ”If you own a house then look to buy and rent another.”
Here’s the idea. You can now buy a decent house for $60,000 to $80,000 depending on where you are. You spend a little to put it into rentable condition. Then, you can rent it for $1,000 a month…maybe $1,500. At $1,200 a month on a $60,000 house you have a gross rental yield of nearly 20%. Assume you spend half of that on taxes, maintenance, etc. That leaves you with 10% net. Not bad.
Better yet, mortgage it for 30 years. Say you put up cash of $20,000…and mortgage the rest. Your mortgage payments should be a good deal less than $250 a month. So, after expenses (assuming they are 50% of your gross rent) you are netting $250 a month, which works out to a 15% yield on your cash.
And what happens to that $40,000 mortgage? Could be that it is a burden for years…and you pay it off with no gain or loss. More likely, it gets cheaper, year after year. Inflation knocks it down. Perhaps slowly at first — 3%…5%…
But we wouldn’t be at all surprised to see it get knocked away completely in a few years. Most likely, within 10 years a $40,000 mortgage…at today’s fixed rates…will be worth less than half of what it is today. So, you’ll make another $20,000 over 10 years…giving you a real yield on your investment over 20%…
This seems to us like the perfect investment for a retired person with time on his hands. Put $60,000 of savings into a money fund and you’ll get…what…$100 a month?
Instead, buy 3 houses for $60,000 each…mortgaging $40,000 on each one. You’ll have to work to fix them up and find the right tenants. But you’ll end up with positive cashflow of about $750 a month…plus, maybe a bonus of $60,000 more over 10 years as your mortgages get whittled down by inflation.
*** We were wrong about Harley Davidson.
A few months ago we guessed that it was time to sell the big hog builder in Milwaukee. We noticed who rides Harleys. Big, fat, old guys. Not much future in that, we reasoned. Especially when times are tough. The old guys will sell their bikes, we said.
Alas, your Daily Reckoning stock research department seems to have erred.
A report in The Financial Times tells us that Harley Davidson profits rose 44% in the first quarter of this year. Turns out they’re selling more bikes in the US than they expected. To whom?
Foreigners. Two thirds of the sales happen overseas.
A total of a quarter of a million motorcycles are expected to sell this year.
Amazing. We didn’t know there were that many fat, old guys overseas.
Harley Davidson seems to have created a worldwide brand.
Bill Bonner,for The Daily Reckoning
Since founding Agora Inc. in 1979, Bill Bonner has found success and garnered camaraderie in numerous communities and industries. A man of many talents, his entrepreneurial savvy, unique writings, philanthropic undertakings, and preservationist activities have all been recognized and awarded by some of America's most respected authorities. Along with Addison Wiggin, his friend and colleague, Bill has written two New York Times best-selling books, Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt. Both works have been critically acclaimed internationally. With political journalist Lila Rajiva, he wrote his third New York Times best-selling book, Mobs, Messiahs and Markets, which offers concrete advice on how to avoid the public spectacle of modern finance. Since 1999, Bill has been a daily contributor and the driving force behind The Daily Reckoning. Dice Have No Memory: Big Bets & Bad Economics from Paris to the Pampas, the newest book from Bill Bonner, is the definitive compendium of Bill's daily reckonings from more than a decade: 1999-2010.
Good read, but $250 a month on a mortgage of $60,000 grand? I think your numbers are a bit off on that. Even with a 20% down payment, I think you are looking at more in the $400 to $500 a month range if I’m not mistaken.
$1000 rent on a $60,000 house? Maybe in some select neihborhoods. Where I live in the pacific northwest, a house that will garner a $1000 a month in rent will cost you at least $150,000 if not more. I know I have been trying to buy rentals here and they still do not pencil out.
Ha! These bogus rental numbers are the same as all the every-day-person wealth-making books out there.
Anything commanding $1000 rent is going to be $140,000-180,000 in this small city. I doubt you could find a $60,000 mortgage here, except in the well known crime section of town.
In this state’s rural towns you could find a house around $60,000, but rent will be $500.
Where I live you cannot get a 30 year (legally) mortgage unless you live in the house. A rental property requires a business loan typically 6 years max duration. Is it true you can get as many 30 year mortgages as you can afford?
You bought in Baltimore? Are you crazy?
Oh Bill, don’t be a rube. These numbers are pure folly. Rent out a $60,000 house and you better get good at squeezing seldom employed drug addicts and alcoholics. You also better fully educate yourself on your state’s tenant rights and eviction laws. BTW, Harley has been a worldwide brand for quite some time.
Oil isn't the only resource to experience "peaks." Due to a major contraction in gold exploration over the past few years, the mining sector is no longer mining gold at its replacement rate. In other words, the amount of gold above ground is running out. And according to Henry Bonner, it will get worse before it gets better...
Too often investments are made in a vacuum. But as Byron King demonstrates, the global economic crash... easy money... and technological advancements are all interdependent. In particular, that connection has changed the investment calculus in the resource market. Read on to learn how...
Back in the 1980s, John Nestor became infamous for single-handedly causing massive traffic jams on the Capital Beltway. But in his professional life, he created a completely different kind of traffic jam... one that may have contributed to the deaths of thousands of innocent people. Juan Enriquez has the full story. Read on...
Too many people think that long-term care planning is just a decision about whether to purchase long-term care insurance. However, long-term care planning is so much more... It is a discussion about how you will fund this expense, where you will receive long-term care, and who will provide the care. Jamie Hopkins explains...
Lately, the market seems to be obsessed with new tech darlings with flashy names and exciting stories. But there are more sinister forces at work... Today Greg Guenthner explains why you should pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, and avoid being tempted by big name tech IPOs. Read on...