“The US is going to hell,” we told the group at the Watergate last night.
“You mean the economy is really going to get worse, huh?”
“No, I mean it’s going to hell.”
We had been invited to watch the State of the Union address with a group of dinosaurs…a group approaching extinction with dignity and intelligence. You might call them ‘thinking conservatives,’ ‘paleo-conservatives’ or ‘constitutionalists.’ Whatever they were, they were not like the scoundrels currently running for the Republican nomination or the yahoos who vote for them. They were more like a renegade, retrograde group…like a secret society of White Russian intellectuals after the Revolution of 1917. They cling to hope…that the nation will come to its senses…that the constitution will again be honored…and that the old republic, established by the founding fathers, will be resurrected…
…they will hang on to their hope…until they are hanged by a rope.
“What do you mean?”
“I mean…it is on the road to hell… This isn’t just about losing money. Heck, the US is going broke. But you can go broke with honor. Good people go broke. Smart people go broke. Dumb people go broke. You can’t go to hell with honor. Bad people go to hell.”
“You’re saying the American people are bad?”
“Not by nature. No people are bad by nature. Even Republicans are not bad by nature. Or good. They’re all subject to influence. And now Americans are under a bad spell…being influenced to do terrible things…”
We turned to the TV. There was the commander-in-chief. The gist of his message was that the economy was getting better…thanks to all the feds’ nifty programs and fixes. He spoke of all the wonderful things he and his group of fixers had done.
But he didn’t seem content with what he has achieved. Something vexed the chief executive. It was not the economy. Nor the constitution. Nor the foreign wars.
What stuck in POTUS’s craw was ‘fairness.’ He didn’t seem to think there was enough of it. And he felt it was his job, or part of it, to determine what was fair…and how to make sure it happens.
In his wisdom, he has determined that it isn’t fair for a rich person to pay less than 30% of his income to…well…to the feds.
Here’s the Bloomberg report:
President Barack Obama, offering an election-year prescription to spur the economy, said the wealthiest Americans should pay more taxes in the name of fairness, to bring down the deficit and ensure those trying to make ends meet don’t have to “make up the difference.”
In his State of the Union address last night, Obama called on Congress to embrace a tax plan named for billionaire Warren Buffett that would require those making $1 million or more pay at least 30 percent in taxes. With congressional gridlock heightened by the 2012 election, there is little chance the proposal will pass.
“You can call this class warfare all you want,” Obama said in a nationally televised speech before a joint session of Congress. “But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.”
The president’s 65-minute address was directed at both voters and Congress. The populist themes — tax fairness, help for homeowners, cracking down on US financial crimes and unfair trade practices in China and investigating the lending practices that preceded the housing crisis — are those he will be repeating as he campaigns for a second term.
On the same day that Barack Obama revealed that 30% was fair, Mitt Romney revealed that he paid less than 14% of his income in US federal taxes.
Fourteen percent of income seems like more than enough to us. Serfs in the Dark Ages paid less. But it’s not enough to satisfy our main man, Barry Obama. He wants more. And all the low-life zombies who decide elections want more too. ‘The rich’ should pay more, they say.
Even a lot of the world’s rich people think so. Also in the news was a report telling us that a group of very nice billionaires has gotten together at a very chilly place and suggested that they should all pay more in taxes.
Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk wants to talk about income inequality. So does Irish billionaire Denis O’Brien and Indian billionaire Vikas Oberoi.
The three are among a contingent of at least 70 billionaires who are joining more than 2,500 business and political leaders at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, this week, according to a list of attendees and promotional materials obtained by Bloomberg News. A half-dozen of the richest participants, interviewed in advance of the conference, say economic disparity needs to be addressed.
Some sessions in a series labeled “Ensuring Inclusive Growth and Development” will touch on income inequality, said Kevin Steinberg, chief operating officer of the forum in the US. A panel titled “Remodeling Capitalism” is scheduled for Jan. 27 at the Swiss Alpine High School auditorium, six shuttle- bus stops away from the conference’s main location.
See there. A group of people in Davos is going to figure out how to ‘remodel capitalism.’ Out with the dowdy old rattan furniture. Throw out the chintz. Let’s get contemporary!
Already, there’s a problem. If you think you can remodel capitalism you are hopelessly already lost. You must presume someone modeled it in the first place. Who? When? How?
