A few months ago, the insightful and engaging financial market observer, James Grant, drew a comparison between “witchcraft, on the one hand, and modern central banking, on the other.”
Grant presented this novel comparison in an address to the “Investment Decisions and Behavioral Finance” meeting at the Harvard Kennedy School.
“I won’t spend much time defining terms,” Grant began. “Witches, as you know, cast spells, make storms and fly on goats or broomsticks to diabolical nighttime rendezvouses called sabbats. Modern central bankers override the price mechanism, conjure money from thin air and undertake to boost economic growth by raising up stock prices.”
In other words, both activities rely greatly on a kind of mysticism – beginning with the notion that combining bizarre ingredients in a cauldron can work magic…and ending with the notion that mere mortals can wield supernatural powers.
Ben Bernanke’s “eye of newt” is quantitative easing (QE). According to American folklore, Bernanke casts benevolent spells, simply by tossing just the right amount of QE into the economic cauldron at just the right time.
“One might almost call it witchcraft,” Grant concludes his address.
Between Grant’s opening remarks and his conclusion, he presents one very striking, and somewhat alarming, comparison between witchcraft and central banking. Both superstitions emerged and then flourished during a time of relative enlightenment. Educated and enlightened populations embraced both beliefs.
Quoting an essay entitled, “The European Witch Craze of the 16th and 17th Centuries,” by British historian, H.R. Trevor-Roper, Grant remarked, “The belief in witches was not, ‘Trevor-Roper writes, ‘a lingering ancient superstition, only waiting to dissolve. It was a new explosive force, constantly and fearfully expanding with the passage of time…
‘Creduality in high places increased, its engines of expression were made more terrible, more victims were sacrificed to it. The years 1550-1600 were worse than the years 1500-1550, and the years 1600-1650 were worse still…If those two centuries were an age of light, we have to admit that, in one respect at least, the Dark Age was more civilized.”
After contemplating Grant’s observations, a hard-money guy or gal, couldn’t help but think of the “Dark Ages” of the gold standard, in contrast to the Enlightened Age of central banking.
During the monetary Dark Ages, the gold-backed dollar fended for itself, without the benefit of central bank wizardry.
But the Age of Monetary Enlightenment changed all that. The Federal Reserve began casting its spells 100 years ago, and the U.S. dollar has been bewitched ever since. The greenback has lost 97% of its purchasing power since the Federal Reserve came into existence.
The Fed’s beguiling wizardry continues nonetheless. Ben Bernanke concocts his bubbling brews of QE #1 through QE-infinity, while other PhDs at the Fed publish illuminating manuscripts like the recently released, “Computing Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models with Recursive Preferences and Stochastic Volatility.” (Thanks, Jim Grant).
Given their impressive array of charms and potions, it should come as no surprise that the wizards at the Fed believe in their own magic; the surprise is that the investing public also believes in it…and remains spellbound by the Fed’s incantations.
Just yesterday, Chairman Bernanke repeated his familiar incantation, “More QE…More QE…Whatever may be…More QE.”
The Dow Jones Industrial Average promptly rallied more than 100 points. The masses were awed by his power.
“In the current economic environment, the benefits of asset purchases, and of policy accommodation more generally, are clear,” Bernanke told the Senate Housing and Urban Affairs Committee yesterday, referring to the $85 billion of Treasury and mortgage-backed securities the Fed buys under its current quantitative easing program.
“Monetary policy is providing important support to the recovery,” the Chairman-Wizard continues, “while keeping inflation close to the [Fed's] 2% objective.”
Beguiling words, to be sure. But Bernanke’s spells may not be quite as potent as he would have us believe. The “important support to the economy” that QE provides is literally invisible.
The so-called recovery of the last four years has logged the slowest growth rate – by far – of any recovery since WWII, despite the fact that Bernanke has conducted more the $2 trillion of QE programs during that time frame.
Many are the data points that call into question the “success” of QE. For starters, U.S. GDP contracted in the final three months of 2012. Accordingly, unemployment remains stubbornly high and consumer spending stubbornly low.
