Rocky Vega

So many explanations have been offered for the financial crisis, then reheated and reexamined, that it’s nearly impossible to imagine a new theory worth considering. However, Jeffrey Friedman of the Cato Institute has found one. He looks at a little-discussed regulatory mechanism that incentivized banks to put a disproportionate share of capital into what turned out to be some very toxic assets.  

Friedman explains in the Cato Policy Report:

“In 1988, financial regulators from the G-10 agreed on the Basel (I) Accords. Basel I was an attempt to standardize the world’s bank-capital regulations…

“It differentiated among the risks presented by different types of assets. For instance, a commercial bank did not have to devote any capital to its holdings of government bonds, cash, or gold — the safest assets, in the regulators’ judgment. But it had to allot 4 percent capital to each mortgage that it issued, and 8 percent to commercial loans and corporate bonds…

“The United States implemented it in 1991 [...] Ten years later, however, came what proved in retrospect to be the pivotal event. The FDIC, the Fed, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Office of Thrift Supervision issued an amendment to Basel I, the Recourse Rule, that extended the accord’s risk differentiations to asset-backed securities (ABS): bonds backed by credit card debt, or car loans — or mortgages — required a mere 2 percent capital cushion, as long as these bonds were rated AA or AAA or were issued by a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE), such as Fannie or Freddie.

“Thus, where a well-capitalized commercial bank needed to devote $10 of capital to $100 worth of commercial loans or corporate bonds, or $5 to $100 worth of mortgages, it needed to spend only $2 of capital on a mortgage-backed security (MBS) worth $100.

“A bank interested in reducing its capital cushion — also known as ‘leveraging up’ — would gain a 60 percent benefit from trading its mortgages for MBSs and an 80 percent benefit for trading its commercial loans and corporate securities for MBSs.”

As Friedman describes above, the regulations intended to improve the operations of the banks instead put the wheels in motion for a financial mess. It shows how oftentimes meddling in a system is worse than leaving it alone.

For more details and insight into the causes and consequences of the financial crisis visit the Cato Policy Report’s coverage of a perfect storm of ignorance.

Rocky Vega

Rocky Vega is publisher of Agora Financial International, where he advances the growth of Agora Financial publishing enterprises outside of the US. Previously, he was publisher of The Daily Reckoning, and founding publisher of both UrbanTurf and RFID Update -- which he ran from Brazil, Chile, and Puerto Rico -- as well as associate publisher of FierceFinance. Rocky has an honors MS from the Stockholm School of Economics and an honors BA from Harvard University, where he served on the board of directors for Let?s Go Publications, Harvard Student Agencies, and The Harvard Advocate.

  • http://dailyreckoning mike

    …Q…WHAT CAUSED THE FINANCIAL MESS…A…NEW TECHNOLOGIES ARE DISPROPORTIONATELY ‘HOARDED’ FOR MILITARY USE AND KEPT FROM CIVILIAN EVERYDAY USE…THUS OPPORTUNITY FOR INVESTMENT GROWTH AND ADVANCE GRINDS TO A HALT…now, wherz my nobel baby?…

  • sierra

    I’m a registered no-partisan voter….disgusted with the actions of both major parties….but we have to remember that we are a “political economy” not just an “economic” economy.
    The present crisis can be argued ad infinitum over minutia but the bottom line it can be attributed to the quest for power, greed and a lack of business ethics.
    A decent study of the history of banking in the US will give you a clue.
    The present administration, however you rate it, inherited the worst of the worst policies administered (by both parties genuflecting to $$$$$) too much in the interests of “the invisible hand” rather than a LONG TERM vision of a truly progressive society. Until we “free” ourselves from the notion that the “market” forces will cure Society’s problems we will continue to wallow in the mud of mediocrity.
    End of story.

  • La buena vida

    Free markets are too blame? What frickin universe do you live on? Free markets haven’t been in play for a very long time except for the small business owner who must put up with increased regulation, tax and interference. Then when they are bankrupted they are liquidated. They aren’t too big to fail. I say liquidate the banks(someone will buy their assets), liquidate the states, liquidate the feds(hell, sell the Grand Canyon). That will get the “progressives” attention. You want all these gubmint programs then pay for them… now!

  • Pingback: Trackback

  • Pingback: Trackback

Recent Articles

Maestro
6 Major Flaws in the Fed’s Economic Model

James Rickards

Use what analogy you will: a car, a clock, a chemistry experiment... the point remains that the Fed believes it can control the economy. Indeed the Fed will stop at nothing to realize the goals of its dual mandate" to maximize job growth and maintain price stability. But, as Jim Rickards expalins, that conceit always ends in disaster. Read on...


The Best Way to Play the Surge in Equity Crowdfunding

Matthew Milner

When it comes to life-changing tech investments, venture capital has been at the forefront of the investment landscape. But now, there’s a new kid on the block that’s threatening the “old way” of doing things: Equity Crowdfunding. What happens when these two fields meet? Matthew Milner explains...


How You’re Attracting Unwanted Government Attention

Mike Leahy

The NSA will tell you their surveillance programs protect you and the country from terrorists who seek to do you harm. But when you get past their talking points and prepackaged press statements, you'll find their search for enemies covers more people than you'd imagine. Mike Leahy explains...


The Surging Market Sector You’re Probably Ignoring

Greg Guenthner

If the back-and-forth action in the markets has you banging your head against the wall these days, maybe you're concentrating on the wrong stocks. While the market churns near its highs and investors continue to fret over the makings of a possible correction, Asian stocks listed on U.S. exchanges are catching fire. Greg Guenthner explains...


Bill Bonner
Why the Government Views You As Collateral Damage

Bill Bonner

The economist Milton Friedman didn't go far enough when he said, "Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it." In fact, as Bill Bonner explains, those same good intentions are often used as pavement on a road that leads to a rather ominous and fiery destination. Read on...