Someday, someone will fund an academic study identifying the crevice in the human brain that craves year-end predictions for the coming 12 months. Wherever it resides, it is undeniably strong and far more prevalent among the populace than the craving for news about, say, the “fiscal cliff” or the New York Jets’ quarterback saga.
Within the finance sector, such predictions abound. “Macro surprises” from Morgan Stanley, “13 outliers for ’13” from Deutsche Bank, and the ever popular “outrageous predictions” from Denmark’s Saxo Bank. And you know what? These institutions are, umn, lily-white, every last one of them.
Saxo, for instance, describes its predictions as an “annual exercise in rooting out relatively extreme market and political events for which the probability is perhaps low, if still vastly underappreciated.” In other words, they’re “thought experiments.” They do a nice job of covering their backsides, however.
Then again, they have depositors and clients and shareholders to please. Actually predicting the German stock market will plunge 33% next year — the lead item on Saxo’s list — might discomfort one or more of those constituencies. So they’re obligated to couch their predictions in the abstract.
We, on the other hand, suffer no such conflicts of interest. We rise and fall, live and die on the trust you place in our research… a liberating state, especially given the amount of rope you’ve shown you’re willing to give us.
With that rope firmly in mind, we bring you the following six provocative predictions for 2013… and beyond.
These are not thought experiments to be touted in a late-December press release and posted on Zero Hedge, then quickly forgotten. These are themes that we fully expect to develop during the next 12 months. Let’s begin!
1. The “mother of all financial bubbles” will burst… but not before blowing up even bigger! Money manager and Vancouver Symposium favorite Barry Ritholtz recently bored himself silly with a spreadsheet: It showed a monthly survey of economists by Bloomberg going back to 2002, revealing their “expert” guesses about the 10-year Treasury yield over the following six months.
“In the history of finance,” Barry quips, “we cannot find a more one-sided opinion about a freely traded double-auction market.” Ninety-seven percent of the time a majority of economists predicted higher yields. On three occasions, including last May, the consensus was unanimous: The average forecast was for a yield of 2.4%. Oops… It turned out to be 1.7%. Just a little bit off.
The most recent survey? Ninety-four percent of economists surveyed expect higher rates by next May… and their average guess is 1.93%.
We’ll take the other side of that trade. Indeed, as we told the subscribers of Apogee Advisory last October, “We think the 30-year bull market has one more blowoff phase before the end. You need to act accordingly.”
Back then, the factor we cited was the pending demise of money market funds. We figured on a time horizon of three years. But now that we see such an overwhelming consensus for higher yields and lower prices, we’ll double down: We’ll see a Black Swan emerging early next year — another debt-ceiling crisis (even if the “fiscal cliff” issue is resolved) or more likely another euro-scare. Hot money will flood back into the “safety” of Treasuries. The 10-year yield will plunge below its 1.4% record set last July. It might even go all the way down to 1%.
But that would be the final blowoff that would signal the beginning of a major bear market in bonds. In other words, we think interest rates will rise substantially over the next few years…but not quite yet.
“At some point,” Barry says, “the bond bears are going to be right.” We’re confident that point will arrive before the end of the decade.
2. Boomers’ retirements are about to be crushed (again) in junk bonds and the wrong dividend stocks. First, they lost their shirts in the tech bust. Then they lost their pants in the housing bust. And in 2013, the baby boomer cohort is about to be stripped of its skivvies…thanks to the Fed’s zero-interest rate policy. Because intermediate-term Treasurys and CDs yield close to nothing, savers have been trying to get some yield on their savings wherever they can find it. In this context, junk bonds seem appealing. They offer yields that are at least greater than zero, which is why many investors have been flooding into the junk bond market.
Understand the Fed’s priorities: Saving and investing is their mortal enemy. “They want spending and speculating,” says our macro strategist Dan Amoss, “and are willing to risk the entire monetary system in the process.” Result: “Investors are taking foolish risks; they’ve bid up junk bonds and dividend stocks, pushing yields down in the process.”
If only investing were as simple as buying risky assets when interest rates are stuck at zero. Ask the average Japanese investor how that’s worked for them the last 20 years.
“The 2012 rallies in almost every stock and bond will not last,” declares Dan. “When investors bid up junk bonds and stocks in a zero interest rate environment, they are simply pulling future returns into the present.”
When interest rates start rising again, junk bond prices could plummet.
3. The World’s Fastest-Growing Economies in 2013: Forget the BRICs. If it’s emerging markets with explosive potential you’re looking for, the globe-trotting Chris Mayer has identified three. He’s visited all of them — the first two in 2012.