Just last week, Wal-Mart’s VP of finance and logistics groaned in an internal email:
“In case you haven’t seen a sales report these days, February MTD (month-to-date) sales are a total disaster…The worst start to a month I have seen in my seven years with the company.”
The retail giant also reported that its sales are tracking very closely to what it calls the “paycheck cycle” – i.e., sales spike twice a month…on paydays.
“[This trend] speaks to a strapped consumer that lacks the confidence to spend unless they literally have cash in their pocket,” blogger, Jeff Macke, observes. “Living paycheck to paycheck isn’t something you typically see in the fourth year of an economic recovery.”
Nevertheless, very few investors exhibit any desire to consider the downside. Perhaps for good reason. Why fret over “Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble” when Chairman Bernanke provides continues helpings of “Bubble, Bubble?”
Despite Bernanke’s dubious power over the economy, the man sure knows how to conjure a stock market rally out of thin air. The Dow has soared about 250 points since he began addressing the Senate yesterday.
One might almost call it witchcraft.
Eric J. Fry, Agora Financial's Editorial Director, has been a specialist in international equities for nearly two decades. He was a professional portfolio manager for more than 10 years, specializing in international investment strategies and short-selling. Following his successes in professional money management, Mr. Fry joined the Wall Street-based publishing operations of James Grant, editor of the prestigious Grant's Interest Rate Observer. Working alongside Grant, Mr. Fry produced Grant's International and Apogee Research, institutional research products dedicated to international investment opportunities and short selling.
Mr. Fry subsequently joined Agora Inc., as Editorial Director. In this role, Mr. Fry supervises the editorial and research processes of numerous investment letters and services. Mr. Fry also publishes investment insights and commentary under his own byline as Editor of The Daily Reckoning. Mr. Fry authored the first comprehensive guide to investing internationally with American Depository Receipts. His views and investment insights have appeared in numerous publications including Time, Barron's, Wall Street Journal, International Herald Tribune, Business Week, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Money.
This is all going to end very badly!
“I won’t spend much time defining terms,” Grant began. “Witches, as you know, cast spells, make storms and fly on goats or broomsticks to diabolical nighttime rendezvouses called sabbats.
Was this fictitious analogy really necessary? Fox just got caught pulling the same crap…we witches are not amused.
Fuck your religion too, you worthless bigot!!
You realize that there are actual witches, correct? This article is extremely offensive to actual Witches and Wiccans.
You sir are ignorant beyond words. I am a Wiccan, and this article offends me in essentially every possible way. We as witches are not evil, not mythological, not out to fuck up your day. we simply want respect, love, and to be treated as equal humans, nothing more, nothing less. So I shall suggest you either learn what the fuck you’re talking about before you write up an article about it, or don’t fucking talk about it at all. Shouldn’t be too fucking difficult for your peanut-sized mental-capacity to wrap around.
Wow, I don’t even know where to begin except to say that you just drastically maligned and defamed over a million people in America alone who are Wiccans and Witches.
Try substituting the word “Witch” with “Jew” or “Irish” or “Indian” or “Gay” and see how it sounds to you.
Do you kiss your mom with that mouth?
This is only one of the things we are talking about. There is lots more.
“If you piss off a bunch of witches, you’re going to have a bad time”
This is not going to end badly….. It means everyone is going to have to live very carefully. They are going to have to invest their savings in oil sands upgrading and oil recovery, as in northern Alberta or in the Gulf of Mexico now, for example. Or it means they are going to have to lend money to state, provincial, federal, or local governments. In other words, apparently during the zero-interest rate policy, the saver has to be willing to take-on some minimal risk to gain some yield in his/her portfolio.
Another thing to-day, people have to conserve money. For example, they have to return empty bottles into the bottle depot, not just for the good of the environment but actually for the money itself and for the important practical jobs that returning the bottles creates in the economy everywhere.
Another thing that might be changing now with Bernanke’s zero-interest rate policy is that new homes cost more money. How much older homes are going to appreciate remains to be seen, AND NEITHER NEW NOR OLD HOMES WILL APPRECIATE IF BANKS WON’T LEND WITHOUT LARGE DOWN PAYMENTS.
