Three months ago, Ben Bernanke promised lower mortgage rates and lower corporate bond rates.
Quantitative Easing – i.e. the Fed’s scheme to print money and buy bonds – would deliver these benefits, Bernanke promised in a November 4, 2010, op-ed piece for The Washington Post. “Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth,” the Chairman declared. “For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable, and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence…”
But the Chairman was wrong. Three months after issuing his promise, interest rates are rising steeply, which is causing mortgage rates to rise as well. Quantitative Easing is not magic. It is a shell game that is producing predictably inflationary results.
The prices of stocks and commodities are soaring, while the prices of long-dated bonds are tanking (which means bond yields are soaring). This is “Inflation 101,” folks. Nevertheless, Bernanke credits QE2 for all things good.
“The Chairman reviewed his Quantitative Easing, Second Inning (QE2) at the National Press Club on Thursday, February 3, 2011,” writes financial market observer, Fred Sheehan. “His conclusion: ‘The economic recovery that began in the middle of 2009 appears to have strengthened in recent months… A wide range of market indicators supports the view that the Federal Reserve’s securities purchases have been effective at easing financial conditions. For example, equity prices have risen significantly, volatility in the equity market has fallen, corporate bond spreads have narrowed… Yields on 5- to 10-year Treasury securities initially declined markedly as markets priced in prospective Fed purchases; these yields subsequently rose, however, as investors became more optimistic about economic growth…”
As to bond yields, Bernanke’s assessment of his handiwork seems a bit disingenuous. While true that “yields…initially declined,” it is also true – and more to the point – that yields subsequently soared. Therefore, to claim success because yields “initially declined” would be a bit like declaring the Titanic’s maiden voyage a success because the ship initially floated.
“The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has jumped from 2.48% on November 4, 2010, to 3.65%,” Sheehan points out. “That’s a 47% boost, during the period in which the Federal Reserve bought approximately $200 billion of Treasury bonds to reduce mortgage rates… Accordingly, since November 4, 2010, Freddie Mac 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rates have risen from $4.10% to 4.81%. Housing – which accounted for 40% of new jobs during the ersatz-boom – is sinking, partially due to the higher rates since Bernanke’s November 4, 2010, manifesto.”
Elsewhere in Washington, the Executive and Legislative branches of our democracy are busy making Bernanke’s job even more hopeless. Enormous deficits are extending far, far toward the horizon, like amber waves of grain. As our colleagues at The 5-Minute Forecast observed earlier today, “The White House has given up any pretense: Its latest forecast for the fiscal 2011 deficit is now $1.65 trillion – which would set a record. And at 11.3% of GDP, the deficit’s share of the overall economy would be the highest since World War II.
“Today the Administration unveils a plan to cut $1.1 trillion from the budget…over the next 10 years. These 10-year projections, no matter which political party trots them out, are always a ruse to distract you from the fact that ‘budget cuts’ never seem to be ‘deficit cuts.’ If you want to talk about the next 10 years, here’s the only number that matters: Under the White House plan, the official national debt would grow by 50% over the next decade, to $21 trillion.”
Hmmm… Since it might be a little tricky to borrow all of those dollars, we may have to print a few extras for ourselves.
Eric Fryfor The Daily Reckoning
Eric J. Fry, Agora Financial's Editorial Director, has been a specialist in international equities for nearly two decades. He was a professional portfolio manager for more than 10 years, specializing in international investment strategies and short-selling. Following his successes in professional money management, Mr. Fry joined the Wall Street-based publishing operations of James Grant, editor of the prestigious Grant's Interest Rate Observer. Working alongside Grant, Mr. Fry produced Grant's International and Apogee Research, institutional research products dedicated to international investment opportunities and short selling.
Mr. Fry subsequently joined Agora Inc., as Editorial Director. In this role, Mr. Fry supervises the editorial and research processes of numerous investment letters and services. Mr. Fry also publishes investment insights and commentary under his own byline as Editor of The Daily Reckoning. Mr. Fry authored the first comprehensive guide to investing internationally with American Depository Receipts. His views and investment insights have appeared in numerous publications including Time, Barron's, Wall Street Journal, International Herald Tribune, Business Week, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Money.
All of Bernanke’s actions and policies make perfect sense if you first establish the premise that the Federal Reserve was not instituted to serve the interests of the American people, but rather, to destroy the interests of the American people. “By their fruits ye shall know them” is a universal principle and applies no less to The Fed. This cartel has been remarkably successful in accomplishing what it was created to do way back in 1913. Don’t listen to what Bernanke is saying; listen to what he is doing.
No matter where you live in the US, it seems like some federal employee has his hand on your wallet. That said, not all states are created equal in that regard. And so today, Addison Wiggin details which states offer you the least intrusive options when it comes to dealing with the various levels of government. Read on...
When it comes to investing in small companies with explosive growth potential, there is one number investors tend to be fixated on: share price. But as Jonas Elmerraji explains, there is another number that is far more important when it comes to discovering quality investments on the cheap. Read on...
A lot of people are buying to a lot of bad ideas right now, based on faulty logic or blindly following a political agenda. But if you ask the right questions, you can expose these ideas, as well as the people who support them, and show how silly (and stupid) they really are. Thankfully, one man has been doing just that for decades. Doug French explains...
The world is obsessed with smartphones. Most people can't go ten minutes without checking their phone for status updates on Facebook or Twitter or any number of apps they happen to have. And while Facebook's stock continues to soar, it's only natural to wonder, "What's the best way to play this mobile revolution?" Greg Guenthner explains...
One of the most heated political battles raging across the western world is debt versus austerity. In the U.S. this debate reached it's apex in 2011 when the U.S. credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poor's. In today's essay, however, Chris Mayer throws the debate out the window, explaining why he thinks a U.S. debt crisis will never happen...