10/13/09 London, England
Our ‘Crash Alert’ flag goes back up the pole…
October is almost half over. Will we get through the month without a major sell-off?
Dear reader, if you think we know the answer to that you’ve got us mixed up with someone else. Someone who is crazy.
No one with his wits about him thinks he knows what the stock market is going to do.
Still, here at The Daily Reckoning, we have our hunches. We think it’s time for a major pull back. Frankly, we’ll be disappointed if we don’t get one soon. Because, once again stocks are too expensive.
Too expensive for what? Too expensive for the circumstances.
The Dow rose another 20 points yesterday to a new bounce record. Oil rose to over $73. Gold didn’t budge.
Of course, everyone now knows that the recession is over. NABE interviewed 44 economic forecasters. Four-fifths of them said the recession was over.
But we don’t care what they said. These are the same seers who missed the biggest single event in financial history. There are many banking crises, recessions, panics and defaults in the record books. But none were as great as the one that hit September a year ago. Most economists didn’t see it coming; why should we trust them to tell us when it is going?
Besides they’ve got the whole thing wrong. It isn’t a recession; it’s a depression. There is no recovery from a depression; instead, the economy has to re-invent itself in another form. Things aren’t going ‘back to normal,’ in other words. Because the period leading up to the crisis was not ‘normal;’ it was a bubble. After a bubble explodes, you have a lot of debris to clean up. The bigger the bubble, the more damage it does when it blows up.
“The force of a correction is equal and opposite to the deception that preceded it.”
You’ve heard our dictum before. In fact, you’ve heard our explanations for all these points before.
We just lived through the biggest bubble in history. Get ready for the biggest bust. Not just two years of falling stock prices and news-making bailouts. Not just 10% unemployment. Not just 100 bank failures and 30% off housing prices.
Noooo… We’re talking about a worthy correction…a real correction…a noble and distinguished correction…a correction that can hold its head up in public.
This is a correction that will take many years…one that will knock housing prices down for at least five years…and stock prices down to the point where people no longer want to buy them. It’s a correction that goes deep enough and continues long enough to do its work – wiping out the bad investments and mistakes of the Bubble Era, while allowing the survivors to pay down their debts and build up their savings.
Now, here’s a confusing little item. Yesterday’s news tells us that consumer spending as a percentage of the entire economy has edged up to 71%. Now wait just one cotton-pickin’ minute. How could consumer spending be going up?
Hold on, cupcake. It’s not going up. It’s going down. It’s just that the other components of the economy are going down even more.
In the second quarter consumers spent $195 billion less than they did the year before – a 1.9% drop. In the 20 years before that, consumer spending increased at an average rate of 3.3%. So, you do the math… that’s an about-face of more than 5% of GDP – a loss to the economy of about $700 billion!
Consumer credit is going down (we reported the figures earlier in the week)…unemployment is going up…consumer spending is going down…
…those are not the circumstances in which stocks sell for 27 times earnings…and move higher. Those are the circumstances in which stocks crash.
David Rosenberg:
“By some measures, the S&P 500 is already trading at valuation levels that would ordinarily be consistent with an economic expansion that is five-years old as opposed to a recovery that, at best, is in its infancy stages.
“On an operating (‘scrubbed’) basis, the trailing P/E multiple on the S&P 500 has expanded a massive 10 points from the March lows, to stand at 27.6x. Historically, when the economy is taking the turn away from contraction towards expansion, which indeed was the case in Q3, the trailing P/E multiple is 15x or half what it is… While we will not belabor the point, when all the write-downs are included, the trailing P/E on ‘reported’ earnings just widened to its highest levels in recorded history of nearly 140x, which is three times the levels prevailing during the height of the tech bubble.”
So, here goes…yes…today, we are officially running our “Crash Alert” flag up the pole here at the London headquarters of The Daily Reckoning. Cross Blackfriars Bridge and you might see if flapping in the wind, between the two huge gold balls on the roof.
Our Crash Alert flag is out because stocks have become too expensive…and because this bounce should be reaching its apogee by now. Already, central banks are talking about cutting back on their efforts to sustain the bounce with easy credit. Australia led the way last week with a rate hike.
It is also becoming clearer and clearer that the feds’ efforts aren’t really working. They can give money to their friends in the banking industry. They can give money to speculators who then make bets on the stock market, among other things. They can bailout major companies. But they can’t really get much money into the real economy.
Au contraire; they take money OUT of the real economy. The feds will absorb $700 billion of private savings this year alone…to finance their deficit. They expect $1 trillion deficits at least for another 10 years. That won’t leave much money for the private sector.
Naturally, Washington, DC, is doing well. While unemployment is near 10% in the rest of the nation, it’s only about 6% in the Washington area.
