A decade ago, I concluded that we were in the early stages of a secular bear market, and that investors needed to adjust their risk postures accordingly. Back in December 2003, I penned a piece for the Stock Trader’s Almanac, titled Managing the Very, Very Long Term, based on this blog post from November 2003.
Long time readers know this is a major theme to for me. Much of my commentary, presentations and investing posture has been about longer term, secular cycles. Search the Big Picture for the phrase “secular bear market” and 659 results come up (in quotes, 130).
Here’s what I wrote back in 2003:
The panoramic view leads me to the present conclusion. Following an 18-year Bull market [1982-2000], and a three year Bear market, we are now committed to what looks like a long-term military obligation in Iraq. In the grand scheme of things, I suspect we are in for a harder long-term slog than the mere 3 year Bear market suggests.
Historically, this suggests an extended period of range bound trading as the highest probability long-term scenario in my view. I expect vicious rallies, and wicked sell-offs to occur — over shorter term cycles — within the larger timeline. Active management and capital preservation are going to be the key methods of outperformance.
Let’s put this into more specific quantitative terms. According to data from Fidelity:
Here we are, a few weeks away from the start of the 14th year of the secular Bear market that began March 2000. The question on more than a few peoples’ minds has been whether or not it is reaching its end.
To answer that question, we need to understand exactly what a secular bear market is. Over the years, I have developed my own definition of Secular Bear Markets:
A Secular Bear Market is a long term cycle which typically begins after a long term bull market peak and crash. It is primarily characterized by strong, even excessive rallies and selloffs, all occurring within a broad trading range. Despite the strong rallies, markets often appear to be unchanged a decade or so into secular bears.
The psychology is one of compressing Price to Earnings multiples, as investors become increasingly unwilling to pay the same price for each dollar of earnings. There is often a general malaise to the broader society, sometimes encompassing political scandals and/or war.
On Main Street, there is a general disinterest in equities. Ratings for financial television and other media fall. Interest in non stock investments — especially Bonds, Commodities and Real Estate — rise.
To conclude that the Secular Bear is ongoing, we need to see a few factors:
— Are markets still rangebound? Have we made new highs in various indices?— Are P/E multiples still contracting?— Are financial news media ratings still falling?— Is society generally pessimistic?— Is Main Street still disinterested in equities?
Some of the answers to these questions are purely quantitative, and do not require any human judgment. A few of these do require a squishier answer. After 36 months or so of capital outflows from equity funds, we should not rush to judgement after the first month of inflows.
And there is a major caveat to this: The Fed’s extraordinary ZIRP/QE intervention creates an impression of inorganic gains. Without the unprecedented FOMC actions, I am unsure markets would be anywhere near current levels.
Regardless of your answer to our broad question, there is one thing that I believe to be clear: We are much closer to the end of this secular cycle than to the beginning. Many optimists — most notably, famed technician Ralph Acampora — believe the secular bear market has ended. Even skeptics have to agree that we are more likely in the 7th or 8th inning than earlier stages of the game. Only the “America is Japan” crowd thinks we are in the 3rd or 4th inning.
The key question for investors: Are you prepared to make changes to your portfolios?
Barry Ritholtzfor The Daily Reckoning
This article is reproduced with permission of author. Copyright Ginormous Content Limited. All rights reserved.
Barry Ritholtz is the author of Bailout Nation: How Greed and Easy Money Corrupted Wall Street and Shook the World Economy. He blogs at The Big Picture. You can follow him on Twitter @Ritholtz.
Barry Ritholtz is author of Bailout Nation (Wiley), publisher and editor of The Big Picture , and CEO and director of equity research at FusionIQ , a quantitative research firm that provides web-based software services to individual investors and traders. Ritholtz makes frequent TV & Radio appearances, including Bloomberg, CNBC, CNN, Fox and PBS. He is regularly quoted in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Barron's, Forbes, TheStreet.com, and other media. At the moment, he has his eye on a 28-foot Doral Venezio and a 1968 230 SL.
Nobody’s in the market any more Barry. Look at all the comments. It’s 8 computers in lower Manhattan doing all the trading. Nice try. Time to find a new line of work. The “America is Japan” crowd. That’s funny. How about the “America is bankrupt” crowd. Here’s a quick question, Wall Street boy… How many zeros are in twenty trillion? Guns and gold, Riholtz. You can’t eat stocks and bonds.
As GOOGLE proceeds to its maximum growth valuation in 2 weeks and as the Nikkei does the same … as the Bell Weather former Fed Chairman leads his familiar last musical chair Equity Cheer …. and as the total world debt cannot be further substantially expanded to elevate the value of existing assets used as collateral to minimize existing debt …. and cannot be redeemed by a demand-less high unemployment citizen-work-for-currency- based forward consumption economy …………………. the final countercyclical top of the secular bear market is at hand….
I would start with http://sentiment-trader.blogspot.com/ that guy gives regular updates on whether we are in a bull market, bear market regularly and uses charts to back it up.
Right now we are in a bull market, but that will soon end I think. And also another important note is that over time the market always rises, not falls and sells off.
Something is coming to an end, alright… this country. Too much debt, too much war, too much fascism, too many stupid sheep following douche bags like Bernanke and Krugman. By the way, this article completely sucked because you didn’t actually present any PE or leverage ratios (what’s that? PE of 17.9?). I knew it was just link bait, which is why I haven’t visited your blog in years.
You don’t seem to understand that our courageous leaders have outlawed bear markets; thus there will be no bull ones either.
People assume that markets and financial instruments have some kind of long-term average they tend to flock toward. But in reality, a handful of wild swings in various directions often skew these averages to a point where the "long-term" is not at all reliable, let along predictable. Chris Mayer has more...
The debt and leverage that Washington and Wall Street have built up over the years will eventually blow up. And when it does, it could be "worse than 2008." But there is at least one way to protect yourself. And today Dave Gonigam explains how you can get started before any of this occurs. Read on...
By now you've probably heard about the violence in Gaza and Isreal. It's tragic, but there's more to it than the mainstream media lets on. Today, Byron King explains how, amid the conflict, there's also resource scarcity behind the Israeli-Palestinian crisis - namely, in the enormous offshore natural gas deposit known as "Leviathan..."
Last year, when Amazon announced they would be using drones to send packages to customers, a lot of people saw it as a clever marketing ploy just in time for the holiday shopping season. But, as Matthew Milner explains, this use of drones could soon be widespread, and that presents a unique investment opportunity for savvy investors...
After the 2008 financial crisis, little could be heard over the deafening cries of "mission accomplished." And while the Fed's massive QE program seemed to work, the question remains: for how long? Addison Wiggin explains why the next round of QE will fail miserably, paving the way for the IMF to step in with something called "special drawing rights." Read on...