Finally, if the zero-interest rate policy really marks the shift to the beginning of a deflation, it still might not hurt to keep some gold in one’s safe deposit box, just in case the central bank changes its policy and abandons its zero-interest rate policy and goes back to its former ways of inflating forever.
Fry is lucky we Wiccans are peaceful people. He wold do well to learn to live by our creed “Do no harm.” Very ignorant statements. There are more of us than you know
I dont see the need to be offended. I just expect stupidity out of the mundanes, so when I find a smart one I can be pleasantly surprised. I doesn’t matter a tinkers damn what the mundanes think of us, unless they are thinking about trying to hurt us.
This is the type of negative stereotypes that persist because people speak out of ignorance. This guy obviously knows nothing about the subject of witches or wicca and yet basis his whole analogy on something he pulled out of his… hat.
“extremely offensive to actual Witches and Wiccans”?
Wow! I’ll bet Harry Potter fans the world over are miffed by all this?
Surprises me that the easily offended Dungeons and Dragons crowd spends much time on a page like this?
I’m not sure if you are being serious or not. I’m thinking maybe you are. While there are people out there who pretend to be witches, the rest of us know there is no such thing as a witch anywhere except in imaginations. I don’t think people should have to pretend truths are untrue in order to protect the fragile emotional state of people who believe in falsehood.
That is absolutely unfair. A lot of them are in the Live Action Role Play crowd as well.
Uh oh, I think he’s mad, oh no! Watch out! Ribbit, ribbit.
“Mundanes”? Is that like a “muggle”?
I’ve met loads of angry Wiccans. Give me a break. Like Islam is the “religion of peace”.
Witch? What are you some kind of clown?
Do you believe in a God? I’m not sure if you’re serious if you do. We all know that there is no such thing as a God anywhere except in your imaginations.
Maybe you should educate yourself a bit before being such a bigot.
Pingback: Joshua A. Jacobi MD
Pingback: Vehicle expenses other than gas
Pingback: plantacja lawendy
Pingback: jazda konna
Pingback: visit link
Pingback: fare soldi
Pingback: autoversicherung vergleich
Pingback: online casino
Pingback: empower network loophole
Pingback: coal miner song
Pingback: Glenn Rhee
Pingback: come giocare alle slot machine da bar gratis
Pingback: promotional gifts
Pingback: driving lessons milton keynes
Pingback: jalia parsnip
Pingback: mark mania
Pingback: click to watch
Pingback: Another Blog Title
Pingback: universal remote
Pingback: Anastacia Poirer
Pingback: Kathe Groshek
Pingback: visit the website
"There are two sides to every coin," as the saying goes. And nowhere is that phrase more apt than in matters of money, especially as regards the U.S. Federal Reserve. Today, Mark Spitznagel squares off against none other than Paul Krugman to discuss that very topic. What follows is sublime entertainment. Read on...
As long as markets exist, there will people who try to predict where they are headed. Of course, no one can know for sure. And as Greg Guenthner explains, their prognostications can sometimes do more harm than good. Read on...
A massive storm recently blanketed the U.S. northeast. And as it did, most people ran to their thermostats to keep warm. But staying warm and cozy this winter comes at a price, even with the U.S. nat gas boom in full swing. Today, Matt Insley explains why, when it comes to nat gas prices, seasonality definitely matters. Read on...
Like it or not, size does matter. But contrary to a popular saying, bigger is not always better. Especially when it comes to the size of the state. Marc Faber explains why a world of smaller states might function better than one dominated by excessively large "superpowers." Read on...
Pope Francis recently warned people to beware the "tyranny" of capitalism. Hmmm... Would that be true capitalism and trust in free enterprise? Or the crony capitalism we're currently saddled with? Bill Bonner explains why, even though capitalism is easily corrupted by the capitalists, that doesn't necessarily mean it is a bum creed. Read on...
The average postwar U.S. expansion has lasted 58 months. In the midst of major policy dislocation in Congress and at the Fed, we are at month 52 of the current expansion, which began in June 2009. But we are running out of time – and luck.