It’s America’s final frontier for shale. And the payout will be huge.
If you add up the recoverable resource estimate for the oft-mentioned Bakken formation in North Dakota, as well as the Eagle Ford in South Texas…then DOUBLE it, you’ll get close to the number of recoverable barrels of oil that remain trapped in the heart of this untapped “mega” shale deposit.
Put another way, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, this one massive shale play represents 64% of the total recoverable shale oil resource base in the country.
It’s the big kahuna, and today we’ll take a look at how the profit opportunities are stacking up for this behemoth…
But first, let’s tackle what I’d consider the most important question when it comes to any resource investment: why now?
Sure, we’ve always known California has oil. Starting early in the 20th century, black gold was flowing up and down the West Coast – propelling business and riches alike.
Of course, like most of the other conventional deposits in the U.S., output has slowly but surely declined.
Today, though, the shale revolution is turning those declining deposits around. From Texas to North Dakota and even towards the East Coast, shale oil and gas are changing America’s energy future. Natural gas is plentiful and oil is coming to the surface, more each day.
That is, except for one untapped shale deposit — what I call the big kahuna — California’s Monterey shale.
Unlike other shale turn-around stories California’s energy output has continued on a downward path. Once a 1.1 million barrel per day (Mbpd) state, California is now producing just half of that – around 500,000 bpd. But when operators in that area finally crack the code, you can bet production will rocket higher.
The best analogy is what we saw recently in Texas.
Once the code was cracked and companies found a way to produce oil and make money, total production for the state skyrocketed. Today, Texas is well on its way to eclipsing the mid-80’s production level above 2.4 Mbpd. Take a look:
Put in perspective, California’s Monterey is truly a sleeping dragon.
The sheer size of this deposit is staggering. In shale terms, the Monterey formation could hold as many as 400 billion barrels of oil. Of that 400 billion, over 15 billion barrels are considered recoverable with today’s technology. That trumps the recoverable estimates from the Bakken and Eagle Ford.
Getting back to the eye-popping statistics above, that represents a whopping 64% of America’s recoverable oil shale reserves. And the way I see it, it’s only a matter of time before this behemoth is spitting out profit opportunities.
That brings us to the other bit of timeliness to this story.
If we were talking about any state other than California (or maybe New York) this energy turnaround story would already be under way. Indeed, the Monterey would be a “household” shale player – with hundreds of rigs spinning as we speak.
But alas, this is California. The political and environmental red tape in the state have brought energy development to a virtual halt.
Of course, if that were the end of the story I wouldn’t’ be writing to you today.
Instead, the way I see it, there’s big change on the horizon. Soon, I believe California’s shale will be open for business…
A Confluence Of Events, The Tipping Point…
What’s the one thing that shale producing states have in common?
Well for starters, governments like Texas, North Dakota and Pennsylvania have enjoyed a boost to tax revenues via shale production. Along with that, unemployment rates are lower than the U.S. average and energy prices are affordable.
Currently California finds itself on the opposite end of this spectrum — a huge budget deficit, high unemployment and expensive energy. As the days pass and deficits increase, pressure mounts to tap this hidden revenue stream.
Another factor at play here is time. Each passing day with, safe, reliable, affordable, U.S. shale production ramping up, there’s more reason for California lawmakers and politicians to look towards shale production as a potential savior for out of control government budgets.
One recent example of this is New York State. New York was the first state to quickly ban shale development. But recently legislation is gaining steam to allow shale production. Indeed, if New York goes the way of shale, the road may be paved for California.
I believe today we’re at the tipping point. As you know I’ve devoted my professional career to “keep my boots muddy” in the resource space. That said, for the past few years I’ve stayed abreast of any worthwhile profit opportunities in America’s shale patch.
Up until now, I haven’t heard a peep out of California. But recently that’s changed. Frankly, I’m not smart enough to know “why” it has changed – whether the debt situation has gotten that bad or the deposit has gotten that good – but it has.
I’m seeing more talk from a political side about permitting and regulation – two things that wouldn’t be hitting my resource desk unless there was a change a’brewin.
In fact, as recently as December, California Governor Jerry Brown released draft regulations that could speed up shale development in the state. Along with that, also in December, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management auctioned off a handful of leases in the state.
The writing is on the wall for a ramp-up of California’s Monterey shale.
Here’s What To Look For…
There are two key factors to keep an eye on here – permits and production.
First, we’ll want to keep an eye on the permit process out west. If sweeping changes open up the permit process – allowing for a massive increase in permit approvals – it’s only a matter of time before the major players skyrocket (California’s usual cast of characters include: Chevron, Shell, Exxon, Occidental and Venoco.)
A change in tone from the political side could fuel this permit turnaround, and the impending shale boom. Is the incumbent Gov. Jerry Brown the pioneer for the job? We’ll see.
However, there is one other force that could boost permitting.
In a similar way that more permits can lead to more production, production can lead to permits. What I’m looking for here is a “code crack” for the Monterey shale. For instance, if an operator in the area can “crack” the Monterey code, and start drastically increasing the production per well, we could see a turnaround for the whole state.
This is similar to what happened in North Dakota, Texas and Pennsylvania. Quietly, but quickly, the shale-code was cracked and production per well started jumping off the charts. The immediate effect was a drastic increase in tax revenue for the state. In the case of ND, TX and PA the states welcomed the bump in tax revenue with open arms and accommodating regulation – meaning plentiful permits.
If permits and production perk up, watch out. The shale boom on the West Coast could come fast. Keep your ear to the ground on this one.
