12/02/09 London, England – The crisis is over, say the feds. Now, they can begin turning off the taps.
“Fed takes first step in exit strategy,” is the headline in The Financial Times. A more accurate headline would have been…
“Fed dodges and weaves…fakes exit.”
The only way to exit is by the door the Fed came in. It barged into the market buying up toxic assets and Treasury notes and bonds. In order to get back out the door, it has to get rid of all the debt it gobbled up. How? It has to sell them back to the people it bought them from – or to someone else.
Instead, the Fed has come up with a subterfuge: the reverse repo.
“In a reverse repo,” The Financial Times explains, “the Fed sells assets, such as Treasury securities, to dealers for cash, with an agreement to buy them back later at a slightly higher price…”
No kidding. That’s what it says. Now, let us put the question to you, dear reader. Having thus reverse repo-ed a boatload of debt, has the Fed:
a) unloaded its unwanted debt and drained liquidity from the system,
b) not unloaded any debt at all…but merely lent out the credits at negative interest rates
c) postponed the problem until later?
If you answered “all of the above” you are not paying attention to the choices we’ve given you. It’s not on the list. Still, it’s probably the right answer…
The Fed says it’s going to try out this reverse repo trick and see how it works. We can tell them now. Save them some trouble. Either the Fed is the bagman of bad US debt, or it is not. It is either in or out. Long or short. Either Fannie Mae, AIG, GM are backed by the government or they’re not. If they’re not, the market will sort them out in its own good time. If they are the bagmen…well, then, the feds will squirm and dissemble…get themselves in deeper and deeper…until, finally, the bags drag them beneath the surface.
This reverse repo is just a scam to disguise the situation…so the Fed can pretend to exit without actually going out the door.
Sign Up for The Daily Reckoning e-letter and receive a copy of Bill Bonner's The Trade of The Decade report… at NO CHARGE.
We Value Your Privacy.
ShareThis
All of the above is the correct answer unfortunately. Spot on…
“Reverse” re-po reminds me of football, the contrast between college and professional. College football sometimes seems more “exciting” than pro ball because of the often used “reverse hand-off” play.
In college ball, it is used because they can get away with it more…
In pro ball, it is exceptional to succeed with this play because pro ballers “react” with more swiftness to the play.
As with Bernanke’s “reverse” play the pro’s will see thru it almost immediately….and????
Watch out below!!!!
As the Fed’s shell game gets more and more convoluted by them adding more and more shells, do you think we will ever reach a point when someone stands up and says the famous line from Risky Business?
You know the one “Joel says: Sometimes you just gotta say “what the ..ck.”
“reverse re-po” Is that the same as a cash out refinance on your house at a HIGHER interest rate?
Finally , someone has called the “Reverse Repo” scheme what is really is , a sham that is a scam. To me this seems like trying to get the water out of a bath tub by siphoning it into another bath tub and then saying to your wife “Look honey , I fixed the problem and got the water out of the tub.” Then after she goes to bed , you drain the water back to the first tub. as long as she doesn’t notice the extra tub or nothing leaks out, you are cool. Oh , you also have to hope the floor doesn’t break or no more water comes in. This would be funny if it was a Laurel and Hardy movie.
I may be dumb here but is he not, at least temporarily, taking money out of the system through this device?