Fact is, capitalism is what you get when you don’t have master designers on the job. It’s what happens when POTUS and the feds leave it alone. It’s what you get when people are allowed to work out their own designs, one by one, willingly… without a gun to their heads… When they can make money or go broke themselves…and Washington doesn’t care.
But that’s the trouble with Davos. They’re all meddlers. They’re all world improvers. And they’re all making the world a worse place.
“If James Madison and the rest of the people who were at the constitutional convention came back to the US they wouldn’t recognize it,” said a man we met last night at the Watergate.
“They’d be appalled. They put all that work into the US Constitution…using every trick they could think of to limit the power of the executive branch. Because they knew that if you let the executive branch get away with it, it’s only a matter of time before it becomes a tyrant. It doesn’t matter whether you call it a king or a dictator…or an emperor…once you put too much power in one man’s hands, you will corrupt the man who has the power…and destroy the society that gave it to him.
“That was the whole point of the constitution. It was to limit power. They put in checks and balances…and the Bill of Rights. They thought about it. They figured it out. They wanted to be sure that the US really was different. The people were meant to be sovereign. They were meant to be in control.
“And the role of the government…and the only role of the government…was to protect the liberty and sovereignty of the people. And they knew too that the main threat to individual liberty was the government. That’s why you needed warrants…you need to have a trial by a jury of your peers…you needed habeus corpus. They built all these protections into the system to protect the individual from the government. They weren’t there to protect the individual from Al Qaida or from China. They were there to protect the individual citizen from the government.
“And now, with this anti-terrorism bugaboo all of those protections have gone away. The president has the power to put any American citizen in jail — for life. No charges. No witnesses. No hearing. No trial. No nothing.
“He can have you tortured. He can have you killed.
“I mean, President Obama has powers that King George would have envied. And he got those outrageous powers without a word of protest. Nobody said anything. Congress said nothing. The people said nothing.
“Yeah…I guess that’s what you mean about Americans going to hell. I guess they deserve to go to hell. But, of course, that’s exactly what we’re trying to stop…
“And now the prez has more power than Louis the 14th… And he was upposed to be an absolute monarch I mean, Louis had to pay for his wars. He had to pay for his public buildings. He had the nobility against him much of the time. He had much of Europe against him.
“America was lucky. It was far from Europe. It was protected by oceans from foreign domination. Every backwoodsman had a rifle and he knew how to use it. You know that when King George sent troops to put down the revolution a letter appeared in the London paper. It came from a man who had lived in the colonies. He told his countrymen that if they were shipping out to fight the Americans they should be sure to write their Last Wills and Testaments before they left. Because the Americans all had guns and knew how to use them.
“And that is also why the new government of the US went to such lengths to try to curb the power of the army. There was to be no standing army. The whole idea was a nation of free men. Armed and ready to protect themselves. And the constitution was very clear, if the president wanted to make war he had to convince congress not only to approve it…it also had to raise an army and raise the money to pay for it.
“But now the president can make war on whomever he pleases with no act of Congress. He doesn’t even have to ask the congress for money. There’s so much money sloshing around in the Homeland Security and Pentagon budgets that he can make war on anyone.
“The apologists for this kind of thing say the president will only use his new powers for good causes. But that’s not what history tells us. Even if one or two presidents resist…and govern more or less benevolently, like Caesar Augustus…it won’t be long before we get a Caligula, a Nero, or a Gingrich…
“So now we send out drones and hit squads to kill people in Afghanistan and Pakistan. And soon — it is just a matter of time before the power corrupts the US president, if it hasn’t already — that the drones and hit squads target Americans on American soil.”
Regards,Bill Bonnerfor The Daily Reckoning
Since founding Agora Inc. in 1979, Bill Bonner has found success and garnered camaraderie in numerous communities and industries. A man of many talents, his entrepreneurial savvy, unique writings, philanthropic undertakings, and preservationist activities have all been recognized and awarded by some of America's most respected authorities. Along with Addison Wiggin, his friend and colleague, Bill has written two New York Times best-selling books, Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt. Both works have been critically acclaimed internationally. With political journalist Lila Rajiva, he wrote his third New York Times best-selling book, Mobs, Messiahs and Markets, which offers concrete advice on how to avoid the public spectacle of modern finance. Since 1999, Bill has been a daily contributor and the driving force behind The Daily Reckoning. Dice Have No Memory: Big Bets & Bad Economics from Paris to the Pampas, the newest book from Bill Bonner, is the definitive compendium of Bill's daily reckonings from more than a decade: 1999-2010.
like infestors are any better. read the bible, book of genesis, chapter 47.
