Byron King recounts a Philadelphia exhibit of Titanic Artifacts — specifically, some period British and American banknotes– and springboards from there into a discussion of the value and decline of British and American currency.
Here’s your second issue of Whiskey & Gunpowder…introducing Byron King, my friend from Pennsylvania.
I want to keep this intro short…and not spoil anything he’s about to reveal to you.
THE FIRST ITEM is a set of gold rimmed eyeglasses. Further on, there is a pocket watch stopped at 11:14. Then there is a brown leather suitcase, somewhat worse for the wear. There are stacks of white dishes and racks of dark green bottles. Another display shows brass plumbing fixtures and a gray, steel wrench. And at another stop along the walk one sees a copper and glass engine thermometer. There is a jade rosary, and a man’s boulder hat, of all things, in remarkably fine condition, considering…. And a pair of woman’s shoes, made of black leather. Not one shoe, but a pair, recovered from the sea floor beneath 12,000 feet of cold North Atlantic water column.
A pair of shoes does not fall over two miles through moving currents and cross-currents of seawater, and fortuitously embed themselves in close proximity, left shoe next to the right, in the fine sand of a deep sea bed. These shoes were attached to the feet of a long deceased passenger of the RMS Titanic, an unfortunate victim who perished on the night of April 14, 1912 in one of history’s most famous shipwrecks. Her body has been consumed, and returned to nature. Her soul is with the Good Lord, or at least we so hope and pray. But her leather shoes.
Well, these shoes, and all of the other items listed above, rained down to the ocean floor on that sad night, and are part of the collection of artifacts recovered by RMS Titanic, Inc.(http://www.tulloch.net/work/rmstitanic/company/index.htm) from the lost vessel of that famous and hubristic name, the flag ship of the White Star Line. These Titanic artifacts are on display at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia through January 2, 2005.
The Captain of the Titanic, a skilled mariner named E. J. Smith, once said: “I cannot conceive of any vital disaster happening to this vessel. Modern shipbuilding has gone beyond that.” But on the night of April 14, 1912 Captain Smith said something else. He gave an order: “Prepare the lifeboats.” And later, in the wee hours of the morning of April 15, he shouted as the water lapped over the bridge: “Every man for himself.”
Things change, don’t they?
The White Star liner Titanic was the grandest ship of her time, unsurpassed, or so it was said, in quality of construction and opulence of fittings. One of the survivors of the shipwreck thought that Titanic was “not simply a means of conveying people from a place they wished to leave to a place they wanted to be.” No, the RMS Titanic “was a floating symbol of status.” Her loss, after striking an iceberg and foundering on her maiden voyage, sent shock waves through the Western world. The sinking of the Titanic caused people to question basic assumptions at every level of civilization, from fundamental principles of naval architecture and ferrous metallurgy, to the class-based system of social intercourse. On that night at least, God would not be mocked. The event caused people around the world to revisit the relationship between mankind, and the Almighty and His rules.
There have been other disasters in history with greater loss of life, greater loss of property and treasure, and greater impact on the direction of day-to-day events than that of the Titanic. But even in the tenth decade after she slipped beneath the dark sea, the ruined Titanic holds a certain fascination, an unusual attraction, a mesmerizing power that draws people in.
One thinks of the Titanic, and looks at her artifacts from so far below, as if one were looking in a mirror.
Titantic Artifacts: Sunken Silver Coins and Drowned Gold Notes
At a location about midway through the exhibit of Titanic artifacts at the Franklin Institute, is a collection of paper currency and coins recovered from the 1912 wreck. Gold coins, silver coins, copper. British, American, French. This was real money back then, from a gold standard era. And the paper notes also tell a tale. They are a collection of official British and American treasury promissory notes, and a remarkable amount of scrip from private banks, redeemable in precious metal.