But let’s face it… What’s good for Washington is bad for the rest of the nation. The feds have used this correction to increase their power…and add to their wealth. The average federal employee now earns twice as much as his counterpart in the private sector – if the fellow in the private sector has a job at all.
A news item tells us that TARP recipients spent $114 million lobbying for their bailout money – most of it going into Washington, of course.
And the feds now own major stakes in what used to be the private sector – insurance, automobiles, and banking industries.
This has been a great period for government. Money, power…it is all floating down the Potomac like raw sewage…and coming to rest in the capitol city.
Our advice to the feds: enjoy it while you can. When stocks fall again…and people figure out what a mess you’ve made of the economy…you’ll be lucky if you aren’t tarred, feathered and run out of town on a rail.
Barack Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize. Everyone is talking about it. They want to know what they put in the water in Stockholm. Why would the Nobel committee give the prize to someone who hadn’t really done much for world peace? Of course, the committee spokesmen had their lame answers. Now, they’re just hoping Obama doesn’t make fools of them.
It is as if the Pulitzer committee had given the prize to someone whose book had just one chapter; “We hope this will encourage him to finish it well,” says the committee.
But the Nobel committee might have done worse. Barack Obama is not the first American president to win the award. Woodrow Wilson got it before him. Obama seems ready to continue unnecessary wars. But at least he didn’t start them. Wilson sent American troops into the Europea in 1917. He transformed the European war into a World War and drew it out for another 2 years…at a cost of millions of lives, not to mention trillions in expenses.
Wilson was a fool and a humbug, no more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize than Kaiser Wilhelm. As for Obama, we haven’t quite gotten his measure yet. Fool? Fraud? It’s still too early to say.
But if he had been smart, he would have followed the example of another US president – Millard Fillmore. Go to Washington. You will find no monuments to Fillmore. ’Tis a pity. Fillmore actually kept the peace. Not only that, he made improvements; he installed running water in the White House. Then, when Oxford University offered him an honorary degree, he turned it down. The degree was written in Latin. Fillmore said he didn’t want a degree he couldn’t understand.
Chris Mayer, currently in Dubai with Addison Wiggin, sends us this note:
“The real boom in Dubai really only kicked off recently. After spending some time here and chatting with those who live here, I would boil down the more important ingredients to these:
- Low regulations, low tax. This has probably been a Dubai advantage for a hundred years, but people here told us repeatedly how easy it is to set up shop in Dubai and how your privacy is protected. There are also no income, property or corporate taxes. Zero.
(The city funds itself with taxes on hotel occupancy, liquor sales and restaurant meals, as well as permits for roads and such. Part of the budget also comes from the Sheikh’s business interests – such as Emirates Airlines and the aluminum smelters.)
- The introduction of freeholds. In 2002, Dubai allowed foreigners to own property in so-called freeholds. That was a big milestone that kicked off a wave of immigration. So now there are these freeholds where the Penthouse Gypsies live in high style and in very nice communities.
- The backlash of 9/11. Before 9/11, Middle-Eastern exporting countries re-invested $25 billion a year in the US. After 9/11, that slowed to about $1.2 billion a year. Arabs no longer felt welcome and feared what might happen to their wealth. So guess where the money went?
Arab wealth started flowing back to their own countries. The economies of the eight states of the Gulf Coast grew 60% between 2001-08, compared to 18% for the US. ‘Cash poured into Dubai,’ Krane writes. And Dubai’s growth rate topped China’s, averaging 13% per year.
Essentially, the repatriation of Arab wealth in the US was a big driver and still continues to today. As the Middle East region gets wealthier, a good chunk of that wealth will flow through Dubai.
- Finally, the UAE fixes the value of its currency to the dollar – at least for now. What this means is that as the US printed dollars the effects were exported to Dubai, too. That is where Dubai got into trouble. Lots of speculative capital flowed to building islands in the shape of date palms or creating residential communities with robotic dinosaurs from Japan. Now Dubai is suffering through a massive real estate bust as a result.
“Still, Dubai’s important position in world trade is many layered, like a wedding cake.”
“What happened to global warming?” asks a headline at the BBC.
Folks in the Rockies are shivering. “Western Montana breaks records,” says a report. Missoula reported a low of 8 degrees yesterday…14 degrees lower than the previous record for this early in the season.
Nearby Idaho had heavy snow last week too. Same thing in New Zealand, where roads were blocked by heavy snow.
In New Zealand, two major North Island highways remain closed after unseasonal heavy snow days stranded motorists for two nights. “Even if this was the middle of winter this is extreme,” said an analyst.
And right now, it’s spring in NZ. They had a spring snowstorm that put their winter snowstorms to shame.
