06/16/09 London, England Yesterday, the Dow fell 187 points. Oil slipped to $70. The dollar rose to $1.37. And gold lost another $12 â to $928.
The rally may run through the summer; it may not.
Asked about the rally on Wall Street, Barronâs latest Roundtable panel had various views about how far and how fast it would take us. But all were sure of one thing: the worst is over. We will not go below the lows set this past March.
This recovery is for real, they believe…and so is the bull market on Wall Street.
Investors believe it too. Analysts believe it. Economists believe it.
And why not? The âCommittee to Save the World,â part II, is on the job. And here are two of the three committee members writing in the Washington Post. âWe have nothing to fear but fear itself,â they would have written. But that line had already been taken:
Like all financial crises, the current crisis is a crisis of confidence and trust. Reassuring the American people that our financial system will be better controlled is critical to our economic recovery.
By restoring the publicâs trust in our financial system, the administrationâs reforms will allow the financial system to play its most important function: transforming the earnings and savings of workers into the loans that help families buy homes and cars, help parents send kids to college, and help entrepreneurs build their businesses.
Get it, dear reader? The slump has nothing to do with bad investments and bad businesses…or with too much debt…or with too many producers making too much stuff for too many people who canât pay for it.
Instead, itâs all in our heads! And if we can make some âreformsâ that cause the public to think everything is all right, well…heck…everything WILL be all right.
Except that itâs not all right. You can pull as much wool over the publicâs eyes as you want, GM still wonât be a going concern. Nor will any of the other problems go away. And until those problems are worked out, there wonât be enough earnings and savings to push the economy forward.
As for the fedsâ confidence tricks, they only make the situation worse. If the public spends more money…it just goes even deeper in debt!
Our old friend Rick Ackerman has no more faith in this recovery than we do. Itâs âjust like the recovery of â31,â he says. Of course, as regular DR sufferers know, there was no recovery in â31. Instead, it was a head-fake upwards, followed by a major drive to the bottom in â32. The â29 crash was just the beginning. The Dow reached its peak of 381 in September â29. It crashed in October…but then bounced back for the following five months. By April 17th the bounce was exhausted at Dow 294. Then, too, people thought the âworst was overâ and that the initiatives of the Hoover administration had put the economy back on track for growth and prosperity. But then stocks headed down again and the economy sank. On July 8th, 1932, the Dow hit 41 â its low for the Great Depression.
Why wonât history repeat itself? The run-up in debt in the â90-â07 period exceeded even the debt build-up of the â20s. Many other features are similar too â a huge expansion of global trade…new inventions…suburbs…financial innovation. Why would it be different this time?
âBecause the government has taken aggressive action to correct the problem!â
Thatâs what most people think. But hereâs what Rick has to say about the fedsâ rescue:
Bailing out the economy and the banking system has been such a brazenly corrupt, mendacious and, ultimately, doomed enterprise that one could almost forget for a moment how very clever the perpetrators are. If we needed proof that these guys are the slickest behind-the-scenes spin-doctors around, consider the following two headlines that ran on successive days atop the Wall Street Journalâs front page. âRate Rise Clouds Recoveryâ was the grim news that greeted us last Thursday, on day one. The article described how, despite the Federal Reserveâs explicit strategy of buying as much Treasury paper as it takes to hold market rates down, particularly in the mortgage sector, rates are rising anyway, and steeply. In fact, 30-year fixeds climbed to 5.79% from 5.00% just two weeks earlier, suggesting that market demand for mortgage paper is drying up despite the Fedâs strategy of direct monetization of Treasury debt (a.k.a. âquantitative easingâ).
But get this: On day two, as if to reassure us that [the] Treasuryâs borrowing is well under control despite the fact that the opposite is true, the spinmeisters co-opted the Journalâs front page with this well-timed policy leak: âFed to Keep Lid on Bond Buys.â Are we actually being asked to believe that, absent the acceleration of direct purchases of Treasury paper by the central bank, demand from other sources will suffice to keep rates from rising further?
Yesterday, we saw a chart that showed the effectiveness of the Fedâs efforts. When the Fed intervenes to buy Treasuries, yields tend to go down â thatâs the whole idea. Low yields help people borrow…and pay their debts.
But the chart clearly shows that each subsequent intervention has less effect. This is very bad news…though just what youâd expect. Itâs why a little bit of monetary inflation has a tendency to become a lot of consumer price inflation. On a more philosophical note, it is how people get trapped into doing things they really donât want to do â because the alternative is even worse.
