“Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate farmers, liquidate real estate… it will purge the rottenness out of the system. High costs of living and high living will come down. People will work harder, live a more moral life. Values will be adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up from less competent people.”
— Andrew Mellon
Down, down, down…
Oil is at a 5-month low. Russian stocks are 20% below their high. Commodities are back to 2010 levels.
Everything is going down. Even gold.
Wait a minute. Since we know from Einstein that all motion is relative, everything CAN’T be going down. If everything were going down, everything would be standing still. Something must be going up as a point of reference.
So what’s going up?
Cash is going up against oil, houses, stocks, copper, commodities of all sorts…and just about everything else.
Cash is king.
Why? Because we are in a Great Correction. And in a great correction, prices are corrected. In a bubble, prices tend to go up. This tends to push up animal spirits…encouraging investors and business people to do things that they will later regret. They build houses no one can afford…and shopping centers no one really needs. Then, these things — and the loans against them — appear as “assets” on the books of banks, pension funds, hedge funds, private equity outfits…you name it.
Later, as the correction continues, markets discover that these ‘assets’ are not worth quite as much as they thought. Prices go down. Some ‘assets’ become liabilities. They are underwater, with more debt than equity.
Labor rates fall too. There are fewer projects that “make sense”…and they need fewer workers. Business falls off. Unemployment goes up. Salaries go down.
As prices fall, they must fall against something. So they fall against cash. Cash becomes more valuable. You can buy more real assets with every unit. People who hold their cash through a correction usually do well. They are able to buy quality assets, at the bottom, at large discounts to their previous prices.
That’s why so many people are willing to lend money to the feds for such low interest rates. They figure it’s as good as cash.
All this is obvious and hardly worth mentioning. In a better world, we’d all know what was going on…and we could all predict what would happen next: the mistakes would be written off, defaulted on, foreclosed, and marked down…
…and then, the economy could get up, dust itself off, and get back to work.
That’s what used to happen. The first American depression came in 1819. Cotton prices collapsed. Farms were foreclosed. Banks failed. It was over by 1821 — 2 years later.
Then, there was the Panic of 1837. New York brokerage houses failed. Farm prices collapsed. A bank president committed suicide. But it was over by 1843 — 6 years later.
The Panic of 1857 was triggered by the bankruptcy of Ohio Life Insurance and Trust Company. Railroad speculators were ruined. Stocks plunged. Nearly a thousand companies went broke. The resulting depression was hard…but short. Recovery began two years later.
The Panic of 1873 led to a 5-year depression. And the Panic of 1893 hit even harder — with a crash on Wall Street, 16,000 business failures and a 15% unemployment rate. Four years later, the economy was running hot again.
The aftermath of WWI brought the Depression of 1921. By many measures it was as bad as the Great Depression. But it was quick — two years later it was over.
And then, came the Great Depression itself. What made it so great? The feds! Until the 1930s, the feds let the economy take care of itself. Interest rates? They were set by willing buyers and sellers, not by economists working for the government. Monetary policy? Fiscal policy? There were none.
When it was time for a correction, Mr. Market took out a wrecking ball and knocked down the mistakes of the previous boom. The debris was quickly swept away…and it was off to the races again.
Even as late as the 1930s, Andrew Mellon, then Secretary of the US Treasury, advised president Hoover to “liquidate” everything. His idea was to give the correction a helping hand… Rather than wait for the correction to do its work, he’d swing the wrecking ball himself.
That is just what he did in the 1920s. He was Treasury Secretary in 1921 too. And instead of trying to fight the slump of ’21-’23, he helped it on its way. Instead of “countercyclical stimulus” measures, he gave the nation “pro-cyclical” measures. That is, he didn’t increase government spending in order to provide the economy with fiscal stimulus. He cut government spending in order to leave more money in the hands of consumers, investors, and business people.
And it worked. Scarcely 24 months after the beginning of the depression it was over…with unemployment back to 5%.
But the world changed between ’21 and ’31. By the ’30s, the feds had the bit between their teeth. In Germany, the Nazis were already consolidating power and gathering tinder for the Reichstag. In Italy, Mussolini and his gang were wearing funny outfits and plotting out an empire. Stalin was reorganizing Soviet agriculture — which would result in millions of deaths by starvation. And in the western democracies, the meddlers were taking over too.
Instead of thanking Mellon for his input, the feds tried to impeach him! In a few months, Mellon was gone. And then US economic policy was firmly in the hands of people who thought they could do better.
The gist of the new policy was that corrections must be stopped — at all cost. Depressions must be fought. Bankruptcies must be prevented… Markets must be controlled! By bureaucrats!
This new policy was what made the Great Depression great. Mr. Market may have wanted to correct his mistakes; but the feds wouldn’t let him. The depression continued, off and on, throughout the ’30s…and the ’40s too. It didn’t really end until the 1950s.
You might expect the feds would have learned from that experience. Compared to the laissez faire policies of Andrew Mellon their activism was a complete, miserable failure.
Learn? Are you kidding? We’re now in year the 6th year of the crisis that began with the collapse of subprime in April ’07. Does it show any sign of letting up? Any sign of coming to an end?
