Spooky Stats from the U.S. Mint

This week, we find the Mogambo sitting at home, waiting impatiently for the arrival of his newly purchased silver. After a month, he gets suspicious, and begins his investigation. We think you’ll be surprised at what he’s discovered.

I had just gotten off the phone to find out why the silver I ordered last month has not arrived, and I get some runaround about how there is no silver to be had to fill my order. Naturally, being familiar with how the supply/demand dynamic works, I call the little clerk a lying piece of thieving garbage, because it is impossible that the market price of silver is going down in an environment of zero supply and obviously rising demand!

Well, the phone mysteriously went dead right after that, and before I could call him back and REALLY tell him off, I see where this is common right now, as Theodore Butler says that "Premiums are up and delivery delays are longer. This is something we are all witnessing for the first time."

And James Turk at Free Market Gold & Money Report notes that it is the same thing in the gold market, too!

He says that a normal person would assume that the size of the working stock of gold held by the United State’s Mint to make the popular Gold Eagle coins and miscellaneous trinkets would vary "from month to month, just like inventory varies from month to month in any business as a result of changes in production and the ebbs and flows in sales."

It gets spooky when he goes on to note that "indeed, the Mint’s inventory did vary monthly, up until March 2006. But according to the Treasury’s reports, the Mint’s working stock has remained exactly 2,783,218.656 ounces since April 2006. How is it possible that the Mint’s working stock has remained unchanged for 28 months?"

Instantly I was on my feet, shouting, "Because they are all a bunch of lying, corrupt scumbags exploiting a fiat currency and insane levels of fractional-reserve banking, which is the very reason why you should be buying gold and silver in the first place!"

I thought, you know, that this witty interruption of mine would impress Mr. Turk, and so I sat back down with a big smile on my face and crossed my arms in smug self-satisfaction as I waited for him to shower me with praise, and maybe offer to buy me a drink, or a pizza, or let me use his car for a couple of hours or days.

Sure enough, he immediately said, "There are an infinite number of possible answers. Maybe the Treasury does not want to part with its remaining gold at these current low prices. Maybe the Treasury does not want Americans to exchange their fiat dollars for the safe haven of gold as the central banking fiat money scheme implodes. Maybe the Mint doesn’t have any gold because the 2,783,218.656 ounces were loaned out. Maybe the Treasury doesn’t have any gold either. Of course, no one really knows because the Treasury isn’t talking."

So, realizing that I am going to have to do more to impress Mr. Turk, I stand up and say, "I think it is all of these, and more! So much more! Maybe even involving creatures from outer space, probably in the form of spores; and these spores, see, have infected the brains of everybody except smart people like you and me, so that they could control the behaviors of members of Congress, the Federal Reserve, the media, the schools and most of the general moronic populace to cause the collapse of the world’s economy, whereupon flying saucers containing the Main Invasion Force (MIF) will appear and take over the world, whereupon everybody will cry out, ‘Save us, oh, Mighty, Mighty Mogambo (MMM)!’ and I will laugh – ‘hahahaha!’ – rudely in their faces and say, ‘It’s too late for that now! You should have listened to me years and years ago when I told you to either stop electing socialist/collectivist morons who will bankrupt us with allowing, and then spending, a fiat currency multiplied to ridiculous extremes by a ludicrous fractional-reserve banking system, or start buying gold and silver, but preferably both! So shut the hell up, you morons, because you are getting exactly what halfwits like you so Richly, Richly Deserve (RRD)!’"

Apparently, Mr. Turk was not impressed by my insights, and has not been around many paranoid, schizoid, raving gold-bug lunatics like me, either. Obviously visibly shaken, he cleverly diverts my attention by appealing to my greed, and notes that the gold-mining XAU Index shows that "The XAU Index has fallen back to the bottom line of its long-term uptrend channel."

If you have ever worked with technical analysis, you know that the price of something that "has fallen back to the bottom line of its long-term uptrend channel" that has been in effect since October 2000 is one of those rare Holy Grail occurrences that make you salivate with sheer greed and all you can think of is, "Who can I borrow some money from with which to buy this asset at an interim low?" and "How much money am I going to make when the price of gold goes ‘boing!’ back up to the top of the channel and will it be enough to quit my stupid job?"

On the other hand, the same XAU Index measured not in dollars but in grams of gold reveals that "It now takes only 5.0 goldgrams to purchase the XAU Index, just a whisker above the all-time historic low of 4.9 goldgrams reached in November 2000."

Such a paradox will obviously be resolved somehow, and Mr. Turk figures that "we will not see the prices of the mining stocks this dirt cheap again for years to come – if ever."

I’m betting he is right. You should, too, as that is the One Real Lesson (ORL) to be gleaned from the long, sad, sordid history of fiat currencies in the hands of governments; go gold!

Until next time,

The Mogambo Guru
for The Daily Reckoning
September 15, 2008

Richard Daughty is general partner and COO for Smith Consultant Group, serving the financial and medical communities, and the editor of The Mogambo Guru economic newsletter – an avocational exercise to heap disrespect on those who desperately deserve it.

The Mogambo Guru is quoted frequently in Barron’s, The Daily Reckoning and other fine publications.

Now it’s Lehman’s turn.

Ten years ago, the New York Federal Reserve Bank called upon Lehman Bros. and a handful of other major players on Wall Street to rescue a high-flying hedge fund. The firms grumped and whined…but they came up with the money, $3.7 billion. The rescue was a success. LTCM’s positions were unwound slowly; there was no panic; Wall Street soon went back to doing what it is supposed to do – separating customers from their money.

