09/14/11 Laguna Beach, California – What’s wrong with gold stocks?
For the last several months, they’ve been trading a lot like stocks…but nothing like gold. Such is the occasional curse of the gold stock investor. In some market phases, gold stock investors failed to “get paid,” even when gold is soaring.
One of your editor’s friends, a gold stock expert, used to joke, “Gold stocks are the most empathetic of all investments. They fall when the stock market is falling, and also fall when the gold price is falling.”
While not entirely true, this observation is not entirely false either. For long periods of time, gold stocks can produce far more frustration than satisfaction. The last three-and-a-half years illustrate the point. Since the day the gold price first jumped above $1,000 an ounce on March 13, 2008, the yellow metal has soared 83%. But over the same time frame, gold stocks, as represented by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index, have gained a meager 9%.
While it’s true that plus-9% is better than the minus-3% the S&P 500 Index has delivered since mid-March 2008, no investor buys a gold stock to make 9% while the gold price is soaring 83%.
Furthermore, there may never have been a more difficult “plus 9” in the history of financial markets. Between March 2008 and late October of the same year, the XAU Index plummeted 67%. An investor would have had to stay put during that entire, sickening decline — and resist the temptation to cut his losses during the ensuing rebound — in order to eke out his “plus 9.”
On paper, therefore, riding the bull market in gold during the last few years has been “easy money.” In the real world, it has been anything but. Gold and gold stocks both recovered throughout 2009. Even so, during most of the ensuing two years — from October 2009 to the present — owning gold stocks has remained an exercise in frustration.
On October 2, 2009, gold traded below $1,000 an ounce for the very last time (at least so far) and ended the New York trading session at $1,002.80. Since then, the gold price has soared 82%. But again, gold stocks have lagged far behind. Over the last few months, gold stocks have delivered even less glittering results. While gold is up 30%, the XAU Index has gone nowhere. Perhaps gold stocks are due for a change of fortune.

As the chart below illustrates, the XAU Index has spent most of the last 20 years selling for about 20% to 25% of the level of the gold price. During the depths of the 2008 crisis, the XAU plummeted to 11.1% of the gold price. This ratio subsequently rebounded somewhat, but has been rolling back over during the last few months and has almost returned to the crisis lows of 2008. At today’s quote, the XAU sells for 11.9% of the gold price.

In other words, gold stocks are very lowly priced, relative to gold. This looks like a buying opportunity, not simply because gold stocks are cheap relative to gold, but also because gold stocks are cheap from almost every fundamental perspective. (We will examine that theme more closely in tomorrow’s Daily Reckoning).
No “Absolute Law of Mean-Regression” can guarantee that gold stocks will begin outperforming gold itself. Furthermore, no absolute law of any kind can guarantee that outperformance would be synonymous with positive performance.
Thus, the only absolute law that pertains is this one: Cheap is better than expensive, all else being equal.
Gold stocks are cheap.
Eric Fry
for The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





business activity promising future returns is under severe pressure both now and in the future. people buy gold because they want safe money now. are gold stocks money or are they a business activity promising future returns?
Many reasons why stocks are under-performing gold; most important: cost of extraction (many deep mines would not have been opened if it were not for the rise in gold’s price), countries where gold is mined (high taxes or outright nationalization).
I read that at Newmont’s current price you are buying their reserves at $800/oz INCLUDING the cost of extraction. That covers a fair amount of political risk regarding where their reserves are located.
http://www.financialsense.com/financial-sense-newshour/guest-expert/2011/09/08/bill-fleckenstein/mining-stocks-endgame-for-fiat-currency-gold-standard-return
Every fundamental indicator points to the fact taht gold will continue to rise as well as it’s equity counterparts. In some cases the equities may lag, but, on a 3-5 year timeline, I believe gold equities will continue to surge