Hereâs the dilemma. The feds buy US bonds to keep interest rates down. If they donât buy them, the governmentâs huge demand for credit drives up yields: greater supply of bonds leads to lower prices (higher yields). But if they do buy them, investors begin to fear inflation. Then, they sell bonds…driving up yields: less demand leads to lower prices (higher yields).
Thatâs why the Fed is talking about âkeeping a lid on bond buys.â Itâs expected to reassure investors.
So far, everyone seems to be playing the part he has been given. In todayâs news is word that the Japanese and Russians are one hundred percent behind the dollar and US bonds. The Japanese even say their faith is âunshakeable.â
These comments helped send bonds back up…after yields on the 10-year note had reached 4% last week.
But do you believe them? Câmon, dear reader, you know better than that. The Japanese and Russians have two of the biggest piles of US bonds in the world. Only China has more. What would you say if you owned $800 billion worth of bonds? Wouldnât you tell the world what a great investment they were…and then sell them quietly, when no one was looking?
Most likely, the feds will be forced to do what they donât want to do. Theyâll have to buy bonds to keep rates down. Then, theyâll have to buy more…because others will be selling them. Finally, theyâll have to monetize a huge percentage of them…ultimately causing inflation rates to soar.
When and how that will happen is the financial drama that will occupy these Daily Reckonings for many months to come.
âMan lives in closet in Delray Beach,â was a headline that caught our eye. We wondered what sort of man would live in a closet. But there was the photo… He looked like a very ordinary man.
Indeed, he seemed proud of what he had achieved. Downsizing is in style; he is a trendsetter.
Beneath the big financial headlines, thereâs a huge aesthetic change taking place in America. Small is becoming fashionable. Less is becoming more. Ostentation…big spending…and luxury are out. Charm…making do…and innovation are in.
Pick up a copy of Cottage Living magazine and youâll see what we mean. A couple of years ago it was the âwow factorâ that sold houses. Clients were meant to drive up to a façade that looked vaguely impressive…like a bank with a bad architect. They walked into an entry way and saw a huge hall with a chandelier hanging on a chain. The more expensive McMansions had sweeping marble staircases. âWow,â prospective buyers were supposed to say…reaching for their checkbooks.
Now, the McMansions are hard to sell. Cottages are more popular. They tend to be plain and uninteresting when they are purchased. But now people are taking pride in making them nice places to live â with shutters…larger windows…fireplaces…reading nooks, and so forth. Theyâre using imagination and elbow grease instead of credit cards.
People are downsizing â slimming away the unwanted, trimming off the unnecessary, and skimming off the best of what remains. They are making â or trying to make â their lives more manageable, more affordable, and more secure.
In a way, this is âback to the â70s,â when wood stoves became popular ways to heat a house. Wood stoves practically disappeared in the â90s. But theyâre back. And so are back-yard gardens…bicycles…chickens…canning…saving and many other things our grandparents took for granted.
Until tomorrow
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and youâll get a free research report, âHow to Survive the Fall of Social Security.â Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Why politicians and economists can’t be honest to the public, and always play and cheat us? Only Obama seems to be quite straight – admireable – almost too genuine for a US-ceo.
And agree, every bad thing has sth good: back to basics will be fine for many people – good for the environment too. Growing your own food is such a wonderful feeling…of real independancy!
There seems to be an incongruity here. How can there be inflation with excess capacity? “too many producers making too much stuff for too many people” How will less production result in more jobs, income, and savings? Mr. Bonner’s prescription doesn’t seem to provide with a way out of a downward spiral of the economy. Where will people get the income to increase savings, as he prescribes? Do we have a “catch 22″ here?
PS: I mostly agree with Bill and this is not an attack.
As part of Obama’s recovery package he will be handing out copies of “The Secret” to all Americans so we can make the economy better just by using possitive thoughts!
The dollar is collapsing as is consumer confidence. The government is printing treasuries so fast that they are the only people who can afford to buy them by printing money as fast as they can. The banks are no longer safe and anyone with any money over the FDIC limits is looking for somewhere to put it that they can trust.
I like a fixed annuity as I am not subject to the rise and fall of the market, anyone who has money in the markets could have lost 50% of their wealth. A fixed annuity would still be providing you with the same amount of money but increased spending/ buying power. Whoever wrote the annuity is carrying your risk.
There is a risk of inflation with a fixed annuity but if you invest in a foreign currency the devaluation of the dollar will more than overcome this.
Jonathan Rose Company, LLC provides a product very similar to an annuity but without the costs