Of course all the richest people in the world agree to pay higher taxes. When elected officials like Obama nix building new oil pipelines in favor of using rail lines that just happen to be owned by crony capitalist friend and number one cheerleader Warren Buffet, it’s an easy investment decision.
In fact Congress and the Pentagon have recently OK’d drone usage in the USA. I fear the US GOV more than Al-Quaeda in this country.
Sue the Fed : http://www.suethefed.com/ The more people join the more we can sue the Fed for ! PLEASE SUPPORT THIS WORTHY CAUSE AND AT LEAST CHECK IT OUT TO IMPROVE ITS GOOGLE RATINGS !
Billionaires pay more in taxes than their secretaries earn in wages.
But you knew that already. Just ask your IRS.
It’s a myth we ever had any rights. Maybe privileges that can be witdrawn at any time. Americans have been indoctrinated into believing their Constitution is real. It’s just a piece of paper that strong hands can bend over and wipe their behind with..
OF COURSE Buffett says he wants higher taxes. (He could just give his Berk shares to the Treasury if he felt inclined to do so.)
Since the bulk of his wealth is prudently protected by a non-profit foundation, there won’t be anything left to tax.
Sly old fox.
Not only is it only a matter of time before those drones target us here in the US, it’s only a matter of time before the families of the innocent victims of those drone attacks come to our shores and target us.
Al-Qaida has been defeated; bin Laden is dead. All we’re doing now is testing our latest weaponry and creating enemies in the process. No one cares, though, because we’re doing it to “brown savages”. We’ll care when they hit us back.
…of course when the americans all end up where they end up in the end (down there), there will be much gnashing of teeth!…but the poor needn’t worry, they don’t got any left by the time they’ll be needing them there!…DON’T WORRY say the mormons…”they will be provided”…
any idea who the first trillionaire will be, Bill? other than you or i, of course…
or is a somebody or two already there?
if i make before you, i’ll send you a nice rattan room ensemble with chanel-red leather cushions, ok?
We still have those guns Bill, but I’m afraid were no match for the FedGov. Those drones are deadly and probably being controlled by some freak like those Columbine killers. I fear many of those folks would take pleasure in gunning many of us down.
Too many people want roads, healthcare, and education and they want someone else to pay for it. We’re surrounded by parasites and neocons. When this system fails, hopefully the pendulum swings back to freedom.
[That was the whole point of the constitution. It was to limit power.] BB
The Articles limited power…the Constitution centralized power in DC. It was the first baby step towards the monster we see today and those founding fathers knew it. Read the reasons they had for abandoning the Articles…
All nations with historical staying power, –Greece, China, Japan, Spain, Britain, France, Russia– all of them have careened through history from one political extreme to another yet they have remained culturally intact. I see no reason the United States can not join this same group, even if we are multi-cultural.
And through the course of history it’s interesting to see who the declared enemy of the state is from one epoch to the next. In the case of France, Joan of Arc was burned at the stake for being a heretic. Yet a century later, the very same church that had her torched declared she was, in fact, actually a saint.
In the case of the United States, you’ll know the current epoch has run its course when the US Mint is issuing commemorative coins to recognize Timothy McVeigh as a patriot, albeit 25 years ahead of his own time.
Dear Mr Bonner,
I think we – all the readers already know where things are going, and how bad “manipulated economy” is.
When tree grows up, and there is a ceiling above it, sooner or later it will find it’s way up either by the nearby window, or by growing through concrete breaking it on it’s way. In other words it will adapt, or to put it nicely
“nature will always find a way”
Economy is part of nature and it is ALWAYS free to act within men-defined borders (which will eventually get broken).
Reason for introduction welfare in the UK was that in early XX century 90% of men applying were refused to join the army due to bad health conditions. British lords and owners decided to give them money so there is someone to fight for them.