Long Term Capital Management was run by a couple of Nobel Prize winning economists who believed they could use past financial patterns to model the future – just as if price movements were the same as the weather. If a hurricane had hit Houston twice in the last century, they figured the odds that another hurricane would hit the city at 1 in 50. Likewise, if the price of Lehman stock traded between, say, $10 and $30 during its 158-year history, they figured – grosso modo – that it would stay between $10 and $30.

LTCM went bust when the future turned out to be different from the past. Anyone with his eyes open at the time could have told the Nobel laureates why: weather patterns were independent of human decisions; market patterns are not.

One of the big revelations of the ’90s – or was it the ’80s? – was that stocks were traditionally, historically under-priced. Compared to bonds, said a popular financial author, stocks were a better deal. Stock buyers earned a premium over bonds for the risk they undertook, he said. But if you held stocks "for the long run," the risk disappeared. Buying stocks seemed like a no-brainer.

Thus did the lumpen investoriat begin pumping money into stocks…cautiously in the beginning of the ’90s…and recklessly at the end of the decade. And by the year 2000, the stock market no longer reflected the "random" movement of prices as predicted by the previous hundred years of stock market history; instead, it reflected the recent and remarkable belief that stocks always went up…and that if an investor held long enough the risk disappeared.

From the peak of 2000 ’til today, stock market investors have earned nothing for their trouble. In nominal terms, stocks are about where they were 10 years ago. Adjusted for inflation, they are down 25%-80%, depending on how you measure it.

Wall Street made a fortune selling stocks to naïve investors. When the stock marked topped out, the financial industry might have gone back to sleep. Instead, it got a double dose of caffeine. The Greenspan Fed cut rates in 2001-2002 while the Bush administration boosted spending and cut taxes. All of a sudden, every hand on Wall Street turned to pumping out credit – derivatives, SIVs, CDOs, MBS. They didn’t really have to invent any new theories, they merely recycled the same numbskull ideas that sank LTCM – basically, that you could eliminate risk by modeling historic price movements. If Lehman Bros., for example, had never failed in more than a century and a half – the odds that it would fail this year were so close to zero as to be not worth discussing.


"Lehman lurching closer to liquidation," says the front page of today’s International Herald Tribune.

Now, it’s Lehman that is failing. And no consortium of Wall Street banks is willing, or able, to bail it out. Lehman has some $80 billion of dubious credits. These were the products of its own – and many other – whiz kid financial engineers. Lehman hired some of the best talent on Wall Street. It has some of the world’s top financial mathematicians on its payroll. It could compute the risk of loss down to 3…4…heck…as many decimal places as you like. But it could do so only as LTCM did – based on past history.

As we explained, once investors came to consider stocks as a riskless way to get rich, they bid up prices to the point where they were all risk…and no reward. And when their models told them that they could make money by lending money to people who couldn’t pay it back, practically every loan they made took them closer to bankruptcy.

*** The financial industry gained more than any other from the big credit expansion. It makes sense that it should be the industry that suffers most when credit goes the other way.

In that regard, history is a good indicator of what to expect. You can guess about the very broad patterns of the future, based on what you know about the past…and of your fellow man. We know, for example, that investors tend to go from one extreme to another. At once, they are afraid of credit…and then they feel as though credit were their best friend in the world. And they go from feeling very optimistic about the future…to feeling very pessimistic. These feelings have market consequences. When they are upbeat and sans soucis they are willing to lend at very low rates of interest, for example. Why not? They’re sure they’ll get their money back. And when they are feeling lucky, they’ll invest in wild-eyed schemes and half-baked projects too. Everything is going their way; so why not?

But then, the mood changes. The schemes fail. Money is lost. And gradually people come to believe that the future holds more bad days than good ones. Yields rise – as they ask for higher rates of interest before lending money. Not only are they afraid that they may not get their money back, they’re also afraid that the money they get back may not be worth as much as the money they lent out. At the peak of the yields cycle in ’82, for example, investors wanted 14% interest before they’d lend money even to the U.S. government!

When they get gloomy, they want higher cash dividends from their stocks too. Gone are the days when they believed they could just buy stocks and get rich. They come to believe that if a stock is not paying its way – with dividends each year – out it goes. During the Great Depression, for example, stock market investors sold stocks down to such a low level that they paid an average dividend of more than 10%.

We’re still a long way from there. The yield on the 10-year T-note is above 3.7% – but still about 200 basis points below the level of consumer price inflation. Which is to say, real yields on Treasury paper are negative. Still, they’re better than dividend yields, which average only about 2.5%. Investors still believe that their stocks will go up, so they’re willing to accept dividend yields of less than half the current CPI.

But we’re headed in the right direction. Lehman is going bust. AIG is struggling…hopping for a $40 bailout from the government. Houses in California are down 30%…and still sinking.

Alan Greenspan, who bears more responsibility for the present state of financial affairs than anyone, says this may be a "once in a century," event. This time he could be right…

More tomorrow…

Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning

P.S. You are probably familiar with the Agora Financial Reserve, which offers you all the investment advice and recommendations that we have to offer. For some people, that’s just too much information…which is why we’ve decided to create the "Under-$10 Reserve."

It’s a basket of all four of our stock and options research publications that almost always recommend plays that cost less than $10. The mission statement of the "Under-$10" Reserve is short and sweet:

"To give you a chance to make as much money as possible with the cheapest plays we can find."

The Daily Reckoning