A hidden time bomb ticks away inside the government budget: Within a handful of years, US taxpayers will be on the hook for over $100 billion in student loan defaults.
Just last Friday, the US Department of Education released new data on student loan defaults. In short: The hissing sounds coming from the student loan bubble are getting louder.
I doubt it’s a coincidence the Department of Education chose last Friday (when attentions had shifted to the weekend) to release new three-year cohort default rate data for federal student loans. The three-year cohort default rate is defined as follows: the percentage of borrowers who enter repayment on certain loans during a particular federal fiscal year (Oct. 1-Sept. 30) and default or meet other specified conditions prior to the end of the second following fiscal year.
The default rate is horrendous, and it’s only going to get worse. These are uncollateralized loans, so losses given default will be orders of magnitude higher than losses on subprime mortgages; in subprime, losses were mitigated by the value of housing collateral.
“More than one in 10 borrowers defaulted on their federal student loans, intensifying concern about a generation hobbled by $1 trillion in debt and the role of colleges in jacking up costs,” a Bloomberg story notes. The story continues:
“The default rate, for the first three years that students are required to make payments, was 13.4%, with for-profit colleges reporting the worst results, the US Education Department said today.
“The Education Department has revamped the way it reports student loan defaults, which the government said had reached the highest level in 14 years. Previously, the agency reported the rate only for the first two years payments are required. Congress demanded a more comprehensive measure because of concern that colleges counsel students to defer payments to make default rates appear low.”
This 13.4% figure will surely go higher. The post-2008 surge in student loan volume won’t season and start defaulting until after the Class of 2013 graduates. Then we will see the real fireworks. This crisis will finally capture the public’s attention.
What are the investing implications of these defaults-in-waiting? An obvious conclusion is to avoid owning the for-profit education stocks, no matter how cheap they may appear. Education stocks including Apollo Group (APOL) and ITT Educational Services (ESI) probably face a surge in legal and regulatory risk once the enormous scale of student loan defaults comes to public attention next year. In fact, even after they’ve suffered large declines, the for-profit education stocks are starting to look like attractive short sales.
Dan Amoss,for The Daily Reckoning
Dan Amoss, CFA, is a student of the Austrian school of economics, a discipline that he uses to identify imbalances in specific sectors of the market. He tracks aggressive accounting and other red flags that the market typically misses. Amoss is a Maryland native, a graduate of Loyola University Maryland, and earned his CFA charter in 2005. In spring 2008, he recommended Lehman Brothers puts, advising readers to hold the position as the stock fell from $45 to $12. Amoss is our macro strategist and guardian of The 5 Min. Forecast PRO.
Student loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy court unless you can show undue hardship.
Watch how many minorities are granted this “undue hardship” due to the Community Activist we have as Presidente’
Are you kidding me? Student loan is one of the safest unsecured debts. It cannot be discharge, not even in bankruptcy. Sure, the debt holders will have a disruptive cash flow stream and he may incur legal costs when he wants to force the debtors to pay up, so there is a small loss. But the recovery rate is pretty high. Also, the FED and the lenders of this loan have all the time and resources to ride out the storm. That’s from an investor’s stand point. It’s a different story from the perspective of the debtor and it will take its toll on the economy. SO don’t sign anything you don’t understand.
Pingback: Join CPATrend
Pingback: CPA Networks
Pingback: Veja aqui
Pingback: jungs mit sixpack
Pingback: Calgary Roof replacement
Pingback: Calgary SEO
Pingback: Calgary SEO Consultant
Pingback: Calgary SEO Outsourcing
Pingback: bola berita sundul
Pingback: berita-bola.org berita bola
Pingback: berita bola terkini
Pingback: books for 10 year old boys
Pingback: ￼￼￼Order Bystrictin Online
Pingback: Flipora By Infoaxe￼
Pingback: Flipora Article
Pingback: ppi claims letter
Pingback: reviews on muscle factor x
Pingback: Do you know where to buy silos in Italy?
Pingback: how to build muscle
Pingback: consulente del lavoro torino
Pingback: quali sono i prezzi di mercato delle case prefabbricate?
Pingback: Elettronica Cuneo
Pingback: click here
Pingback: I LOVE Myrtle Beach golf packages and hotels
Pingback: riverbank fernvale
Pingback: Peak Life Prostate
Pingback: Subway Surfers - Play free Subway Surfers game online
Pingback: true tech new blog
Pingback: this site
Pingback: Love Letters For Him
The economist Milton Friedman didn't go far enough when he said, "Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it." In fact, as Bill Bonner explains, those same good intentions are often used as pavement on a road that leads to a rather ominous and fiery destination. Read on...
Since the Internet boom of the 1990s, Internet infrastructure has not had a major upgrade in carrying capacity. Now, for the first time in more than a decade, an immense spending cycle is about to be set in motion, and it's aimed at upgrading those "old pipes." Josh Grasmick explains how you can get in on the ground floor of this investment trend...
The best use of a new technology is to solve an old problem you never gave much thought to. It's these problems that become so common, people naturally come to accept them. Now Bitcoin is doing just that, by helping to solve some of the simplest (and most common) problems people face... like splitting a dinner bill. Jeffrey Tucker explains...
Over the past three years, few investments have performed worse than coal. Investors hate it because coal stocks bring them nothing but pain. Environmentalists hate coal because it pollutes. And the list goes on. But recent price action suggests that some of those attitudes might be changing. Greg Guenthner explains...
Taken individually, most people perform relatively well in their daily lives. They get up, drive to work and interact with various other people, largely without incident. But when big groups of people get together, they can be incredibly pig-headed, demanding "action" when the best course of action would simply be inaction. And before you know it, chaos ensues. Bill Bonner explains...