Well, in the scheme of things, that didn’t take long. According to a BBC News poll out last month, “Germany is the most positively viewed nation in the world.”
A mere 70 years after Der Fuhrer and his band of anti-Semitic rogues blitzkrieged their way across Europe, readers of the BBC are apparently ready to forgive and forget and break bread over a frothy stein of Lowenbrau.
“Germany came out top,” says the BBC, “with 59% rating it positively.”
Iran proved to be the most reviled.
And how about the Canadians, eh? Somehow they managed to slip in at No. 2 on the national popularity chart. Those of us below the 49th parallel didn’t fare quite so well. Apparently, the U.S. is only slightly more likable than China… and slightly less likable than Brazil.
OK, the latter we understand:
Brazilian model enjoying the Brazilian national pastime.
But c’mon… the EU isn’t even a country, and it ranks higher than the ol’ U.S.? What gives?
What about all the money, lives and time spent making the world safe for democracy? Doesn’t Uncle Sam get any credit for that? Seriously. Defense spending has risen precipitously every year this century:
And that group at the Pentagon is a determined bunch. According to a report from Defense News, the Pentagon is adding thousands more to the payroll… just to improve their image:
“The size of the Pentagon’s vast oversight organizations grew by more than 15% from 2010-2012, despite efforts to pare down the U.S. Defense Department’s bureaucracy, a Defense News analysis has found.“On Aug. 9, 2010, then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the Pentagon needed to cut staff sizes. He made this task part of his efficiencies initiative — an effort to save hundreds of billions of dollars through better business practices. The military services’ incentive for accomplishing these tasks was that they would be able to get back some of that money to reinvest in other priorities.”
“The size of the Pentagon’s vast oversight organizations grew by more than 15% from 2010-2012, despite efforts to pare down the U.S. Defense Department’s bureaucracy, a Defense News analysis has found.
“On Aug. 9, 2010, then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the Pentagon needed to cut staff sizes. He made this task part of his efficiencies initiative — an effort to save hundreds of billions of dollars through better business practices. The military services’ incentive for accomplishing these tasks was that they would be able to get back some of that money to reinvest in other priorities.”
According to the Costs of War project run out of Brown University, since 2001, the U.S. has already spent $3.1 trillion on the war effort in Afghanistan and Iraq. You would think for all of that money the U.S. would have a few more grateful supporters among the BBC audience.
Or at least some juicy oil deals for U.S. firms…
No? Not there either…?
“We lost out,” said Michael Makovsky told The New York Times. He is a former Defense Department official during the Bush administration who worked on Iraq oil policy. “The Chinese had nothing to do with the war, but from an economic standpoint they are benefiting from it, and our Fifth Fleet and air forces are helping to assure their supply.”
“The Chinese are the biggest beneficiary of this post-Saddam oil boom in Iraq,” said Denise Natali, a Middle East expert at the National Defense University in Washington. “They need energy, and they want to get into the market.”
To successfully do that, the Chinese have spent $2 billion per year and have played ball with the Iraqi government… something the fat cats at Exxon Mobil have a hard time with.
“If the United States invasion and occupation of Iraq ended up benefiting China, American energy experts say the unforeseen turn of events is not necessarily bad for United States’ interests. The increased Iraqi production, much of it pumped by Chinese workers, has also shielded the world economy from a spike in oil prices resulting from Western sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
“And with the boom in American domestic oil production in new shale fields surpassing all expectations over the last four years, dependence on Middle Eastern oil has declined, making access to the Iraqi fields less vital for the United States.”
Ah, well, turns out we didn’t need the oil anyway.
Addison Wigginfor The Daily Reckoning
Ed. Note: This essay was featured prominently in the Daily Reckoning email edition, which offers a detailed, often irreverent view of the markets at large, every day to over 300,000 subscribers. If you’re not receiving the Daily Reckoning by email, you’re missing out on at least 2/3 of our best analysis and commentary. Sign up today, for free, right here.
Ben Bernanke is a lot like the boy who cried wolf. So if you're a skittish trader, anxiously awaiting minutes from the latest FOMC meeting, allow us to save you the suspense.
Addison Wiggin is the executive publisher of Agora Financial, LLC, a fiercely independent economic forecasting and financial research firm. He's the creator and editorial director of Agora Financial's daily 5 Min. Forecast and editorial director of The Daily Reckoning. Wiggin is the founder of Agora Entertainment, executive producer and co-writer of I.O.U.S.A., which was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, the 2009 Critics Choice Award for Best Documentary Feature, and was also shortlisted for a 2009 Academy Award. He is the author of the companion book of the film I.O.U.S.A.and his second edition of The Demise of the Dollar, and Why it's Even Better for Your Investments was just fully revised and updated. Wiggin is a three-time New York Times best-selling author whose work has been recognized by The New York Times Magazine, The Economist, Worth, The New York Times, The Washington Post as well as major network news programs. He also co-authored international bestsellers Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt with Bill Bonner.
Pingback: Love Letters For Him
Traveling the world can be expensive. Between airfare, dining costs and hotel accommodations, travel expenses can add up quickly. And the last thing you want on your vacation is to be stretched too thin. Chris Campbell explains how you can eliminate one of the biggest travel expenses entirely, with one simple trick. Read on...
The S&P finally closed above 2,000 yesterday - a new all-time high. And that has some investors comparing it to the heady days of the late 1990s, when the S&P soared through 1,000 and didn't bother to look back. But as Greg Guenthner explains, that run up wasn't without its pitfalls, and this one won't be either. Read on...
A "fair-weather fan" is someone who only roots for his team when the team is winning. And while that's usually a derogatory term, Matt Insley explains why, at least when it comes to investing, being a "fair-weather fan" can be the best strategy to making huge gains in any kind of market. Read on...
The S&P got back over the 2,000 hump and actually managed to close there by day's end. Dave Gonigam examines the buzz on Wall Street that accompanied the move higher - and takes a closer look at Warren Buffett's role in the Burger King takeover of Canadian doughnut maker Tim Hortons. Read on...
Public companies operate mostly for their own sake, representing the vested interests of their management teams. So much so that shareholders are often little more than an afterthought. As an investor, it's important for your to seek out those companies that have your interests at the forefront. Chris Mayer explains how to find them...
The fall of the US dollar-based monetary system will happen much like Hemingway's description of how one goes bankrupt: "gradually, then suddenly." And, as Dave Gonigam explains, when the inevitable finally happens, there's one group of investors who will be happy they listened to folks like Jim Rickards. Read on...