Dirty Deeds in China
As the Chinese economy  inhales a growing share of the 
world’s natural  resources, it also exhales a growing share 
of the  world’s pollutants. Cleaning up China’s industrial-
sized mess ought to become a lucrative business for 
somebody.
Most investors – ourselves  included – have been focusing 
our attention on the  companies that help to power China’s 
rapidly  industrializing economy. We have been investing, 
for example, in the companies, that sell the iron ore that 
feeds the country’s smoke-belching steel mills.  But now, we 
may want to begin thinking about  investing in companies 
that take the smoke out of  the belch.
China boasts seven of the  world’s 10 most polluted cities. 
The rapidly  industrializing Asian nation spews about 13% of 
the world’s energy-related carbon dioxide emissions into 
the atmosphere, second only to the United States.  Now that 
air pollution has become one of China’s  principal exports, 
we investors may want to  consider investing in the 
companies that will help  China become cleaner…if we can 
find  them.
"We believe no industry in  China will grow as quickly in 
2005 – and for many  years to come – as environmental 
protection and  improvement," predicts Donald Straszheim of 
Straszheim Global Advisors, LLC. "China has no other choice 
but to address this problem – and it knows  it."
Nevertheless, identifying  the problem is much easier than 
identifying a  publicly traded beneficiary of the clean-up 
effort. Your editors at the Rude Awakening have not yet 
pinpointed a "pure-play" on the nascent efforts by  the Red 
Chinese to become the "Green Chinese," but  we are open to 
informed ideas from our  readership.
"There must be 1,000, maybe  10,000, ‘Love Canals’ in China 
– absolutely toxic  bodies of ‘water,’" Straszheim remarks. 
The costs  of this pollution – both human and financial – 
are  mounting.
"With a population well over  one billion people," the 
DisasterRelief.org  observes, "the number of people affected 
by  pollution [in China] is considerably more than in any 
other country in the world…an estimated 178,000 people in 
major cities suffer premature death each year  because of 
pollution. Children in some major  cities have blood-lead 
levels averaging 80% higher  than that considered dangerous 
to mental  development. Water pollution alone costs China $4 
billion per year. Millions of people do not have access to 
clean water."
The water falling from the  skies over China is not much 
healthier than what’s  already on the ground. Acid rain 
falls on about  30% of the country’s land mass. "Acid rain 
in  southern and southwestern China threatens to damage 10% 
of the land area," DisasterRelief.org warns, "and may have 
already reduced crop and forestry productivity by  3%."
In short, enterprising  environmental services companies do 
not lack for  opportunities to ply their trades in China. 
There  is an "unprecedented opportunity" to correct the 
damage, says Todd Johnson, lead author of a recent World 
Bank report entitled, "Clear Water, Blue  Skies."
"We see opportunities  everywhere," says Straszehim, "air 
pollution,  water pollution and solid-waste landfill. China 
needs to import high-tech environmental solutions – largely 
from America, Japan, and Europe. There will be  strong new 
demand for a lot of environmental  service providers. 
Smokestack scrubbers are an  obvious example, especially 
with China’s almost  67% reliance on coal for energy. 
China’s 26  million vehicles are extraordinarily inefficient 
and polluting. China’s SEPA (State Environmental Protection 
Administration) says 79% of China’s air pollution  comes 
from cars. There is great interest, but  little activity 
yet, in renewable (solar, wind,  geothermal) energy – still 
too  expensive."
Three possible future  beneficiaries of China’s clean up, 
Straszheim  suggests, might be Safety Kleen (SK), 
Halliburton  (HAL) or Asea Brown Boveri (ABB). Thus far, 
however, none of these companies conducts a significant 
amount of environmental service business in China.  Your 
editors are on the hunt for other companies  well positioned 
to benefit from the clean-up  trend…but have yet to locate 
any.
The hunt continues  nonetheless, because we agree with 
Straszheim when  he asserts, "This market is too compelling 
to  ignore. As China increasingly dominates manufacturing, 
environmental opportunities will flourish."
Did You  Notice…?
By Eric J. Fry
The ghost of inflation’s  future is spooking the financial 
markets once  again. The surprisingly high producer price 
readings are aligning forces with stubbornly high oil 
prices to terrify stock and bond investors. We  think the 
fear is justified. The recent dismal  performance of 
financial stocks suggests the  haunting specter of inflation 
may be more real  than illusory.
Specifically, the recent  breakdown of financial stocks 
relative to "basic  materials" stocks implies, according to 
veteran  technician John Murphy, "that the scale has finally 
tipped in favor of inflation."
"When rate-sensitive stocks  are in the lead," Murphy 
explains, "deflation is  dominant. When commodity-stocks 
lead, inflation is  dominant (or becoming so)."
The nearby chart presents an  ETF for financial stocks 
divided by an ETF for  basic materials stocks. When the line 
is rising,  financial stocks are outperforming basic 
materials  stocks and when the lining is falling, financial 
stocks are under-performing. At present, the financials are 
clearly under-performing.
"The fact that the ratio has  been trading sideways for 
almost two years shows  that deflation/inflation forces have 
been pretty  evenly balanced," says Murphy. But this week, 
the  ratio of IYG to XLB "broke down" to its lowest level in 
three years.
This new inflationary trend,  according to Murphy, "has 
important implications  for investors. For one thing, it’ll 
be better to  be in inflation-sensitive stocks (like basic 
materials) than deflation-sensitive stocks (like 
financials). It also hints at higher interest rates – both 
short and long. All of which seems to strengthen  my 
negative view on the stock market and my  preference for 
cash, commodity-related stocks, and  defensive stock groups 
in  general."
We would not quarrel with the veteran technician.
And the Markets…
Wednesday  | Tuesday  | This week  | Year-to-Date  | |
DOW  | 10,674  | 10,611  | -111  | -1.0%  | 
S&P  | 1,191  | 1,184  | -11  | -1.7%  | 
NASDAQ  | 2,031  | 2,030  | -27  | -6.6%  | 
10-year Treasury  | 4.26%  | 4.28%  | 0.00  | 0.05  | 
30-year Treasury  | 4.65%  | 4.68%  | 0.01  | -0.17  | 
Russell 2000  | 621  | 618  | -10  | -4.8%  | 
Gold  | $427.42  | $427.42  | $0.00  | -2.3%  | 
Silver  | $7.42  | $7.42  | $0.00  | 8.9%  | 
CRB  | 299.16  | 297.66  | 8.50  | 5.4%  | 
WTI NYMEX CRUDE  | $51.17  | $51.15  | $2.82  | 17.8%  | 
Yen (YEN/USD)  | JPY 104.89  | JPY 104.06  | 0.75  | -2.3%  | 
Dollar (USD/EUR)  | $1.3212  | $1.3257  | -144  | 2.5%  | 
Dollar (USD/GBP)  | $1.9093  | $1.9109  | -148  | 0.5%  | 

                            	        
Comments: