Nathan Lewis

Quick: name an asset, publicly traded, that is the cheapest in a hundred years. Houses? Nope. Stocks? I don’t think so. Commercial real estate? Bonds?

Not too many, are there?

Now here’s a tougher one. Name an asset that is near the lowest price in all of human history.

The answer is: wheat.

Actually, the entire agriculture complex, including corn, beef, pork and beans could fit this description. But for now we will focus on wheat.

Wheat? Didn’t that just leap higher? Aren’t we wringing our hands about the high price of wheat?

People don’t realize how cheap wheat is today, even after its recent gains. In 1904, a bushel of wheat cost about $1.00. That was in 1904 dollars. Since a $20 gold coin contained about an ounce of gold in those days, your $20 gold coin would buy about 20 bushels of wheat. This was a typical price until the mid-1960s.

Today, your $20 gold coin – it could be the very same one – would buy about 187 bushels of wheat. Since there are 60 pounds in a bushel, that would be 11,220 pounds of wheat. At today’s $7.74/bushel, a pound of wheat costs about $0.13 wholesale. Combined with a little meat and vegetables, it would feed a man for a day.

Here’s what it looks like graphically:

We can see that the price of foodstuffs fell dramatically beginning in the late 1960s. This could be ascribed to the “Green Revolution,” which increased crop yields dramatically. However, even if we take just the last few decades, we see that wheat has fallen to very low levels, when compared to the eternal money of gold. (These month-end values are updated to December 2010.)

Commodity values across the board fell against gold during the 1970s, and never really recovered. So, it is possible that grain values will fall to an even lower plateau during today’s currency devaluation episode.

However, we know that wheat is never going to zero. The downside is limited. Actually, it is getting a little difficult to grow wheat these days, mostly due to continuing strange weather. Less supply. On the demand side, multiple billions of people mostly in China and India are adopting a more westernized diet, and they now have the money to pay for it. More demand.

I don’t know what will happen to wheat over the next ten years. However, I suspect that it could do better than stocks, bonds, real estate, and even gold and silver.

Regards,

Nathan Lewis
for The Daily Reckoning

You May Also Like:


The Gold-Oil Ratio and Other Reasons Gold is Still a Buy

Addison Wiggin

After Tuesday’s beat-down and Wednesday’s recovery, precious metals are holding steady. At last check, gold is at $1,598. Of course, the short correction brought with it the usual cries of “bubble” in the gold market. Even here in our own household, we fielded questions on the subject… “Don’t believe what you read about record-high gold […]

Nathan Lewis

Nathan Lewis was formerly the chief international economist of a leading economic forecasting firm. He now works for an asset management company based in New York. Lewis has written for the Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal Asia, the Japan Times, Pravda, and authored Gold: The Once and Future Money.

Recent Articles

Bill Bonner
The Road to Zimbabwe is Paved With Central Bankers’ Good Intentions

Bill Bonner

All over the world, central bankers pretend to sweat and toil on behalf of mankind - correcting... adjusting... nullifying the decisions of honest men and women going about their daily business. But did a central bank ever add one single cent the world's wealth? Bill Bonner explores...


Profit Opportunities Rise Alongside Wages and Consumer Spending

Greg Guenthner

Consumer confidence is rising alongside middle class wages. That means the recovery is no longer resting on the shoulders of the 1%. And that's great news going in to the holiday spending frenzy. Today, Greg Guenthner explains how this presents a great investment opportunity in the retail sector. Read on...


5 Min. Forecast
OPEC Meeting Update: Beware the Oil Price Wars

Dave Gonigam

So much for Americans existing "at the mercy of OPEC." According to the Financial Times, U.S. dependence on oil imports from the OPEC countries is now its lowest since May 1985. Dave Gonigam explains how this is affecting global oil prices, and what to expect from this week's OPEC meeting. Read on...