03/24/09 London, England Another day…another bailout…another rally on Wall Street…
And another milestone on the road to ruin.
âGeithner plan welcomed,â says the headline story in todayâs Financial Times.
âStocks rally on news of toxic assets proposal,â continues the commentary.
Stocks did indeed rally. The Dow rose 497 points…putting some bounce back in the bounce. Weâve been expecting a healthy rebound. Normally, after such a long and steep sell-off, you can expect a rebound that recovers 30%-50% of the losses. We have not had such a rebound…yet. Maybe this is it.
Otherwise, the financial news is mixed. House sales in February were unexpectedly high. Then again, prices continued to fall.
AMEX looks like it is going to be downgraded…as credit card debt now looks as though it could be heading in a subprime direction.
The dollar continues to fall, (to $1.36 yesterday) and gold continues to stay in the same place â around $950.
But letâs focus on the big news: the Geithner Plan.
The gist of the story is that the government will create a public-private fund to buy up to $1 trillion in the banksâ mistakes. These assets will be auctioned off â in a market sustained and supported by public money. This is a âwin â win âwinâ situation, says Bill Gross of PIMCO, the worldâs largest bond fund. We didnât see the rest of his analysis so weâll have to guess. Itâs a win for the banks because they get to clean out their refrigerators. Itâs a win for investors because they get to buy the throwaways at huge discounts â with government guarantees â and then theyâll discover that it doesnât all have fuzz on it. And itâs a win for the government, because it finally gets rid of that nasty odor coming from the kitchen.
We have neither the time nor the stomach to look closely at this program. But we donât have to; even from a distance, it stinks.
Why? Because thereâs not that much âwinâ to share out. The assets are worth what theyâre worth. By all accounts, theyâre worth a lot less than the banks thought they were worth originally. In a better world, the bankers would take their losses, admit their mistakes, and blow their brains out…or at least change careers. In fact, we have a suggestion: they should go into government; there they can make as many mistakes as they like and no one will notice.
But this is not a better world; itâs a world that is full of sin and sorrow…one with a fool on every corner…and an ace up every sleeve.
There wonât be three winners from Mr. Geithnerâs plan. There will only be one. Whatever the toxic assets are worth, they will be sold for either more or less than that amount. If they are sold for less, investors will realize a profit. The banks â and their government backers â will lose because they will have given up an asset for less than it was really worth. On the other hand, if the toxic assets are sold for more than they are worth, it is investors who will lose.
Investorsâ objective is clear: they want to make money. And they wonât invest unless they think theyâre getting the assets for less than they are worth. Bankersâ and the governmentâs motivations are more complex. Mostly, they just want the problem to go away. So, weâll put our money on the buyers of the toxic assets, not the sellers. Most likely, they will be the only winners. They will buy the more palatable pieces of meat at good prices; theyâll leave the most toxic pieces for the government. Most likely, the government will be an even bigger loser than it is now.
But the government will lose twice. First, it will lose money in the poker game with private investors. Then, it will lose again when its expensive flimflam fails to restart the economy.
The banks will be better off once theyâve cleaned out their cupboard. No doubt about it. They will be ready to lend again, right? But to whom?
The problem the bank bailout is designed to fix is only a piece of the larger problem…and not the essential piece. Banks have had plenty of money to lend â despite their own toxic assets. The Fed has been willing to give them the most elastic line of credit in history. The problem was not that they didnât have the money to lend, it was that they didnât have a creditworthy borrower to lend to.
Take the case of mortgage lending. In their vaults, they have billions of dollarsâ worth of mortgage-backed assets. They know that those assets are âtoxicâ because homeowners canât pay their mortgages and the value of their collateral is going down. So, those mortgage-backed assets are getting marked down to what investors think they might really be worth.
But what bank wants to take on more mortgage debt? Housing prices are still falling. And homeowners are still in trouble. Toxic assets are being marked down in ANTICIPATION of the poor homeowner going broke. He still has to go broke…and get back on his feet…before heâs a good credit risk. And that logic applies to the entire economy. Businesses, homeowners, and investors need to clean out their cupboards too, before the credit cycle can turn up again. And that is a very long process….
More thoughts to follow…but first, letâs check in with our team in Baltimore…
âIn the markets, the buying fervor of this bear trap has reached historic proportions,â writes Addison in todayâs issue of The 5 Min. Forecast.
âYouâre looking at the best 10 days for the Dow since 1938.
âAfter yesterdayâs 6.8% shot, the index is up 18.8% in the last two weeks of trading. If history does in fact rhyme, the Dow might be sitting pretty for a while:
âThe last time the Dow rallied over 18% in 10 days, it held on to most of those gains for over a year.â
âIn fact, the Dow at 110 in 1938 ended up being a long term level of resistance,â continues Addison. âThe market traded flatly for the next four years, briefly dipped below during the worst of WWII, and then staged a sure and steady rally for the next 30 years.
