07/31/09 Paris, France Itâs time for summer vacation in France.
âYou can forget about getting anything done in the month of August,â said colleague Simone Wapler. âThe French are busy with serious things…real things…like painting shutters and picking green beans…fixing curtains and making strawberry jam. They donât want to hear about economics or markets…â
France begins its summer vacation today. Weâve come to join them…
But we will keep an eye on the money anyways…because itâs just getting interesting…
Two interesting things are happening. First, the feds are facing a showdown with the vigilantes…you know, the people with money â $2 trillion worth of reserves, $1.5 trillion of it in U.S. Treasury paper. Theyâve got to convince them that theyâll protect their investment. If they fail, the vigilantes sell their bonds…cause the dollar to collapse…and force up U.S. interest rates â which will come down like Round-Up on those green shoots of recovery.
Meanwhile, stocks are not only anticipating a recovery, theyâre counting on it. And for that, they depend on stimulus from the feds. But what Bernanke gives in stimulus, the vigilantes are likely to take away…
More on that in a minute…
The other big thing that is going on is the rally in the worldsâ stock markets. On Wall Street, for example, the Dow rose 96 points yesterday. How far will this rally go? Should you try to take advantage of it?
As a rough rule of thumb, a bounce can be expected to recover half of the losses from the crash. The Dow went down 7600 points below its pre-crash high. So, we can expect a rebound of about 3800 points â which would put the index back around 10,300. By that measure, this rally could still have a lot of life in it â enough to convince practically everyone that the depression will soon be over. Donât believe it. This depression is going to last at least a few years…and the bear market isnât over. The Dow will eventually close below 5,000. At least…thatâs our story and weâre sticking with it.
But letâs go back to poor Ben Bernanke. And poor Tim Geithner. The poor fellows donât seem to know what they are doing. But why should they? Ben Bernanke spent his career as a professor of economics. Modern economics is fundamentally an intelligence-destroying trade. The longer you spend in economics, the less you know about how the economic world functions. Many years ago, the profession got the wrong idea of what it was up to. Ever since, itâs been barking up the wrong tree. (More below…)
As for Geithner, he is a smart young man…destined for hackdom almost from the day he was born. Ivy league university…consulting firms…government â a protĂ©gĂ©e of Robert âNobody Saw the Crisis Comingâ Rubin â you canât blame Geithner either; he hasnât had time to think about how an economy really works.
But at least their mission is clear: to convince the world of two things at the same time…both impossible and mutually exclusive! The Chinese vigilantes must believe that the feds wonât undermine the dollar…and the rest of the world must believe that they will! Inflation is necessary for recovery and growth in the United States…or so everyone believes.
It was French economist Jacques Rueff who revealed the scam more than half a century ago. The whole idea of Keynesian stimulus, he explained, was to cause inflation…which would reduce the real price of labor. In a modern democracy, politics prevents wages from falling. But in a correction, if wages donât fall people donât get jobs. Keynesâ didnât mention it, but the only reason his stimulus works is because it pulls the wool over the eyes of the working classes â reducing their wages by inflation so employers can afford to hire them again. Ergo, no inflation…no recovery in the job market. No recovery in the job market…no recovery in the economy.
But inflation will cost the Chinese plenty. And theyâve let it be known they wonât sit still for it.
âChina seeks assurances that US will cut its deficit,â says a New York Times report:
âChina sought and received assurances from the Obama administration that the United States would reduce its budget deficit once an economic recovery was under way, a senior Chinese official said Tuesday at the end of two days of high-level talks between the countries.
âAttention should be given to the fiscal deficit,â said Xie Xuren, the Chinese finance minister. He said Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner had assured the Chinese that once the economy rebounded, the deficit would gradually come down from its current record levels.
âMr. Geithner confirmed that, saying, âAs we put in place conditions for a durable recovery led by private demand, we will bring our fiscal position down to a more sustainable level over time.ââ
Did you notice, dear reader? Geithner promised a âdurable recovery led by private demand.â In other words, it wonât be government spending that pulls the United States out of its slump, he told the Chinese.
He must have had his fingers crossed behind his back. At this stage, what other kind of demand is there? Are factories being built? Are they hiring? Are consumers borrowing and spending more? As we pointed out yesterday, private demand has collapsed …and itâs likely to collapse even more.
But letâs stick with our vigilantes for a while. Inflation would cause them to lose money. More importantly, it would cause them to lose face. American officials have told them not to worry; the Chinese seem satisfied. But woe to the debtor who lies to his creditor; he gets cut off.
Meanwhile, a report from the IMF names Britain and the United States as the worldâs two biggest spendthrifts…and sees no end coming soon.
A global recovery is ânot yet under wayâ and likely to occur at different times around the world, so pulling back public spending and investment may be âpremature,â the IMF staff said.
Additional discretionary spending may be needed in 2010, the report said.
The staff report also said inflation expectations are picking up, posing a risk to a rebound in economic growth.