Keep your boots muddy,
Original article posted on Daily Resource Hunter
The Managing Editor of the Daily Resource Hunter, Matt is the Agora Financial in-house specialist on commodities and natural resources. He holds a degree from the University of Maryland with a double major in Business and Environmental Economics. Although always familiar with the financial markets, his main area of expertise stems from his background in the Agricultural and Natural Resources (AGNR) department. Over the past years he's stayed well ahead of the curve with forward thinking ideas in both resource stocks and hard commodities. Insley's commentary has been featured by MarketWatch.
I live in Southern California, and can confirm that the state’s finances are a huge mess, largely due to the incompetence of state and local leaders in the state. However, even with the so-called “green” obsession so prevalent here – shale oil might be the key to solving California’s budget mess. I hope you’re right and that the turnaround in the perception of fracking comes about when California political leaders see how much of an economic boom shale can offer to the Golden State as it has everywhere else where it has been accepted.
One of the best kept secrets of the liberal press and the manipulation of information is this; Jerry(Moonbeam)Brown and the nest he comes out of, are up to their collective eyes in oil. The Browns are BIG money oil. So Jerry is tip toeing through the mess(negative growth energy legislation) his party has made. No surprises there. You can bet that the Browns will be the first at the trough, with well adapted snouts, gobbling, gobbling, gobbling.
Social Democrats like myself who are 100% behind Obama and who want some change in the direction of making life easier for people in America, support development of more atomic energy, hydro-electric dams, and immediate fracking of shale for hydro-carbons in California and everywhere in the nation. In California, fracking should have begun decades ago in Monterey County, San Benito County, Modesto County, Fresno County, Kern County and in Los Angeles County.
In Canada, there is hydro-carbon locked in shale in southern Saskatchewan and in northern Alberta and northern BC and NWT. In America, there is hydro-carbon locked in shale in ND, MT, likely WY, likely PA, likely PA, likely OH, likely WV, likely CO, likely SD, likely LA, likely TX, ID, likely UT, maybe AZ and maybe NM and maybe CA, KS, AK, et. al.
Busting through this shale should have been done decades ago! There is no excuse for letting the Sierra Club let our standard of living come to this state of affairs now where people are starving and there is no heat in the stores— no heat in the grocery stores and women and children go around in 50F (10C) in supermarkets to buy groceries in California….. This is an absolute outrage.
If I were in Washington, the Sierra Club would be under Congressional investigation.
Stephen N. Jacobs
This Sierra Club (and their friends in Greenpeace) were the ones who told you a few weeks ago that the Earth’s climate was warming……… We can’t forget that. And they had all of their so-called “experts” in America and the UK presenting papers at world conferences on the state of the Earth’s environment.
And the world news media was presenting all of this to the world as news about how the world was in a warming crisis, etc.
Several dead now in the North-east from this storm in New England, and this just a return back to the old cold and snow dumps of decades ago. This is more proof that the climate is not changing.
Here in California, we are also having a very cold winter, but it is dry in its late portion. This is typical of the first year of the El Nino return. Next year will be even colder, but it will be wetter. The year after, 2014-2015 will be wet and cold as well. Both years will be El Nino.
So why did the Sierra Club proclaim that the Earth was warming and find so-called “experts” who would agree with that thesis and alarm the public, worldwide?
I certainly am not one of these law and order types or one of these strong national defense types. I do not dwell on the extreme right wing, and I do not call myself a Republican. In the United States, I call myself an Obama Democrat, and really a social democrat in European terms….. That said, I say that I find it amazing that a George Bush could and did let the Iranians get away with the obscenity of 9/11 and did absolutely nothing about it.
Here was a George Bush of the Republican Party which was the Party that was encouraging the U.S. to stick its nose, unwanted and unasked, into the affairs of South-East Asia and Vietnam in the early 1960s in the self-proclaimed name of “preserving freedom”, and yet here was the same Republican Party that let 9/11 just pass into history, forgotten if not forgiven.
Maybe the best thing for an Obama Administration to do now would be to present Iran with a measure, and some kind of retribution that would be comensurate to what they gave to America and New York City. That exchange could be by threat, by military action, or by financial action such as seizure of their oil fields. But it should and has to be done.
Like it or not, size does matter. But contrary to a popular saying, bigger is not always better. Especially when it comes to the size of the state. Marc Faber explains why a world of smaller states might function better than one dominated by excessively large "superpowers." Read on...
Pope Francis recently warned people to beware the "tyranny" of capitalism. Hmmm... Would that be true capitalism and trust in free enterprise? Or the crony capitalism we're currently saddled with? Bill Bonner explains why, even though capitalism is easily corrupted by the capitalists, that doesn't necessarily mean it is a bum creed. Read on...
Let's face it... Gold and silver have had a crappy year. That's actually putting it mildly. In reality, they're on the shortlist for "worst performing assets of the year." But as Greg Guenthner explains, that distinction doesn't plague all precious metals. And that good fortune could carry on through 2014. Read on...
2013 has been one heck of a year for stocks. But with a just a few weeks left in the year, can that momentum continue? Byron King thinks so, and sees 5 opportunities to be thankful for as 2013 comes to a close... and that could carry on into next year. Read on...
Income inequality in the U.S. has reached epic proportions. So much so that "1%" is no longer just a simple fraction. Now it's now much more than that, used as a pejorative symbol of excessive wealth and the greed of the American upper class. Marc Faber explains why this is unfair, especially as regards U.S. tax laws. Read on...