Check in tomorrow to see my final three provocative predictions!
for The Daily Reckoning
Addison Wiggin is the executive publisher of Agora Financial, LLC, a fiercely independent economic forecasting and financial research firm. He's the creator and editorial director of Agora Financial's daily 5 Min. Forecast and editorial director of The Daily Reckoning. Wiggin is the founder of Agora Entertainment, executive producer and co-writer of I.O.U.S.A., which was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, the 2009 Critics Choice Award for Best Documentary Feature, and was also shortlisted for a 2009 Academy Award. He is the author of the companion book of the film I.O.U.S.A.and his second edition of The Demise of the Dollar, and Why it's Even Better for Your Investments was just fully revised and updated. Wiggin is a three-time New York Times best-selling author whose work has been recognized by The New York Times Magazine, The Economist, Worth, The New York Times, The Washington Post as well as major network news programs. He also co-authored international bestsellers Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt with Bill Bonner.
yeah on 1. on 2 you need to consider any business which behaves like a utility, and 3 consider mexico which was a boom economy before china got into the picture and will be again
Yes to Mexico as a place to invest for several reasons:
a.) cheap labour in Mexico;
b.) oil and natural gas, hydro-electric, nuclear power generated in Mexico;
c.) proximity to U.S. market and competitive advantage in NAFTA;
d.) large population; i.e, large markets
e.) higher interest rate and low peso rate in terms of purchasing power;
f.) cheap real estate relative to US/Cdn markets
g.) Thirty-seven million people in the U.S. speak Spanish fluently and many more tens-of- millions (like myself) read and write Spanish from university education. Companies from Mexico can serve this population in America by providing banking and financial services or insurance services, for example. Real estate and travel agency services might be another area for the creation of some jobs for Spanish-speaking employees in the U.S. under NAFTA.
Here in California, for example, there are entire cities like Watsonville and Salinas, Fresno and Bakersfield, Stockton and Merced where nearly 80% of the entire city is Spanish-speaking. The South-western U.S. is Spanish speaking, and Mexico is the gateway to the South-west. It always was, and it is a gateway nation even more now as part of NAFTA.
I was just in Silicon Valley yesterday in one of the cocoons for the wealthy, Los Gatos. This was one of the towns where I used to bicycle as a kid in the 1950s. I got to see the damage that Bernanke’s the Federal Reserve Bank’s zero interest rate experiment is doing to house prices, and it is not very pretty. It looks like a bubble disaster is forming.
Each former Victorian home on the Main Street going into Los Gatos, just junk yuppie old homes and nothing to write home about, are now $ 4 million dollars. (They have to have paint, etc. and no termites, of course at least not obvious ones. ) Choice homes in the hills, are $ 8 million dollars and up. And they are serious. Those old Victorian homes used to be $40,000 in the 1950s and hill homes in Los Gatos used to be $ 80,000 to $ 250,000.
But when this bubble breaks as it soon will, not only will it take out the deadbeats who didn’t venture a dime, deadbeats never do venture a dime at the top, but it will take out the lenders all the way down the speculation and greed pyramid……… and into the floor.
If we have not even begun the recovery phase from this Great Recession, one has to wonder what the Great Recession is going to look and feel like when the real estate panic begins, especially in Silicon Valley and when mortgage rates start edging up.
The only way this bubble won’t burst is if the Fed pumps money into it forever, which it may do, in a slow and managed inflation (ha, ha, ha) to keep the inflation and the deflation in balance.
Dr. Marc Faber discusses the Chinese stock market, as well as the contagion risk posed by the Greek debt crisis and the prospects for a resolution...
Puru Saxena explores Greece’s referendum, which will determine whether or not the nation accepts its creditors’ austerity measures...
Jim Rickards sat down one-on-one with Ben Bernanke on May 27th. Read on to listen in on their conversation and learn why “the international monetary system is not coherent”...
Charles Hugh Smith reports on why papering over the structural imbalances in the Eurozone with bailouts or bail-ins will not resolve the fundamental asymmetries in trade...
Chuck Butler discusses the stimulus in China and what he sees are the differences, plus details as Greece arrives in Brussels with their latest proposal for an agreement. All that and more in today's Daily Pfennig...
With the oil sector cruising in low gear since last year’s price collapse, should you be investing in oil companies? Yes, according to our friends at Sprott, Henry and Rick — especially if you look at mid-stream companies, which move oil from point A to point B. Since oil moves no matter the price, they make money no matter the price!