The feds have fought the correction every step of the way…with everything they’ve got. They’ve tried monetary stimulus — taking rates down to zero. They’ve tried fiscal stimulus — with $1 trillion budget deficits for the last 4 years…and no end in sight. They’ve tried “unconventional” measures too — such as QEI, QEII and The Twist. Last year, the Fed funded more than 60% of the US deficit with printed money. And the Fed has increased its holdings of US debt some 3.5 times since 2008, from $479 billion in September, 2008 to $1.66 trillion in March, 2012.
So, put on your seat belts. Sit back. Relax.
Eventually, the correction will do its work. But it could take a long, long time.
for The Daily Reckoning
Since founding Agora Inc. in 1979, Bill Bonner has found success in numerous industries. His unique writing style, philanthropic undertakings and preservationist activities have been recognized by some of America's most respected authorities. With his friend and colleague Addison Wiggin, he co-founded The Daily Reckoning in 1999, and together they co-wrote the New York Times best-selling books Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt. His other works include Mobs, Messiahs and Markets (with Lila Rajiva), Dice Have No Memory, and most recently, Hormegeddon: How Too Much of a Good Thing Leads to Disaster. His most recent project is The Bill Bonner Letter.
“Cash is king.”
Or is it? Maybe when the printing presses aren’t humming, but how about when they are? Bill paints a pretty good deflation picture, but you look long term and I’d be more fearful of inflation.
Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX)
2.93 Down 0.00(0.07%) 1:26PM EDT
yeah, well then bernanke’s an emperor.
“but you look long term and I’d be more fearful of inflation.”
I dunno man … how much in treasuries does the fed own now? it’d be kinda cool to have a lock on 10% of the federal budget in a heavily deflated environment ….
“…the Depression lasted until the 1950s…”.
Wrong. By any measure – jobs, wages, GDP output – America roared out of the Depression in the early 1940s, on the manufacturing buildup to WWII. When you’re in a post-credit bubble liquidity trap, govt stimulus works – it’s simply an objective fact.
Right On BB! C how simple & 2the point that wuz folks. Don’t the REPS an the DEMS get this simple fact 4 simple minds? BB the u know watt started in the summer of 06,if any1 wuz “Simple Enough,” 2 start Shorten Lehman&Gang? Like Simple-minded people were. Cuz i blive in keepin the simple life simple ” U’d b sittin back now goin “How sweet it is!!!” Wooo… Well Happy Trails 2 All! *S* PS Gotta go,looks like in London were gettin close 2 a small time double bottom goin on in SLV & GLD? PPS Remember KISS folks? And watt that stands 4? C-ya…
It seems Europe with its austerity measures is taking the oposite route the US is taking. Time will tell which experiment works. It seems to me that examples from the 1800’s fail to account for the mindset of ‘we the people’. The fed is not to blame as much as we are to blame for not taking control of our own destiny. We vote for jobs, and recovery, and intervention. *We* should be making recovery happen and demanding politics gets out of the way. Our successes and failures are all based on ‘we the people’ and the minute we all step up and do our part … thats when the recovery and more importantly -prosperity- starts.
Unemployment was above 13% in December ’41. Hardly roaring. Perhaps you meant to say that in a post-credit bubble liquidity trap a World War works best.
But roaring is probably a good adjective for describing the conversion to a war economy, although the average consumer during the war couldn’t buy a house, couldn’t buy a car, was subject to rationing for basic foodstuffs and gasoline and rubber, all the while excess labor was soaked up and sent overseas. You need to deconstruct your objective facts in the light of 9 years of ineffective government stimulus.
Bill likes Mellon’s supposed advice; Krugman et al. on the left use him as a whipping boy. But Mellon actually never spoke those words. They come from Herbert Hoover’s memoirs, published 1952, in which Hoover presents a caricature of Mellon against which to contrast his own anti-Depression activism.
Bill Bonner will like this:
How have the wars in Afghn and Iraq worked out for the economy? I’m in favor of expanding them dramatically. Or at least we could bomb large sections of the Pacific Ocean. That should really stimulate the economy.
I’m amazed how many people actually believe that stuff.
Getting into space is getting more complex, and a lot cheaper. A recent launch typifies the new power of private rocketry as well as the ability of competitors like SpaceX and Boeing to cooperate to make the price tag of a launch cheaper. Stephen Petranek has more…
Companies go public to rake in a few billion dollars for themselves and the underwriters. And the suckers-- sorry, investors who gobble up shares when these things come out-- usually end up losers. The stock sinks once the initial euphoria wears off. Then it levels off at a much lower price before maybe rising at a normal pace again.
A money illusion sounds like something a prestidigitator performs by pulling $100 bills from a hat shown to be empty moments before. In fact, money illusion is a longstanding concept in economics that has enormous significance for you if you’re a saver, investor or entrepreneur. Jim Rickards explains...
Traders bid up oil prices this week, based on reports of major escalation of hostilities in Yemen, just south of Saudi Arabia. It’s part of Iran’s long-term strategy to surround the Saudis. Which is why Byron says the Saudis’ primary motivation in crashing oil prices last November was to weaken Iran...
Traders bid up oil prices last week, based on reports of major escalation of hostilities in Yemen, just south of Saudi Arabia. Byron King updates his "Oil War" thesis as Yemen burns and as Saudi Arabia continues to be surrounded by opposition. Read on...
Just look at retail stocks. The S&P Retail Index has surged higher by more than 23% over the past six months. And even after a slow start in January, the index is up nearly 6% year-to-date. That blows away the S&P...