âPreserving investor confidence in government solvency is key to avoiding an increase in interest rates, thereby not only preventing snowballing debt dynamics, but also ensuring that the fiscal stimulus is effective,â the report said.
The IMF noticed the fix U.S. officials are in.
âOn the one hand, a too hasty withdrawal of fiscal stimulus would risk nipping a recovery in the bud,â the report said. âOn the other hand, with a delayed withdrawal investor concerns about sustainability may increase, leading to higher interest rates on government paper, undermining the recovery and increasing risks of a snowballing of debt.â
The IMF staff urged countries to develop medium-term strategies to rein in rising debt levels. Some countries already have begun to do so, the report said.
The economists at the IMF see this as a problem of âbalancing risks.â Here at The Daily Reckoning, we see it differently. To us, it is lies colliding with each other. Stimulus will not produce genuine prosperity. You canât cure a credit-caused crisis by offering more credit; it just wonât work. But rather than let the system correct itself, the feds are determined to âdo something!â What can they do? They can only destroy the dollar â or try to â thereby destroying the value of Chinaâs $1.5 trillion treasure.
Now, more on why private demand is going to weaken, not increase.
As the boom of the post-war period continued, consumer spending played a larger and larger role in the economy. It averaged 64% of the GDP during most of the period, but increased to 70% in 2007. Likewise, debt service as a percentage of disposable personal income rose too â from less than 5% in the â50s and â60s to over 14% now.
If, as we suspect, the trend towards more and more consumer debt has finally peaked out; consumption should have peaked out too. We should now see the percentage of the economy devoted to consumption go down…year after year…until it reaches the ânormalâ level. Private debt too should go down, until it is at a more ânormalâ level.
We calculated that during the last 7 years of the Bubble Epoque consumers added $1.4 trillion in debt per year. That was the spending that made the old mare go. But now what? They are now adding no debt â zero. In fact, they are paying off debt. This alone removed $1.4 trillion in private demand from the economy.
The savings rate is up dramatically too â from zero to 7%. This is another way of measuring the same phenomenon: the decline in consumer spending.
The only thing that would cause consumer spending to go would be a substantial increase in real wages. This would allow Americans to buy more â while simultaneously paying down debt. But with 16% unemployment (Rosenbergâs estimate) it will be a long time before real wages increase at all…let alone substantially.
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and youâll get a free research report, âHow to Survive the Fall of Social Security.â Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Bill I was not disappointed. Good article.
One thing that could help us through this recession (depression?) is if the fat cat CEO’s took a paycut. Companies looking for money to reinvest or pay down debt, should look at the bloated salaries of the Guys in the board room. As an investor, I bailed on stocks years ago because of the way these White Collared Scammers were bleeding companies dry. Ironically, I saved myself huge loses in doing so.
During the last 25 years or so we shipped the manufacturing lured by the slave labor abroad. During the next 25 years we will bring back the manufacturing lured by the slave labor at home. I guess, we will prove that Adam Smithâs comparative advantages theory is still valid.
Great article. We are really seeing this in Los Angeles, every day a new store gets shuttered. We even have a shopping center in an upscale area of Sherman Oaks where two out of the three major tenants, KB Toys and Linens N Things, are gone. All that is left is Ross Dress for Less. A major black eye for the neighborhood.
“He must have had his fingers crossed behind his back. At this stage, what other kind of demand is there? Are factories being built? Are they hiring? Are consumers borrowing and spending more? As we pointed out yesterday, private demand has collapsed âŠand itâs likely to collapse even more.”
This is the heart of the matter…..
I too avoided the “market” except for CD’s; and at least have not lost my nest egg (yet, but it could happen in a “grander catastrophe of epic proportions).
With the Fed feeding the “system” the wherewithall to purchase its securities it is the grandest ponzi scheme of all time.
Good article, Bill……
This article was a Tour Du Force. Tells the whole tale of how we got here, and what our “betters” are “doing about it” – all in a brief, breezy piece. Well done.
“destined for hackdom almost from the day he was born.”
I LOVE that.
“But at least their mission is clear: to convince the world of two things at the same timeâŠboth impossible and mutually exclusive! The Chinese vigilantes must believe that the feds wonât undermine the dollarâŠand the rest of the world must believe that they will!”
Pretty sweet quote, there, too.
“…come down like Round-Up on those green shoots of recovery.”
Someone should publish an encyclopedia of Bill Bonner similes.
The Chinese have quantatively eased to the tune of 4 trillion (2 trillion on infrastructure and 2 trillion bubbling shares and property). This nullifies the US/UK monetary expansion and maintains currency parity. Our Chinese friends have got it sussed.
are people really saving? i’m hearing contrary perspectives on that. curious what your take is, mr. bonner
tnx
“But letâs stick with our vigilantes for a while. Inflation would cause them to lose money. More importantly, it would cause them to lose face.”
I guess you meant to say, they would lose faith, not face, bummer.