Forgotten Victims of Government's Good Intentions

Franklin Delano Roosevelt famously used the term “forgotten man” in a 1932 speech to describe those at the bottom of the economic pyramid who, he felt, government should aid.

But the originator of the phrase “forgotten man” had a whole different meaning in mind. He aimed to expose the seeming good intentions of government to reveal the truth of what was really happening. He boiled it down to a simple schematic: A and B decide what C should do for D.

Note the usually overlooked little matter of the fellow in position C . All the focus of political discourse is on what A and B should decide, and on the wants and needs of D, whether just or not. But what about C?

Here we come to a universal truth that forms a core part of the argument found in the great book, It Is Not Wicked to Be Rich:

“The State cannot get a cent for any man without taking it from some other man and this latter must be a man who has produced and saved it. The latter is the Forgotten Man.”

The man who coined the phrase and wrote those words is, of course, William Graham Sumner (1840-1910).

Sumner was a Yale professor and something of a polymath of the social sciences. It Is Not Wicked to Be Rich was originally published way back in 1883 as What Social Classes Owe to Each Other. It is a tightly argued, powerful little book that gets right to the heart of the nature of political relationships — of the nature of rights and duties. Sumner argues for a society based on contract and associations forged by men of their own volition and who cannot forcibly extract something from another.

“History is a tiresome repetition of one story.” … one of people trying to control the reins of government power for their own ends.

It may be hard to believe that something written so long ago can be so relevant to the complexities of our own day. But this book is essentially one about the timeless principles and ageless logic of a free society. In our era of bailouts and gigantic government budgets, we need this book now more than ever.

No doubt there are many other books that put forth similar ideas as Sumner does here. So, why republish this one? I have an easy answer: Because Sumner was such a darn good writer and clear thinker. His book is fun to read. He turns over many ideas in memorable ways . As a result, it is a powerful statement of libertarian ideas. His book deserves more attention than it gets. My own cherished copy is well marked with favored passages.

“History is a tiresome repetition of one story,” he writes in one of those passages. That story is one of people trying to control the reins of government power for their own ends. This is not a weakness confined to generals or priests, to businessmen or scholars. It does not strike certain ages or races of people. It is not a matter of who rules or what type of government exists. (Democracies, too, can be tyrants.) The weakness is a universal trait, Sumner maintains, rooted in human nature.

For Sumner, the aim of laws and institutions ought to be to protect men against these vices of human nature and against arbitrary power. They ought to guarantee liberty. There are to be no compromises. “All institutions are to be tested by the degree to which they guarantee liberty,” Sumner writes.

“It is not to be admitted for a moment that liberty is a means to social ends, and that it may be impaired for major considerations. Anyone who so argues has lost the bearing and relation of all the facts and factors in a free state.”

To Sumner , it was a profound injustice when government used its powers to arrogate rights to one group by taking from another. Unfortunately, this is not a common view today. A simple illustration comes right out of the political dialogue of our own times. The “right to health care,” for instance, is a topic of much debate. Sumner would have been appalled.

As he makes plain, the “right to health care” is simply the enforcement of a duty on someone else to provide it to you. All government efforts to provide free or subsidized health care — as well as education and retirement, two other perennial hot topics — are in the same ugly moral position. They represent a kind of theft.

Often people will justify such takings by appealing to the democratic process. This, in fact, is a key danger of democracy, Sumner felt. People are eager to assume rights at the expense of others. “That is, they will use political power to plunder those who have,” Sumner wrote.

“Those who have ” often includes that murky term, “the rich.” But for Sumner, the accumulation of wealth was not something to fear or seek to erase. The title It Is Not Wicked to Be Rich is actually from one of the chapter titles. In this chapter , Sumner has some great lines about wealth and the efforts to limit it. Wealth in a free society is earned by serving the wants and needs of your fellow men. People are rewarded on the basis of demand for their goods or services. Here is one of the passages that I’ve marked in my copy:

“If we should set a limit to the accumulation of wealth, we should say to our most valuable producers, ‘We do not want you to do us the services which you best understand how to perform, beyond a certain point.’ It would be like killing off our generals in war.”

It would be a mistake to think of Sumner as some sort of crude defender of privilege or some uncaring social Darwinist. Sumner is eminently practical. He is a realist. He emphasizes repeatedly that life is full of uncertainties. No one can make guarantees against hardships. Moreover, one man’s hardships and misfortunes do not create a moral claim on another man’s efforts.

I also think of Sumner as a true gentleman. He is aware of the plight of humanity on this lonely planet and sympathetic to the human story while adhering to an honorable code of conduct that, sadly, seems almost quaint today. The only duties men owe to each other, Sumner believed, are “respect, courtesy and goodwill.” He was eloquent on this point:

“Men, therefore, owe to men, in the chances and perils of this life, aid and sympathy, on account of the common participation in human frailty and folly. This observation, however, puts aid and sympathy in the field of private and personal relations, under the regulation of reason and conscience.”

What a simple and beautiful life philosophy! And yet, few see how often government power inspires a totally different set of assumptions.

The existence of government power sets man against man. It sets those who would achieve and create against those who would rather steal through elections and laws and taxes. In the end, the burden of government falls on that Forgotten Man, that real Forgotten Man. It is he who has worked and saved and done the right things to take care of himself and his family. And yet, now he is told he must pay again for others who have not worked and saved as he.

I’ve often thought the most powerful arguments for a free society were the moral arguments, the ones that appeal to our simple sense of fair play. Sumner’s book does just that, with a cracking style and an unerring eye for the realities of life. My guess is that you won’t be able to put it down once you start. And I’m sure you’ll have lots of choice passages of your own.

Sincerely,

Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning

Ed. Note: Normally Chris is travelling all over the world looking for the best places for his readers to invest their money. But emails subscribers of Laissez Faire Today found out about a new investment play that doesn’t require sending their money overseas. Yet it lacks risk, and could potentially pay out triple your investment in just a few days. Click here to subscribe to Laissez Faire Today for FREE, and never miss out on another opportunity like this again.

This foreword can be found in the the Laissez Faire Club exclusive book It Is Not Wicked to Be Rich.

This article was originally featured in Laissez Faire Today.