Every note has an annotation at some spot or another, promising to pay to the bearer some quantity of gold or silver. “One Dollar Silver Note,” from a bank in New England, redeemable in an ounce of silver from that institution. Or a “Two Dollar Silver Certificate,” to be paid on demand by the Treasury of the United States of America in, not surprisingly, two ounces of silver. Or “Ten Gold Dollars,” half an ounce of yellow metal in 1912, promised by and intended to be paid to the bearer from the precious gold assets of the Government of the United States. (Well, not in this case. This particular gold-note will stay in the museum, for obvious reasons.)
These artifact paper notes, recovered against all odds from their watery grave, still retain a certain sense of dignity. They do not declare mightily and officiously that they are “legal tender for all debts, public and private.” They do not have to. No, they convey more of a sense that they are an honorable and equitable agreement between equal parties, a man and a powerful bank, if not his government.
The notes represent a solemn promise by the issuer that, in return for a person lending a sum of honest money to the bank or government, the issuer of the note will repay an equal sum of precious metal at a time and place of mutual convenience. There is, it seems, a sense of financial humility, respect and national or corporate duty to these documents.
The Titanic exhibit explains that within about two years of the ship sinking, the British and American governments changed the methods by which they permitted currency to be issued. The exhibit does not go into detail, which is understandable. This is a display of artifacts from a sunken ship, not an exposition on monetary history. But it is interesting that the curators would mention it at all.
In late 1913 the U.S. government enacted the Federal Reserve Act, which removed the power to issue monetary notes from private banks and the U.S. Treasury, and gave that power to the newly established Federal Reserve, or the American central bank. And in 1914, Great Britain’s central bank, the Bank of England, went off the gold standard shortly after Britain entered into what became the Great War, now known as World War I.
For the 100 years before this time, the respective values of the British and U.S. currency had held more-or-less steady, excepting a period of inflation during the American Civil War. But after 1914 the value of the respective currencies was set by… well, by a monetary system, for lack of a better term, run by each nations’ respective central bankers.
The idea was to have an “elastic currency,” meaning a currency base that could expand to meet the needs of a dynamic and growing economy, or in the case of Britain to fight a war that the nation could not afford.
In the ninety or so years since those monetary milestones of 1913 and 1914, both the British pound and the U.S. dollar have lost about 98% of their value due to inflation of the national monetary supplies. The sure makes for one heck of an “elastic currency” eh? There are far more nominal dollars and pounds in circulation today, but each one is worth far less.
But because it has happened so slowly — year by year, decade by decade, generation by generation — this decline of the value of national currency has seemed almost a natural phenomenon, an immutable law of nature. This is the way that monetary theory is taught in all of the best schools, and is how all modern monetary systems work, right?
Typically the politicians have demanded, and people have grown to accept, “a little bit” of inflation fostered by the central bank as the price of progress. Except that “a little bit” of inflation over a long time is actually “a lot” of inflation.
Over the long term, the nominal savings of one generation are reduced, in the aggregate, to a pittance. This matters quite a bit when one goes to retire a generation or so after going to work. And in an inflationary environment, valuations of capital become meaningless over the long term, absent using statistical guesses to determine deflation factors.
Keep in mind that savings create capital, and inflation destroys savings, hence destroys capital.
The 98% decline in value of the British and American currency over 90 years is not exactly a set of state secrets. Both nations’ governments publish statistics that admit the fact. But the problem is that eventually, even that last 2% of purchasing power will decline, leading to an almost complete destruction of both nations’ currencies. And then what, we ask? “Prepare the lifeboats,” as Captain Smith said? Or perhaps, “Every man for himself?”
Titantic Artifacts: The Fed Chairman and the Captain of the Titanic
From the standpoint of ethics, it would seem that the people who run the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England have a responsibility to their respective citizens to maintain a stable value to their currencies, and not to destroy that value over time. It would seem that the managers of a nation’s currency have a duty to maintain monetary standards, and not to wreck savings and impoverish one generation to benefit another. It would seem so, but apparently this is not how the monetary system works.