I think we all got your point very well so far. Zombies are overtaking the west. Why don’t you leave it right there and move to another topic –
How will nature find it’s way this time?
What will happen, when number of people o the planet will reach the “earthly food production capacity”?
There is plenty to write about.
Otherwise we will find you
If push comes to shove, there is no question in my mind who will come out on top. I’ll put it to you then:
Group A: Self-reliant, believe in honor, believe in Good Triumphing over Evil, believe in Liberty and Justice for all. Armed. Well Supplied. 50,000,000 strong.
Group B: Dependent, loop-hole seeking sycophants, believe if you don’t get caught anything is OK to do, no honor, rely on the Feds for Arms and Protection, poorly supplied. 20,000,000 strong.
Pick your side.
I’m pretty sure group b is 100,000,000 strong. and that group a is 20,000,000 or less.
‘course there’s no need to mention illegals ….
Pingback: plantacja lawendy
Pingback: jazda konna
Pingback: the walking dead graphic novel
Pingback: come fare soldi facili su metin2
Pingback: how to win the lottery free please click the up coming post
Pingback: shoulder diagram
Pingback: katy perry wallpaper
Pingback: Facebook Like Button
Pingback: person search
Pingback: free people finder
Pingback: Zalando Gutschein
Pingback: jimmy rose
Pingback: Carl Grimes
Pingback: slot machine bar
Pingback: business ideas for beginners
Pingback: additional info
Pingback: driving schools milton keynes
Pingback: skin tags home remedies
Pingback: unphotoshopped pictures
Pingback: weight loss program
Pingback: seguros madrid
Pingback: kardashian halloween costume
Pingback: wart treatment
Pingback: best e cigarettes
Pingback: smoke free electronic cigarettes
Pingback: How To Conceive A Girl
Pingback: kasyna bonusy bez depozytu
Pingback: HR Software
Pingback: read full article
Pingback: kasyno bonus bez depozytu
Pingback: kasyna z bonusami bez depozytu
Pingback: e cigarette brands
Pingback: raspberry ketone reviews
Pingback: tropical cyclone philippines
Pingback: How To Conceive
Pingback: Waterwoods EC
Pingback: ketogenic diet success
Pingback: how to open a business
Pingback: kourtney kardashian implants
Pingback: click here
Pingback: send flowers minsk
Pingback: przepisy z ryb
Pingback: meg ryan plastic surgery
Pingback: makia julpo
Pingback: Click This Link Here Now
Pingback: Try This Out
Pingback: jalia parsnip
Pingback: Look At This Site
Pingback: mark mania
Pingback: universal remote
Pingback: Mirena IUD
Pingback: click to watch
Pingback: cat videos
Pingback: handy orten
Pingback: handy orten kostenlos
Pingback: GranuFlo recall
Pingback: view video
Pingback: п»їAnyrtew Hisvong
Pingback: Serina Nitzschke
Pingback: Devon Rackow
Pingback: Vickey Banvelos
Pingback: Lashell Hyppolite
Like it or not, size does matter. But contrary to a popular saying, bigger is not always better. Especially when it comes to the size of the state. Marc Faber explains why a world of smaller states might function better than one dominated by excessively large "superpowers." Read on...
Pope Francis recently warned people to beware the "tyranny" of capitalism. Hmmm... Would that be true capitalism and trust in free enterprise? Or the crony capitalism we're currently saddled with? Bill Bonner explains why, even though capitalism is easily corrupted by the capitalists, that doesn't necessarily mean it is a bum creed. Read on...
Let's face it... Gold and silver have had a crappy year. That's actually putting it mildly. In reality, they're on the shortlist for "worst performing assets of the year." But as Greg Guenthner explains, that distinction doesn't plague all precious metals. And that good fortune could carry on through 2014. Read on...
2013 has been one heck of a year for stocks. But with a just a few weeks left in the year, can that momentum continue? Byron King thinks so, and sees 5 opportunities to be thankful for as 2013 comes to a close... and that could carry on into next year. Read on...
Income inequality in the U.S. has reached epic proportions. So much so that "1%" is no longer just a simple fraction. Now it's now much more than that, used as a pejorative symbol of excessive wealth and the greed of the American upper class. Marc Faber explains why this is unfair, especially as regards U.S. tax laws. Read on...