09/25/09 London, England
Personal conversions sometimes mark dramatic turns in history. Saul of Taursus saw a vision so bright it left him blind. The next thing you know, he had changed his name and was pushing Christianity all over the world. According to Gibbon, the Roman Empire fell as a consequence. Then, on the advice of his mistress, Gabrielle, Henry IV became a Catholic, leading to the Edict of Nantes and its subsequent revocation.
Even in the world of finance, there are momentous conversions. As they say on Wall Street, a rally ends when the last bear gives up. An old friend had been a source of inspiration for tech bears for many years. He suddenly saw the light and gave up in 1999. Shares he had formerly scorned – often dotcoms with no revenue and no business plans – were suddenly added to his own portfolio. This also heralded a big change – the end of the tech bubble. Tech stocks collapsed. Most disappeared. Then, Stephen Roach became vaguely bullish in 2007, after a long period of doubt and misgivings.
Now it is Jim Grant who has changed his mind. A generation of investors has gotten used to Grant’s ‘doom is nigh’ warnings. Now, he says, it’s a boom that is nigh.
What is remarkable about the Grant conversion is that his vision gives off so little heat and light. His WSJ article shillyshallies around; rehearses the history of previous recessions and comes to rest in front of a flickering match: “The deeper the slump, the zippier the recovery.”
Many were the sheep in Grant’s flock. They feel betrayed, as if their shepherd had gone over to the wolves. Here at The Daily Reckoning, we take no personal offense. In the following few words we merely stoke up the fire.
We will not argue with Newton’s Third Law. For every action, there is a reaction. Every boom has a bust. And every busted bubble has a bounce. Even the Titanic’s stern rose, before she slipped below the waves.
First, we consult the facts. But facts are survivors. They will tell whatever tale their interrogators want to hear. As for opinions, after six months of a stock market rally, the once half empty glass has become half full. We predicted it ourselves. But we’ll let Robert Prechter say, ‘I told you so.’ Even before the rally began, Prechter foretold its story:
“Regardless of extent, it should generate feelings of optimism. At its peak, the President’s popularity will be higher, the government will be taking credit for successfully bailing out the economy, the fed will appear to have saved the banking system and investors will be convinced that the bear market is behind us.”
As to Mr. Obama’s popularity, Prechter was wrong. But 4 out of 5 ain’t bad.
Grant’s brief tour of recession history seems to confirm his Newtonian position: the further an economy falls, the further up it rises to get back to normal. This downturn has clipped nearly 4% off America’s GDP, substantially more than any previous downturn since WWII. Therefore, it will come back strong.
Today’s slump in the United States hardly compares to the one of ’29-’33, which took 27% off the GDP. Then, in the ranks of the unemployed, stood one out of every four able-bodied workers, as opposed to just one out of every 10, according to today’s statistical legerdemain. Still, the depth of the drop did not prevent a vigorous bounce; on the contrary, it seemed to demand it. After ’33, the US economy grew by nearly 10% in each of the next four years.
In the slump of ’82, GDP sank at a 6.4% rate. Again, the reaction was nearly equal and opposite to the action. “Not until the third quarter of 1984,” says Grant, “did real quarterly GDP growth drop below 5%.”
Of course, even a US Congressman will bounce, if you push him down the Capitol steps. But not every one will get up again. In the ’33 example, the US economy, still youthful and vigorous, got up nicely. But then it fell again. By the end of the decade he was still on his back, with 15% unemployment and 2% deflation. Only later, after four years of world war, did the economy begin a sustained recovery.
Now it is 2009. The poor fellow is down again. The feds rushed to help him to his feet. They gave him a combined fiscal and monetary shot-in-the-arm seven times stronger – in terms of GDP – than the average postwar countercyclical stimulus. The juice opened his eyes. But he still staggers. He has put on some weight over the years; he now carries three times the debt/GDP as he had in ’82. His stocks are three times as expensive, in P/E terms, too. His bones are more brittle and his mind a little slower. What’s more, in ’82, he had been on a deleveraging diet for more than a decade. In ’09, he has just begun.
What will happen next, we don’t know. But if we turn bullish on this economy and urge you to buy stocks, it will surely be time to sell them.
Enjoy your weekend,
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Hey Bill!
I’ve enjoyed reading your essays for the better part of this decade. Keep up the good work. You have a wonderful way with words…you old cantankerous curmudgeon!
The bears should be coming out of hibernation again. The durable goods was a disappointment, and I read in the newspaper that the government might bail out the smaller banks–the banks that aren’t too big to fail, but many of them are about to fail because of defaults.
Jim Grant was always one of my favourite bears. The economy boomeranging back from the abyss is conceivable as the era of “great inflation” could continue for some more time yet.
But since the financial meltdown, the green shoots have wither and died as there is no hint of economic recovery. We have seen at best a de-acceleration of the free fall. I will keep my power dry as always, but I am not about to become trigger happy, even out of my admiration for Mr. Grant.
i am pushing 70 hopefully i will die in my sleep..i can see an end coming..everyone is in denial in florida no one can get a job down here (socially) we all drive old cars..we no longer trust banks,insurance companies,politicians..i don t buy anything new..i see people like myself living in a house i can never keep ..my small business is foundering..i just got my ss check and i can pay my bills if i eat one less meal a day (or 3)and my taxes are going up still and the govt says the recession is over but the depression is just starting
The trouble with the bear position is that is in deep conflict with reality while being extremely logical in its foundations. At the core of it is the fact that paper currency is something that can be created to whatever degree the politicians wish to. Zimbabwe is a much worse place than the U.S. will ever be and yet their stock market is robust. Stocks will rise to new highs constantly
because they are always better than worthless dollars.(the good ones that is) There will be a deflation-depression if you measure in gold however. We will be murdered by excruciating high prices in everything and yet bears want to deny us one of the few places to hide, stocks, preferably metals and energy. Every big drop I make a fortune buying when people are singing the end of the world song. I hope the panics keep coming. I sell when when I hear the happy music from the TV.
I agree with you Steve, always the contrarion, however the day eventually comes when logic and reality collide. That day I believe the patient will be DOA and no amount of adreneline will bring him back. But hey don’t worry they’re still bad mouthing gold.
Back in the 30′s, they calculated unemployment based on anyone who didn’t have a job.
Much more stricter definitions today, plus many are working less hours. Unemployment may be more like 15%. Who really believes 10% unemployment? You are gullible, and stop listening to our government – they are the lame brains that believe fractional reserve lending is a good idea.