âSo all we have to do is fight and win another global war, pay down our debts and ignite another phase of industrial production… then weâll be fervently buying, too.â
The 5 Min Forecast is an executive series e-letter that provides a quick and dirty analysis of daily economic and financial developments â in five minutes or less.
Back to Bill, reporting from London…
According to Frank Rich in the International Herald Tribune, President Obama may be having a âKatrina moment.â The storm caused by AIG bonuses just keeps blowing out windows and taking off roofs. Bailouts are stupid and corrupt, of course. But they play a key role; they help divert the publicâs attention…like a guy who picks a fight in front of a liquor store, while his friends rob it.
So far, a poll found that Obama himself has avoided the publicâs anger. But the poor AIG executives are being hounded, even at home. Employees are âliving in fear,â says one press report, as âbusloadsâ of protesters arrive in front of their Connecticut homes.
Then, the TV cameras catch these poor schmucks as they tell their sad stories. âMy husband lost his job at the carwash…and now I have to see these crooks living in houses that I could never even begin to dream about.â
Here at The Daily Reckoning, we do not envy the AIG crew. Nor do we have any desire to take their money away. They stole it fair and square, as far as weâre concerned. But the lumpen are much less open minded.
The House of Representatives actually passed a resolution imposing a 90% tax on AIG bonuses. The measure looks clearly unconstitutional to us. Itâs a penalty tax…a Bill of Retainer, specifically outlawed by the Constitution. Youâre not supposed to be penalized, after the fact, without due process of law. But who cares? Members of Congress never read the Constitution anyway. And itâs probably better that they donât. If they took it seriously, theyâd have to punish themselves.
But while all this wind was passing through the press, the important story was highlighted at Salon.com: âEconomists agree: Print. Money. Now.â
What worries us is that this is all too obvious and too predictable. The economists agree, because they see no alternative. The real problem is not a lack of money for the banks to lend â they can borrow all they want from the Fed at near-zero interest. The real problem is too much debt. And printing money will help ease the debt burden. On paper, people will owe as much as ever, but it will be a whole lot easier to pay with the dollar going down by 10% …or 20%…per year.
So, print…money…now…is just what the Fed is doing. Bernanke said so. And he says heâll keep doing it as long as necessary.
This unsettles the Chinese, of course. Theyâve got $1.4 trillion in dollar assets. They told the United States that they expected it to protect the value of the Chinese holdings.
But how can the feds do that? Quantitative easing is an increase in the QUANTITY of money. Generally, an increase in the quantity means a decrease in the QUALITY of it. Thatâs how it works. And thatâs exactly what the feds want.
So, the poor feds! Out of one side of their mouths, they had to reassure their biggest creditor that theyâd protect the value of the dollar…while out of the other, they have to reassure the markets that they will create enough inflation to get the economy moving.
They are caught between Scylla…and Charybdis…on the one hand the rock of deflation…on the other, the Chinese. What can they do?
Our guess it that they are aiming to muddle through…with just a little bit of QUALITATIVE decline in the dollar â not enough to cause the Chinese to panic â but enough to get U.S. consumers, investors and businessmen to loosen up.
Good luck to them.
But thereâs no such thing as a controlled ârun on the dollar.â Once investors start running for cover, itâs every man for himself. And who knows where it will end up? Foreigners are already exiting U.S. agency debt. It wouldnât be very surprising that they suddenly rush for cover from all U.S. dollar debt.
Therefore, is it not obvious that the dollar will fall? And bonds will be crushed? And gold will rise?
Almost too obvious. Still, we now have taken down our âCrash Alertâ flag for the stock market. But we hoist another one: a Crash Alert flag for the dollar.
The horror! The French leftist newspaper, Liberation, convened a forum of intellectuals to discuss how to get the world economy out of its funk. University professors, social workers, journalists â hundreds of them. Weâll wager that not a one of them had a clue about what is going on…and every suggestion they made would make the situation worse.
Meanwhile, we were surprised to see that the leftist English newspaper, the Guardian, actually shares our critique of the bailout efforts. âThe rich need a dose of capitalism,â writes Andrew Lilico. âCapitalism punishes those who invest in companies that fail.â
Well…thatâs the way itâs supposed to work. But the meddlers, improvers, and chiselers are out in force.
And whatâs happening in that heart of financial darkness, Zimbabwe? The Guardian also reports that children are eating rats to survive. For many, only gold is keeping them from starving.
Unfortunately, they donât have much gold. The Zimbabwe inflation rate is still running around 230 million percent, despite recent reforms (we donât know what happened after the government took 13 zeros off its currency; maybe itâs putting them back). So, the only reliable money is either foreign currency â or gold. Many people are panning for gold in the few streams where it is present.
