Most everyone is familiar with the disastrous consequences of the war on drugs: drug gangs, drug lords, drug suppliers, gang wars, muggings, robberies, thefts, corruption of judges, prosecutors, and law-enforcement officials, murders, assassinations, overcrowded jails, asset forfeiture, and on and on. The fact is that nothing good is produced by the war on drugs. All the results are bad. If you have any doubts, just ask the people of Mexico, who have experienced the unbelievable number of 30,000 drug war deaths in the last 3 years alone.
Making drugs illegal causes the price to increase, which motivates suppliers to enter the black market to make money. The state gets angry over this economic phenomenon, imposing harsher penalties and more brutally enforcing the laws. That causes prices to go up even more, which motivates more people to enter into the market as suppliers. Ultimately, the black market price gets so high that ordinary citizens are lured into the market in the hopes of scoring big financially.
All the bad consequences of the drug war, however, are not the primary reason for why we should legalize drugs. Freedom is the primary reason to legalize drugs. When the state has the power to put people into jail for ingesting a non-approved substance, there is no way that people in that society can be considered free.
A person is sitting in the privacy of his own living room. He decides to smoke marijuana, snort cocaine, or inject himself with heroin. The state — e.g., the members of Congress, the president, the DEA, the Justice Department — claim the authority to punish the person for doing that.
But it’s that person’s mouth, it’s his body, it’s his health.
Alas, not under terms of the drug war. The state says: We own you, we control you, we regulate you. You do as we say with respect to what you put into your mouth, or else.
How can that possibly be reconciled with fundamental principles of freedom? A society in which freedom is genuine is one in which people are free to engage in any activity, so long as it is peaceful and non-fraudulent. That includes, at a minimum, conduct that could be considered self-destructive.
You want to smoke? That’s your decision. You want to drink? That’s your decision. You want to ingest other drugs, no matter how harmful? That’s your decision. That’s what freedom is all about — the right to live your life the way you want, so long as you don’t initiate force or fraud against others.
Unfortunately, statists take an opposite approach. They say that every person ultimately belongs to society and, therefore, can be controlled and regulated by the state for the benefit of society. Since a person taking drugs is harming society, the collectivist argument goes, the state can send him to his room when he is caught violating drug laws, as much as a parent can do so to a child who violates rules on what he should and shouldn’t put into his mouth.
Most everyone now realizes that government officials benefit tremendously from the drug war, just as drug lords and drug gangs do. There is the ever-burgeoning business of asset forfeiture, including against innocent people, which is a way that the state helps fills its coffers without going through the legislative process of raising taxes. There are the bribes of public officials. And there are simply the jobs that the drug war produces — drug war agents, prosecutors, judges, clerks, and so forth. Thus, it isn’t surprising that among the people who still favor the drug war, government officials and drug lords are at the top of the list. Both groups would be put out of work immediately with drug legalization.
We live in a universe in which bad means beget bad ends. It is not surprising that the drug war produces nothing but bad consequences. Violating a fundamental principle of freedom — what a person chooses to ingest — brings about death, destruction, crisis, chaos, violence, corruption, and other bad consequences. Legalizing drugs would be a major step toward restoring the freedoms of the American people, while also bringing an immediate end to the bad consequences that the drug war produces.
Regards,Jacob G. HornbergerWhiskey & Gunpowder
January 21, 2011
The same can be said for seat belt laws!
Netherlands is closing 8 prisons because there is not enough crime
as a voter who because of the antics of the republicans in the past two years will never again vote for a republican let me tell you that i think you are absolutely correct–right on target. keep up the good work. gr
It’s not just that.
For some reason, Congress seems to turn off the capitalist part of their brains when it comes to the drug war. Anyone in Washington ever heard of supply and demand? Can any legislator guess what happens when you do everything in your power to cut supply? Has anyone figured out yet that if you only attack the supply aspect of an economic issue, you’re only looking at half of it?
They aren’t just missing the ‘freedom’ thing, they’re missing the ‘math’ thing.
There was an article in the Los Angeles Times in April of 1973 which summarized in fair detail the results of the War on Drugs. Just from basic arithmetic, it was quite obvious that this war had been lost.
It’s far more a war on the Bill of Rights than a war on drug use. In 1980, the street price for a gram of cocaine was $100 per gram. That’s relatively unchanged in 30 years, so far as I know, which says that the narcotrafficantes are far more successful at their trade than almost any other entity around. I’d admire to see 1980 prices for bread, meat, cars and many other consumer items…
Whilst I agree with your basic premises it is wriiten with such a ONE sided slant that you definitely need a wake up call.
All is a wonderful fairy floss world in OUR own living (& dying from overdoses as a possibility) but when these FREEDOM lovers start to kill brain cells at an ever increasing rate then become a threat to a FREEDOM loving society – what then? Logans Run without an age limitation.
Fair dinkum Jacob, do they pay you to write extreme biased pieces.
Wake up! Have a look in the mirror!
ps By the by the USA is heading for 3rd or maybe even 4th world status in a few years.
Pingback: The Evils of the Drug War | The Liberty Voice
Pingback: The Evils of the Drug War | Bastiat Institute
Pingback: The Evils of the Drug War | Strike-The-Root: A Journal Of Liberty
Only the rule of law can maintain FREEDOM which can quickly degrade into anarchy and every man for himself. Life is a balancing act and “purists’ of all kinds goof that up the balance.
I also think that all drugs should be legalized and free. make the big pharmaceutical companies give it away to any adults who want it, free and pure. Just don’t drive or fly or do anything under the influence that could harm anybody else. But I want to see, if it exists, a simple study of inflation adjusted prices for cocaine, heroin, pot, etc that can back up the supply and demand argument for legalization. Any takers?
Few investments have yielded better returns for early investors than Bitcoin. But now that the price has stabilized, are there any gains left to be made? Today, Josh Grasmick details one investable Bitcoin service coming online that could still lead early investors to massive profits... and with less speculation and risk. Read on...
The Cold War introduced the world to a terrifying new phrase: mutually assured destruction. Thankfully the cold war ended without ever realizing this outcome. But the remnants of that "balance of terror" between the US and Russia still exist... and are beginning to surface in the financial sector. Jim Rickards explains...
'Tis the season for fall market predictions. But don't dust off that crystal ball just yet. Good traders don't try to predict when an important price move is going to happen - they just react when it does. However, as Greg Guenthner explains, forecasts can help you manage your risk/reward, as well as your non-trading portfolio. Read on...
The US Social Security program is complete mess. The funds needed to pay these benefits are quickly drying up, and agreeable solutions are in short supply. But all is not lost... There actually IS a viable way to "save" Social Security. But as Dave Gonigam explains, you're probably not going to like it. Read on...
This summer, the worst Ebola outbreak ever recorded hit sub-Saharan Africa. But the greatest danger, as Stephen Petranek explains, is that the virus will have a chance to mutate into a form that spreads more easily. And if that happens, there will be far reaching consequences - from both a health and an investment side. Read on...