“Forget global warming,” says old friend Jim Davidson. “Get ready for another ice age.” Buy Brazil, he advises; the cold will drive down farm output in North America and Europe.
As the BBC reports, worldwide temperatures are not increasing; they’ve been falling for the last 10 years. No one knows why. Global warming enthusiasts say the trend is still towards higher temperatures. Their opponents say the world is actually beginning a major period of cooling – driven by solar activity, not by man-made carbon emissions.
Who’s right? We get out our mittens and wait to find out.
Until tomorrow,
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Intel profits fell but their stock jumped up on their bright outlook! It’s almost like getting a Nobel Prize for what you might do someday! Maybe I can get a paycheck for all the work that I will do some day.
I lost my wit and started dumping stocks last month expecting a sell off. The market didn’t sell off, nor did it rise, seems like it is stuck in a trading range. Some weather we are having.
The ghost credit has already turned into various products.
Only payment has left with absence of capability.
And They piling up day by day, aiming to form Mount Everest.
But we ignoring this serious movement.
According to other statistics, unemployment and underemployment is about 20%. After the gov’t stimulus for cars, homes, etc., ends, the numbers will drop again. Retail sales still are terrible. The only people making money are stock insiders who continue to game the market because they’re not in jail where they belong. I will never put my money in the market again; I’d rather buy anything else instead.
As far as the temperature difference you mention, the sun has seen a record number of days without sun spots this year. It’s on pace to set an all-time record for sun spot-less days which means a brutally cold winter. Some speculate this could mean a return to a global cooling period, but I’m nowhere near educated enough to comment on the merits of that claim.
Stick to what you are qualified to comment on… it’s pretty obvious you are no climate scientist. The changes in climate are never measured by antecdotal storms. Climate scientists have never said that the changes in climate would be linear, or that snow would stop… merely that continuing to add greenhouse gases (whose absorbtion of infrared gases can be measured in a lab and is fact) will over time warm the atmosphere. Thousands of scientists agree that this is exactly what is happening, and the denial of this is in reality a fringe belief among scientists with little support.
Really. Stick to what you know something about, which is the effects of Debt and Deflation…
Hey Mom check this its cool
Green House effect countered by Sunspots?
Hey BillR lighten up will ya. What Bonner is trying to relay to us is that you have to careful who, or is it whom, you put your faith in. Global Warming advocates just like some economists have a dog in the fight and will try to sell the public their proganda to further their agenda, so please be a little skeptical when someone tells you the sky is falling. You are free to believe anything you wish, but don’t expect the rest of us to blindly follow along.
Well the Dow has come dangerously close to 10,000 this morning based on the stupendous earnings reports from Intel and some bank or other that is bloated with tax payer money.
BillR – you are emitting “greenhouse gases” 24hrs a day. What are you doing about it?
I agree with BillR on climate change but here is an idea worth investigating.
A company called Carbon Sciences CABN has an efficient way to turn CO2 into liquid fuel. This can be captured at the source then made into fuel that can be used by transportation. This could help to solve the CO2 problem and energy at the same time.
BillRRRRRR-
Who should stick to what they are qualified to comment on…the BBC?
BB merely quoted THEM, silly man.
BB knows, and is honest enough to say that the dismal science is not actually a science. At worst pure fantasy and at best thoughful anaylsis with many unpredictable factors. Climate/Atmospheric science is actually real science, with evidence and facts, not simply opinion.
The BBC reports a lot of things – hang on, this wasn’t actually a report, but a blog. But the sceptics will sieze on anything to spread misinformation.
Go read the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report.
As a matter of fact, global warming models predict severe winters and severe summers also. As the globe gets warmer, climate will become more extreme, both on the cold and hot sides. And seasons will becoome more erratic. Global warming is now a fact. The artic lost 40% of its ice cap. Mount Kilimanjaro’s eternal snow has disapeared (so much for eternal eh?). Debating that is just foolish. As for sunspots, they indeed affect climate in ways we dont know well.
The BBC article merely stated that 1998 was the hottest year on record and that no year since has been hotter. Which is true. Does that mean the planet is cooling? Hardly. The decade from 1998-2008 is the hottest on record by a significant margin, and the next significant El Nino will likly break 1998 as the hottest year.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
Agueing that because one or two years are cooler that the planet is cooling is like saying the tide is going out because a wave just receded. You have to look at trends over many decades and these clearly indicate that we are in a very long term warming that can only be explained by GHG emisssions. This is the conclusion of the vast majority of scientific community, and anecdotal information does not counter this truth.
The BBC article would leave you to believe that perhaps there are a significant number of scientists argueing or debating this truth… but you can only roll out Don Easterbrook or Doug Christy etc. so many times. There are very few scientist debating this consensus and practically NONE of them make it into the peer-reviewed journals because the science just does not hold up.