“Eighty percent of the world’s problems are the fault of British mapmakers,” quipped the late Sen. Eugene McCarthy. Or words to that effect anyway; the precise quotation eludes our best efforts to find it this morning.
And who could argue? The Brits drew arbitrary lines in the sand to create something called “Iraq” in the 1920s. Thirty years earlier, they drew another arbitrary line through some mountains in south Asia that today marks the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The big news today falls into the other 20% that can’t be blamed on the Brits. Blame Soviet mapmakers for the mess in the Crimean peninsula — Russian territory transferred to Ukraine in 1954.
Armed forces — with no recognizable insignia on their uniforms — have taken over the two main airports. The Russians deny the troops are theirs. Meanwhile, gunmen have seized the regional parliament building. Oh, and Ukrainians are now limited to foreign-currency withdrawals equal to 15,000 hryvnias a day — about $1,500.
Ugly, ugly, ugly. As a reminder, Crimea is the most Russian part of Ukraine, one of the two deep-red regions we showed in this heat map of language on Tuesday…
Of course, if you read The Economist, the divide between a Ukrainian-speaking Roman Catholic west and Russian-speaking Orthodox east is imaginary. “The real division among Ukrainians,” reads a flowery editorial in the new issue out this morning, “is not between east and west, but between hope and cynicism: between those who believe a better kind of government is possible and those who understandably think that, in their troubled post-Soviet nation, corrupt paternalism is the best they can do.” The solution? More Western aid, the better to checkmate the Russkies, natch.
We love reading The Economist’s editorials. They’ve got everything figured out: If the peoples of the world simply conducted themselves in keeping with the wishes of The Economist’s editorial board, we’d see an end to war, poverty and even psoriasis.
“We should anticipate that Crimea will soon declare some sort of ‘independence’ from Ukraine,” says our military affairs expert Byron King — bursting The Economist’s bubble with a splash of reality.
“Russia will quickly recognize the ‘non-Ukrainian’ status of Crimea and begin to make accommodation, whether a close association with a ‘sovereign’ state or even national incorporation as part of Greater Russia.
“Western interests will howl, but overall, this will be tit for tat with respect to how quickly the West recognized Kosovo when it broke away from Serbia in 2008.
“Russia told the world that Kosovo would set a bad precedent for future border disputes. Now that legalistic warning comes into play in a manner that the West will not like.
“Meanwhile, Russia will maintain its naval and other military access to the Black Sea, which is a strategic requirement for Russia that dates back over 300 years.
“Ukraine will become a much smaller state — perhaps even landlocked, depending on how much of the ‘north shore’ of the Black Sea region goes with Crimea. I anticipate that we’ll all be updating our map collections in the not-too-distant future.”
“Threats to our nation in cyberspace are growing,” warns Gen. Keith Alexander, head of both the NSA and the military’s Cyber Command.
The military, he told Congress yesterday, needs to boost its cyberdefenses. “Those attacks are coming, and I think those are near term, and we’re not ready for them… We have a lot of infrastructure — electric, our government, our financial networks. We have to have a defensible architecture for our country, and we’ve got to get on with that.”
OK, yeah, Alexander is pushing to feather the nest of Cyber Command, like any other self-interested bureaucrat — even one who’s on his way out the door, probably to a cush consulting gig with an NSA contractor.
Our point is that we fully expect Congress to heed his call — even after boosting Cyber Command’s budget 134% this year, to $447 million.
for The Daily Reckoning
P.S. When the boost to Cyber Command comes, a few companies stand to make a killing. And readers of The Daily Reckoning are given regular opportunities to discover how to find these companies out for themselves. If you’re not a Daily Reckoning reader, you can sign up for FREE, right here.
Despite so much positive sentiment surrounding the US economy, the fact remains that the US is still struggling under the weight of an unbearable load of debt. So who in his right mind would think it is a good time to start a war with Russia over Ukraine? Dr. Ron Paul explains...
Dave Gonigam has been managing editor of The 5 Min. Forecast since September 2010. Before joining the research and writing team at Agora Financial in 2007, he worked for 20 years as an Emmy award-winning television news producer.
To allow exports of oil or to not allow exports of oil? That has become a very important question. Today Jody Chudley takes a look at that and three ways to invest around political thumb sucking…
As the business publication Quartz reports, "Cisco projects video to represent 71% of all mobile data traffic by 2019, up from about 55% last year, and representing the bulk of mobile traffic growth."
Bill Bonner writes with his mouth wide open… staggered by the shabby immensity of it… a tear forming in the corner of his eye. Yes, he's looking at how the US economy, money and government have changed since President Nixon ended the gold-backed monetary system in 1971.
There may be a long trip to India in your future if you have hepatitis C. That’s because the Indian Patent Office recently rejected Gilead Sciences’ application for a patent on Sovaldi. You may remember Sovaldi, the nearly miraculous “cure” for hep C that was approved by the FDA a little more than a year ago.
Use what analogy you will: a car, a clock, a chemistry experiment... the point remains that the Fed believes it can control the economy. Indeed the Fed will stop at nothing to realize the goals of its dual mandate" to maximize job growth and maintain price stability. But, as Jim Rickards expalins, that conceit always ends in disaster. Read on...
The median forecast of the 76 economists Bloomberg surveyed undershot the actual total by 75,000. And the highest estimate was still 49,000 short. Not even close guys. Try again next month.