Yes, the real rate of interest matters to gold. But not as much as its direction…
Wall Street and the City are coming to decide that gold is a sell. Because interest rates, they reason, are set to rise sooner than they used to imagine.
This professional money is only half-wrong. Central banks aren’t about to hike the returns on cash savings, which have been a wasting asset pretty much non-stop since 2007.
But when the central banks do move to defend the real value of cash by hiking rates — or stop beating up short-term rates so badly that longer-term rates start to rise — gold is likely to suffer. Just so long as those hikes actually outpace inflation. Because it’s the direction of travel which matters, not any particular level.
See the two fake-outs below? The first, in the mid-1970s, saw gold prices halve in just 18 months, even though the real rate of interest stayed below zero for much of that time.
And once the direction of travel in real interest rates turned around again, gold prices began the second leg of their 1970s’ bull market, rising 8-fold between the end of 1976 and the start of 1980.
The second feint came in early 2009, when T-bond yields held steady but inflation went negative on the official CPI index at least. The gold market didn’t buy for one second the idea that real rates would stay positive. The Fed wouldn’t allow it, gold buyers reasoned (whether they knew it or not). Which now looks a smart call.
Since then, the very worst real rates were offered in September 2011, right when the Dollar gold price hit its current peak of $1920 per ounce. Since then real rates have crept higher. No, today’s mere 0.4% might not sound like much. But it’s been enough to flatline the gold bull.
Do you think the Fed will now allow or reverse these above-zero debt costs for the US Treasury?
Adrian Ashfor The Daily Reckoning
Gold price chart, no delay | Buy gold online at live prices
The trouble with being a contrarian is that you can never be quite contrarian enough.We began having doubts about the ‘feds inflate…gold soars’ hypothesis last year. It was too easy…too obvious. And if it were that easy to inflate a nation’s currency, how come the Japanese couldn’t get the hang of it in the ’90s?So, […]
Formerly the City correspondent for The Daily Reckoning in London and head of editorial at Fleet Street Publications Ltd, the U.K.'s leading financial advisory for private investors. Adrian Ash is also the editor of Gold News and head of research at BullionVault. SPECIAL REPORT- The Endless PAYCHECK PORTFOLIO: In three simple steps, unleash a steady flow of work-free income... starting with up to 75 automatic "paychecks" deposited directly into your account.
You cannot compare what was happening in the ’70s with any other period of time. ’71 was the beginning of the end of the gold standard and global fiat currencies. That alone is unique enough in that it untethered the price of gold. More importantly, gold since 1933 was illegal to own in the USA. It wasn’t until ’75 that gold was finally legal (and entire generation could not own gold!). Finally in ’77 the 1933 Executive Order 6102 was finally ended. At the same time inflation was skyrocketing. Add just those few facts together, and it’s plenty enough to explain why the price of gold skyrocketed in 1980.
That was then – and it’s never going to happen again. We can’t compare this never before, and never again, event with anything else and say there’s a pattern.
How can the interest rate rise when the US government is in so much debt that it can hardly pay the interest on the debt yet alone the debt itself?
Despite the huge debt, intermittent “feint moves” of marginal
rate hike may be created to liven up the market. There will be
dearth of excitement and thrill if you were to draw a perpendicular
line down to the valley. Never, have I seen a straight line down to
the abyss being drwan on a diagram. Expert does not lack artistic
The rising of the interest rates amazed me thinking of the debts.
Pingback: payday loan software
Pingback: robert kirkman walking dead
Pingback: play roulette online free download
Pingback: how to win the lottery books arkansas lotto
Pingback: chloe grace moretz
Pingback: Zalando Gutschein
Pingback: Check out the website
Pingback: online casino
Pingback: name lookup
Pingback: plastic surgery celebrities
Pingback: coal miner song
Pingback: leggere questa recensione
Pingback: bronx home inspection
Pingback: slot machine bar
Pingback: The Amazing Diet Secrets Of A Frustrated Clebourne Housewife
Pingback: free grand national bet
Pingback: what to text a girl you like
Pingback: york county bail bonds
Pingback: Filipino woman seeking men
Pingback: jalia parsnip
Pingback: test bank
Pingback: mark mania
Pingback: seo raleigh nc
Pingback: Bad Robot Surgery
Pingback: click to watch
Pingback: Mirena IUD Complications
Pingback: My Blog Title
Pingback: universal remote
Pingback: la bourse pour les nuls
The words "income inequality" seem to be popping up all over the place lately. Mostly by people who take issue with the serious wealth disparity in the U.S. But as Walter Williams explains, "income inequality" isn't the problem... it's "productivity inequality" that people should really be concerned about. Read on...
Imagine you could print your own aspirin... your own tums... your own Viagra... One chemist is exploring a new way to do that, combining chemistry with 3-D printing. J.D. Tuccille explores this new breakthrough and discusses the myriad headaches this is sure to cause for federal regulators. Read on...
While 2013 has been a very good year for the markets, in general, the rally has come with its fair share of skeptics. Of course, they won't stay skeptics forever. And as Greg Guenthner explains, by the time your neighbor decides to get in on the action, you'll want to make sure you're ahead of him. Read on....
It's no secret that the Fed loves to print money. With "QE" this and "stimulus package" that, it's no wonder the dollar's purchasing power has been in steady decline for over 100 years. But is all this Fed money printing inflationary? And is gold really the best way to hedge against it? Chris Mayer explains...
"There are two sides to every coin," as the saying goes. And nowhere is that phrase more apt than in matters of money, especially as regards the U.S. Federal Reserve. Today, Mark Spitznagel squares off against none other than Paul Krugman to discuss that very topic. What follows is sublime entertainment. Read on...
The U.S. may not be the only bubble farm currently planting crops, as this infographic from Der Spiegel indicates.