By way of comparison, this ethical duty to maintain standards is much the same as the duty of the principals of the White Star Line to design and build a fine ship, appropriate to the hazards of oceanic crossings. And this is much as Captain E.J. Smith had a duty to train his crew and sail his vessel along a track that would bring her safely into the port of destination. But on the night that the Titanic sank, there was a failure of duty by the Captain to sail a safe course, even after an ice warning was received over the radio. And the iceberg, scraping the rivet heads off the steel plating of the Titanic and permitting the sea to flood the ship through hundreds of small penetrations, revealed a flaw in construction. And the sinking revealed the failure of White Star Line fundamentally to design a proper ship, with lifeboats sufficient to the need of passengers and crew in a time of peril.
As fate would have it, J. Bruce Ismay, one of the directors of the White Star Line, survived the Titanic’s sinking by leaping into one of the last lifeboats that dropped from the doomed vessel into the freezing ocean. Later on, Director Ismay was greatly criticized from almost every quarter, because he survived the sinking when over 1,500 others did not. One of the most trenchant critiques of Ismay came from Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan, the great historian, strategist and sea power visionary of the U.S. Navy, who reviewed Ismay’s retreat to the lifeboats and his abandonment of hundreds to death by freezing and drowning, and wrote:
“We should be careful not to pervert standards. Witness the talk that the result is due to ‘the system.’ What is a system, except that which individuals have made it and keep it? Whatever weakens the sense of individual responsibility is harmful, and so likewise is all condonation of failure of the individual to meet his responsibility.”
Titanic Artifacts: Lest 2 Leather Shoes Meet the 2 Percent Left
What will the central bankers say in their own defense when that last 2% of value of the dollar, or the pound, vanishes like the Titanic beneath the sea? Will they simply shrug their shoulders and blame “the monetary system?” What will they say to those doomed souls who are the victims of their failure, and whose lives, communities, nations and cultures are shattered? What will they say as the wreckage of their monetary system slips away and rains down, like the artifacts from the Titanic landing on the dark abyssal plain far below?
Byron King, Contributing Editor,
Whiskey & Gunpowder
December 1, 2004
Byron King is the editor of Outstanding Investments, Byron King's Military-Tech Alert, and Real Wealth Trader. He is a Harvard-trained geologist who has traveled to every U.S. state and territory and six of the seven continents. He has conducted site visits to mineral deposits in 26 countries and deep-water oil fields in five oceans. This provides him with a unique perspective on the myriad of investment opportunities in energy and mineral exploration. He has been interviewed by dozens of major print and broadcast media outlets including The Financial Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post, MSN Money, MarketWatch, Fox Business News, and PBS Newshour.
Titanic 100th Anniversary Gold, Silver and Bronze. For 2012 the launch of the exclusive limited edition medallion collection. 50mm diameter and 3.5mm thick Pure Gold.
Pingback: Guest Post: Titanic – the ship that sank the gold standard | Bogpaper.com()
Do u now y the titanic whas no took it out
Ben Bernanke has a blog now (not an April Fool's joke). David Stockman takes "The Bernank" the task, using his first-ever post to refute all of central banking...
Getting into space is getting more complex, and a lot cheaper. A recent launch typifies the new power of private rocketry as well as the ability of competitors like SpaceX and Boeing to cooperate to make the price tag of a launch cheaper. Stephen Petranek has more…
Companies go public to rake in a few billion dollars for themselves and the underwriters. And the suckers-- sorry, investors who gobble up shares when these things come out-- usually end up losers. The stock sinks once the initial euphoria wears off. Then it levels off at a much lower price before maybe rising at a normal pace again.
A money illusion sounds like something a prestidigitator performs by pulling $100 bills from a hat shown to be empty moments before. In fact, money illusion is a longstanding concept in economics that has enormous significance for you if you’re a saver, investor or entrepreneur. Jim Rickards explains...
Traders bid up oil prices this week, based on reports of major escalation of hostilities in Yemen, just south of Saudi Arabia. It’s part of Iran’s long-term strategy to surround the Saudis. Which is why Byron says the Saudis’ primary motivation in crashing oil prices last November was to weaken Iran...