07/01/09 London, England Last night, we went to an awards ceremony for the magazine publishing industry in Britain. Our title, MoneyWeek, had been nominated as âbest weekly business magazine.â
It was a sparkling affair…with hundreds of attendees dressed in black tie and gowns. There were showgirls too â dressed in a pert â20s style…somewhere between the Great Gatsby and the Ziegfeld Follies. Short, tight dresses with shimmering fringes…hats with feathers…the girls served champagne and did dance numbers.
âI see the publishers association has chosen a â20s theme,â began the emcee. âWhat is wrong with you people? Donât you know what came after the â20s? The â30s!â
It doesnât seem like the â30s…yet. Ask the man on the street and he will tell you what heâs heard on TV: the worst of the crisis is over.
According to Bloomberg: âWall Streetâs largest bond-trading firms say the worst may be over for investors in Treasuries after government securities posted their biggest first-half losses in at least three decades.
âThe 16 primary dealers, which trade directly with the Federal Reserve and are obligated to bid at Treasury auctions, forecast the benchmark 10-year note yield will finish the year little changed at 3.58 percent, after rising from 2.21 percent at the end of 2008, according to a survey by Bloomberg News.â
Stocks will keep going up until 2010, says money manager John Dorfman. The âcrisis managementâ phase is behind us, says Jeff Immelt.
But this only reminds us of…1930. Let us wake up the ghosts just so we can laugh at them:
âThe spring…marks the end of a period of grave concern…American business is steadily coming back to a normal level of prosperity,â Julius Barnes, Head of Hooverâs National Business Survey, March 16, 1930.
âWe are now near the end of the declining phase of the depression,â the Harvard Economic Review, November 15, 1930
In 1930…as in 2009…the average fellow thought the crisis had passed.
âWell…depression wasnât so bad,â he said to himself.
Is it possible that the credit expansion that began after WWII and lasted until 2007…taking the debt-to-GDP ratio from about 150% to 360%…has contracted in the space of 24 months? Have the mistakes of the Bubble Epoque been corrected already? Are household balance sheets back in balance?
The markets continue their daily hum…
The Dow fell 81 points yesterday. Gold dropped $12. Oil traded at $69. And bonds fell a little â the 10-year yield rose back above 3.5%.
Meanwhile, the economy continues its work…correcting…paring…amputating…discarding…destroying the illusions of the bubble years…to bring things back in balance.
âGloomy US consumers clip housing recovery,â begins a Reuters article. Another report, at MarketWatch, blamed the gloom on a âgloomier jobs view.â
Housing and jobs are the two cornerstones of American middle class wealth. If they canât hold the weight of a building economy, there is little chance of a broad recovery in the United States…or Britain.
âLast week, I hosted a meeting of mortgage lenders,â continued last nightâs emcee. âThey got together all the mortgage lenders in Britain who are still in business. I felt sorry for the guy. All alone…
âToday, a guy goes into a bank and he says… âIâd like to talk to you about a loan…â and the banker says to him, âGreat…how much can you lend us?â
Net mortgage lending in Britain is the weakest it has been since they began keeping records in â93. And todayâs news tells us that the UK economy is shrinking faster than people thought. In the first quarter, the UK GDP fell by 2.49%.
In Britain as in America, the real economy is falling off just as investors, analysts, and commentators think they see a recovery. They think rising stock prices â US stocks are up 40% since March 9th â predict and precede a growing economy. Stocks, they say, âlook ahead.â
People will believe anything. If stocks had been watching where the economy was going they never would have traded at such high levels in â07. They clearly had no idea what was ahead. Nor do they now.
The images of the â30s keep coming back. TIME has put Franklin Rooseveltâs picture on its cover, as if he were the man of the hour now.
Americans think they are confronted with a challenge, which…with proper leadership…they will overcome. Madoff has been locked up; now itâs just a question of beefing up those regulators so it doesnât happen again. The stimulus packages have been set up; now we just have to wait for them to do their work. The Fed has done its part too; itâs just a matter of time until all that money and credit it put into the banking system turns up in the consumer economy.
And Obama…isnât he just like Roosevelt? Isnât he taking advantage of this crisis to help build a stronger…fairer…US economy?
If you read the papers you might think so. In The New York Times, Felix Rohatyn, has written a remarkable essay â remarkable in the sense that he has managed to take up 2/3 of a page without saying anything. To help him do so, he calls on the first Roosevelt, Theodore: âHe insisted on governmentâs obligation to regulate the large new business aggregations not so much to address the inequalities of wealth as to police its potential distorting influence…to reinforce the new system, not weaken it.â
Mr. Rohatyn goes on to advise Obama:
The work ahead, he says, âwill require difficult and painful actions, which can only come from a multi-year, bipartisan plan, led by the president and the Congress, with the support of business and labor.â
Blah, blah…blah… What he is urging on the nation is more central planning â with no idea how or why central planners will be better at controlling other peoplesâ money than people are at controlling their own. And imagine the âplanâ that would have the support of politicians of both parties, business interests and labor; itâs bound to be a disaster â like all of Teddy Rooseveltâs plans.
But itâs the other disastrous Roosevelt that catches most looks. The one on the cover of TIME magazine. This was the Roosevelt who, with the help of Herbert Hoover, turned the correction of the early â30s into the Great Depression. Rather than let the markets quickly correct the mistakes of the â20s, he tried to put them in a straitjacket. And rather than let people sort out their own finances, he set up a huge bureaucracy to bring Mussolini-style central planning to America. That bureaucracy is still with us â including Fannie Mae, which was instrumental in creating the housing bubble…and the SEC, which was instrumental in camouflaging the risks of in the investment markets.
But thereâs no point in going on about the two Roosevelts. TIME and the nation believe they were great heroes who practically single-handed saved the country from destruction. No use trying to tell them anything different.
So, instead…we will continue our lonely vigil â watching to see what mischief these clowns undertake next…and how we might protect ourselves…
What we see is this: the United States prospered in the 20th century not because of the Roosevelts, but in spite of them. The American economy was expanding… it was still young, strong, competitive and prosperous. The empire grew with economic power.
But the years ahead are not likely to resemble the post-Roosevelt years. Americaâs position relative to the rest of the world is weak and in decline. She is not a creditor, she is a debtor. She is not a low-cost competitor; she is a high-cost competitor. She no longer has a free and flexible economy; she has one freighted with central planners, regulators and busybodies.
There is a heat wave here in London. At least, that is what you would think if you listened to Londoners.
âI canât take this heat,â said a friend yesterday. It didnât seem that hot. Compared to Maryland in the summer, it seemed like a winter day. We checked the headlines:
â80 Degrees again tomorrow,â said one. âNo relief in sight.â
Until tomorrow,
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and youâll get a free research report, âHow to Survive the Fall of Social Security.â Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Right on, Bill. Good article. ……….
It amazes me how few want to know anything about economic history. They just believe things they are told, right or not. This is the only reason I can see for why FDR and Teddy R. are thought to be such great leaders. ………….
Rubbish, I say.
Bill. I like your writing. Comparing the Great Depression in the 1930′s with a common recession/correction is like comparing cancer with a cold. Recessions are like a cold: overproducting that outpaces demand. Corrections last long enough for demand to catch up again with supply. Debt Depressions (1930 and 2007) are cancers. No matter what the politicians in power due, they cannot fix the patient. Only time will unwind the debt. The illusion is that FDR caused the Great Depression and that Obama is causing this one. Too much debt caused both. A cold is not cancer and a recession is not a depression.