Chris Mayer

“It’s like Thailand was 50 years ago,” Alexandre de Lesseps told me. We were talking about the next big emerging market to bloom in Asia. It may surprise you, but it is one heck of a story… and opportunity. It also fits our grand thesis on emerging markets and is the subject of my upcoming book, World Right Side Up. The country I’m talking about is Myanmar (or Burma, as most people still seem to call it).

I caught up with Alex over the holidays because I remembered his infectious enthusiasm for the country. He is an accomplished investor of frontier markets, those half-forgotten realms on the fringe of the investing world. Alex has been investing in Burma for 15 years as a partner at SPA Capital Partners, working with Serge Pun & Associates. The latter is an investment holding company that has been in Burma since ’91. (And yes, Alex is the great-great-grandson of Ferdinand de Lesseps, the French developer of the Suez Canal, who also oversaw the early construction of the Panama Canal.)

I first met Alex at a dinner at a pleasant riverside restaurant in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. My friend Doug Clayton of Leopard Capital arranged the dinner. (We’ll hear from Doug in a bit.) I was in the middle of a swing through Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam. When I asked investors in these places what the next big story to emerge from Southeast Asia would be, the answer was always the same: Burma.

Burma is beginning, at last, to thaw. The grip of the military junta is loosening, by its own hand. (“This is very important,” Alex said. “The decision to change the country came from within. It speaks to the depth and substance of the changes taking place.”) The market is beginning to open up. Political prisoners have been released. Press censorship rules have been relaxed. Things are happening quickly. Even Hillary Clinton visited late last year, the first US Secretary of State to do so in 50 years.

Alex told me he’s never seen anything like it in all his years in Burma. The hotels are full. Many are already sold-out for the first few months of the year. And Burma gets more and more mainstream attention nearly every week. Why is Burma important?

In short, it has everything the world craves — in size. The Wall Street Journal reported: “Myanmar’s potential is too great for some investors to ignore. One of the last, large frontier markets in Asia, it is rich in oil, gas, timber and gems and has the potential to be a major rice and seafood exporter.” Estimates of natural gas reserves, for instance, would make Burmese fields the 10th largest in the world. Labor costs are low, which could support basic manufacturing.

Doug Clayton visited Rangoon (Yangon) and wrote about it in his newsletter (it is available free at www.leopardasia.com — well worth the visit). Doug notes that Burma has the largest landmass in mainland Southeast Asia and big fertile river deltas. It has 1,240 miles of uninterrupted coastline, deep-water port sites on the strategic Indian Ocean, plus 600 little-used tropical islands.

As home to more than 2,000 pagodas and temples and miles of pristine beaches, Burma could support a larger tourism business. “From my own wanderings in both countries,” Doug concludes, “I would rate Myanmar’s long-term tourism potential just as strong as Thailand’s — which draws 14 million tourists a year, versus Myanmar’s 300,000.”

The comparison with Thailand is hard to miss, and Doug pursues it further. “To comprehend Myanmar’s potential, look over the border at Thailand, a country of comparable size and population,” Doug continues. “Around the time of World War II, colonial Burma’s economy and development surpassed Thailand’s.” Since then, though, Thailand’s economy is now 10 times bigger than Myanmar’s. Doug reckons that “the gap between these historical peers seems likely to narrow as Myanmar introduces a political system more similar to Thailand’s.”

This is essentially the motive force behind the “world right side up” idea — this narrowing of historically anomalous large gaps in development to a world more in tune with longer historical experience (and hence, right side up).

One of the books I read over the holidays was Thant Myint-U’s Where China Meets India: Burma and the New Crossroads of Asia. Thant continues the theme. Rangoon was once the rich capital of British Burma. It was an exporter of rice, timber and oil. “By the late 1920s,” Thant writes, “Rangoon exceeded New York as the greatest immigrant port in the world… Rangoon became a hub for all of Asia.” By the 1930s, Burma’s economy, on a per capita basis, was at least twice that of China’s. Today, China’s is about six times as great. That is a gap that ought to narrow as Burma opens up.

Simple geography also anchors Burma’s importance. It sits between China and India like a hinge. It is a big country, the size of France, with 60 million people. Thant makes Burma’s unique position clear. If you draw a 700-mile radius around Mandalay, Burma’s second-largest city, you encompass a population of 700 million people — nearly one in 10 of all the people on the planet.

It is a natural crossroads. Already, work has begun on a network of pipelines and highways and railways — all with Burma as the bridge to the two potentially biggest markets on earth, China and India.