Until tomorrow,
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and youâll get a free research report, âHow to Survive the Fall of Social Security.â Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address







in the 30′s depression – ‘money’ was hard to come by.
now ‘money’ can be created at will.
Another wonderful article, unfortunately I wager it will go unnoticed, quoting from your book (joint work with Lila Rajiva), that I am reading right now:
“People occasionally appreciate the truth in the same way they appreciate a good joke. It breaks the monotony. But it is to falsehood that they look to organize their lives. Myths stick to them like burrs to a sweater …”
It is still Thomas L. Friedman’s world until the market crashes or the USA defaults on its debt.
In the 1994 opinion United States v. Carlton, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that retroactive tax laws did not violate the constitutional prohibition on ex post facto legislation, provided their retroactive application was “supported by a legitimate legislative purpose furthered by rational means”.[5]
When President Barack Obama reaches the point where he is laundering credit card loans to AIG for the purpose of bailing out Golden Sachs, you know you have a corrupt government.
Golden Sachs under Paulson played a major role in securitizing the sub-prime loans forced on bank to lend.
Congress started this mess and now the tax payers are on the hook.
The bonuses paid to AIG are pennies compared to the Billions in bail out money and the Trillions in proposed spending.
Obama is putting my children and grandchildren into tax slavery in his role as Americaâs power seeking Giving God.
The man is a fool and the danger lies in the fact that he thinks he is a God.
You add the power hungry Congress and we have world war like crises.
Before this is over, there will be a blood in the street type dictatorship.
Only the mercy of the true God can help us.
I bet Zimbabweans wish they had a bottle of booze or some ciggys to trade…
Prisons, 3rd world scenarios, boot camp, World war!…
Bet you wish you had a bottle of booze or ciggys to trade…
If Obama still smokes, so do the poor. Damned be the luxury taxes too. Damned to HELL
My crystal ball indicates that the real
incomming poop has not yet hit the proverbial financial fan.
What the Administration is really thinking, they will never tell us. They call the situation challenging, while it is basically hopeless, and they can only postpone Armageddon and social chaos – so be prepared!
Even Greenspan knew that sooner or later Fed-policy was to end in drama, but in 2001 it was easily possible to create another credit-boom, pushing the inevitable downturn forward.
Now the Fed is bringing the horses to a huge pool to drink, but they don’t want to drink no more…No one wants to borrow no more, no one wants to lend no more…
“The problem was not that they didnât have the money to lend, it was that they didnât have a creditworthy borrower to lend to.”
Last week I received a phone call from my 18 year old daughter. She told me she had just purchased a $9,000 used car, financing $6,000 of the purchase. I was shocked that she got a loan so easily, because she has no credit history. However she is in the Coast Guard so apparently the financing agency believes she has a secure job and will be able to repay. I called my representatives in Washington to explain this situation, hoping they would perhaps take another look at the bailouts but they acted as if I were speaking another language.
I’d like to see Bill review the movie “The Obama Deception”
Come on Bill go for it.
Herr Bonner wrote:
“They are caught between ScyllaâŚand CharybdisâŚon the one hand the rock of deflationâŚon the other, the Chinese. What can they do?
Our guess it that they are aiming to muddle throughâŚwith just a little bit of QUALITATIVE decline in the dollar â not enough to cause the Chinese to panic â but enough to get U.S. consumers, investors and businessmen to loosen up.
Good luck to them.”
It would be interesting to compare the actual mechanics of the quantitative easing the Fed’s conducting today versus
the money supply expansion they embarked on in the 1970s. In particular, how does the Bernanke Reserve’s information command/control system of today compare to the information capabilities available to Volcker, et al. in the late 60s and 70s?
In terms of growing the money supply there’s probably little difference between the transactions executed today versus the open market methods used by the Fed during the Johnson/Nixon/Ford/Carter era.
However, to drain the system back in those days, the Volcker Fed’s brute force market operations resulted in the deep recession of the early 80s. On the other hand, do Bernanke & Co. have the technical information capabilities, a “secret weapon” if you will, that will allow him to snuff out all these excess reserves once the inflation fire begins burning? If a trillion dollars can be placed on the Fed’s balance sheet in a day, surely it can be removed just as swiftly…of course, I don’t recommend you try this at home…
P.S. Mr Bonner: I think the term is bills of attainder…In any event, TAG just showed the Supremes don’t care what the Constitution says…
Nice article. When you say “Bill of Retainer”, I think you meant “Bill of Attainder”, which like an ex post facto law (the 90% retroactive tax could be considered as such) is forbidden by the U.S. Constitution.
From Wikipedia: A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of the legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial. Bills of attainder are forbidden by Article I, section 9, clause 3 of the United States Constitution.