The US economy is still broken, which is the only plausible reason why bonds might not be a “sell.” But then Bernanke keeps trying to fix the economy, which is the best reason why bonds probably are not a “buy.”
According to conventional wisdom, a sluggish economy tends to reduce demand for credit, which, therefore, tends to keep interest rates low… all else being equal. Robust economic conditions, on the other hand, tend to increase demand for credit, which tends to push interest rates higher…all else being equal.
But “all else” is almost never equal, especially not in the America of 2011. Today in America, most welfare recipients possess a better balance sheet than the US government; most teenagers display greater fiscal responsibility that a Congressman; most comic books contain more gravitas than the minutes of a Federal Open Market Committee meeting.
Yes, that’s right, our national finances are a joke, perpetrated by a troupe of Ivy League educated jesters. As we noted in Tuesday’s edition of The Daily Reckoning, the IRS could double its income tax receipts and the federal government would still operate in the red. And since our elected officials are unwilling to propose legitimate remedies (mostly because we voters would be unwilling to reelect them if they did), the job of fixing this mess falls to Ben Bernanke.
But he can’t fix it. He’s just a guy with an impressive résumé and stupid ideas. He can try to paper over trillion-dollar deficits by printing dollars and buying Treasury debt, but it won’t work. And the more he tries to make it work, the less folks around the world desire to hold dollars. That’s a very dangerous game he’s playing.
When individuals lose faith in a faith-based currency, bad things happen…often quickly. Once a nation loses the trust that supports its currency, that nation also loses the trust that supports its bond market. That’s why a currency crisis usually strolls hand-in-hand with a sovereign debt crisis.
These twin disasters tend to unfold very quickly. Think: Mexico, 1994; Thailand, 1997; Russia, 1998 and Argentina, 1999… Or think: America, 1979.
Back in the 1970s, a US “inflation problem” became a “dollar problem” which became a “bond market problem.” After a while, cause and effect became indistinguishable from one another.
Shortly after President Nixon severed the dollar’s last remaining connection to gold in 1971, inflation rates started edging higher. The annual CPI readings soared from 3.3% in 1971 to 9% in 1973 and 12% during the Arab oil embargo year of 1974.
In October of 1974, President Ford announced his infamous “Whip Inflation Now” campaign. In a speech before Congress, Ford declared inflation, “public enemy number one” and announced a series of measures to combat it.
But President Ford did not whip inflation…and neither did President Carter. Although inflation rates dipped back down toward the 6% range in 1976 and ’77, they skyrocketed shortly thereafter. Dollar-holders and T-bond holders both suffered mightily.
Less than a month after President Carter’s inauguration, the US Treasury issued its first 30-year bond – the 7 5/8s of 2007. Over the next four years this bond lost nearly half its value, as inflation and bond yields both soared toward 15%.
President Carter responded to this dire situation by issuing T-bonds denominated in Deutschemarks and Swiss francs. In 1978, these so-called Carter Bonds came to market, with the hope of attracting investors who would not buy the Treasury’s dollar-denominated bonds. The buyers of these unique bonds fared pretty well; the buyers of traditional Treasury bonds, not so much.
From 1978 to 1981 inflation continued soaring, which meant that the dollar and the bond market continued tumbling. The bond market shellacking of the late 1970s was swift and severe, as the chart below illustrates.
Could history repeat itself? Absolutely.
Could it happen soon? Why not?
Cautious investors may wish to move to the sidelines and watch the spectacle from a safe distance. Aggressive investors and/or speculators may wish to dive into the fray and place bets against the bond market.
The bond market selloff of early 2009 provides a glimpse of the profit potential. With the benefit of flawless hindsight, an investor could have sold short “TLT,” the iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF on December 30, 2008 and closed out the position six months later for a hefty 27% gain. That’s a big winner in “Bond Land.”
If, as we suspect, a large-scale bond bear market is likely to begin soon, investors will not require flawless hindsight to place a profitable bet on the short side… just a little foresight…and an appetite for betting against Ben Bernanke.
But remember, short selling is very risky. The potential for loss is infinite.
Eric Fryfor The Daily Reckoning
Eric J. Fry, Agora Financial's Editorial Director, has been a specialist in international equities for nearly two decades. He was a professional portfolio manager for more than 10 years, specializing in international investment strategies and short-selling. Following his successes in professional money management, Mr. Fry joined the Wall Street-based publishing operations of James Grant, editor of the prestigious Grant's Interest Rate Observer. Working alongside Grant, Mr. Fry produced Grant's International and Apogee Research, institutional research products dedicated to international investment opportunities and short selling.
Mr. Fry subsequently joined Agora Inc., as Editorial Director. In this role, Mr. Fry supervises the editorial and research processes of numerous investment letters and services. Mr. Fry also publishes investment insights and commentary under his own byline as Editor of The Daily Reckoning. Mr. Fry authored the first comprehensive guide to investing internationally with American Depository Receipts. His views and investment insights have appeared in numerous publications including Time, Barron's, Wall Street Journal, International Herald Tribune, Business Week, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Money.
And one in four Amerikan mortgages are “under water” meaning they owe more on their house than the place is worth.
It certainly looks as if Capitalism is failing most people. Hmmmm
Capitalism is not failing, politicians and the US government is – this is a huge distinction. If you dislike the US system, make a decision to embrace something you do like elsewhere and denounce your US citizenship – I suspect they would love to have you as a subject. The grass is always greener . . . right?
Wrong. If a US citizen dislikes the US system, then like any other citizen, he can work to change his country’s system.
Systems come and go. Peoples must endure.
Income inequality in the U.S. has reached epic proportions. So much so that "1%" is no longer just a simple fraction. Now it's now much more than that, used as a pejorative symbol of excessive wealth and the greed of the American upper class. Marc Faber explains why this is unfair, especially as regards U.S. tax laws. Read on...
Throughout history, financial markets have been comprised of a series of bubbles and crashes. However, the Fed’s endless policy of easy money has broken the mold when it comes to these financial bubbles. But, as Doug French explains, it seems some investors refuse to learn from the lessons of the past. Read on...
Remember the Fed's "taper talk"? Well, it's starting to rear it's ugly head again. Of course, as with almost any market trend, it's all about perception. And while some investors may be panicking, Greg Guenthner explains how you can use the current "taper trend" to your advantage. Read on...
With so much of the national media focused on negative stories, it's easy to feel a bit depressed and to think that the world is hopelessly doomed to failure. But, as Alexander Green points out, there are several things for which humanity, especially in the developed world, should be eternally thankful. Read on...
The president and his supporters are trying to convince Americans that all of the problems with the implementation of Obamacare are simply bumps in the road, normal as part of any new program in its early days. Of course, that's not true. In fact, that's exactly what one should expect when the government is in charge.