“There will be opportunities to invest,” Alex told me. Indeed, he’s already seeing investors line up. In the next several months, new funds will launch. The Tokyo Stock Exchange announced it would help Myanmar develop its stock market. Many companies are already trying to elbow their way in Burma. These are mostly Asian companies, as they are not covered by the sanctions imposed by the US and Europe. But some Western companies are already making inroads. Unilever sells soap and soup. Caterpillar, too, has a business there. And a few are still there as exceptions to the sanctions, such as the French oil giant Total.

Overwhelmingly, the foreign investment has focused on oil and gas, mining and power. And Burma’s biggest investor has been China. (One Chinese businessman quoted in Thant’s book says, “I hope the sanctions last forever.” And why not? It keeps out the competition.) There is plenty of opportunity in basic things like cement and automobiles and hotels.

And it’s all just beginning. We’ll keep an eye on Burma as opportunities open up. It’s an exciting time to be an investor as the world turns right side up.

Regards,

Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning

Chris Mayer

Chris Mayer is managing editor of the Capital and Crisis and Mayer's Special Situations newsletters. Graduating magna cum laude with a degree in finance and an MBA from the University of Maryland, he began his business career as a corporate banker. Mayer left the banking industry after ten years and signed on with Agora Financial. His book, Invest Like a Dealmaker, Secrets of a Former Banking Insider, documents his ability to analyze macro issues and micro investment opportunities to produce an exceptional long-term track record of winning ideas. In April 2012, Chris released his newest book World Right Side Up: Investing Across Six Continents

  • Smithers Jeeves

    Burma is King. Great food, sweet people. The best-kept secret no longer.

  • emdfl

    Has the current government figured out what they are going to do about the Karen people’s on-going “disagreement” with the currentgovernment in Burma?

  • bupaya

    Today the only direct way to invest in Myanmar is through the Singapore listed
    Yoma Strategic Holdings (which is controled by Serge Pun of SPA).
    One ought to take a look at their website
    to understand the enormous potentiel over the next few years : Real estate, trucks, agriculture & 100,000 acres of Jatropha oil.

  • Sophia Kemble

    Forgive my detachment from the economic subject, but I must point out that people”still seem to call it” Burma because, as I’m sure the author is aware, that is the true name of the country. The corrupt, oppressive militant government labeled it Myanmar, and in the name of injustices in the several forms of human rights violations, it seems favorable to disregard the attempted name change.

Recent Articles

Solar to Save the World, Ebola to Maim it

Chris Campbell

The duality is stark. In one hand, we have an energy renaissance underway, in the other, a virus is threatening to wreak havoc on the markets and, potentially, your life. Nothing we’re currently doing to fight the Ebola virus will work in 2014, say the researchers. Nothing we’re currently doing will beat it in 2015, either. We need a new game-plan. Read on…


How to Profit From the “Cycle of Hype”

Greg Guenthner

Lose your shirt in 3D printing stocks this year? Don’t kick yourself. You’re not alone. (Okay, kick yourself a little if it’ll make you feel better.) You need to make sure you don’t lose your 3D-printed shirt in the next tech craze. Because there will be a next time. Look, it’s really not your fault if you got taken for a ride on 3D stocks. Greg Guenthner has more...


From Creditopia to Utopia

Richard Duncan

Our friend Richard Duncan believes the U.S. economy requires credit growth to survive. Here, you’ll see what he thinks will happen if the U.S. doesn’t continue expanding credit. You’ll also find exclusive footage we shot in the Daily Reckoning’s studio explaining how the U.S. could lose it’s global dominance… and how programs like Social Security or Medicare could go bust...


Video
Why Democracy Won’t Survive the New Depression

Richard Duncan

The hum of the printing presses and the steady drip of cheap credit over the past five years made it easy to believe the U.S. economy was in a true recovery. But what happens when the excess liquidity begins to dry up?


Your Personal Gold Standard

James Rickards

All paper currency has a shelf life. It could be 5 years or 500 years, but at some point, the value of any paper currency eventually reaches zero. That's why, for centuries, people have turned to one shiny metal to safeguard their personal store of wealth. And, as Jim Rickards explains, you still have that option. Read on...


Don’t Blame Obama (He Has No Power)

Chris Campbell

The Americans who voted for Obama were expecting some big changes. But, six years later, the government he acquired has only spied harder, the drones have flown lower, and the weapons have gotten bigger. But don’t blame Obama. Read on…